When a young Eva Kollisch arrives as a refugee in New York in 1940, she finds a community among socialists who share her values and idealism. She soon discovers ‘the cause’ isn’t as idyllic as it seems. Little does she know this is the beginning of a lifelong commitment to activism and her determination to create radical change in ways that include belonging, love and one's full self. In addition to Eva Kollisch’s memoirs Girl in Movement (2000) and The Ground Under My Feet (2014), LBI’s collections include an oral history interview with Eva conducted in 2014 and the papers of Eva’s mother, poet Margarete Kolllisch, which document Eva’s childhood experience on the Kindertransport. Learn more at www.lbi.org/kollisch . Exile is a production of the Leo Baeck Institute , New York | Berlin and Antica Productions . It’s narrated by Mandy Patinkin. Executive Producers include Katrina Onstad, Stuart Coxe, and Bernie Blum. Senior Producer is Debbie Pacheco. Associate Producers are Hailey Choi and Emily Morantz. Research and translation by Isabella Kempf. Sound design and audio mix by Philip Wilson, with help from Cameron McIver. Theme music by Oliver Wickham. Voice acting by Natalia Bushnik. Special thanks to the Kollisch family for the use of Eva’s two memoirs, “Girl in Movement” and “The Ground Under My Feet”, the Sophia Smith Collection at Smith College and their “Voices of Feminism Oral History Project”, and Soundtrack New York.…
Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
Checked 6M ago
two 年前已添加!
内容由Keith Anderson and Decarbonizing Commerce提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Keith Anderson and Decarbonizing Commerce 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!
使用Player FM应用程序离线!
值得一听的播客
赞助
The Potential of Smart Packaging in Sustainable CPG with Adhithi Aji of Adrich
Manage episode 409274593 series 3498616
内容由Keith Anderson and Decarbonizing Commerce提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Keith Anderson and Decarbonizing Commerce 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
This week's episode features Adhithi Aji, founder and CEO of Adrich, a smart packaging solution for connected e-commerce. Adrich takes some of the friction out of replenishing consumable products, helping overcome some of the challenge of changing behavior in the shift to more sustainable consumption models.
Tune in to hear more about how it plays a role in accelerating behavioral change in areas like refillable packaging, other use cases and possibilities, and the unit economics of new technologies in the connected packaging space.
Tune in to hear more about how it plays a role in accelerating behavioral change in areas like refillable packaging, other use cases and possibilities, and the unit economics of new technologies in the connected packaging space.
Learn more about Adhithi Aji:
To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co:
If you enjoyed this episode then please:
- Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts
- Follow and rate on Spotify
Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co
TRANSCRIPT BELOW:
Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability.
TRANSCRIPT BELOW:
Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability.
I'm Keith Anderson. This is the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Thanks for listening. This week's guest is Adhithi Aji, who's founder and CEO of a company called Adrich, which is smart packaging for connected e-commerce. And I had to spend a little time on the website and with Adhithi to understand what smart packaging for e-commerce is all about.
But the more I learned, the more intrigued that I was, because, you know, we've had a few conversations already about the role of refillable and reusable packaging, both on the consumer side and backstage in internal logistics. And one of the big themes of the conversation we had with Mike Newman of Returnity, if you caught that episode, is behavioral change is really challenging.
And even when somebody has an intent to make a choice as a consumer that is maybe more sustainable, inertia and habit play a big role in preserving the status quo, and so I won't steal Adhithi's thunder about how Adrich does what it does, but it takes some of the friction out and effectively automates some of the work of replenishing a consumable product that you might want to reorder and refill packaging with.
And so in our conversation, we certainly got to know a bit more about Adhithi and where Adrich comes from, how it works, how it plays a role in accelerating behavioral change in areas like refillable packaging. But we talk about other use cases and possibilities. I'm always curious about the unit economics of new technologies like this, and we covered that.
We talked about some of the categories where it's a better fit than others and much more. So, I think you'll enjoy meeting and learning from Adhithi Aji of Adrich.
Adhithi, thanks for joining the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast.
Adhithi Aji: Hi, Keith. Thanks for having me here. Excited to talk more.
Keith Anderson: Well, so am I. You know, I discovered your company a few months ago, and the website has a lot of words that were interesting to me. You know, you characterize what you're doing at Adrich as Connected E-commerce, I thought maybe just to contextualize things for listeners, we could start with, you telling us what is Adrich exactly and how did you end up starting the company?
Adhithi Aji: Sure thing.
So, Adrich is a smart packaging enabled e-commerce, and connected e-commerce solution in that it has a hardware, which is a smart label, that tracks consumption of each individual unit of product in terms of the volume remaining. And, it has sensor-based smart labels and smart in the true sense that it's not RFID, it is not a QR code, but it's a sensor-enable label that tracks volume remaining and auto reorders automatically for the consumer or end user without having them to push a button or scan or do anything. And when they're down to 20% it detects that, it reorders, and it routes it to any e-commerce platform. So for you as a consumer, the next time you run out of coffee or shampoo, you'll find one at the door.
And for the brands and retailers, it's really about increasing consumer lifetime value and improving the subscription programs that we have today. Because today, consumers, when they run out or when they opt in for subscribe and save or any such programs, you either get more product than you need or you run out earlier.
And that is not very fun because they charge your credit card. We changed that to individual consumption based subscription, which means you'll get the next product only when you run out. Not early, not too late.
And that way brands are reducing the churn from the subscription programs as well.
Keith Anderson: I'm smiling because I have somewhere around a half dozen subscriptions that either get paused or a month gets skipped as we end up having a surplus and then we end up going a few weeks without, and you know, when, when I was getting to know your platform, it reminded me certainly of subscribe and save type programs and also of the dash replenishment button and dash replenishment service that Amazon introduced and has now sort of retired and rolled into Alexa.
But I remember in, in both of those implementations, the idea was almost an extension of one click ordering for replenishable products to, again, reduce some of the friction of, getting what you needed again, right when you need it. And so, both from a commercial and a customer behavior point of view, this is a really interesting idea.
Adhithi Aji: Right? On the note of the dash button, right, so we are integrated with Amazon on Alexa now, so think of it as the advanced version of the dash button. I think one challenge, with the dash button was, that consumers had to have these buttons all over their homes. And, an interesting, learning from that dash button was the kids were going on pressing the button because it was fun.
And they'd just keep ordering, right? So the parents got a whole bunch of products. So, we're in fact working with Amazon to kind of introduce this as an advanced version of the dash button where it's zero touch. You don't even have to push a button. It'll automatically detect you're running out and auto reorder.
Keith Anderson: Got it. So, tell us a bit about how, how did you end up, you know, working on this problem and creating Adrich?
Adhithi Aji: Yeah, it's interesting. It started as a capstone project when I was studying in Carnegie Mellon. I did a master's specializing in innovation management, right? How do you bring high end research technologies to market? And, you know, during that time, came up with an idea. So I'm an electrical engineer by trade.
And also I have a supply chain management and MBA in that program. And, so the last mile data was sort of missing, right? There was a lot of data up until the retail store, but once the product leaves the store, it's sort of a black box. Brands don't know how consumers are using the product, how much they are now, are they using it once and throwing it in the trash?
That gap in that data set is probably why all the problems of supply chain, marketing, and in terms of inventory control, all of those problems stem from not having consumption data. So the idea, and honestly my passion circles, came together with electrical engineering and supply chain and product management in that our mission became to enable brand managers, retailers with usage and consumption data and that last mile data that could really empower them to build better products suited to consumer needs, make sure they get the right product to the right consumer at the right time. And for consumers, really, our days are so busy these days that we want some quality time and, just bringing convenience into the day to day life. That's really the key and doing that with sustainability in mind because we can enable this auto reordering for refills and not just single use plastic. And that way we are reducing reusing, re refilling, introducing refill and reducing single use plastics.
Keith Anderson: Well, I appreciate you handling that segue on my behalf. That was where I was going to lead the conversation next, because, you know, that's one of the clearest linkages, I think, to what you're doing and some of the goals and targets that a lot of, certainly big CPGs, but not just the big ones, have.
And as you and I were discussing, previously, the, the, a challenge, maybe the biggest challenge to several of these consumer facing refillable and reusable packaging initiatives has really been driving adoption and getting shoppers to, you know, be consistent in using the refillable packaging when the cost and convenience of single use, in addition to just being so widespread and more available, you know, the customer behavioral component is one of the bigger hurdles.
And so tell us more about what you've learned about how this kind of connected label can accelerate the behavioral change of using refillables.
Adhithi Aji: Sure thing. And Keith, honestly, I brought up the sustainability because that seems to be the top of mind for consumers, right? With environmental conditions changing, we've actually seen consumers becoming more cognizant of what they're using, how they're using it. And I think that's a big driver, market driver that, probably CPG retailers, all of them are, also seeing.
And that's a good news, right? I guess it's now about using technology to really help bridge the gap in communication between the brand retailers and the consumers because brands have a purpose of introducing refill to reduce single use plastic and communicating that to the consumers could go a long way in terms of changing the behavior.
We, in fact, are working with, Clorox, Unilever, Reckitt and the like across product categories to be able to introduce refill. And it could be refill at home or refill in stores. And how we're doing that is by embedding our smart labels. So I have a, example of a Clorox, which we worked as a pilot and, introducing this as a smart kit, a smart starter kit, which means we can even position it as a smart subscription program.
We just talked about how, you know, potentially subscriptions get you more products. So consumers opt into this as a starting point saying, "Hey, I don't get the next product until I need it." So that's great news. So they buy into this and, because it's smart, it creates a sense of IOT experience, so it already creates that elevated experience, so they create a one time setup, and then they forget about it, and you can see the label is embedded behind the bottle of Clorox, and this is a bottle for life.
Right? When they run out, it auto reorders refill, which is a diffuse pod, and consumers fill this with water, they diffuse it, and they're good to run out and do this whole thing again. So, by digitizing the system, we are detecting when they run out. But we also create a touchpoint to, to consumers and the brands to understand when they're refilling.
So it creates additional points of engagement, which one informs the consumer that, "hey, you're running out," you know, "you're getting your next refill is on its way," or you can prompt them as to where they can get refills. But more importantly, when they refill, you can encourage them because every time they refill, you can probably communicate the carbon credits that they are saving and empower them with a push notification or a text to be part of this whole ecosystem change and environmental change.
And I think that's very key in driving adoption because I think, you can also, once the digital link is created, you can communicate the brand purpose. You can communicate how they are helping with sustainability and broadly speaking, brands can also use the digital connection to drive the necessary behavioral change, by sending push notification and text automatically at different points of view.
Does that make sense?
Keith Anderson: It does make sense, and I encourage anybody, you know, some of the examples that Adhithi just shared are, you really have to see them to understand them, so I encourage you, visit YouTube, or we're now going to begin posting the videos to Spotify as well, but for those that are just listening, I just want to play back a little bit of what I observed so that if you can't see the examples, you sort of are able to follow everything that we just covered.
You know, the first thing that we looked at was a really elegant, sort of, smart, kit that was packaged in, in well branded packaging that did a couple things. You know, it, it emphasized, the smart connection that the package itself has and had instructions on how it works and also featured some of the environmental and likely other benefits of working with this package.
And then the second example was the refillable package itself and one of the concentrates. And, you know, maybe you can just take a moment, Adhithi, and describe how does the sensor that sits on the package itself work exactly and what are some of the contexts in which you've already demonstrated it accurately detects when it's time to reorder?
Adhithi Aji: Sure thing. So it, the sensor has three, the smart label, and we call it digital IoT label because it has sensors. It has three main sensors in it. One is a motion sensor, so, right off the bat, it detects only usage. So every time you spray or you pour a product or you scoop a product, so it only captures usages and it eliminates any false positives to get technical, basically, if you just move around the bottle or take it from the shelf on the kitchen counter, those data points are eliminated.
So, the motion sensor is used to eliminate, false positive and pick up only usages. Now, within that subset, we have, two other proprietary patented sensors on this label, and it, uses electromagnetic characteristics of the product. So, the label sends a pulse through the product from outside the packaging it takes, the reflection and takes the viscosity and the packaging type, so, whether it's a PET or a HTP and all of those material, characteristics, and determines whether there's product remaining or not. And that's how it uses some neural networks to actually determine volume remaining.
So, it's the same three sensors, whether it's going on a spray bottle or a bottle of spirits or a nutrition pills. The difference is that we calibrate those same sensors to simulate the type of usage, whether it's a pour or a spray or a scoop. And from there, with the viscosity of the product inside the packaging, we determine how much is remaining.
And then it talks Bluetooth, so anything in the home environment that talks Bluetooth, it could be a phone, it could be Alexa or a Google Home or it could be a smart refrigerator. So it's fully automated and then it comes to our cloud and we process it based on individual consumer patterns and it, once you run out, our cloud communicates to any other e-commerce and routes that order.
Now, all of this is done through opt in, right? So there is a one time setup that consumers will do and they know it's smart. So, everything is done with privacy compliance kept in mind.
Keith Anderson: My mind is headed in 10 different directions, so I have to, I have to pick one. What I'm really thinking about are, you know, the several use cases for a technology like this, and then the flip side of that topic is, well, what are the unit economics and how does it pay back, you know, why don't we start with the really fun stuff for a second, which is, what are the possibilities?
Because I think, you know, we've been talking about refillable packaging, which, as, as you've said, is a, it's a topic of growing interest, although it's a very small percentage of all packaging today. And again, part of the reason that I was so interested to learn more is the behavioral change component of what would have to be true for refill to take off at scale is a big part of why the industry is, is, studying it so carefully. But I also think about, you mentioned pills and the sort of compliance component, and that actually got me thinking about, first, refill is so interesting to the brands because it allows them to reduce or eliminate packaging waste, and as in the Clorox example you shared, a lot of refills are concentrated and therefore have less volume, they're lighter weight, which also translates to additional savings on the emissions front in addition to savings from producing less packaging.
But the waste component of the product itself is another one that I don't think we've discussed because I can imagine, you know, if you, if you have as you were describing the opportunities to communicate based on intelligence about the consumption pattern, you know, if you've got the expiry date for a product, I could imagine, I don't know what your pantry looks like.
Mine always has a box of snacks or cereal or something that's hidden that we've forgotten about. And again, just for the sake of the hypothetical and, you know, exploring what could be possible imagine every product in the pantry and every product in the fridge was equipped with this. I'm not saying it makes sense.
I'm simply saying, imagine you could notify me weeks ahead of, "hey, this cereal is going to likely be past its best by date three weeks from now, so maybe you want cereal for breakfast." You know, food waste in particular, but waste in any category is another big topic. And there's so many interesting approaches to food waste.
