))
AI Copyright Law for Non-Humans, with Joel MacMull, Shannon Lietz, and Mark Miller
Manage episode 395801120 series 3548164
内容由Mark Miller, Shannon Lietz, Joel MacMull, Mark Miller, Shannon Lietz, and Joel MacMull提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 Mark Miller, Shannon Lietz, Joel MacMull, Mark Miller, Shannon Lietz, and Joel MacMull 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
In today's episode, we examine the case of Steven Thaler trying to copyright protect a piece of artwork generated by his instructions to an AI creation engine. We'll start with Joel's overview of the case.
The Thaler case is interesting for a couple of reasons. One is obviously that it deals with AI, but it is also an extension of existing legal principles. I mean, the long and short of it is, was that Stephen Thaler applied for a copyright with the Copyright Office. He indicated that he was the claimant, but that the author was essentially his creativity machine. This was essentially some code that he developed in an effort to create an image. The Copyright Office rejected his application on grounds that, at least as applied for, there did not appear to be any human authorship.
And, oh, backstory, one of the requirements of the Copyright Office, as recently as earlier this year in February, is that human authorship is necessary for subject matter that is amenable to being copyrighted in the United States.
8集单集
分享
