Artwork

内容由Farooq Ahmed提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Farooq Ahmed 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

Fixed or Removable, Which Functional Appliance Is Best?? 6 MINUTE SUMMARY

6:27
 
分享
 

Manage episode 420833345 series 2830917
内容由Farooq Ahmed提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Farooq Ahmed 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Join me for a summary looking at fixed versus removable functional appliances. This podcast sheds light on recent research comparing the main two types of functional appliances, which appliance offers the most advantages, and what patients think about the two appliance types. This was a lecture given by Ama Johal at last year’s British Orthodontic Conference, where the most recent evidence carried out by his PhD student Moaiyad Pacha.

Moaiyad Pacha’s RCT 2023 – received Dewel 2024 clinical research award

· Hanks Herbst Vs Modified Twinblock

o Rollo bands

o Expansion

o No fixed appliances

o Incremental advancement – no evidence to support but patient-centred

· Overjet correction: More effective Herbst at 7mm Vs 5.8mm Twinblock ,

· Molar and skeletal changes: no difference

o Twinblock = greater residual overjet after treatment p=0.2

· Dental changes: Herbst advance lower incisor greater 3mm Vs 1mm

· Failure to complete: 17% Herbst Vs 37% twin block

o 3 times greater likelihood of discontinue treatment OR 2.8

· Treatment duration: longer with Twinblock 1.5 months 8.8 Vs 10.3, and quicker rate of correction with Herbst

· Chairside time : Greater than Twinblock 2.7 hours longer, 7.6 Vs 4.9

· Emergency appointments greater with Hanks Herbst 2.7 Vs 0.3

o Herbst mainly

· Severe complications = same 0.5

o Severe complications – previously defined as involving lab work or break in appliance wear from Pasha’s SR 2020

Advantage of Hanks Herbst

· Greater completion of treatment, 3 times less likely to discontinue

· Quicker rate of correction, shorter duration,

Disadvantages

· Greater chairside time of nearly 3 hours

· Greater emergency appointments, each patient needing 2-3 emergency appointments

Qualitative

· Both appliances – very negative to QoL and daily life

· Aesthetic and self-image – worse with Twinblock

· Patient preference – Herbst

o Due to non-compliance and likely to get to the end

· Positive Twinblock is flexible and easier to eat

Conclusion was profound

· Patients prefer Herbst, based on aesthetics, self image and non-compliance

· Clinicians are likely to prefer Twinblock, quicker, easier, less emergencies

Time to reconsider, and having both options, as well as both discussing of clinician Vs patient preferences, should decide which appliance

  continue reading

124集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 420833345 series 2830917
内容由Farooq Ahmed提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Farooq Ahmed 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Join me for a summary looking at fixed versus removable functional appliances. This podcast sheds light on recent research comparing the main two types of functional appliances, which appliance offers the most advantages, and what patients think about the two appliance types. This was a lecture given by Ama Johal at last year’s British Orthodontic Conference, where the most recent evidence carried out by his PhD student Moaiyad Pacha.

Moaiyad Pacha’s RCT 2023 – received Dewel 2024 clinical research award

· Hanks Herbst Vs Modified Twinblock

o Rollo bands

o Expansion

o No fixed appliances

o Incremental advancement – no evidence to support but patient-centred

· Overjet correction: More effective Herbst at 7mm Vs 5.8mm Twinblock ,

· Molar and skeletal changes: no difference

o Twinblock = greater residual overjet after treatment p=0.2

· Dental changes: Herbst advance lower incisor greater 3mm Vs 1mm

· Failure to complete: 17% Herbst Vs 37% twin block

o 3 times greater likelihood of discontinue treatment OR 2.8

· Treatment duration: longer with Twinblock 1.5 months 8.8 Vs 10.3, and quicker rate of correction with Herbst

· Chairside time : Greater than Twinblock 2.7 hours longer, 7.6 Vs 4.9

· Emergency appointments greater with Hanks Herbst 2.7 Vs 0.3

o Herbst mainly

· Severe complications = same 0.5

o Severe complications – previously defined as involving lab work or break in appliance wear from Pasha’s SR 2020

Advantage of Hanks Herbst

· Greater completion of treatment, 3 times less likely to discontinue

· Quicker rate of correction, shorter duration,

Disadvantages

· Greater chairside time of nearly 3 hours

· Greater emergency appointments, each patient needing 2-3 emergency appointments

Qualitative

· Both appliances – very negative to QoL and daily life

· Aesthetic and self-image – worse with Twinblock

· Patient preference – Herbst

o Due to non-compliance and likely to get to the end

· Positive Twinblock is flexible and easier to eat

Conclusion was profound

· Patients prefer Herbst, based on aesthetics, self image and non-compliance

· Clinicians are likely to prefer Twinblock, quicker, easier, less emergencies

Time to reconsider, and having both options, as well as both discussing of clinician Vs patient preferences, should decide which appliance

  continue reading

124集单集

所有剧集

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南

边探索边听这个节目
播放