This, this seems like an interesting possibility.
Adhithi Aji: Yeah, to that point, yes, it opens up a lot of use cases for the consumers as well, you know, to your point, food wastage is huge and, also making it still lifestyle inclusive for the consumers, right? Today, probably you're storing cereals on a, in a airtight container. You're storing pet food in a container.
So brands could probably, give some additional containers that are co-branded with our smart label and the consumers can store it in that. And then it still creates a digital communication where you can communicate the expiry dates and how fresh, you know, in case of coffee, how fresh it is. And, more importantly for consumers, they now have a refillable container that's smart, that'll auto reorder, and brands can ship a recyclable package that they can refill.
So that is one area of still getting sustainability into the market, but keeping it lifestyle inclusive while giving additional, value to the consumer. So, expiry is being one, in case of nutrition and beauty, compliance or regimen building. So if you have to take vitamin two times a day, just make it a smart digital assistance around them to just nudge them on friendly reminders. You know, for beauty, if it's a night cream, you know, just a friendly reminder to be, to create those habits.
So that's in the high involvement category and in the low involvement, of course, like pet food and those, you don't want to run out in the middle of the night and it just... plain convenience, right? Just when you run out the next refill or refillable package shows up at the door. So there are ways to bring about sustainability, reduce food wastage, but the value equation remains with the consumer that will help drive adoption as well.
Because you are introducing new avenues in their existing behavior, not necessarily changing the entire lifestyle. So there is a reusability with your single use packaging as of today, but bringing in the refill using smart bins as a concept.
Keith Anderson: And is that, is that being piloted in categories like pet food or anything today?
Adhithi Aji: Yes, pet food, coffee, those are categories that, we have been working in, have got some great results. We've seenn across categories on an average at least 20 to 30 percent increase in auto reorders because of the convenience factor. And because it auto reorders, brands are getting a increased lifetime value.
And we saw, incremental reorders from the same consumer up to 50 percent. So, because they don't run to the store and, and, try and buy some other product when they run out, you're able to, retain the consumers for a longer lifetime value and at the same time increase your, top line with incremental orders per consumer.
Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode.
Well, if folks want to learn more about the capability or get in touch with you, how should they find you?
Adhithi Aji: Yeah, I'm, of course, very approachable on LinkedIn, you know, it's, just a text message there, or I'm also available through our website, and our email is getintouch@adrich.io so, certainly, email, very accessible, but more than happy to collaborate and talk more about what we are seeing in the industry.
I think they're very positive market drivers to take sustainability to the next level along with subscription business model for CPG.
Keith Anderson: Well, Adhithi, thanks so much for joining me.
Adhithi Aji: So thank you. Thanks for having me.
Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce.
Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=08j434v8
35集单集
Manage episode 409274593 series 3498616
内容由Keith Anderson and Decarbonizing Commerce提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Keith Anderson and Decarbonizing Commerce 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
This week's episode features Adhithi Aji, founder and CEO of Adrich, a smart packaging solution for connected e-commerce. Adrich takes some of the friction out of replenishing consumable products, helping overcome some of the challenge of changing behavior in the shift to more sustainable consumption models.
Tune in to hear more about how it plays a role in accelerating behavioral change in areas like refillable packaging, other use cases and possibilities, and the unit economics of new technologies in the connected packaging space.
Tune in to hear more about how it plays a role in accelerating behavioral change in areas like refillable packaging, other use cases and possibilities, and the unit economics of new technologies in the connected packaging space.
Learn more about Adhithi Aji:
To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co:
If you enjoyed this episode then please:
- Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts
- Follow and rate on Spotify
Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co
TRANSCRIPT BELOW:
Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability.
TRANSCRIPT BELOW:
Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability.
I'm Keith Anderson. This is the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Thanks for listening. This week's guest is Adhithi Aji, who's founder and CEO of a company called Adrich, which is smart packaging for connected e-commerce. And I had to spend a little time on the website and with Adhithi to understand what smart packaging for e-commerce is all about.
But the more I learned, the more intrigued that I was, because, you know, we've had a few conversations already about the role of refillable and reusable packaging, both on the consumer side and backstage in internal logistics. And one of the big themes of the conversation we had with Mike Newman of Returnity, if you caught that episode, is behavioral change is really challenging.
And even when somebody has an intent to make a choice as a consumer that is maybe more sustainable, inertia and habit play a big role in preserving the status quo, and so I won't steal Adhithi's thunder about how Adrich does what it does, but it takes some of the friction out and effectively automates some of the work of replenishing a consumable product that you might want to reorder and refill packaging with.
And so in our conversation, we certainly got to know a bit more about Adhithi and where Adrich comes from, how it works, how it plays a role in accelerating behavioral change in areas like refillable packaging. But we talk about other use cases and possibilities. I'm always curious about the unit economics of new technologies like this, and we covered that.
We talked about some of the categories where it's a better fit than others and much more. So, I think you'll enjoy meeting and learning from Adhithi Aji of Adrich.
Adhithi, thanks for joining the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast.
Adhithi Aji: Hi, Keith. Thanks for having me here. Excited to talk more.
Keith Anderson: Well, so am I. You know, I discovered your company a few months ago, and the website has a lot of words that were interesting to me. You know, you characterize what you're doing at Adrich as Connected E-commerce, I thought maybe just to contextualize things for listeners, we could start with, you telling us what is Adrich exactly and how did you end up starting the company?
Adhithi Aji: Sure thing.
So, Adrich is a smart packaging enabled e-commerce, and connected e-commerce solution in that it has a hardware, which is a smart label, that tracks consumption of each individual unit of product in terms of the volume remaining. And, it has sensor-based smart labels and smart in the true sense that it's not RFID, it is not a QR code, but it's a sensor-enable label that tracks volume remaining and auto reorders automatically for the consumer or end user without having them to push a button or scan or do anything. And when they're down to 20% it detects that, it reorders, and it routes it to any e-commerce platform. So for you as a consumer, the next time you run out of coffee or shampoo, you'll find one at the door.
And for the brands and retailers, it's really about increasing consumer lifetime value and improving the subscription programs that we have today. Because today, consumers, when they run out or when they opt in for subscribe and save or any such programs, you either get more product than you need or you run out earlier.
And that is not very fun because they charge your credit card. We changed that to individual consumption based subscription, which means you'll get the next product only when you run out. Not early, not too late.
And that way brands are reducing the churn from the subscription programs as well.
Keith Anderson: I'm smiling because I have somewhere around a half dozen subscriptions that either get paused or a month gets skipped as we end up having a surplus and then we end up going a few weeks without, and you know, when, when I was getting to know your platform, it reminded me certainly of subscribe and save type programs and also of the dash replenishment button and dash replenishment service that Amazon introduced and has now sort of retired and rolled into Alexa.
But I remember in, in both of those implementations, the idea was almost an extension of one click ordering for replenishable products to, again, reduce some of the friction of, getting what you needed again, right when you need it. And so, both from a commercial and a customer behavior point of view, this is a really interesting idea.
Adhithi Aji: Right? On the note of the dash button, right, so we are integrated with Amazon on Alexa now, so think of it as the advanced version of the dash button. I think one challenge, with the dash button was, that consumers had to have these buttons all over their homes. And, an interesting, learning from that dash button was the kids were going on pressing the button because it was fun.
And they'd just keep ordering, right? So the parents got a whole bunch of products. So, we're in fact working with Amazon to kind of introduce this as an advanced version of the dash button where it's zero touch. You don't even have to push a button. It'll automatically detect you're running out and auto reorder.
Keith Anderson: Got it. So, tell us a bit about how, how did you end up, you know, working on this problem and creating Adrich?
Adhithi Aji: Yeah, it's interesting. It started as a capstone project when I was studying in Carnegie Mellon. I did a master's specializing in innovation management, right? How do you bring high end research technologies to market? And, you know, during that time, came up with an idea. So I'm an electrical engineer by trade.
And also I have a supply chain management and MBA in that program. And, so the last mile data was sort of missing, right? There was a lot of data up until the retail store, but once the product leaves the store, it's sort of a black box. Brands don't know how consumers are using the product, how much they are now, are they using it once and throwing it in the trash?
That gap in that data set is probably why all the problems of supply chain, marketing, and in terms of inventory control, all of those problems stem from not having consumption data. So the idea, and honestly my passion circles, came together with electrical engineering and supply chain and product management in that our mission became to enable brand managers, retailers with usage and consumption data and that last mile data that could really empower them to build better products suited to consumer needs, make sure they get the right product to the right consumer at the right time. And for consumers, really, our days are so busy these days that we want some quality time and, just bringing convenience into the day to day life. That's really the key and doing that with sustainability in mind because we can enable this auto reordering for refills and not just single use plastic. And that way we are reducing reusing, re refilling, introducing refill and reducing single use plastics.
Keith Anderson: Well, I appreciate you handling that segue on my behalf. That was where I was going to lead the conversation next, because, you know, that's one of the clearest linkages, I think, to what you're doing and some of the goals and targets that a lot of, certainly big CPGs, but not just the big ones, have.
And as you and I were discussing, previously, the, the, a challenge, maybe the biggest challenge to several of these consumer facing refillable and reusable packaging initiatives has really been driving adoption and getting shoppers to, you know, be consistent in using the refillable packaging when the cost and convenience of single use, in addition to just being so widespread and more available, you know, the customer behavioral component is one of the bigger hurdles.
And so tell us more about what you've learned about how this kind of connected label can accelerate the behavioral change of using refillables.
Adhithi Aji: Sure thing. And Keith, honestly, I brought up the sustainability because that seems to be the top of mind for consumers, right? With environmental conditions changing, we've actually seen consumers becoming more cognizant of what they're using, how they're using it. And I think that's a big driver, market driver that, probably CPG retailers, all of them are, also seeing.
And that's a good news, right? I guess it's now about using technology to really help bridge the gap in communication between the brand retailers and the consumers because brands have a purpose of introducing refill to reduce single use plastic and communicating that to the consumers could go a long way in terms of changing the behavior.
We, in fact, are working with, Clorox, Unilever, Reckitt and the like across product categories to be able to introduce refill. And it could be refill at home or refill in stores. And how we're doing that is by embedding our smart labels. So I have a, example of a Clorox, which we worked as a pilot and, introducing this as a smart kit, a smart starter kit, which means we can even position it as a smart subscription program.
We just talked about how, you know, potentially subscriptions get you more products. So consumers opt into this as a starting point saying, "Hey, I don't get the next product until I need it." So that's great news. So they buy into this and, because it's smart, it creates a sense of IOT experience, so it already creates that elevated experience, so they create a one time setup, and then they forget about it, and you can see the label is embedded behind the bottle of Clorox, and this is a bottle for life.
Right? When they run out, it auto reorders refill, which is a diffuse pod, and consumers fill this with water, they diffuse it, and they're good to run out and do this whole thing again. So, by digitizing the system, we are detecting when they run out. But we also create a touchpoint to, to consumers and the brands to understand when they're refilling.
So it creates additional points of engagement, which one informs the consumer that, "hey, you're running out," you know, "you're getting your next refill is on its way," or you can prompt them as to where they can get refills. But more importantly, when they refill, you can encourage them because every time they refill, you can probably communicate the carbon credits that they are saving and empower them with a push notification or a text to be part of this whole ecosystem change and environmental change.
And I think that's very key in driving adoption because I think, you can also, once the digital link is created, you can communicate the brand purpose. You can communicate how they are helping with sustainability and broadly speaking, brands can also use the digital connection to drive the necessary behavioral change, by sending push notification and text automatically at different points of view.
Does that make sense?
Keith Anderson: It does make sense, and I encourage anybody, you know, some of the examples that Adhithi just shared are, you really have to see them to understand them, so I encourage you, visit YouTube, or we're now going to begin posting the videos to Spotify as well, but for those that are just listening, I just want to play back a little bit of what I observed so that if you can't see the examples, you sort of are able to follow everything that we just covered.
You know, the first thing that we looked at was a really elegant, sort of, smart, kit that was packaged in, in well branded packaging that did a couple things. You know, it, it emphasized, the smart connection that the package itself has and had instructions on how it works and also featured some of the environmental and likely other benefits of working with this package.
And then the second example was the refillable package itself and one of the concentrates. And, you know, maybe you can just take a moment, Adhithi, and describe how does the sensor that sits on the package itself work exactly and what are some of the contexts in which you've already demonstrated it accurately detects when it's time to reorder?
Adhithi Aji: Sure thing. So it, the sensor has three, the smart label, and we call it digital IoT label because it has sensors. It has three main sensors in it. One is a motion sensor, so, right off the bat, it detects only usage. So every time you spray or you pour a product or you scoop a product, so it only captures usages and it eliminates any false positives to get technical, basically, if you just move around the bottle or take it from the shelf on the kitchen counter, those data points are eliminated.
So, the motion sensor is used to eliminate, false positive and pick up only usages. Now, within that subset, we have, two other proprietary patented sensors on this label, and it, uses electromagnetic characteristics of the product. So, the label sends a pulse through the product from outside the packaging it takes, the reflection and takes the viscosity and the packaging type, so, whether it's a PET or a HTP and all of those material, characteristics, and determines whether there's product remaining or not. And that's how it uses some neural networks to actually determine volume remaining.
So, it's the same three sensors, whether it's going on a spray bottle or a bottle of spirits or a nutrition pills. The difference is that we calibrate those same sensors to simulate the type of usage, whether it's a pour or a spray or a scoop. And from there, with the viscosity of the product inside the packaging, we determine how much is remaining.
And then it talks Bluetooth, so anything in the home environment that talks Bluetooth, it could be a phone, it could be Alexa or a Google Home or it could be a smart refrigerator. So it's fully automated and then it comes to our cloud and we process it based on individual consumer patterns and it, once you run out, our cloud communicates to any other e-commerce and routes that order.
Now, all of this is done through opt in, right? So there is a one time setup that consumers will do and they know it's smart. So, everything is done with privacy compliance kept in mind.
Keith Anderson: My mind is headed in 10 different directions, so I have to, I have to pick one. What I'm really thinking about are, you know, the several use cases for a technology like this, and then the flip side of that topic is, well, what are the unit economics and how does it pay back, you know, why don't we start with the really fun stuff for a second, which is, what are the possibilities?
