Royal Canin USA Inc. v. Wullschleger (Federal Jurisdiction)

Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

内容由Jake Leahy提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 Jake Leahy 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。

5d ago 10:19

MP3•单集首页

Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger (Decided January 15, 2025)
In Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger, the Supreme Court addressed whether a federal court retains supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1367 when a plaintiff amends their complaint to remove all federal claims after a case is removed to federal court.

The case arose after Wullschleger sued Royal Canin in state court, asserting both federal and state claims. Following removal to federal court, Wullschleger amended her complaint, eliminating the federal claims and seeking remand to state court. The Court held that when federal claims are removed from an amended complaint, federal courts lose supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims, requiring remand to state court. Justice Kagan, writing for a unanimous Court, emphasized that federal jurisdiction must be assessed based on the operative complaint.

Justice Kagan delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.

458集单集