))
$1M Verdict in Pennsylvania’s Fayette County With Tom Crenney and James Tallman
Manage episode 414025629 series 3490836
内容由Brendan Lupetin提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 Brendan Lupetin 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
In Pennsylvania, plaintiff lawyers call Fayette County “Fayette-Nam.” They say jurors are anti-establishment. They say it’s one of the toughest counties in the Commonwealth. They say job one is to get their case out of Fayette County.
James Tallman and Tom Crenney tried their med mal case in Fayette County. They won.
In this episode of Just Verdicts, James and Tom tell host Brendan Lupetin how they prevailed on behalf of the family of a 35-year-old woman who died after what should have been a routine gallbladder surgery. They recall jitters, such as when their expert witness had to testify via Zoom. Would the wifi work? They share surprises: What did the jury really care about in the defendant doctor’s testimony? They describe how they argued for damages: “the old-fashioned way.”
Tune in to put yourself in a Fayette County courtroom as this med mal team champions for their client.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Tom Crenney | LinkedIn
☑️ Tom Crenney & Associates | LinkedIn
☑️ James Tallman | LinkedIn
☑️ Elliott & Davis, PC | LinkedIn | Facebook
☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn
☑️ Connect: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Episode Preview
- What they faced in the Pennsylvania county known a “Fayette-Nam”
- Why “anti-establishment” jurors can be an asset
- What the jurors cared about
- How their expert witness made an impact testifying via Zoom
- What they revealed about the defense’s expert witness
- How they framed the loss
- How they argued for damages
Ready to refer or collaborate on med mal, medical negligence, and catastrophic injury cases? Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.
21集单集
分享