Because I think, you know, we've been talking about refillable packaging, which, as, as you've said, is a, it's a topic of growing interest, although it's a very small percentage of all packaging today. And again, part of the reason that I was so interested to learn more is the behavioral change component of what would have to be true for refill to take off at scale is a big part of why the industry is, is, studying it so carefully. But I also think about, you mentioned pills and the sort of compliance component, and that actually got me thinking about, first, refill is so interesting to the brands because it allows them to reduce or eliminate packaging waste, and as in the Clorox example you shared, a lot of refills are concentrated and therefore have less volume, they're lighter weight, which also translates to additional savings on the emissions front in addition to savings from producing less packaging.
But the waste component of the product itself is another one that I don't think we've discussed because I can imagine, you know, if you, if you have as you were describing the opportunities to communicate based on intelligence about the consumption pattern, you know, if you've got the expiry date for a product, I could imagine, I don't know what your pantry looks like.
Mine always has a box of snacks or cereal or something that's hidden that we've forgotten about. And again, just for the sake of the hypothetical and, you know, exploring what could be possible imagine every product in the pantry and every product in the fridge was equipped with this. I'm not saying it makes sense.
I'm simply saying, imagine you could notify me weeks ahead of, "hey, this cereal is going to likely be past its best by date three weeks from now, so maybe you want cereal for breakfast." You know, food waste in particular, but waste in any category is another big topic. And there's so many interesting approaches to food waste.
This, this seems like an interesting possibility.
Adhithi Aji: Yeah, to that point, yes, it opens up a lot of use cases for the consumers as well, you know, to your point, food wastage is huge and, also making it still lifestyle inclusive for the consumers, right? Today, probably you're storing cereals on a, in a airtight container. You're storing pet food in a container.
So brands could probably, give some additional containers that are co-branded with our smart label and the consumers can store it in that. And then it still creates a digital communication where you can communicate the expiry dates and how fresh, you know, in case of coffee, how fresh it is. And, more importantly for consumers, they now have a refillable container that's smart, that'll auto reorder, and brands can ship a recyclable package that they can refill.
So that is one area of still getting sustainability into the market, but keeping it lifestyle inclusive while giving additional, value to the consumer. So, expiry is being one, in case of nutrition and beauty, compliance or regimen building. So if you have to take vitamin two times a day, just make it a smart digital assistance around them to just nudge them on friendly reminders. You know, for beauty, if it's a night cream, you know, just a friendly reminder to be, to create those habits.
So that's in the high involvement category and in the low involvement, of course, like pet food and those, you don't want to run out in the middle of the night and it just... plain convenience, right? Just when you run out the next refill or refillable package shows up at the door. So there are ways to bring about sustainability, reduce food wastage, but the value equation remains with the consumer that will help drive adoption as well.
Because you are introducing new avenues in their existing behavior, not necessarily changing the entire lifestyle. So there is a reusability with your single use packaging as of today, but bringing in the refill using smart bins as a concept.
Keith Anderson: And is that, is that being piloted in categories like pet food or anything today?
Adhithi Aji: Yes, pet food, coffee, those are categories that, we have been working in, have got some great results. We've seenn across categories on an average at least 20 to 30 percent increase in auto reorders because of the convenience factor. And because it auto reorders, brands are getting a increased lifetime value.
And we saw, incremental reorders from the same consumer up to 50 percent. So, because they don't run to the store and, and, try and buy some other product when they run out, you're able to, retain the consumers for a longer lifetime value and at the same time increase your, top line with incremental orders per consumer.
Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode.
Well, if folks want to learn more about the capability or get in touch with you, how should they find you?
Adhithi Aji: Yeah, I'm, of course, very approachable on LinkedIn, you know, it's, just a text message there, or I'm also available through our website, and our email is getintouch@adrich.io so, certainly, email, very accessible, but more than happy to collaborate and talk more about what we are seeing in the industry.
I think they're very positive market drivers to take sustainability to the next level along with subscription business model for CPG.
Keith Anderson: Well, Adhithi, thanks so much for joining me.
Adhithi Aji: So thank you. Thanks for having me.
Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce.
Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=08j434v8
35集单集
所有剧集
×Host Keith Anderson is joined by Ankit Patel, Vice President of Sustainable Solutions at ZeroMe, a platform for companies to engage and align their workforce with the company's sustainability goals through personalized awareness and education. Together, they cover interesting topics like the commonalities and distinctions between the rise of e-commerce and now the rise of sustainability, as well as tipping points that will nudge this discipline and this topic to the same level of sort of mainstream interest and adoption that e-commerce has experienced. Learn more about Ankit Patel: Link to ZeroMe ’s website Link to Ankit’s LinkedIn Episode resources: Metallica’s European Tour Showcases Renewable-Energy Big Rigs—And Their Limits - WSJ If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=p8m5x1y8…
Keith Anderson is joined by Darko Mandich, founder of MeliBio, a sustainable plant-based honey alternative. Together, they discuss the importance of new sustainable alternatives to industries that impact both the environment and animal welfare, contrasting conventional approaches with the innovative practices of MeliBio regarding the commercial considerations of honey alternatives. Tune in for an enlightening perspective on the commerce, innovation, and considerations regarding honey bees and the industry built around them. Learn more about Darko Mandich: Link to MeliBio ’s website Link to Darko Mandichh’s LinkedIn Episode resources: Mellody Foods If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Hello, welcome back to the decarbonizing commerce podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and we've got a sweet episode for you this week. Our guest is Darko Mandic, founder of MeliBio, a sustainable plant-based honey alternative. And we talk a lot about the importance of creating, new sustainable alternatives and industries that, We have a significant impact on the environment and animal welfare. We do some comparison and contrasting of conventional approaches to honey production versus the practices that MellyBio is using. And we spent a ton of time on some of the consumer and commercial considerations that Darko and his team have faced in areas like taste and unit economics and distribution strategy, as they develop the product and are building both a national brand in Mellody, which you'll hear more about, and supporting some retailers with private label brands. So, I'm really excited for you to meet Darko, learn more about bees, honey, and MeliBio. Darko, thanks so much for joining us. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. Darko Mandich: Thanks for having me. Keith Anderson: Well, I love to start with a bit of the founder's story and a bit about the company that you're leading. Can you tell us a bit about MeliBio and Mellody and how you came to invent and start the business? Darko Mandich: MeliBio started with a big dream of two people who really care about bees and are really connected to the importance of bees for our planet. So in 2020, after I emmigrated from Europe to the United States, With this idea to update the hunting industry, make it sustainable. I came to San Francisco to join the food tech scene that was booming at that time over here. And at one of those meetups, I met a scientist. His name is Aaron Schaller. And, he was finishing his PhD at UC Berkeley at that time. And we started talking about bees. He told me that he's a scientist who's looking to join the food tech scene. He loves bees because he's also a gardener. I have my own story with bees. I used to work for honey companies and companies making bee products using bees. And I've seen everything about that industry. Wanted to bring some changes there. And when Aaron and I met, end of 2019, just felt like it was meant to be. Keith Anderson: Tell us a bit about what you learned as somebody working in the honey industry, as it's conventionally operated, what are some of the challenges of producing honey and other related products with live bees. Darko Mandich: Honey is a fascinating product as well as some other bee products too. bees are such intelligent creatures that work in amazing way as community and many communities, and they have this ability to produce. Amazing ingredients that traditionally have been used by food, beverage, beauty, personal care, cosmetics and pharma industry. So bee products are really everywhere. And I joined this industry in 2012, right after I finished my business school, without having any prior knowledge. I just got a job offer from a company that is a significant company back in Europe that has a division. That works on bee products and that really got me excited. I joined that industry not knowing anything and, now I'm still in it in a different form. But before launching MeliBio as the world's first company that's giving bees a break by putting science to work instead of honeybees, I can say that, it's, it's an industry that is fascinating in so many ways, it's an industry that's growing because next time you go in supermarket or a pharmacy store, you'll probably identify many products that are formulated with one of the ingredients that bees are known to make. Especially Honey. Keith Anderson: Well, I'm the father of a seven year old daughter and you'll be happy to hear Darko, she asks for honey on everything. This morning, she agreed to have oatmeal if I would put honey on the bananas in the oatmeal. Darko Mandich: I'd love for her to try our product and, see how things go, so. we have to definitely a taste happen. Keith Anderson: We'll, Darko Mandich: let's do that. Keith Anderson: On a future episode, we'll come back and share the results. Darko Mandich: yeah, that, that's how we landed some of our customers, but we'll speak about that a little bit later. I think, humans at some point identified a way to domesticate one species of bees. their name is Apis mellifera or European honeybee. And that was figured out a long time ago and in 16th or 17th century, Spanish conquistadors brought first beehives to this part of the world. They brought them to Yucatan in Mexico. And then since then, the beehives with honey, European honeybees proliferated across this side of the world and are now one of the biggest, biggest species here, but that's just one of the 20 000 bee species that exists. People when people talk about bees, they usually refer to honeybees and people usually get surprised when I tell them you probably don't know much about bees because if you think of bees, you probably think of this one subspecies. And people get surprised when I tell them the story, there are 20 000 different bee species, 4 000 of native bee species only in North America. Keith Anderson: That's amazing. so, in the business of using bees to produce honey, I don't think of necessarily the footprint as being immense, at least compared to some of the other animal-based product categories. But I am aware that bees have been under a lot of environmental pressure and I know there's a lot of interdependency of other crops on bees. So why don't we spend a little time talking about some of the trade-offs between a plant-based versus conventional approach in the category. Darko Mandich: Absolutely. So our company, MeliBio, commercialized this approach to take the same plants that bees visit in nature and turn them into a product that taste the same, look the same, behave the same, and is very close on the molecular level to real honey. And that's where we launched Mellody, our brand, plant-based honey, as well as some private label deals with retailers, especially in Europe. And, the reason we're doing that is we really love the bees. And we say that there's no other company in the world that loves bees as much as we do. And because of that, we want to give them a break. And then people ask, but why would you give bees a break? Because they're doing what they're meant for. So the story here is that we essentially need bees to keep the plant as we know it, because bees are essential pollinators. They contribute to the food system, to the plant diversity. Essentially, our existence as humans on this planet wouldn't be possible without bees. So, why the need to give them a break from the work on the products that we harvest from them? In the process of Manufacturing bee products, especially honey, on a large scale, the species of bees, as I mentioned, European honeybees, are being artificially bred and added into ecosystems where they don't belong. And that is causing them to do this thing that I like to refer to as pollinator gentrification. They don't allow other pollinators and other bee species to share this space. And they're essentially very aggressive and invasive. So our thesis is, if we take the work of the honeybees and start turning plants into the honey, the bee ecosystems will get a break from that artificial pressure that humans are creating. And therefore, The nature will balance things out in ecosystems. Bees will be thriving, all these species, they will be doing their favorite work, which is just, pollination. And we'll take over from the work that is essentially very damaging for our planet. If we continue just relying on these honeybees that will just push, back on all the other pollinators. Keith Anderson: I like that solution more than another one that I've heard of, which is robotic bees to pollinate, because in that scenario, I don't get the honey. Darko Mandich: So with the robotic bees, I'm just hoping, I think a lot about that because, there are things that need to be done on the pollination side, especially in California. You have these large almond orchards where a lot of honey bees are being brought because it's very convenient for almond growers, but that's actually not great for California bumblebees that are specifically endangered species, here in California. For me, the robotic bees feels like if that comes into play and becomes a mainstream, that would mean that we lost other opporunities to make things right. So if we really end up using robots to pollinate the planet, that would tell me that we failed in so many ways to make nature balance things out. So for us, to have nature do its thing is really making sure that we don't have too much honeybees. As a company, we're not saying, "hey, let's stop, beekeeping entirely or bee pollination. Let's kind of, destroy the presence of honeybees in North America." We're not saying that. We're just saying that it's too many of them. And it's just requiring a thoughtful approach to producing bee products. So we believe that if we take those same plants and turn them into products that people love, that chefs love, that people can't distinguish on blind tasting, and we do that in a bee-friendly way, we have an opportunity to, just kind of, give a slight nudge to the nature to tell it, "Hey, we're here. You can take over." Every time someone consumes our product and you can see behind my back, you are contributing to removing the work of 20 000 honeybees from ecosystem. You're basically helping bee biodiversity. Keith Anderson: That's really interesting. One of the things that I find myself doing is sort of sorting product categories on a couple of dimensions. We talked about the category's environmental impact. The flip side of that coin is its susceptibility to more extreme temperatures, more volatile weather. We had a guest on from a company that produces olive oil. And that's a category where droughts and other crop disruptions have really impacted quality and quantity of supply and therefore pricing. Is that a present issue in the animal-based honey industry, or is it more of a future possibility? And where does plant-based honey fit into that equation? Darko Mandich: It's a great question. People are reading about their chocolate prices going to the roof because of issues around cocoa supply chain. There are challenges around all kinds of oils, including olive oil and palm oil. I think honey is coming up next, unfortunately, and here's why. THe, honey, manufacturing, is complex because it only happens within a few months in a year. So in a given geography, within a couple of weeks per year, you have an opportunity to make spring honey in Europe, or you can make, summer honey in Asia. And if weather conditions within those couple of weeks, within a given geography, are not perfect, that heavily influences the yield of the product. So I've seen years working for honey companies where I had to deliver thousands of tons of products. I'm talking about million dollar plus contracts where within few weeks price doubles. So imagine how does that affect the supply chain, the purchasing departments of various ingredients companies and private label companies. They just don't understand what's happening. They're flying their teams from Western Europe or the United States to Ukraine or the Balkans to see for themselves how come that the ingredient that they used to pay this much doubles in price within a few weeks. So that is because of weather affecting the crop very much and that particular animal working in that particular geography only within those few weeks when certain flowers are blooming. So, when I think about environmental issues and, animal welfare, which are definitely something that's close to my heart, and the main reasons I'm doing this, there's a set of reasons that require us to update honey industry that are just purely capitalistic. Efficiency, supply chain predictability, for United States, it's important to say that people mostly don't consume American honey because you don't get to consume it because most of the products on the shelves that you buy are formulated with imported honey. I mean, importing food, it's not a big problem, the world functions in a global trade environment, but I need to say that most honey coming into this country is dependent on different regions in the world in different countries that don't have levels of standard that are required here. And very often some of the shipments go through and some of the product that is not honey ends up on the shelves. And that's usually a product that's cut with rice syrups and things like that. And we make our honey without bees, our plant-based honey. We only use components that would be components of honey in nature. So, some people ask me, "Oh, in a world of fake honey, what are you guys, what are you guys doing?" And I'm saying, "hey, that's a great question." Fake