Artwork

内容由John Danaher提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 John Danaher 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

#62 – Häggström on AI Motivations and Risk Denialism

 
分享
 

Manage episode 237316984 series 1328245
内容由John Danaher提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 John Danaher 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Olle_Häggström

In this episode I talk to Olle Häggström. Olle is a professor of mathematical statistics at Chalmers University of Technology and a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA) and of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA). Olle’s main research is in probability theory and statistical mechanics, but in recent years he has broadened his research interests to focus applied statistics, philosophy, climate science, artificial intelligence and social consequences of future technologies. He is the author of Here be Dragons: Science, Technology and the Future of Humanity (OUP 2016). We talk about AI motivations, specifically the Omohundro-Bostrom theory of AI motivation and its weaknesses. We also discuss AI risk denialism.

You can download the episode here or listen below. You can also subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher and a variety of other podcasting services (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 2:02 – Do we need to define AI?
  • 4:15 – The Omohundro-Bostrom theory of AI motivation
  • 7:46 – Key concepts in the Omohundro-Bostrom Theory: Final Goals vs Instrumental Goals
  • 10:50 – The Orthogonality Thesis
  • 14:47 – The Instrumental Convergence Thesis
  • 20:16 – Resource Acquisition as an Instrumental Goal
  • 22:02 – The importance of goal-content integrity
  • 25:42 – Deception as an Instrumental Goal
  • 29:17 – How the doomsaying argument works
  • 31:46 – Critiquing the theory: the problem of self-referential final goals
  • 36:20 – The problem of incoherent goals
  • 42:44 – Does the truth of moral realism undermine the orthogonality thesis?
  • 50:50 – Problems with the distinction between instrumental goals and final goals
  • 57:52 – Why do some people deny the problem of AI risk?
  • 1:04:10 – Strong versus Weak AI Scepticism
  • 1:09:00 – Is it difficult to be taken seriously on this topic?

Relevant Links

  continue reading

64集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 237316984 series 1328245
内容由John Danaher提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 John Danaher 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Olle_Häggström

In this episode I talk to Olle Häggström. Olle is a professor of mathematical statistics at Chalmers University of Technology and a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA) and of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA). Olle’s main research is in probability theory and statistical mechanics, but in recent years he has broadened his research interests to focus applied statistics, philosophy, climate science, artificial intelligence and social consequences of future technologies. He is the author of Here be Dragons: Science, Technology and the Future of Humanity (OUP 2016). We talk about AI motivations, specifically the Omohundro-Bostrom theory of AI motivation and its weaknesses. We also discuss AI risk denialism.

You can download the episode here or listen below. You can also subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher and a variety of other podcasting services (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 2:02 – Do we need to define AI?
  • 4:15 – The Omohundro-Bostrom theory of AI motivation
  • 7:46 – Key concepts in the Omohundro-Bostrom Theory: Final Goals vs Instrumental Goals
  • 10:50 – The Orthogonality Thesis
  • 14:47 – The Instrumental Convergence Thesis
  • 20:16 – Resource Acquisition as an Instrumental Goal
  • 22:02 – The importance of goal-content integrity
  • 25:42 – Deception as an Instrumental Goal
  • 29:17 – How the doomsaying argument works
  • 31:46 – Critiquing the theory: the problem of self-referential final goals
  • 36:20 – The problem of incoherent goals
  • 42:44 – Does the truth of moral realism undermine the orthogonality thesis?
  • 50:50 – Problems with the distinction between instrumental goals and final goals
  • 57:52 – Why do some people deny the problem of AI risk?
  • 1:04:10 – Strong versus Weak AI Scepticism
  • 1:09:00 – Is it difficult to be taken seriously on this topic?

Relevant Links

  continue reading

64集单集

همه قسمت ها

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南