Artwork

内容由Independence Institute提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Independence Institute 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

Even Constitutional Conventions are Limited

 
分享
 

Manage episode 394668510 series 3548889
内容由Independence Institute提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Independence Institute 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

For an audio read by the author, please click here.

A common tactic among opponents of an amendments convention is to label it a “constitutional convention,” and then claim that a constitutional convention is inherently unlimited. The fact that courts have repeatedly limited constitutional conventions seems not to have occurred to them.

New scholarship by Roman J. Hoyos, a law professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles, traces the growth of the legal understanding that even a constitutional convention can be limited. His publication is entitled Article V and the Law of Constitutional Conventions, and it appeared in the British Journal of American Legal Studies (pdf).

Professor Hoyos gives credit to John Alexander Jameson, the leading 19th century convention scholar, as playing a pivotal role in the understanding that constitutional conventions can be limited. Jameson distinguished constitutional conventions—which are subject to law and legal restrictions—from unlimited “revolutionary conventions.” Examples of the latter were the “committees of correspondence” set up in states just before and during the American Revolution.

Professor Hoyos discusses some of the many judicial opinions that have declared limits on constitutional conventions.

He then shows that an Article V convention has even less scope than a constitutional convention. One reason is that an Article V convention’s power is limited to “proposing Amendments.” Amendments are narrower than general constitutional revision, which most constitutional conventions are empowered to do. He points out also that an Article V convention’s power terminates once it has turned its proposals over the Congress for referral to the states.

Professor Hoyos credits a historian named George Parkinson with labeling a convention designed to circumvent a legislature, a “circumvention convention.” An Article V convention is of that species, because it was designed to enable state representatives to propose amendments without Congress.

Toward the end of the article Professor Hoyos lists multiple ways in which limits on an Article V convention can be enforced.

The post Even Constitutional Conventions are Limited first appeared on Independence Institute.

The post Even Constitutional Conventions are Limited appeared first on Independence Institute.

  continue reading

47集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 394668510 series 3548889
内容由Independence Institute提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Independence Institute 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

For an audio read by the author, please click here.

A common tactic among opponents of an amendments convention is to label it a “constitutional convention,” and then claim that a constitutional convention is inherently unlimited. The fact that courts have repeatedly limited constitutional conventions seems not to have occurred to them.

New scholarship by Roman J. Hoyos, a law professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles, traces the growth of the legal understanding that even a constitutional convention can be limited. His publication is entitled Article V and the Law of Constitutional Conventions, and it appeared in the British Journal of American Legal Studies (pdf).

Professor Hoyos gives credit to John Alexander Jameson, the leading 19th century convention scholar, as playing a pivotal role in the understanding that constitutional conventions can be limited. Jameson distinguished constitutional conventions—which are subject to law and legal restrictions—from unlimited “revolutionary conventions.” Examples of the latter were the “committees of correspondence” set up in states just before and during the American Revolution.

Professor Hoyos discusses some of the many judicial opinions that have declared limits on constitutional conventions.

He then shows that an Article V convention has even less scope than a constitutional convention. One reason is that an Article V convention’s power is limited to “proposing Amendments.” Amendments are narrower than general constitutional revision, which most constitutional conventions are empowered to do. He points out also that an Article V convention’s power terminates once it has turned its proposals over the Congress for referral to the states.

Professor Hoyos credits a historian named George Parkinson with labeling a convention designed to circumvent a legislature, a “circumvention convention.” An Article V convention is of that species, because it was designed to enable state representatives to propose amendments without Congress.

Toward the end of the article Professor Hoyos lists multiple ways in which limits on an Article V convention can be enforced.

The post Even Constitutional Conventions are Limited first appeared on Independence Institute.

The post Even Constitutional Conventions are Limited appeared first on Independence Institute.

  continue reading

47集单集

Tous les épisodes

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南

边探索边听这个节目
播放