The Jacaranda FM News team is based in Gauteng – but covers local and international news of the day, providing the latest developments online and on-air. News bulletins run from 5am to 7pm weekdays, and from 7am to 6pm on weekends and public holidays. Tune into Jacaranda FM, or log on to www.jacarandafm.com, for the news you need to know.. now.
…
continue reading
内容由Bobby Capucci提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Bobby Capucci 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!
使用Player FM应用程序离线!
JP Morgan And Their Request For A Summary Judgement Against The USVI (Part 3) (8/24/24)
Manage episode 435947161 series 3380507
内容由Bobby Capucci提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Bobby Capucci 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
The memorandum of law submitted by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in Case No. 22-cv-10904 (JSR) seeks partial summary judgment against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI). Here’s a summary of the key arguments and points presented in the memorandum:1. Basis for Partial Summary Judgment:
(commercial at 7:45)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.223.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
- No Direct Evidence of Wrongdoing: JPMorgan argues that there is no direct evidence linking the bank to any alleged wrongdoing regarding Jeffrey Epstein's activities. The bank claims it did not knowingly participate in or benefit from Epstein's criminal conduct.
- Lack of Proximate Cause: The memorandum asserts that the USVI cannot establish proximate cause between JPMorgan’s actions and Epstein's criminal activities. JPMorgan argues that its business relationship with Epstein does not make it liable for his independent illegal acts.
- Summary Judgment Standards: The bank outlines the legal standard for summary judgment, emphasizing that such a judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
- Application to Facts: JPMorgan contends that the facts presented do not meet the threshold required to proceed to trial, thereby warranting a summary judgment in its favor.
- Vicarious Liability: JPMorgan argues that it cannot be held vicariously liable for Epstein’s actions. The bank contends that there is no legal basis to extend liability to the bank for actions taken by Epstein, especially when those actions were criminal in nature.
- Knowledge and Participation: The bank emphasizes that it had no actual knowledge of Epstein's alleged illegal activities and did not participate in or facilitate them. JPMorgan claims any connection to Epstein was purely a banking relationship and not one of criminal conspiracy or complicity.
- Lack of Evidence of Financial Gain from Wrongdoing: JPMorgan also argues that there is no evidence showing that the bank financially benefited from Epstein’s criminal activities. They assert that standard banking fees and services do not equate to complicity in criminal acts.
- Request for Summary Judgment: The bank requests that the court grant partial summary judgment in its favor, dismissing the claims brought by the USVI to the extent they seek to hold the bank liable for Epstein's criminal conduct.
- Limitation of Liability: JPMorgan seeks to limit its liability, arguing that any potential misconduct on its part is too far removed from Epstein’s actions to warrant legal culpability.
(commercial at 7:45)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.223.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1034集单集
Manage episode 435947161 series 3380507
内容由Bobby Capucci提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Bobby Capucci 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
The memorandum of law submitted by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in Case No. 22-cv-10904 (JSR) seeks partial summary judgment against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI). Here’s a summary of the key arguments and points presented in the memorandum:1. Basis for Partial Summary Judgment:
(commercial at 7:45)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.223.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
- No Direct Evidence of Wrongdoing: JPMorgan argues that there is no direct evidence linking the bank to any alleged wrongdoing regarding Jeffrey Epstein's activities. The bank claims it did not knowingly participate in or benefit from Epstein's criminal conduct.
- Lack of Proximate Cause: The memorandum asserts that the USVI cannot establish proximate cause between JPMorgan’s actions and Epstein's criminal activities. JPMorgan argues that its business relationship with Epstein does not make it liable for his independent illegal acts.
- Summary Judgment Standards: The bank outlines the legal standard for summary judgment, emphasizing that such a judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
- Application to Facts: JPMorgan contends that the facts presented do not meet the threshold required to proceed to trial, thereby warranting a summary judgment in its favor.
- Vicarious Liability: JPMorgan argues that it cannot be held vicariously liable for Epstein’s actions. The bank contends that there is no legal basis to extend liability to the bank for actions taken by Epstein, especially when those actions were criminal in nature.
- Knowledge and Participation: The bank emphasizes that it had no actual knowledge of Epstein's alleged illegal activities and did not participate in or facilitate them. JPMorgan claims any connection to Epstein was purely a banking relationship and not one of criminal conspiracy or complicity.
- Lack of Evidence of Financial Gain from Wrongdoing: JPMorgan also argues that there is no evidence showing that the bank financially benefited from Epstein’s criminal activities. They assert that standard banking fees and services do not equate to complicity in criminal acts.
- Request for Summary Judgment: The bank requests that the court grant partial summary judgment in its favor, dismissing the claims brought by the USVI to the extent they seek to hold the bank liable for Epstein's criminal conduct.
- Limitation of Liability: JPMorgan seeks to limit its liability, arguing that any potential misconduct on its part is too far removed from Epstein’s actions to warrant legal culpability.
(commercial at 7:45)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.223.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1034集单集
All episodes
×欢迎使用Player FM
Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。