Bonus: Rebuttal to Think Twice, Part 2

The Michael Jackson Case for Innocence Podcast

内容由@Case4Innocence提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 @Case4Innocence 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。

3M ago 1:04:24

MP3•单集首页

In part 2 of our rebuttal, you'll hear some examples of bias, lack of context and misleading information in Think Twice that undermines their presumption of guilt. The focus of this episode is examining how Think Twice handles the evidence in the first two sex abuse cases against Michael Jackson.
What sort of fact checking process have they used to check the claims of the Chandler and Arvizo allegations? What sources are they citing? What sources are they leaving out? Who do they choose or not choose to interview?
Looking at what their reference pages leave out and looking at the people they selected to interview reveals the motive in Think Twice towards a predetermined narrative, versus a motive to finding the truth. We argue that because of what they left out, Think Twice can't cover these allegations with any degree of fairness.
For all our source material, please visit our website. You can reach out to us with any questions or comments through our website or on Twitter.
Website: www.michaeljacksoncaseforinnocence.com
Twitter: @Case4Innocence