Artwork

内容由Open to Debate提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Open to Debate 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

MOCK TRIAL: Murthy v. Missouri - Free speech, Government and Misinformation on Social Media Platforms

53:15
 
分享
 

Manage episode 423544517 series 2300998
内容由Open to Debate提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Open to Debate 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

The Supreme Court will soon decide on a case whether government interference on social media is coercive and suppresses free speech. Those who argue legitimate cooperation say that where misinformation threatens public health or safety, they are justified to protect the public. Those argue coercion believe that increased content moderation could lead to authoritarian control over public discourse online. Now we debate: Mock Trial: Free Speech, Government, and Misinformation on Social Media Platforms.

Plaintiff: Charles "Chip" Miller, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Free Speech

Defendant: Rylee Sommers-Flanagan, Founder and Executive Director of Upper Seven Law

Cross examiners: Nina Jankowicz, CEO of The American Sunlight Project; Former Executive Director of the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board

Matt Taibbi, Best-selling Author and Journalist; Writer and Publisher of Racket News

Eric Schurenberg, Business Journalist and Media Executive; Founder of the Alliance for Trust in Media

Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  continue reading

386集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 423544517 series 2300998
内容由Open to Debate提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Open to Debate 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

The Supreme Court will soon decide on a case whether government interference on social media is coercive and suppresses free speech. Those who argue legitimate cooperation say that where misinformation threatens public health or safety, they are justified to protect the public. Those argue coercion believe that increased content moderation could lead to authoritarian control over public discourse online. Now we debate: Mock Trial: Free Speech, Government, and Misinformation on Social Media Platforms.

Plaintiff: Charles "Chip" Miller, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Free Speech

Defendant: Rylee Sommers-Flanagan, Founder and Executive Director of Upper Seven Law

Cross examiners: Nina Jankowicz, CEO of The American Sunlight Project; Former Executive Director of the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board

Matt Taibbi, Best-selling Author and Journalist; Writer and Publisher of Racket News

Eric Schurenberg, Business Journalist and Media Executive; Founder of the Alliance for Trust in Media

Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  continue reading

386集单集

所有剧集

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南

边探索边听这个节目
播放