honey is 10 percent of real honey and 90 percent of rice syrup. We don't use rice syrup in our product because bees wouldn't bring rice into honey. But there are so many challenges and we believe that Mellody being an American brand, bringing the manufacturing back into the US, guaranteeing our consumers that were regulated here by domestic market that we have to comply with very stricter quality standards than many other markets out there that are trying to, sometimes just dump their products here. I think there are so many reasons outside of the environment that build a strong case for the existence of companies of ours and our brand Mellody. Keith Anderson: Well, as you said, you're one of the first vegan honey companies, maybe the only, and you've followed an interesting path so far, with both B2B and B2C routes to market. I'm often looking at the value equation for these disruptive entrants in a category through the following lenses. One is what you can think of as, the merits, I guess, sort of conventional taste, nutritional profile effectiveness, whatever the consideration factors are for the, for a given category. And the second would be sort of climate alignment, both through the sense of is it low impact and is it in steady supply? And then the third is sort of, unit economics and how those compare. And I know that it's very early so, a lot of the economies of scale that the conventional honey industry enjoys, I'm sure are not here yet. But how do you think about the business case, whether you're pitching distribution for your own brand to a retailer, or whether you're pitching your product as an ingredient or a private label alternative. Where, what do you find is most resonant in those scenarios today? Darko Mandich: Taste is the king. And then taste is the king. And again, taste is the king. The first three important things to make a product successful. So we nailed that. And when we were comfortable with the taste of our product, we wanted to land, and we were successful in landing Eleven Madison Park, a three Michelin star restaurant, as our first customer. After me hearing a podcast where the founder of Eleven Madison Park, Chef Humm shared his story of their restaurant turning plant-based except for one ingredient, which is honey, because they were not comfortable with honey alternatives at that time. That, that was an interesting story. We wanted to convince them that there's a company who succeeded for the first time ever to make an alternative that tastes great, and that is also, by the way, vegan. Vegan honey alternatives existed, actually, before our company. They were usually syrup-based products made of tapioca, stevia, all these ingredients that naturally are absolutely not connected with honey. I'm not saying people shouldn't go for other sweeteners, try products and see what works for you. But we wanted genuinely to make, as much as we can, real honey made without bees. So once we nailed the taste, we realized that there's a certain level of people that will get excited about a very expensive world's first product. And then that story can live for a certain amount of time. And if we don't expand that into including more customers, that's not going to be a viable case, because we want to build a large company because large company for us means large impact, less honeybees required to make, those volumes of honey. The price was the next thing that we started working on. I can say that at this point, we match European honeys in Europe and American honey in the US we are on parity with those, and that's amazing because we've done that within three and a half years of R&D, and we raised about 10 million. In the food tech industry, many companies exist that raise hundreds of millions of dollars. There are a few that raise almost a billion dollars and are still not at a commercial level that, that we are. I think the goal by the end of this year is try to make our solution a little bit cheaper than domestic products made by bees here in the United States. And then the next target would be to try to compete with countries like Ukraine, Brazil, Vietnam, where a lot of, cheaper honey is being made. With the inflatory pressures and consumers and businesses that I project and the economists say will last through the next couple of years, I think it's responsibility, huge responsibility from companies like ours to continue working on scale and science to get up, to make our prices go down. Because yes, we're vegan, honey, but we also want to include everyone, including the vegans. And we want to make sure that when we talk to food service operators, retailers, businesses, that our approach is the most efficient and that them joining the bee coalition, heroic mission of saving the bees also makes a good impact on their calculation. And for all of that, to put more dollars back in consumers' wallets. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I will say, I think you've done a nice job describing the challenge that so many companies, whether they're technologies or consumer products, are trying to cross that chasm from the early adopters and reach a critical mass of mainstream customers or shoppers. And, I think more and more of the industry is prioritizing product superiority and parity. But I haven't encountered a huge number of examples where pricing and unit economics are competitive, and so it's really exciting that you're, in some ways there and still making that a focus. Darko Mandich: It's back to the DNA of our team. Because when we were thinking about who should be part of our team, we really thought that one big requirement to join our team would be that you have a previous scale up experience and hopefully with a lot of mistakes. And the reasons I'm saying mistakes is that people learn through mistakes. And in the past few years, there's been this huge influx of activists going into the food industry, wanting to pitch solutions that make the world a better place. And that's amazing. I think of myself, big part of myself being an activist, wanting to build this world for humans and bees that's better, for myself and the future generation and for people around me. But there's a big part in the way how I run this team and the members of our team around our previous experience in scaling manufacturing. Working for other companies, I built two manufacturing facilities. I worked with co-packers. I built extensive international supply chains. And that kind of knowledge really helped us get past the activism and coolness. Because activism and coolness has this initial phase that lasts. And even for companies like Tesla or Apple, at some point, it just kind of faded out and you just start to become this company that talks about efficiency, latency, how fast can you fill out the orders, how can you make the people on the other side of supply chain happy. And I think if you build teams with that DNA, any, in any industry that requires physical products to be manufactured and moved, it's being required. And I would like to see more of that. And as we also grow as a team, I would love to see more people who have dealt with ingredients or even honey who would happily join our mission and use that knowledge from before and hopefully many thoughtful mistakes and do things differently to make people happy. Keith Anderson: Well, the, love the idea of the DNA being so essential and predictive of outcomes. Darko, if people want to learn more about you or your products, where would you direct them? Darko Mandich: Absolutely. If you are an industry executive looking to learn about more about our technology and possibilities and some of the large enterprise deals that we've done, such as a deal with Aldi in Europe, I advise you go to, MeliBio.com, which is our company website. If you're a consumer that cares to know where you can get our brand Mellody in your favorite restaurant or store or even online in the US, go to Mellodyfoods.com and, learn about our story and get one of our two products that exist in the US market. We have Golden Clover, which is a regular, original, our number one product. But we also have an exciting Spicy Habanero, world's first plant-based hot honey. Hot honey is a growing category, especially in pizzerias. And if you like some spiciness or you like to add some kick to a burger or salad, I try you suggest, I suggest you try our new product that we just recently launched. Keith Anderson: That one caught my eye when I was poking around the site. Darko Mandich: It's super hot. People love it. Keith Anderson: Is it? I'm going to have to put it somewhere where my daughter won't, confuse it with the regular though. She's not as big a fan of spice as I am. Well, Darko, what a, fascinating opportunity. Congrats on the progress so far and good luck. And thanks again for joining me for the show. Darko Mandich: Thank you for having me and thank you for thinking of the bees. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=qn0q22x8…
In this episode of Decarbonizing Commerce, host Keith Anderson welcomes Phil White, co-founder of Grounded, a boutique agency and B Corp focused on embedding sustainability into business models. Phil discusses how Grounded helps both large and emerging brands integrate sustainability into areas like product design, packaging innovation, and retail activation. By connecting purpose to profit, Grounded aims to close the gap between sustainability intentions and commercial actions. Phil shares insights into their innovative approach, including case studies on transforming consumer behaviors towards more sustainable practices and the importance of commercial value in driving retailer support for sustainability initiatives. This episode highlights the critical steps and collaborative efforts required to make sustainability a core business driver. Learn more about Phil White: Link to Grounded World ’s website Link to Phil’s LinkedIn If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce. I'm Keith Anderson. I'm really excited about this week's episode because when I started Decarbonize.co, my core thesis was that many retailers and brands struggle to embed sustainability commercially. That is, adapt their business models and integrate sustainability objectives into the way that they do what they do. And our guest this week is Phil White, who along with his partner and wife, Heidi, is co founder of Grounded, a boutique agency and B Corp that helps both large, established, and emerging retailers and brands make progress in what I call commercial sustainability. That is, embedding sustainability as a discipline in areas like product design, packaging innovation, retail activation, and much more that you'll hear about from Phil during this week's episode. But, when I met Phil a few months ago and learned about the work that he and Heidi are doing, I wanted to continue the conversation and be sure that you all could listen in because I think it really represents a lot of what we as an industry are going to have to focus on over the next decade or so. And I saw firsthand through other industry transitions, like the growth of digital commerce, just how much effort and coordination it takes to, make a shift like this across different functions. So I'm very excited to introduce you to Phil White of Grounded. Phil, good to see you. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Thanks for having me. Well, I thought to kick us off, maybe you could tell us a bit about the business that you and your partner, Heidi, run, Grounded, and how you came to start that particular venture. Phil White: Sure. With pleasure. So, so grounded. So grounded, I guess the way we describe ourselves is a social innovation and brand activation agency. And the reason we chose those two terms was kind of quite specific because, particularly in the world of brand purpose and sustainability, we realize the existential challenge that most companies and brands and actually non profits face, frankly, is the ability to connect the why of purpose to the way of doing business. Or sometimes we say the way of profit, obviously we can't say that for non profits because it's a bit contradictory, but it's the way that you connect your purpose to Keith Anderson: Getting things done. Phil White: getting things done. And the more we kind of got into that, the more we heard that this was the existential challenge faced by most businesses, particularly today, the more we realized that the way to solve that was to kind of figure out what the gap between intention and action actually is, or in other words, purpose and profit. Same difference, just to kind of level deeper. And therefore, that's why we focus on innovation because innovation is obviously setting the intention in terms of what you want to sell, produce, deliver in order to add value to the consumer and drive some kind of revenue. And then action is actually what you're going to do to unlock that revenue and sell stuff, right? How are you going to change behavior and get people to buy it? So, that's why we kind of Focus on those two areas. And that's why a lot of the work we do is more upstream innovation focused in terms of coming up with kind of positioning and propositions and go to market strategies and ideas and platforms and sometimes products and packaging and innovation. And the other part then is often focuses on retail, because obviously that's where the rubber hits the road, right? To figure out how are we going to get people to actually believe that this is worth buying versus their competitors in the category, wherever it might be, and actually figure out where the intention action gap is and how big it is that's preventing people from making a better, more responsible, sustainable choice. And then when we can close that gap, then sustainability stops being a risk mitigating factor, a cost to the business and starts becoming a driver of consumer demand. Purchase intent, which again is the holy grail. So going back to what Decarbonizing Commerce is all about is how do you commercialize sustainability? And that's exactly what we do. So that's what we do all day every day is help clients figure out how to commercialize sustainability. Keith Anderson: And in terms of your background and, Heidi's background, has sustainability always been your focus, or are you coming to the topic from a different perspective? Phil White: Yeah, no, it's a great question. So before we started Grounded, we worked for a big global advertising network that everyone knows and we actually run the Unilever business here in North America. And we were kind of pretty instrumental in trying to figure out how you can translate Paul Polman's, sustainable living plan into tangible brand building activations and campaigns, basically. And the more we got into doing that, the more we wanted to do it, because we saw the positive impact that we could have, the more engaged the teams that we ran were and wanted to be part of it. And of course, as we did more of that, we got more connected to the UN and the Sustainable Development Goals. And we began to kind of, see the importance of why this was critical, right? In terms of driving, trying to, activate that plan to save the world. So it's really all of those three things coming together that made us go, okay, well, actually we want to be doing more, of this. And because we work with a big multinational, agency holding group, and we're working with one of the biggest multinational companies on the planet, amazing credibility and amazing experience, but it's still too slow. We're not seeing the impact that we want to have. We're not operating in an agile and exponential way. So I think like most kind of slightly jaundiced and tired advertising agency execs, we decided that it was time to kind of separate from the mothership and go off and do our own thing. So Grounded was born in 2018, actually, to be exactly that. A smaller boutique, more agile, more nimble, exponential agency to help you kind of transform purpose into profit and create value by doing good. So that's kind of how we all started. Keith Anderson: Well, maybe we can bring it to life with, one or two case studies or examples. I think it would be really interesting to hear, who are the types of folks that are approaching you and what's the problem they're approaching you with? And then what do we do, what do you do to move the needle forward? Phil White: Yeah. Great question. So we kind of work with four, I guess you could say four main constituents. So we work with big kind of global enterprise level brands. Will that be Ford or the Lycra company or Nestle or Nespresso or whoever it might be. And that tends to be focused on two things. One is kind of helping them better articulate their overall corporate or brand purpose. And two is, as we talked about at the start, is how do you then connect that to the, your sustainability goals and commitments in order to turn those into drivers of value or purchase intent across whatever your brand portfolio is. So that's kind of, Pillar 1. The other kind of main constituent we work with, and connected to that then of course are the retailers, because often they're CPG orientated brands that need to then be activated at retail. So that's kind of where the retailers come in. We do have some retail, direct retail clients like Grove, Collaborative, for example. But usually it's through the lens of the brands themselves that we kind of engage with the retailers and, generally that tends to be the case. The other kind of main constituents are non profits. And they have a similar problem often in that they might have low brand awareness or low brand relevance or saliency that are out there in the market. But they're trying to fund all these programs on the ground and of course they need money. They need people to put their hands in the pockets and support them. So it's kind of the same deal. It's, it's a parallel world in terms of how do you figure out what your mission and your purpose is? How do you make that engaging and clear for people to want to support it? And then how do you drive the behavior change to people to put their hands in the pockets and support it? And it's, really the same thing. So, as we got into this and we started working with some larger non profits like the World Food Program and the UN Institutes Hospital and Plan International and the Samaritans and whoever it might be, we, quickly realized that there was a lot of commonality between what we'd learned for the past 30 years in terms of, brand building at a global level and activation and how you can apply some of those principles, package them up in perhaps a more accessible or exponential way for non profits. So that's kind of what we did, and I guess kind of what lies at the heart of what we do, to bridge that gap, a lot of the work we do is design sprint based, so we often kind of show up and do a lot of workshops and design sprints, and we do it efficiently, we do it at speed, and iteratively, and we facilitate it ourselves because that makes it accessible for the big brands who might be just stuck in a rut or stuck in their existing relationships, or just are struggling to kind of push the needle internally for whatever the myriad reasons there might be around sustainability. So it gives them a very quick opportunity, a wedge, if you like, to be able to kind of jump on and do something and get that ball rolling. And for nonprofits, from a financial equation point of view, obviously it's more accessible. So we can go in and we can do it fast because we generally know what we're doing and it ain't our first rodeo. So we can go in there fairly quickly and deliver the value and deliver the clarity that we need. so that tends to be kind of how we work. So I would say, in kind of summary, we tend to do three things. We tend to kind of work with brands, retailers, startups, and nonprofits to help them articulate their