Artwork

内容由Mark Geise提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Mark Geise 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

Episode 17 – The War on Cash and Post-Debate

 
分享
 

Manage episode 308832048 series 3021383
内容由Mark Geise提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Mark Geise 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

In this episode, I discuss an interview with Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff. I discussed Rogoff and the “War on Cash” in Episode 14 (linked below); I stumbled upon this interview a couple days ago and could not resist talking about his views yet again. Rogoff’s editorial that I discussed in Episode 14 was crafted in such a way to avoid disclosing too many of his biases, but this interview did not allow him to tailor his message in such a way. This interview supports my inferences in that previous episode: the war on cash is far more about increasing control and increasing the power of central banks than it is about reducing criminality or tax evasion. Rogoff’s pretentiousness comes through strong.

Also, I discuss Monday’s debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Both candidates scare me pretty much equally. I do not think my life will be markedly different if either gets into office, so I frankly do not care about the election beyond analyzing the overarching trends. In this debate, Trump’s protectionism and ignorance of civil liberties concerned me most, while Clinton’s economic policies concerned me most. Both are scary, but in slightly different ways. Clinton clearly won the debate, but it does not appear to have markedly changed the polls. I am sure many out there feel similarly pessimistic, so my solution is to focus on local and state elections and to optimize your own personal and economic lives. You do not hold any sway on the national stage when one person is battling to represent 330 million people, but you can conceivably hold sway in your local elections. That is far more constructive than expending energy to watch two poor candidates battle it out in a chaotic election.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/mark-geise-show/Episode+17+-+The+War+on+Cash+and+Post-Debate.mp3

Suggested Readings/Referenced Articles:
“Big Bills are a Curse (Kenneth Rogoff interview transcript)” – Finanz and Wirtschaft
“The Trickle Down Lie – Thomas Sowell” – National Review
Podcast: “Episode 14 – Why Should We Care that Gary Johnson Doesn’t Know Aleppo?” – Mark Geise Show
“Federal Individual Tax Rates History (Inflation Adjusted)” – Tax Foundation
“Why Americans Need to Support Free Trade” – Heritage Foundation
“Why trade is good for you” – The Economist
Book: “Economics in One Lesson” by Henry Hazlitt (free, legal PDF download)
Podcast: “Episode 23: Think Locally, Act Locally” – The Brion McClanahan Show

  continue reading

57集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 308832048 series 3021383
内容由Mark Geise提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Mark Geise 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

In this episode, I discuss an interview with Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff. I discussed Rogoff and the “War on Cash” in Episode 14 (linked below); I stumbled upon this interview a couple days ago and could not resist talking about his views yet again. Rogoff’s editorial that I discussed in Episode 14 was crafted in such a way to avoid disclosing too many of his biases, but this interview did not allow him to tailor his message in such a way. This interview supports my inferences in that previous episode: the war on cash is far more about increasing control and increasing the power of central banks than it is about reducing criminality or tax evasion. Rogoff’s pretentiousness comes through strong.

Also, I discuss Monday’s debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Both candidates scare me pretty much equally. I do not think my life will be markedly different if either gets into office, so I frankly do not care about the election beyond analyzing the overarching trends. In this debate, Trump’s protectionism and ignorance of civil liberties concerned me most, while Clinton’s economic policies concerned me most. Both are scary, but in slightly different ways. Clinton clearly won the debate, but it does not appear to have markedly changed the polls. I am sure many out there feel similarly pessimistic, so my solution is to focus on local and state elections and to optimize your own personal and economic lives. You do not hold any sway on the national stage when one person is battling to represent 330 million people, but you can conceivably hold sway in your local elections. That is far more constructive than expending energy to watch two poor candidates battle it out in a chaotic election.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/mark-geise-show/Episode+17+-+The+War+on+Cash+and+Post-Debate.mp3

Suggested Readings/Referenced Articles:
“Big Bills are a Curse (Kenneth Rogoff interview transcript)” – Finanz and Wirtschaft
“The Trickle Down Lie – Thomas Sowell” – National Review
Podcast: “Episode 14 – Why Should We Care that Gary Johnson Doesn’t Know Aleppo?” – Mark Geise Show
“Federal Individual Tax Rates History (Inflation Adjusted)” – Tax Foundation
“Why Americans Need to Support Free Trade” – Heritage Foundation
“Why trade is good for you” – The Economist
Book: “Economics in One Lesson” by Henry Hazlitt (free, legal PDF download)
Podcast: “Episode 23: Think Locally, Act Locally” – The Brion McClanahan Show

  continue reading

57集单集

所有剧集

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南