Artwork

内容由Felix Ronkes Agerbeek提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Felix Ronkes Agerbeek 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

A Realist’s take on EU law | Tamara Ćapeta

44:57
 
分享
 

Manage episode 362073571 series 3471841
内容由Felix Ronkes Agerbeek提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Felix Ronkes Agerbeek 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

My guest in this episode is Tamara Ćapeta, Advocate General at the European Court of Justice and law professor at the University of Zagreb. Our main topic of conversation is legal realism, a topic on which she has written several academic articles.
It’s tempting to misconstrue legal realism as a cynical, 'anything goes'-approach to the law. But in Ćapeta‘s writings and in this interview, legal realism emerges as a form of judicial modesty. She argues that the idea that legal questions have a single, correct answer is basically a myth, and hat courts would gain credibility if judges acknowledged more openly that their legal decisions are choices, instead of objective truths.
I ask her what it’s like to be Advocate General and if it has changed her perspective on judicial decision-making. We talk about legal reasoning and objectivity. We discuss if artificial intelligence can replace judges. We talk about transparency in court rulings, about whether the Court of Justice should allow dissenting opinions, and about imagining different realities — in law and in science fiction.

Mentioned:

Book recommendations:

  • Liu Cixin, The Three-Body Problem trilogy
  • Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
  • David Mitchell, Cloud Atlas

Special thanks to Alessandro Spina, Jacco Bomhoff and Mislav Mataija.
Comments? Guest suggestions? Email me at felix@europafelix.eu.

  continue reading

10集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 362073571 series 3471841
内容由Felix Ronkes Agerbeek提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Felix Ronkes Agerbeek 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

My guest in this episode is Tamara Ćapeta, Advocate General at the European Court of Justice and law professor at the University of Zagreb. Our main topic of conversation is legal realism, a topic on which she has written several academic articles.
It’s tempting to misconstrue legal realism as a cynical, 'anything goes'-approach to the law. But in Ćapeta‘s writings and in this interview, legal realism emerges as a form of judicial modesty. She argues that the idea that legal questions have a single, correct answer is basically a myth, and hat courts would gain credibility if judges acknowledged more openly that their legal decisions are choices, instead of objective truths.
I ask her what it’s like to be Advocate General and if it has changed her perspective on judicial decision-making. We talk about legal reasoning and objectivity. We discuss if artificial intelligence can replace judges. We talk about transparency in court rulings, about whether the Court of Justice should allow dissenting opinions, and about imagining different realities — in law and in science fiction.

Mentioned:

Book recommendations:

  • Liu Cixin, The Three-Body Problem trilogy
  • Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
  • David Mitchell, Cloud Atlas

Special thanks to Alessandro Spina, Jacco Bomhoff and Mislav Mataija.
Comments? Guest suggestions? Email me at felix@europafelix.eu.

  continue reading

10集单集

所有剧集

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南