purpose, pull that down into a brand position and then go to market strategy. We help them activate their brands, whether through packaging, design, identity, omnichannel experiences, digital, so whatever it is along the path of purchase and based on understanding where that intention action gap is to drive the behavior change and close that intention action gap. And then we help them accelerate their impact and that tends to kind of come down to obviously tracking and measurement because you can't. Manage what you can't measure, lots of kind of partnerships, either commercial or non profit. We work quite closely with UN Officer Partnerships, actually, and figure out often how to design sprint potential partnerships between for profit and non for profit sectors to, again, to accelerate SDGs. Going back to what I kind of said based on our experience with Unilever. And then we tend to do kind of publish and write quite a lot of thought leadership and do speaking engagements and run design sprints again, just to start getting that flywheel internally spinning. So people feel that they're able to kind of make progress against whatever initiatives or platforms that are already out there and working. So they tend to be the kind of three things, but I'd say the core of what all that really comes down to is the retail aspect. Because, the ability to then combine commercial innovation with brand activation or social innovation to brand activation is obviously the bit that is where the biggest gap is in our experience. So that's why we very much tend to focus and often, design sprint with brands and retailers together to try and come up with platforms that are going to drive that sustainability agenda through to the end consumer or the end shopper and drive the behavior change that everyone's looking for. Keith Anderson: And when we talk about behavior change, are we talking purely about making a product or brand switching or substitution decision, I'm going to swap a more sustainable option for what I'm currently buying, or is it in some cases even more significant behavioral change, for example, just making it up, switching from single use to refillable and reusable packaging. Phil White: Both and a lot more. So, a good example might be, so we were recently engaged by a startup that had licensed the, like the, Brita brand actually from Clorox. And they wanted to create a new bottled water and we're like, "Oh no, the world doesn't need another bottled water. That's the very last thing we need." But when we got into it, we kind of thinking about the Brita system and the Brita equity, we realized, that there was a gap between, using your Brita kind of container at home, which is obviously a more, much more sustainable way of consuming and storing water and the actual kind of reality, the usage gap of people forgetting their swell bottles and forgetting their reusable bottles when they went out or, did whatever. There was a gap in the market. Keith Anderson: I think it's Stanley bottles now, Phil. Phil White: Stanley, there you go. I'm obviously out of touch and this was only two years ago. But what that gap was meaning that what people were doing was doing what everyone does is just default to walk into your nearest retail outlet and buy a plastic water bottle, right? So that was the gap that we were actually filling. That was the category opportunity, but also the intention action gap that we're quite literally trying to close. So as a result of that, we did a lot of research, competitive landscape assessments and retail audits and focus groups and you name it, all the usual stuff and realized that actually this problem was much bigger than we thought it was. And there was the real, there was a really behavioral problem there that people were forgetting, wanted to do the right thing and not buy plastic water bottles and all that kind of stuff, but reality, when you're out or you're late for work or you're stuck out as you've been on vacation, you know outside and you're desperate for a drink, you're gonna just do what you do and go and buy a bottle, a plastic water bottle. 'Cause usually that's the only option. So this entire platform is about how do we develop a product that fills that gap, that addresses that need, which switches people out of buying plastic water bottles, but also kind of gets them into a more regular behavior where they can actually fill up their water bottle at home. They can buy it once, they can drink it on the go, but they can keep it because it can be used for six or seven times. So they can actually use it as a kind of interim, as a fill in for their kind of normal kind of swell or Stanley water bottle. So that was a bit of everything. That was like changing perception, changing attitudes, changing behavior, locking people into a new system or new ritual, as well as identifying the bigger category gap that was driving the, which was driving, kind of negative environmental impact, let's say. So maybe that's a good example of, how, it addressed all of those things simultaneously. So to your point, yeah, it's rarely one thing, but the, idea of figuring out where the intention action gap along the journey is, once you know where the biggest intention action gap is, where it's occurring, how big it is, then you can focus on, all your energy on addressing that. And then use rest the journey tactically to kind of try and embed or habituate the right behavior, which is often what we end up trying to do. Keith Anderson: And just sticking with that example, how much of the, effort to close that intent to action gap happened at the, were there ad campaigns that support it? Is it a packaging redesign? What kind of retail activation ends up being pivotal to something like that? Phil White: Yeah, yes, all of the above, definitely an omni channel, but it started effectively with a new product, a new pack, an entirely new kind of product packaging driven proposition, which then obviously fundamentally needed to be merchandised and displayed at retail in the category and at the moment where people would otherwise default to buying and doing what they usually do. So, it's still launching and rolling out, frankly. And a lot of it has been driven initially through social, through very kind of targeted, geo targeted social media to just raise the awareness and the relevance and set the occasion. But of course, retail, just in terms of its ability to kind of drive visibility and accessibility is obviously the most important thing, particularly in this category. Which is, that's what drives the category. It's visibility and accessibility. That's it, basically. So if you're not, if you're not, if you're not visible and you're not available, then you ain't gonna, you ain't gonna win. Keith Anderson: Makes a ton of sense. And, then, of course, there's the commercial value equation. Do we sell more? Are the margins, comparable or accretive? Is that part of the work also? or are we starting really from the customer and working backwards? Phil White: Yeah, so often what we try and do with the intention action gap is we try and size it. How big is it? And then what for value can you put against not closing it? Right? So, what's the category selling story, right? What's the size of the prize or the money that's being left on the table by not closing the gap? And that's usually the way in because as we all know, rightly or wrongly, depending on which way you look at it, retailers want to drive category value, right? They want to drive category profit. And you can talk a lot of great stuff around sustainability, but unless it's going to drive the value commercially at a category level that retailers are looking for, it's going to be very hard to convince buyers to support it. It's just the reality of how the machine works, right? But if you can frame it as, well, this is how much money you're losing on the table, leaving on the table, if you don't do this, and this is the quantified amount, right? Oh, and by the way, this also ties back to your, your sustainability objectives as a retailer that you've pledged to uphold that you're holding your suppliers to account for to deliver. We're turning up not only doing that for you, which helps, with your kind of own commitments, but we can deliver higher category profit and value. Why wouldn't you do it? And that's really the essence of what it comes down to, it's connecting those dots. Keith Anderson: And are you starting to see the retailers be responsive to that kind of framing? I mean, I, look at some retailers who are increasingly vocal about how they're incorporating some of these factors in decisions about assortment and merchandising. They're introducing their own labeling schemes to add credentialing to some of the products that meet their conditions. Is that something that's still relatively limited across major retail or is it becoming more widespread? Phil White: I mean, I think, I don't think there's a clinker answer to that. I think it just depends. you have retailers that embody those values into their own label products and portfolios, right? We all know who they are and do very well at it. And there are those that are trying to figure out how to do it. And there are those that are on the bleeding edge of circularity and changing their infrastructure, right? To, try and deliver it with reverse logistics and reselling and re-commerce and all the other good stuff that needs to be kind of built up around it. So, It just depends. And I think part of it is going back to kind of figuring out then, from a brand owner's point of view is what's our purpose? What can we realistically deliver, credibly deliver from a sustainability point of view? How is that going to support the sustainability commitments of our retailer, our customers, and therefore what activation platform can we build around it? To kind of move the needle. and I think there's always tends to be, particularly in this space, that tends to be a kind of just a general conception that if you don't knock it out of the park, then it's not worth doing. And of course that's never the case. Rome was not built in a day. It's the little incremental steps over time that build up that result in the, in, in the impact. So half of the problems often, and again, why we approach this from a design spring point of view is that the barriers to then engagement are as low as we can possibly get them. We can get as many people together, cross sector people from together from different, areas of the business interacting and interfacing and ideating around it. So the chances of something getting out there and happening are greatly increased. And then it's a case of giving it a run and seeing what happens. And, usually, I would say, once you get it in and it starts working, then it tends to kind of grow and then sometimes becomes a category platform and then sometimes becomes an ongoing evergreen platform and sometimes even gets to become a complete category invention priority kind of moving forward for a, for a retailer. So yeah, there's so many different ways in which it can, kind of show up. It, I think it really just depends on kind of where you are on your journey, and trying to figure out that connection point between, you feel like what the brand stands for, where the intention action gap is, and what's going to have the biggest impact socially and environmentally. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I, I was speaking with a brand this morning who I think is, sort of mid flight on a very similar initiative. They're trying to pivot from single use to refillable, in at least one of their product lines. And like most brands, they're starting, they've been in market for about a year, six months in a limited regional pilot, six months nationally, and the early results are encouraging. They've now converted about 25 percent of their own brand buyers to the refill. The economics look good for the retailer and them, and they're, to your point, now starting to explore, well, what kind of, shelf design is going to be necessary to really scale this. And so, it's, turning into an opportunity for a particular retailer, along with this brand, to do something, unique and different that, Who knows? I know at least the brand is hopeful that in 12 or 18 months, it'll migrate from the first retailer to many others. Phil White: Yeah. And, not for nothing, we all know what, we all know the policies that are coming down the pipe. Right. Particularly EPR and the impact that's going to have on both brands and retailers to, to kind of, clean their act up a little bit, quite frankly. So with all of these things coming down the pipe, I think we're going to, we're anticipating that we're going to see a lot more of these initiatives and innovations, not because they're nice to do, but because they're a have to do. Keith Anderson: Sure. Sure. Phil White: So that's the, that, that's the hope anyway. Yeah. Keith Anderson: Thinking almost about the other side of the coin, I'm thinking of another major brand who just reassigned one of their veteran executives, 20 year veteran at the company, with experience in a lot of functions, sales, marketing, e-commerce, very little in sustainability, but that person has now been tasked with taking credit, and getting credit with shoppers and retailers for some of the good things they've already done. Is that a scenario that you've encountered where in fact, they've already done things to clean up their act and now it's as much about finding a way to present that? Both commercially and to consumers? Phil White: Yeah, for sure. So something that we'll hopefully talk about the conference in Chicago a little bit more around is, a kind of design sprint that we've developed called Retail Activation for Good. And it's quite literally designed to do everything that we just kind of talked about. And even though we kind of launched it about three years ago and it was based on, lots of deep insight with some of the biggest brands and retailers on the planet who were kind enough to contribute their thought leadership and examples to help us build out this framework in these case studies. Believe it or not, it was quite tough to get it going. And we were like, we don't understand why, because everyone's asking for it. And it took a while for the penny to drop because a lot of these big companies are still kind of caught up internally with what's our purpose and what's our sustainability goals and commitments and how to report against them and how do we quantify them and how do we kind of position them internally and how do we get funding in and, getting it down to the, what you might call the tactical level of retail is, of course, where everyone knows it needs to be. But getting there, crossing that bridge and taking that path is a bit of a challenge. So it's taking a while for companies to go through that journey of internal transformation and understanding, and then figure out how to collapse the traditional silos that exist within, larger companies and be more kind of, what's the word? Intersectional is probably the right word in terms of how do we approach these problems. And, how does the CMO and the CSO and the COO and the CRO, the CIO, whoever it might be, all get together to kind of figure out, say that, sustainability doesn't exist in a silo. It touches or should drive everything from innovation to activation. So that not only demands a different mindset and way of thinking, functionally and, operationally, it demands a different way of working. so it, we tend to find that, even though retail activation for good makes complete sense. To many companies, many are still on that journey of transformation and trying to figure out how to kind of rally the support and change the design and their operational infrastructure to enable them to actually get to the point of doing that. And there's relatively few actually proportionally that are there and that are able, to do it. Keith Anderson: Are there any that you would hold up as, shiny beacons of inspiration for folks listening? Phil White: Yeah, I mean, there's some that do just do that naturally and intuitively, Grove Collaborative probably being a kind of good one because of just their proposition and their purpose and their positioning. You've got larger organizations that have been doing this actually for, a number of years, whether that be kind of PNGs and Unilevers through to your kind of, your Patagonias and whatever it might be, right? And, as a certified B Corp ourselves, we tend to kind of see that, a lot of the B Corp brands and businesses tend to kind of, again, have a tendency to kind of do this more intuitively anyway, because it's kind of embedded into their operating and procedure and their governance, right. And how they think and kind of how they behave. So, and what's kind of interesting is what we're seeing is that the smaller, the kind of smaller disruptors that are coming into established categories and shaking things up a bit tend to be also be the more sustainable or purpose driven brands that are able to get that flywheel spinning quicker and have a cohort, a smaller cohort, a very active, often younger, more dynamic consumers behind them are kind of helping to kind of drive that agenda. So that's an interesting thing that we're seeing, whether that be in beauty or fashion or diapers or whatever it might be, you're getting these smaller players coming in and kind of disrupting the status quo a little bit. And they're the ones actually that we're finding are really kind of leading the pack and, encouraging the larger companies to try and, change their behavior, which tends to result in those larger companies trying to buy them and acquire them. Which sometimes works, more often than not doesn't, because as soon as you get... if you're bought by a big brother or big sister, then you kind of tend to lose the essence and the drive behind what made you a disruptor in the first place, because you get lost in the, you kind of get lost in the, matrix, so to speak. So yeah, it's just, it's really, it's just a really interesting time to be intersectionally kind of where we're at, because there are so many forces at play. Keith Anderson: Yeah. I mean, you've just touched on something that, I pay very close attention to, which is where is the change originating, and, scaling? It, to your point, it very often starts with the emerging brands who have the benefit of being able to design from day one for the next decade or two without a century long legacy and large scale production facilities and established ways of working. They get to start from scratch and design the product and business that they think will be durable, for the future. But exactly as you say, they often struggle to remain independent. And then the question becomes, what does that integration, look like? Is it assimilation or do they end up setting the pace for the new mothership? Phil White: Right. And a good parallel to that is, whether you, depending on what side of the fence you're on, if you look at the kind of carbon offset marketplace and how many new disruptors have come in to, providing carbon offset platforms and verifiable projects. But what we're kind of finding is those smaller disruptors are kind of drying up a bit because the investors behind them are losing patience, frankly, Keith Anderson: Yep. Phil White: in their ability to kind of convert and get the growth, get the growth multipliers that they're looking for. So those are tending to go out of business or being acquired by other larger companies who are, who have got the resources and have got the infrastructure to be able to start to scale them. So that's a really interesting kind of dynamic that's going on just in that category. But I think that probably holds for quite a few, actually, when you kind of look at how it seems to be working. So, Keith Anderson: Yeah. Yeah. And I look at it, I mean, as, you and I have discussed offline, a lot of the work that I did in the early days of online grocery and e-commerce was helping some of the big retailers and brands initially assess, what's the speed and likelihood that this is going to be a big factor in my own business? And there was a lot of discussion and debate about, well, sure, for these small companies, it makes sense, but at our scale, it doesn't make sense. But looking back 10 or 15 years later, there's no question for direct to consumer and other emerging brands, it's, 80 percent in some cases of their total sales. But look at the majors, Amazon is a top five customer for basically any major CPG at this point. And so I'm optimistic that we'll see a similar maturity curve in this sense, where the companies again, that have the luxury of no legacy, they can get everything closer to right on the first swing at bat and, eventually as the infrastructure and the systems and the ways of working and the data and the tool set, all these things that are in development get refined and more sophisticated and battle tested. I think it's going to continue to borrow the word you used, it's going to grow exponentially. Phil White: Yeah, Keith Anderson: that's why you and I are both out here trying to help companies, get ahead of it because, the problem with ignoring things on an exponential trajectory is it always seems small and inconsequential until suddenly it's the only thing anybody can talk about, Phil White: Right. