Artwork

内容由Christopher J. Nesi and Christopher J. Nesi - Education Podcast Network提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Christopher J. Nesi and Christopher J. Nesi - Education Podcast Network 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

The Great Cell Phone Debate - HoET238

1:02:34
 
分享
 

Manage episode 389992362 series 79092
内容由Christopher J. Nesi and Christopher J. Nesi - Education Podcast Network提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Christopher J. Nesi and Christopher J. Nesi - Education Podcast Network 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Feedback & Shout Outs

Stephanie Skrocki - Thank you for the email re: Episode 237

Featured Content

Welcome to Episode 238 of the House of #EdTech Podcast! In this episode, I share my recent appearance on an episode of Teachers on Fire, hosted by Tim Cavey. I participated in a live debate addressing a highly relevant topic in education: "Should student phones be banned from our K-12 schools?" I debated Dr. Matt Rhoads, who brought his extensive experience in education and technology to this thought-provoking discussion.

Debate Overview:

The debate revolves around using cell phones in K-12 educational settings, weighing the benefits and drawbacks. Our guests offer diverse viewpoints:

  • My Perspective: Advocating against banning cell phones, I emphasizes the importance of leveraging these powerful tools for learning and teaching responsible digital citizenship. I highlighted the potential of cell phones for research, collaboration, creativity, and communication.

  • Dr. Matt Rhoads's Viewpoint: Supporting the ban, Dr. Rhoads underscores concerns about declining academic performance, mental health crises, cyberbullying, and distractions caused by cell phones. He argues for using school-issued devices to teach digital citizenship while maintaining a focused learning environment.

Discussion Highlights:

  1. Learning Tools vs. Distractions: The debate delves into whether cell phones are indispensable educational tools or sources of distraction and decline in academic performance.

  2. Digital Citizenship and Responsibility: I argue that school cell phones offer opportunities to teach digital responsibility, while Matt suggests that the risks outweigh the benefits.

  3. Mental Health and Bullying: Matt raises concerns about the impact of cell phones on student mental health and bullying, advocating for a safer school environment free from these influences.

  4. Communication and Safety: The conversation touches on the role of cell phones in ensuring student safety and communication, especially in emergencies.

Conclusion:

The episode concludes without a definitive resolution but provides listeners with a comprehensive understanding of both sides. The guests agree on the need for community involvement in decision-making regarding technology in schools.

Connect with Tim and Matt

  continue reading

261集单集

Artwork

The Great Cell Phone Debate - HoET238

House of #EdTech

145 subscribers

published

icon分享
 
Manage episode 389992362 series 79092
内容由Christopher J. Nesi and Christopher J. Nesi - Education Podcast Network提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Christopher J. Nesi and Christopher J. Nesi - Education Podcast Network 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Feedback & Shout Outs

Stephanie Skrocki - Thank you for the email re: Episode 237

Featured Content

Welcome to Episode 238 of the House of #EdTech Podcast! In this episode, I share my recent appearance on an episode of Teachers on Fire, hosted by Tim Cavey. I participated in a live debate addressing a highly relevant topic in education: "Should student phones be banned from our K-12 schools?" I debated Dr. Matt Rhoads, who brought his extensive experience in education and technology to this thought-provoking discussion.

Debate Overview:

The debate revolves around using cell phones in K-12 educational settings, weighing the benefits and drawbacks. Our guests offer diverse viewpoints:

  • My Perspective: Advocating against banning cell phones, I emphasizes the importance of leveraging these powerful tools for learning and teaching responsible digital citizenship. I highlighted the potential of cell phones for research, collaboration, creativity, and communication.

  • Dr. Matt Rhoads's Viewpoint: Supporting the ban, Dr. Rhoads underscores concerns about declining academic performance, mental health crises, cyberbullying, and distractions caused by cell phones. He argues for using school-issued devices to teach digital citizenship while maintaining a focused learning environment.

Discussion Highlights:

  1. Learning Tools vs. Distractions: The debate delves into whether cell phones are indispensable educational tools or sources of distraction and decline in academic performance.

  2. Digital Citizenship and Responsibility: I argue that school cell phones offer opportunities to teach digital responsibility, while Matt suggests that the risks outweigh the benefits.

  3. Mental Health and Bullying: Matt raises concerns about the impact of cell phones on student mental health and bullying, advocating for a safer school environment free from these influences.

  4. Communication and Safety: The conversation touches on the role of cell phones in ensuring student safety and communication, especially in emergencies.

Conclusion:

The episode concludes without a definitive resolution but provides listeners with a comprehensive understanding of both sides. The guests agree on the need for community involvement in decision-making regarding technology in schools.

Connect with Tim and Matt

  continue reading

261集单集

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南