))
23-677 Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger [10/07/24]
Manage episode 451642516 series 3618198
内容由Better Informed Network提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 Better Informed Network 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
The case Royal Canin v. Wullschleger. The core issue revolves around whether a federal court retains supplemental jurisdiction after a plaintiff amends their complaint to remove all federal claims, particularly in cases initially brought in state court and then removed. Petitioners argue established precedent and Section 1367 support retaining jurisdiction, emphasizing the defendant's right to removal. Respondents contend the amended complaint should control, aligning with a principle that the operative pleading determines jurisdiction. The justices' questions explore the nuances of Section 1367, precedent (including Cohill and Rockwell), and the implications for various jurisdictional doctrines.
27集单集
分享