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That, hockey stick kicks in pretty quick, doesn't it? And you need to be at that election point, yeah, ready and open and willing to know how to do it. Yeah. Keith Anderson: Well, one thing I'm looking forward to is your sessions at the Summit in Chicago. Aside from that, is there anything on the horizon that you're really excited about or, looking forward to? Phil White: Lots. In fact, we were talking about it a bit before. I know kind of climate week, there's a lot going on at climate week, New York. And there's a kind of big CSO awards ceremony that's kind of happening during climate week that I'm kind of looking forward to and just kind of seeing some of the impact that some of these kind of global enterprise level CEOs are having on some of the issues that we've talked about, so that's kind of really exciting. We've got a kind of few interesting kind of projects in the pipeline as well, both on a kind of brand level and a non profit level. There's one non profit in particular, which I've really enjoyed working with, which I think has universal application to everybody called ProSocial World, and they've basically managed to combine evolutionary social and political science together to create a framework that enables groups to better cooperate and collaborate together. So if you can imagine the implication of that across every single sector, whether that be individuals, groups, organizations, networks, states, countries, nations, you name it. It has tremendous power. And one of the, as we all know, the new economic paradigm needs to shift from competitive to pre-competitive and it needs to be based on collaboration versus competition, because otherwise we're all going to run out of resources very quickly. And, the tragedy of the commons is going to kick in pretty quickly as it is already in some, in some markets. So, yeah, so that's the, that's what I'm most excited about because it ladders up to this new economic paradigm and it just challenges the very precepts on which we even think commerce is built. So that's kind of what I'm kind of quite excited about. And with, and we're hoping to run a session at the UN in November around the conscious attention economy, which is kind of linked to that, which is how do you kind of engage people in a more meaningful way and value, value their attention, not just in terms of clicks and eyeballs or whatever, but value their conscious attention in their ability to tackle some of these big, kind of larger issues, whether it be false narratives or AI and algorithms all the way through to how we currently monetize media. So lots of interesting stuff coming, going on. Keith Anderson: No shortage of things to stay up to speed on. Well, Phil, I really enjoyed the conversation. I'm sure listeners did also. If folks want to get in touch with you, how can they reach you? Phil White: Yeah. So, website is grounded.world, or you can just drop me an email at phil@grounded.world, kind of simple as that. Keith Anderson: Wonderful. Well, thanks so much for joining us. Phil White: Thanks for having me. Great to see you. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=2nx03vmn…
In this episode of the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast, host Keith Anderson interviews Morgan Mixon and Rima Suppan, founders of Peachies, a London-based premium nappy brand focused on reducing environmental impact. They discuss how Peachies aims to disrupt the traditional nappy market with high-quality, eco-friendly products designed for contemporary parenting. Furthermore, they delve into how Morgan and Rima’s collaboration began at Imperial College and their journey from a business school project to launching a startup. The discussion covers the unique aspects of Peachies' design-centric approach, balancing sustainability with premium product performance, and their future aspirations for expanding the brand. Learn more about Morgan Mixon and Rima Suppan: Link to Peachies ’ website Link to Morgan Mixon’s LinkedIn Link to Rima Suppan’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome back to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson. And our guests today are Morgan Mixon and Rima Suppan of Peachies, a London based nappy brand that is aiming to disrupt the category with a premium take on diapers with a lower environmental footprint. They were participants in the Amazon European Sustainability Accelerator, among others, in the spring, they raised their first round of capital, and I, was introduced to them by another of our guests, Mark Rushmore of SURI, also based in the UK, who, you know, what I see in common about both of these brands is, you know, they're taking a very design-centric, practical approach to producing products that deliver on consumer expectations, while also being mindful of environmental and other sustainability considerations. And, as always, we get into some interesting commercial considerations, along with how they've made climate and sustainability considerations Central to the business model. So I'm really excited for you to meet Morgan Mixon and Rima Suppan of Peachies. Morgan and Rima, great to see you both. Thanks so much for joining the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Rima Suppan: Thank you so much for having us. Morgan Mixon: We're excited to be here. Keith Anderson: well, I think some of our listeners may be familiar with the company and the brand, but I imagine some are not. So maybe we can start just by introducing what is Peachies? What do you make? Rima Suppan: Well, Peachies is our life project in the meantime. I'll give you the full definition. So Peachies is a premium nappy brand for the contemporary parenting experience. What that means really is that we designed an upgrade to the, so to say, humble nappy. That means that we engineered these nappies for revolutionary softness and longer nights. Because that is really what parents deserve, and desire, of course. that means that we, of course, you know, we made substitutions for more eco friendly materials, for high quality materials, but also changed the design slightly so, that the fit of the nappy is really perfect for a child's skin, but also the needs that a child has. We then of course went through rigorous dermatological testing, to make sure that, yeah, we, our babies stay dry and comfortable. And we, yeah, nappy rushes is a thing of the past, so to say. Keith Anderson: Now my daughter is seven. Why did you wait until after she had outgrown nappies and diapers to start this company? Rima Suppan: Well, I guess because Morgan and I only met three years ago. Keith Anderson: Fair enough. Fair enough. Well, we're gonna come back and talk a lot about some of those attributes and benefits that you've basically designed into the product and the brand, but maybe we can take a minute and you can tell us about how you met and how you ended up deciding to start a, nappy or for our American listeners, a diaper brand. Rima Suppan: I'm happy to go first. So, Morgan and I really met at Imperial College. The nerds that we are. We were randomly selected by the Imperial College leadership to run the Innovation Entrepreneurship Club together. And then quite quickly, both coming from family businesses quite quickly realized that we really love working together and that at some points in our lives, we wanted to be entrepreneurs ourselves. We had little idea that would happen so quickly. But it happened and we're, super happy where we are today and thank God, we both took the decision to not become, Morgan, I think I wanted to be a product manager at some point. I wanted to go, back to my consulting career or into the tech space. I was at Google by that, at that time, and had an offer pending, but nappies, diapers just excited us way too much, to not to not go down that route. and so actually before starting that business, there, there was a funny story. it was of course COVID times when we met, we had never really met up in person before starting Peachies. And at some point we were like, we're only going to run a company together, build a company together if we actually get along in person as well. And so Morgan invited me over to, it was Dalston, right? Yeah, to Dawson, to a park and we had a full bottle of wine, and after that bottle of wine, we knew that was a match, not only company building wise and kind of, yeah, vision wise, but also personality wise, which is incredibly important, that is also a fit. Keith Anderson: Yeah, and I imagine you were socially distanced at that first meeting. Morgan Mixon: Yeah, exactly. We, well, we actually had a chance meeting outside the business school, during orientation, and Rima walked up to a friend and I and said, asked about a dress we were wearing. And I remember thinking like, who is this? But now I'm so grateful for her sort of social butterfly nature, and, willingness to just chat to anybody. And really the idea for Peachies, I mean, it started as a business school project. We are, we fall into that category. We were, very fortunate to be in a university during COVID time, a lot of down time to focus on your academics, but our course, the Imperial College Business School gives you a lot of opportunity to pursue entrepreneurial ventures, and, so just thinking about like, where can we have impact actually, and connecting back to kind of sustainability in its own right, we think about sustainability very holistically. We think about impacts at a societal level, at also an environmental level. And so we knew when we were coming up with an idea to work on, it would have to be something that got us out of bed in the morning. It wasn't going to be B2B software. That wasn't, that's not us. We actually love consumer products. We love getting excited about brands. We love trying new things. We love implementing them into our life. We love trying to find shortcuts to make the week easier. And we stumbled across nappies. We thought about, you know, our the people we would want to design for. And that was our friends and family. And we thought about our working moms and like what did they go through and where could their lives have been a little bit easier when we were growing up. And just so happens we're kind of at that life stage where everybody's kinda starting to reproduce . So we're kind of more in tune to parenting generally. And we saw this category that's, we think wildly overlooked. It's one of the kind of last necessity or essential goods that hasn't changed much, both from a product perspective, but also from a branding and community perspective, underlying also the very bricks and mortar retail service model. Whereas increasingly the world is direct to consumer subscriptions actually make sense for something like nappies that you need on a regular basis. And this is against a, you know, a backdrop of, you know, two global players that dominate really 80 percent of the global market, Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark. It's old, stale brands that are boring, that are pastel, that do not reflect, in our opinion, what millennials want from the brands that they buy. both in terms of how it looks in the aesthetic, but also how the product performs and, the impact that it has. And so it was sort of a perfect storm. We saw, we saw all of this kind of coming together and thought, "we should think about this" and Imperial being Imperial, we had opportunities to enter competitions and accelerator programs and basically by the time it was time to graduate, we looked at each other and said, "Honestly, nothing else we're doing excites us more than, diapers." And that was a shocking for us, like, as you can imagine, you know, Rima had a very cushy job at Google. She was ecstatic about it. And I said, "surely you'd rather be a broke founder with me and pursue this." And she took the plunge as well. And we came out of school and said, "there's no time like the present. Why wait to start our entrepreneurial journey in five years or 10 years? Let's do it now." And we, yeah, took it forward, set up some email addresses, did some Google searching and the rest is history. Now we're a year into our journey in the markets. And, yeah, we're loving every single day, I have to say. Keith Anderson: So you launched a year ago and are you, what geographies are you available in? Rima Suppan: We're currently available in the UK only, but the future is bright. Keith Anderson: Yeah. Well, I mean, you know, it's an interesting market, I find, in many ways, both on the retail side and on the innovation side. Yeah. you know, in our weekly newsletter, we include funding announcements from, you know, retailers, brands, solution providers, and, you know, a pretty high concentration of innovation in this little ecosystem that I'm studying in the UK. So, it's a, good place to start. Rima Suppan: I think particularly from a branding perspective and from a, as you mentioned, direct to consumer product perspective, London, particularly, is a very exciting place. There's a lot happening. And as Morgan mentioned, nappies is one of the, these overlooked or one of the last overlooked consumer product categories. And what we mean by that is we've seen things happening, happen in the, toilet paper space, for example, or in the razor space, where companies have just completely disrupted first, how, products are designed, how sustainable they are, but also the way how they're serviced and the channels that you can access them through. And so for us, London, as of course, it's. It's easier to found the business there than in many other places as well. So that was also a reason, of course, our geographical location was a reason for that. But also because it's, you know, it's an exciting space. You have a lot of accelerator programs there, a lot of, great universities. That was of course how we met. But yeah, the ecosystem is a great one nowadays with, you know, growing after completing our funding round. also that was, helpful to being, yeah, in the British market, but also now hiring talent for the first time or growing our team, substantially. It is just exciting, to have access to such incredible talent. Keith Anderson: Makes sense. So you've touched on two or three of the key themes that we typically cover. you know, one is, a category that is, really mature and large and, right for disruption. And you're sort of disrupting, or aiming to disrupt in two ways from what I'm hearing. One is, with a premium product that is, you know, better aligned with the shopper that is the parent and also has benefits for the consumer, you know, the, infant and, secondly is the environmental or sustainability angle. So I'd love to get into the interplay between those two, how big of a role in the product design and the packaging and the logistics and the branding, is sustainability? You know, do you lean on that heavily as a differentiator and a reason to buy, or is it much more about a premium, superior product, and, you know, it's sort of a nice to have, Where you can fit it into the business model? Morgan Mixon: It's a really good question. We think premium unlocks a lot of eco credentials and I'm happy to elaborate on that. To kind of set the scene, the diaper space has been really interesting and I'll use kind of the European context cause that's ours, but you have the big, you know, the big brands, the Pampers of the world. And then you kind of have the eco brands on the other side of the spectrum. and there's not much in the middle. And what we've seen is the big brands have no incentive to innovate. You know, they dominate. They're doing great. They've been doing great for 50 plus years or whatever. They're, fine. They, of course, sense customer sentiment is changing, but they also lack an authenticity to be able to portray the changes they make, to be able to make those product shifts or re gear their products compelling to consumers, I think. on the other side, you have what are sort of self professed eco brands. And we're talking really more on that kind of disposable diaper side of things. we think, The cloth diapers will remain a niche for a lot of behavioral reasons because it's a huge fundamental shift in consumer behavior, but those eco brands that we've seen really increasingly pop up in our markets have focused so much on sustainability, they've sacrificed product quality. And so our philosophy is, despite, if you have all the best intentions to launch an eco products, but it doesn't stack up or stand up with its most basic job, which is to hold in all the things that come out of your child, then where are we? You know, like, if it's falling apart or tearing and you're going through more of them and throwing more away, are we really doing, are we really having a positive impact on the planet? So where we saw this opportunity was premium design. It was to elevate the product quality in a category that's been long commoditized. You know, in the UK, supermarkets, produce nappies at the White Label and even sell them as a lost leader just to bring people into the store. And so what we could do or the opportunity that we saw was let's elevate it. Let's bring in higher quality materials. Let's really focus on things like the fit of the products and dial things up and down in terms of the features so that we can provide a product. So on a range of products, that will make a significant impact on a parent's life, because actually parents, and Rima will undoubtedly get to this in a bit, as part of the brand, parents are our protagonist. We design for them, we design for their well being, and we saw that if we dialed up premium, or dialed up the quality of design, we could have nappies that last a little bit longer, you could do fewer changes in a day. You could therefore do less laundry because you're not dealing with this kind of blowouts and stuff like that. We can make sure your child's skin is dry and protected and things like nappy rash aren't a problem. And all of those things have the added benefits of reducing impact on the planet. So we're very practical about our design. We call it no bullshit design, which means we will make advances in terms of integrating sustainable materials into our product as long as it doesn't sacrifice premium product quality. That's the most important thing to us. So, we, first and foremost, make sure that nappy works, and works to a level that we deem