Does Your Collection Agency Name Violate Regulation F?

The Debt Collection Drill

内容由John K. Rossman提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 John K. Rossman 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。

2+ y ago 15:58

MP3•单集首页

已归档的系列专辑 ("不活跃的收取点" status)

When? This feed was archived on February 04, 2024 09:07 (3M ago). Last successful fetch was on October 07, 2021 02:04 (2+ y ago)

Why? 不活跃的收取点 status. 我们的伺服器已尝试了一段时间，但仍然无法截取有效的播客收取点

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Regulation F contemplates debt collectors communicating with consumers using a scripted “limited content” voicemail message which contains the business name of the debt collector, but “does not indicate that the debt collector is in the debt collection business.” While consumer advocates agree that this limited content message will be extremely beneficial to consumers, debt collectors must proceed cautiously with implementation to ensure full compliance with all requirements of the limited content message contained within Regulation F.

In this episode of the Debt Collection Drill podcast, Moss & Barnett attorneys John Rossman, Sarah Doerr and Brad Armstrong provide practical guidance for implementation of the Regulation F limited content message and the attorneys also examine the legal restrictions regarding the use of certain words in a collection agency name.

83集单集

#Business #John K. Rossman #MBA #Podcasting Education