Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

#Politics #Law #Government #United States #News #Business #Business Disciplines

46:55

The War and Treaty’s Michael and Tanya Trotter grew up in Cleveland, Ohio, and Washington, DC, respectively, but both have family roots in the South. They also grew up in the musical traditions of their churches – Tanya in the Black Baptist Church and Michael in the Seventh Day Adventist Church – where they learned the power of song to move people. After becoming a father at a very young age, Michael eventually joined the armed forces and served in Iraq and Germany, where he took up songwriting as a way of dealing with his experiences there. Meanwhile Tanya embarked on a singing and acting career after a breakthrough appearance in Sister Act 2 alongside Whoopi Goldberg and Lauryn Hill. Now, after a long and sometimes traumatic journey, Michael and Tanya are married, touring, winning all sorts of awards, and set to release their fifth album together, and their fourth as The War and Treaty. Sid talks to Michael and Tanya about the new record, Plus One , as well as their collaboration with Miranda Lambert, what it was like to record at FAME studios in Muscle Shoals, and how they’re blending country, soul, gospel, and R&B. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices…

大约1年之前 1:47:46

MP3•单集首页

A case in which the Court clarified the test for whether the National Bank Act preempts the application of state laws to national banks.

529集单集

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

505 subscribers

published 大约1年之前

MP3•单集首页

A case in which the Court clarified the test for whether the National Bank Act preempts the application of state laws to national banks.

529集单集

#Politics #Law #Government #United States #News #Business #Business Disciplines

所有剧集

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos 1:31:09

3天之前1:31:09

1:31:09

A case in which the Court will decide whether U.S. gun manufacturers can be held liable for violence in Mexico under theories of proximate causation and aiding and abetting, based on their domestic production and sale of firearms that are later trafficked to Mexican cartels.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman 52:42

4天之前52:42

52:42

A case in which the Court will decide whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd. 49:24

4天之前49:24

49:24

A case in which the Court will decide whether plaintiffs must prove minimum contacts before federal courts may assert personal jurisdiction over foreign states sued under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services 54:56

9天之前54:56

54:56

A case in which the Court will decide whether a majority-group plaintiff must show “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority” to establish a prima facie case of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.…

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Esteras v. United States 1:15:29

10天之前1:15:29

1:15:29

A case in which the Court will decide whether a court may, in considering whether to revoke an individual’s supervised release and impose a prison sentence, consider factors from the law governing sentencing not mentioned in the supervised release law.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Perttu v. Richards 1:16:16

10天之前1:16:16

1:16:16

A case in which the Court will decide whether, in cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies where disputed facts regarding exhaustion are intertwined with the underlying merits of their claim.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Gutierrez v. Saenz 1:34:31

11天之前1:34:31

1:34:31

A case in which the Court will decide whether a Texas death-row inmate has standing to sue the state over its refusal to give him access to DNA testing pursuant to a law permitting DNA testing only when the person can prove that he would not have been convicted if the DNA testing produced exculpatory results.…

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Cunningham v. Cornell University 1:30:44

6 weeks之前1:30:44

1:30:44

A case in which the Court will decide whether a plaintiff can state a claim under a provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that bars a plan fiduciary from knowingly engaging in a transaction that is an exchange of goods or services between the plan and anyone barred from doing business with the plan, simply by alleging that such a transaction occurred.…

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Barnes v. Felix 1:15:57

6 weeks之前1:15:57

1:15:57

A case in which the Court will decide whether courts should apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. 1:12:11

6 weeks之前1:12:11

1:12:11

A case in which the Court will decide whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation 1:13:53

6 weeks之前1:13:53

1:13:53

A case in which the Court will decide whether, under the Hobbs Act, a federal district court is bound by the Federal Communication Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton 2:05:32

7 weeks之前2:05:32

2:05:32

A case in which the Court will decide whether a Texas law that requires any website that publishes content one-third or more of which is “harmful to minors” to verify the age of each of its users before providing access should be subject to “rational basis” review or “strict scrutiny.”

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 49:00

7 weeks之前49:00

49:00

A case in which the Court held that a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Thompson v. United States 1:17:02

7 weeks之前1:17:02

1:17:02

A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014, which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

1
Hewitt v. United States 1:30:42

8 weeks之前1:30:42