is exceptional, and then we think about how we can continuously improve on environment. But, the thing that is, I think, most important to kind of draw an analogy is, We think our nappies can be like preventative medicine in the sense that if you diet and exercise and take care of yourself, you end up going to the doctor less. And of course, going to A&E, hopefully never. Same with nappies. If you can use a more superior product and it's no surprise that it does come at a higher price tag, but that value that you unlock is actually ultimately sending less to landfill because you're not using as many. And you've got that assurance that the product is, safe and and, well, yeah, high quality, you're going to get to the night, for example, and that's really where we've tried to do something different in this space is actually premium can be something that really unlocks a lot of value for parents, and it's not just a race to the bottom, on price or, therefore product quality. Rima Suppan: I can add a few thoughts here. What Morgan mentioned, particularly on, on how sustainability plays a role in a consumer's decision making process. What we found out is sustainability for us sits very much at our core. So, yes, we've talked about the product a lot now, you know, highest quality materials. We, of course, continue to seek to reduce the environmental impact of our product and ensure better future for our children, in short, but for us, it is really elevating at one level higher up. It's also, as you mentioned, you know, the packaging that we use, the logistics provider that we use, the warehousing that we use, warehouse provider that we use, but even small things as a company, like, the office space we have, the internet provider we choose. Those are all important decisions and they all contribute to the same thing. And so for us, it's yes, it's a product, but hopefully at some point in the future, sustainability will be so normal that sustainability itself is not a, not something that makes a customer, yeah, purchase a product. And so even for us, what we've quickly realized in the market is sustainability is the thing that keeps, if the product works, that's what keeps people, coming back to you. Which of course, with a product that is, that runs on a subscription is very important from a business model perspective. But even beyond that. you, what we found is, for example, longer nights of sleep are so essential in that period of your life that you would basically do anything to, yeah, to get an hour or two more of sleep, more, yeah, two more hours of sleep per night. And so we've actually, from reading many hundreds of reviews that we've in the meantime gotten from consumers, that is, for example, their, conversion reason number one is to get an hour more of shut-eye. Morgan Mixon: And I can vouch for that. I've got a nine month old at home and, sleep is a premium. Talk about premium. That's what you want. I mean, you want to do better for the planet. But it's a secondary consideration for a lot of people. You're really, particularly with small children at home, and maybe I'm just projecting my own experience, but it's so day to survival, that you're looking always for hacks to how you can do it better or more efficiently. I think we all agree people just want what's best for their kids, and we're hoping that we can help provide them with a solution that takes the pain away of also having to think about some of your sustainable impacts, but you can kind of focus on what you really want to focus on most, which is raising healthy, happy, healthy children, and we try to smooth that out for them a little bit with, that premium products. Keith Anderson: You know, you mentioned a couple of things that I want to circle back to 1 is some of the other categories that have been disrupted. You know, razors are one that I think of, and I've seen it disrupted in two directions. There's sort of the, opening price point or discount disruption that companies like Dollar Shave Club made famous, I don't know, 10 years ago. But I also now increasingly see at the premium end, a, renaissance of double edged safety razors and, you know, a return to simpler designs with, you know, no plastic, and maybe the handle is at a premium versus what you're getting at the drugstore, but the cartridges are much, much cheaper and, the reason I mentioned that example is, the lifetime value to a customer over 5 or 10 years, you know, even though the upfront cost is more expensive, ultimately, they save a lot of money and some of those brands are actually marketing that way, you know, they're saying, you may flinch when you see the first price, but if you think about how many of those 4 cartridges you're buying every two weeks at the drugstore, it's not going to take too long for you to break even. So, is that at all part of the equation in this category? Do you see it becoming part of the equation? I think of things like subscription and how you can sometimes offer a consumer, some savings for locking in, you know, how are you finding managing the value equation with consumers is working? Morgan Mixon: You know, we are a startup. We are doing. Something new in our category, in our geography, right? So we have to educate customers about what that value is of premium. that's where the challenge of marketing comes in. That's, and that's, you know, education is, a big part of that. But what we find is once that value has been demonstrated, once that product is in somebody's hand and, indeed with Peachies, the second you hold it, you can tell it's a different type of product. Just from that first interaction with the products, we see it resonates, you know, the, those intangible benefits or kind of priceless benefits rather of, you know, the two hours more of sleep perhaps, is something that is worth the money. And I think where we ever get pushed back on price, you know, you look at things like we all make decisions all day long, right? About what we're going to buy or spend our time on or whatever. And I don't think it's any different in our category. You know, if you want to. If you can see the value in what you're investing in and indeed get a higher return on investment than it's something that we find people stick to and something with diapers. That's really brilliant is a perfect kind of model. If it's not broke, don't fix it kind of thing. So once people are in the door and loving the products, you're, with them through potty training and that's, something we've seen. and so we do have our, we do have our challenge of educating customers about what premium means, what the materials mean, you know, we have no dyes or fragrances. We have an all white design. We don't have little cute animals on them. We try to limit, of course, there's no harmful chemicals. We look at our CO2 impact, those kind of things. But at the end of the day, it's how does that customer feel when it's in their hand or after they've used that first pack? And, if you've got a product that can, stand up then that value is, demonstratable. And therefore, the price point also follows with that. So, the, momentum is there because that's starting to now emanate. We're starting to really get, you know, the kind of flywheel effect of like people sending me photos at a one year old's birthday party with our like little tote bag in the corner, hanging off somebody's stroller. And, you know, that shows us that it's starting to really resonate. Those messages that we're putting across are not only good for advertising and bringing people to the door, but are actually backed up by, by the experience that they're having. Keith Anderson: You mentioned, emissions and just looking at the website, you know, one of the claims is 40 percent lower emissions than conventional nappies. Maybe we can walk through, where those savings come from and, you may or may not have it at your fingertips, but anything we can cover about, emissions and the overall footprint of the category overall. You know, why from a climate or sustainability footprint, perspective, it's a category that sort of needs some innovation. Rima Suppan: It's a really interesting aspect of our category. The nappy category itself is quite, yeah, it's, there's a lot of greenwashing in the industry, let's put it that way. I think there's a lot of industry where that, industries where that's happening, but for ours, I think it's especially interesting because we're dealing with children, we're dealing with, I mean, a parent or a child goes through about 5,000 to 7,000 nappies until they're potty trained. So we're talking about a lot of product, and, a lot that is being sent to landfills, for example, and a lot that is sitting around for many, years. And so for us, one of the, most important aspects when, launching Peachies was, transparency. And so it. Against kind of what's happening in the industry, we always said, "let's provide our parents or our customers with as much information about our product and about our company and the people behind that it, that, we're not a big conglomerate, but two female founders that have a, big dream that they want to make reality, provide them with all this information and then let them take the decision themselves for what they think is best for them and for their children." And so one of the things that we did quite early on in connection with the Amazon Sustainability Accelerator, was that we partnered with the European Union's Climate Innovation Organization called ClimateKick, and we wanted to verify our, yeah, CO2 footprint. And so, They verified that we save the equivalent of 93 tons of CO2 for every 1, 000 babies that use us, because that's quite hard to imagine. That's the equivalent of the weight of 17 elephants. Morgan Mixon: Just to add to that, you know, I think Rima and I on that transparency point is like, we know we're not perfect. we don't aim to convey that to parents. What we want to do is just empower them in their decision making. So, you know, we show our ingredients lists. We are very clear about what's not in our diapers. We're very transparent that we still have some plastic in there. You know, most brands do. And they'll kind of ignore that, like, it's in things like adhesives or, or elastics, things like that. But, you know, we made a conscious decision, for example, to include it in our, include a waistband on our product because it has such a substantial impact on the product fits and how efficient it is in doing its job. And so what we try to do is, you know, of course, benchmark ourselves and make smart decisions on materials. And, you know, things like our super absorbent polymer that's in our absorbent pad, you know, we use a more efficient material. So we use 20 percent less than other brands without sacrificing the product's performance, the fluff pulp that's also with that SAP is, from a hundred percent sustainably managed forests. But we still use a waistband, and we still, are, want to make sure that, you know, parents know that, and so that we can empower them to make those good decisions, but for us, it's like, if you're in our products, we want you to know why you're there, and if it's working for you, great, and know that if you trust in us, and spend your time with us, we're always looking to innovate, and reinvest in our product design, and fuel R&D, and push our category to new heights, but always maintaining that, that design philosophy of, bring a brilliant product to market first and make sure it works and does its job. And the rest we'll continue to figure out. Rima Suppan: One important aspect that we haven't even mentioned yet is that of course, sustainability has more angles to it than the ecological side. it is also, there's an economic side, which of course, as a Yeah, for profit business, you need to keep in mind, but then there's also the social side, and that is something that is, sits very close to our hearts, and we're, actually supporting Save the Children, or have supported them since, since the very beginning, because we think they're a brilliant organization, and support with that family's in need. because we've also learned very early on that, the first a thousand days are really what define a child's development, and, the quality of the nutrition, the sleep, that the, yeah, the environment they're in can can really have a huge impact on their, IQ and on their, yeah, on their life as an adult. So for us, it's, we view, as we mentioned, sustainability very holistically. And so the social aspect is also part of that. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Well, it sounds like an exciting time at Peachies and I wish you luck. Thank you so much, both of you, for joining us. Morgan Mixon: It's been great. Thank you so much, Keith. Rima Suppan: Thank you so much. It was a pleasure. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=lnq20rk8…
Host Keith Anderson is joined by Jaxie Friedman, Sustainability Manager for Atomo Coffee. Together, they discuss the innovative approach Atomo takes towards creating sustainable coffee. Jaxie delves into the environmental challenges facing the coffee industry, including emissions and deforestation, and how Atomo's upcycled ingredients contribute to reducing their carbon footprint. The conversation also explores the complexities of measuring and managing these impacts, emphasizing the importance of maintaining product quality while making sustainable choices. Learn more about Jaxie Friedman: Link to Atomo Coffee ’s website Link to Jaxie Friedman’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. I'm Keith Anderson. This is the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. And my guest today is Jaxie Friedman, Sustainability Manager for Atomo Coffee, which is a producer of both beanless and hybrid, some bean, some no bean, coffee. Which is, you know, one of the most interesting categories that I think is exposed to climate as a business impact, and their approach to it is really worth being aware of and studying. And so I'll tell you a bit about why, and then we'll meet Jaxie. You know, firstly, coffee is one of these categories that is not among the highest emission categories you'll find in the supermarket, but it is you know, not at the low end. And so on the mitigation side of things, that is, you know, what can we do, what do we need to do to lower the emissions profile at a category level? Coffee and, cocoa are categories that are pretty interesting to look at. On the flip side though, as you've heard in other conversations in, you know, the case of olive oil is one example, it's one of the categories that is exposed to some of the disruption and risk of more extreme weather and higher temperatures. And so, you know, starting with targeting coffee as a category to go innovate in and innovating through a lens of both you know, producing a product that people want to drink, and choose to drink that also has a lower environmental footprint and is less exposed to the disruption of more extreme weather is a pretty interesting case study. And Jaxie has played a big role in a lot of the decisions that the company has made from a sustainability perspective. She's got a really deep understanding of everything that I've sort of set up here, and, I really enjoyed meeting and speaking with her, and I think you will too. So, let's meet Jaxi Friedman of Atomo Coffee. Jaxie, great to see you. Thanks so much for joining us for the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. Jaxie Friedman: So great to be here. Thanks for having me. Keith Anderson: So I think for those that maybe are less familiar with Atomo, maybe we could start with just, in your words, what is Atomo and what do you do? Jaxie Friedman: Yeah. so, Atomo is all about redefining the coffee landscape with beanless coffee. We make a coffee that's crafted out of high quality superfoods and upcycled ingredients to make coffee, something that tastes just like coffee, but without any green coffee beans. That's why we call ourself beanless coffee. And a little bit more about me and what I do at Atomo. So I'm our sustainability manager here. So a big part of why Atomo exists is that coffee supply chains are threatened by climate change and coffee has a massive environmental footprint. It's one of the kind of plant-based commodities that is most directly tied to deforestation and other major things that are, you know, influencing, changing climate and all of the negative effects that come with that. So, sustainability is kind of really core to why Atomo exists. And so, as a sustainability manager here, I help us to kind of quantify our impact and think about, how we can incorporate sustainability into different components of our business. We just recently released, our environmental footprint of our espresso grounds, and when you compare beanless coffee to conventional coffee, our espresso grounds uses 70 percent less farmland, which means, more forest and grasslands that are able to be preserved, and that we cause 83 percent fewer carbon emissions. Yeah, so I'm really excited that we've been able to kind of put some proof out there that our beanless coffee, Does some good stuff for the planet. Keith Anderson: Well, I mean, those are some just incredible data points. Maybe we can talk for a minute about how you arrive at those kinds of, estimates. You know, I know that, there's a lot of moving pieces and a lot of variables and there are some standards, but not everything is standardized. So how do you arrive at those kinds of estimates? Jaxie Friedman: Yeah, that's a great question. So, we did the calculations in partnership with a company called HowGood. They are a, they provide a data platform that allows folks to calculate their, environmental impact in a variety of different areas, and we've really focused on kind of the carbon component of it, and how good works with a lot of the globally established methodologies that allow you to kind of analyze the footprint of a product from the raw materials through to end of life. So, it's called a product environmental footprint, but it's similar to what you'd think of as a life cycle analysis in that it's analyzing the footprint of various different components of the product's life cycle. Keith Anderson: We know HowGood, they're going to be providing climate labels for the meals at our summit in September. Jaxie Friedman: And Ah, I love that! Yeah, they're doing some incredible work, and they've been a great partner for us. Keith Anderson: how deep in the weeds do you personally get in understanding what drives emissions up or down, and to what extent does that then influence decisions that the company makes about future formulations and sourcing decisions, you know, any of those sort of commercial considerations? Jaxie Friedman: Yeah, so for the first part of your question, how deep in the weeds, I go pretty deep in the weeds, partially because as I mentioned, we're not using green coffee beans. We use a variety of other plant-based ingredients to create something that tastes exactly identical to coffee, but it means we have a more diverse supply chain. We use some ingredients that are readily available and others that are a little bit more niche and have less established supply chains. For ingredients that are, less commonly studied, you may need to incorporate in some proxies, understanding the footprint of one commodity and using that as a reference point for another because it hasn't been studied. So I've had to go pretty deep into the weeds to make sure that, you know, we're using appropriate proxies in terms of understanding the impact of our ingredients. And also when we're thinking about, it's not just at the ingredient level, but also from a, region and kind of looking at the specifics and the comparison of, you know, if we were to source something from India versus Kenya versus wherever, the impacts of those growing practices are going