NCLA Amicus Brief in NY Case Against Trump Explains Why NY’s Executive Law Violates Free Speech

Administrative Static Podcast

内容由1360 KHNC and Administrative Static提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。

7M ago 12:30

MP3•单集首页

已归档的系列专辑 ("不活跃的收取点" status)

When? This feed was archived on February 08, 2025 22:10 (24d ago). Last successful fetch was on August 13, 2024 17:49 (7M ago)

Why? 不活跃的收取点 status. 我们的伺服器已尝试了一段时间，但仍然无法截取有效的播客收取点

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

NCLA, with its founder Professor Philip Hamburger, has filed a crucial amicus curiae brief in the case of New York v. Donald Trump. They are challenging a New York law used by Attorney General Letitia James to prosecute Trump for alleged fraud. Unlike typical fraud cases, New York Executive Law § 63.12 allows for penalties simply for making incorrect business statements, without needing to prove intent or harm.

NCLA argues that this law infringes on First Amendment rights and is urging the court to overturn it to safeguard free speech for everyone. In this episode, Mark, Vec, and Senior Litigation Counsel Greg Dolin discuss the case and its broader implications.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

105集单集

#News #Government #1360 KHNC #Administrative Static