to be really different. And so, we've been excited to be able to use the Lattice platform that HowGood offers, to be able to take that kind of next step to thinking about how it influences our product development. So, because this was our first official product environmental footprint we launched with HowGood, we've really been able to now use the learnings coming off of that to start to implement some practices so we can think about how it influences product development down the line. You kind of need to know your baseline to be able to make improvements for the future. And we've been using it to inform, when we're thinking about if we want to source a new ingredient from a different location, should, are there lower impact places that make sense to get certain things? We've also been using it as a reference point for when we're considering new ingredients within our formula, not necessarily in terms of saying like "it must hit this threshold to be in the formula," but thinking about, "okay, which are ingredients that are hot spots in our formula and what could be some alternatives?" and thinking about, kind of the bigger picture of with, sort of, some kind of guardrails of what the footprints could be. It allows us to kind of make more strategic decisions about, you know, where we're able to improve our footprint and what are the levers that we can pull. Keith Anderson: Well, Jaxie Friedman: Happy to get into deeper questions parts of that, if you'd like. Keith Anderson: I would love to, and you know, maybe we can weave into the discussion something that you also said, which was that from a taste and flavor perspective, it's functionally indistinguishable from conventional bean coffee, beaned coffee. I don't know how I would describe it, but, you know, that's something that I think is really important and something that we hear a lot of brand manufacturers discussing more and more, which is we're trying to balance these trade offs in essentially four areas, from what I can see. one is sort of quality, whether that's defined as taste, nutrition, you name it. Another is emissions profile. Another is how reliably can we get it, and the final is what's it cost. So, you know, when you said it, it tastes the same, it immediately had me think about what's that dynamic look like inside the company when you're getting this new data and then meeting with the product development or innovation team and thinking about, okay, well, this might lower the footprint, but then we've got to consider the cost, and we've got to consider the taste, and we've, you know, Jaxie Friedman: Yeah. so I'll just say outright from, like, kind of the broader CPG perspective and most of the sustainable food and beverage companies, like the even the sustainability people who are kind of owning the footprint part of things, I feel like most folks are aligned that ultimately the taste is the most important thing, right? If, you know, even if a product is better for the planet, but it's not quite as good, it's just really hard for get to get folks to buy it and to get bought into it, right? And so there needs to be these fundamental benefits, whether it's flavor or health benefits that people are seeking out, that I think have to be, of the most importance to, when creating a new product, especially a product that's an alternative to something that people already know and love, right? People are really passionate about their morning coffee. It's part of their habit, their routine, and they're not going to, at least most folks aren't going to just, you know, swap it out for a cup of tea or you know, some other alternative. And so. I think with that in mind, you know, we always discuss internally that like the flavor has to be right. And so that I would say is the most important thing. And I think that we've been really successful with, because I think our products tastes really good. But with that in mind, I think, you know, as we're looking at new product development and also as we're looking at scaling, I think all of those things that you just mentioned are important, right? We have to think about, what is our price gonna be on shelf? How does it affect our footprint, and how does that connect to kind of the sustainability story that is core to our brand? I think all of these things do kind of come into play. it's not necessarily my scope of work that is kind of owning that decision making framework, but I'd say all four of those components do come to the table when we're looking at the launch of a product. I'd say The kind of root of our ideation is coming from that, like, let's nail down a great tasting product. It needs to taste good, have the right mouthfeel, all of these things. I'd say, like, that is the driver of our innovation. And then because we have a really passionate team that cares about environmental components, we weave it in at any stage of the process that we can so that as we're identifying flavor notes that are really good that we want in our product, we can think about how those individual components can be a little bit better, a slightly lower footprint. Keith Anderson: Makes a ton of sense. And you had mentioned you could go even deeper on some of the footprint analysis. You know, you mentioned the location that you're sourcing from as one variable. What, are some of the other factors? Jaxie Friedman: We're really, I think this is really important among a lot of different kind of natural products. There's certain things that I think are foundational criteria. If you want to be in certain retail spaces, you know, being non-GMO among many kind of natural food products is important. We like to source organic ingredients when we can, but it's not, one of our kind of leading criteria. I think there's some other components, I think the jury is up in terms of, you know, for instance, organic. We kind of were taking a look at our ingredient, one of our ingredients that is organic certified compared to normal ones. And we were like, why doesn't the footprint change that much? And what's interesting is certain things that we would expect to be better from a carbon footprint standpoint aren't always, right? Because with an organic product, you may have slight decreases in yield, even if there's lower input of carbon fertilizers or whatever it is. So there's some interesting nuance there that I've been exploring as I kind of dig into specific ingredients. For us, I'd say one of the leading drivers around sustainability with our sourcing is upcycling. So our foundational ingredient is date pits, which we rescue from farmers waste streams in the Coachella Valley in California. And food waste is just a huge problem in our country and it leads to, a much larger footprint because agriculture has tremendous ripples on our ecosystems. It has a huge carbon footprint and we grow a lot of stuff that just ends up in the trash, right? And it's really unfortunate. And so by being a product that is certified upcycled, with the date bits being that core upcycled ingredient, we also see that being a huge lever in terms of understanding how we are doing good for the planet because it is improving, it is reducing the methane emissions that may come from some of those, those pits ending up in landfill, but it's also creating a new commodity out of something that wouldn't have been used in the past. So you have the avoided emissions, and then you also have this new opportunity. Where if you're using less coffee that has a higher footprint and then you're also rescuing this waste stream to make that same cup of coffee, there's kind of dual benefit there. And I'd say in terms of upcycling, our core ingredient, the date pits is upcycled, but we're also looking to incorporate in as many upcycled ingredients into new formulations as possible. So I think that's definitely something that is kind of core to our sourcing priorities. And we're continuing to develop our coffee to use more and more of those types of ingredients. Keith Anderson: Yeah. I see, upcycling as a industry, you know, it's been a trend for a while, but it's actually really interesting to see how it's formalizing with the certification and associations and it's becoming a more prominent feature of a lot of brands and how they're coming to market. Jaxie Friedman: Yeah, the Upcycled Food Association has done some amazing work with kind of rallying folks together around, I think, this kind of overarching, concept. And I think what's been really exciting is to see the ripples coming out of that. So, the Upcycled certification, the number of companies that are getting that certification, which is basically like a proof of that your product has a certain quantity of ways of, diverted waste streams going into that product. The number of companies getting that certification is growing. I think we also see, you know, there's been ripples in terms of food waste policy. The EPA's food waste hierarchy now has upcycling as one of the kind of better ways in which you can mitigate food waste, which wasn't there before. So it's been really exciting to kind of be in the upcycled world, while this momentum is building. Keith Anderson: You know, to take a bit of a step back, and I probably should have asked this question earlier in the conversation, but I think you've done a great job unpacking some of the ways that Atomo itself is producing products that are good for the planet. Maybe it would be helpful to listeners to spend a couple minutes just talking about the coffee business itself. I mean, you mentioned, you know, clearing forests or using farmland are a couple of the, environmental impacts that the conventional approach to producing coffee has, but I think it would be interesting just to highlight why this is a category that was interesting to build a brand and a business like this in. Jaxie Friedman: Yeah, that's a great question. And I'm happy to dig in deeper there. So coffee, I'll say kind of the foundational thing around it is that the coffee market is growing and simultaneously the amount of land that is suitable to grow coffee is shifting and shrinking due to climate change. So I'd say there's this broader issue, where by 2050, 50 percent of the land currently suitable to grow coffee will be able to grow coffee. And so then there's these ripples of, issues for coffee supply chains where, the growing locations are going to need to change, which often means that farms are going to have to move to higher altitudes, there's going to, in association with those increased altitudes, there also happens to be a lot more forests in those landscapes, which means there's likely to be a lot more deforestation. And so that's a huge issue, and coffee companies, I think, are starting to pay a little more attention to the fact that, regardless of coffee's footprint, which I can talk about in a second, just thinking about, you know, being able to have a cup of coffee is going to be harder and harder, especially because coffee demand is increasing, right? So if we have more coffee that needs to be consumed and a shrinking space to grow it, that's a huge issue. In terms of the coffee footprint, I think the deforestation is one of the biggest drivers of coffee's footprint. When we did our calculations with HowGood, we also created a benchmark competitor, which was supposed to be representing global Arabica coffee production, which include 13 of the top coffee producing countries as those source regions and their kind of estimated impact. And what we found with this conventional coffee benchmark was that 58 percent of those emissions were coming from some of that, deforestation component. And, that's a huge portion of the coffee life cycle. Of course, there's other things that are contributing to that other remaining percentage, right? That's fossil fuel usage on farms to be able to grow the green coffee beans. It's the processing to roast the coffee beans. It's the transportation to bring coffee from, you know, different regions where it's grown, like Brazil or, or different parts of Africa over to the places where it's most often consumed, right? In Europe or the United States. So there's so many different components that are contributing to the high carbon footprint, but I'd say the most critical one is deforestation. And it's actually driven a lot of attention. Coffee is one of seven commodities that recently has, been looped in, the, to a recent study that was basically looking at how these were the main drivers of agricultural deforestation, these 7 commodities. It was coffee as well as a few other products. I don't know all of them off the top of my head, but cocoa, paper pulp products, beef, of course, various different things. And these commodities are the key drivers around cutting forests in places like the Amazon. And so that's a huge problem. It's also driven a lot of change. There's recent regulation in Europe. It's called the EUDR, which is around deforestation regulation and forcing certain supply chains, such as coffee, to now show traceability, that their coffee is not being sourced from places tied to deforestation. There's increasing attention to companies that are setting science-based targets, for instance, to also pay attention to, you know, they have to, if you're setting a science-based target in partnership with, or with like the new FLAG, which is like a forest, land, and agricultural, might not have the acronym exactly right, You Keith Anderson: nailed it. Jaxie Friedman: Footprint. Okay. Keith Anderson: my screen. You got it. You got Jaxie Friedman: yeah, so the. FLAG footprint is now being, it's starting to be required among, companies that have a heavy agricultural footprint and within that flag requirement is, preventing deforestation. I think it's beginning in 2025. It's like a commitment to have no deforestation in their supply chains. And this is really hard to execute because coffee. It's mostly grown by lots of smallholder farmers who don't have access to certain technology and ways of tracking these things. So the coffee supply chain is really complicated and, I think climate change is threatening coffee, and simultaneously because of coffee's footprint. I think it's created additional pressure at the legislative level, which I think is exciting but also going to be a huge challenge for coffee companies to meet to be able to prevent, to, prevent the deforestation that is so tightly connected to coffee supply chains. Those are just a few of the ways that I think coffee influences, supply chains, but happy to, dig into some other areas too, if you want, but I could go on and on about this. No, that Keith Anderson: was exactly what I was hoping to cover there. Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Keith Anderson: Well, I really appreciate you joining me, Jaxie. It was super interesting. Thanks so much for joining the show. Jaxie Friedman: You're so welcome. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=lnq201m8…
In this episode, join host Keith Anderson as he speaks Suzy Monford, founder and CEO of advisory firm Food Sport International. With an extensive career as an executive in the global grocery industry, and having worked at places like H-E-B Central Market, Kroger, and Coles and Woolworth's in Australia, Suzy has been a pioneer at leading grocery and retail technology companies and has a deep interest and commitment to sustainability in the industry. Tune in for her insight on online grocery, food waste, frozen food, and much more! Learn more about Suzy Monford: Link to Food Sport ’s website Link to Suzy’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm Keith Anderson. And I'm so excited for this episode of the show. My guest is Suzy Monford, founder and CEO of a consultancy called Food Sport International. But Suzy has a long and storied career as an executive in the global grocery industry. She's worked at places like H-E-B, Central Market, Kroger, some of the Australian majors, Woolworths, Kohl's. And increasingly, she's played a role in some of the leading grocery and retail technology companies. And in addition to all that, she's got a deep interest and commitment to sustainability in the industry. And I always find it really interesting and important to hear from folks who sit adjacent to sustainability as a specialty. You know, they are operators and executives in the industry that are partners to and collaborators with the deep experts whose background comes from climate and sustainability. But, you know, the compliment that they bring is. real expertise about the operation of the business. And I think that's why Suzy has such a interesting perspective. And, you know, we cover all kinds of topics in our discussion, online grocery, frozen food, and much more, so I don't want to keep you any longer from listening to and learning from Suzy Monford, founder and CEO of Food Sport International. Hi Suzy, welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Great to have you join us. Suzy Monford: Thanks, Keith. I'm glad to be here. Keith Anderson: And the tables have turned a bit. You and I first met when you had me on your show. And so, for those listening, if you haven't yet checked it out, it's on the Conversations on Retail platform. And it's the People, Planet, and Profit show, correct? Yeah, definitely, definitely check it out. And as I was saying to Suzy, we, we had a great conversation, but it felt like we had more to say than time permitted. And so I wanted to have her on our show so that we could continue some of the discussion and, our audience could get to know her better. So thank you, Suzy. Suzy Monford: Thank you, Keith. And I completely agree. I could talk to you all day, which, which, yeah, I know you actually have a job to do, but no, I really, really appreciate this. I enjoyed our conversation very much. I learned a lot, frankly, and gave me a lot, a lot of good things to take away and dive deeper into. So I appreciate it. Keith Anderson: Well, I'll leave most of describing your background and focus to you, but, you know, part of what I found interesting about your experience and what you're up to is, you know, similar to my background before focusing on sustainability in retail and CPG, I spent a lot of my career in sort of retail technology and, you know, that's, that's where you've spent a lot of your energy. Can you just tell us a bit about, you know, your career trajectory and how it's led you where you are now? Suzy Monford: Sure. I'm happy to. And it's, I, I'm kind of inwardly smiling at that question because my career began where I actually am in the same city I'm in now, which is unique for me because I think I've moved 10 times at least for my career. So I'm in Austin, Texas now. I went to UT, so Hookham Horns, majoring in economics. And, minor in English, so basically not really qualified to do much other than go to graduate school or start working. So, I spent a decade in the restaurant industry with a start up that was based here in Texas. Learned a lot, obviously, a lot about the restaurant business, but probably more, what was more informative to me was a lot about managing teams and leading, designing go-to-market strategies, and honestly doing a lot of product development that was very healthy and clean and simple. And that's been a through line throughout my career. So about a decade in restaurants, and then I started into grocery. I've often said I felt, feel like one of the luckiest girls in grocery. I began my grocery career with H-E-B Central Market Division. At a time that we only had three central market stores, two in Austin and then one in San Antonio. Because I was coming from the restaurant business, they were like, "Hey, terrific! Please come and run all of our food service," which was all the in-house chef-prepared foods, the artisanal bakery, the deli department, the cheese department, all the restaurants, all the catering. Basically, 25/30 percent of the revenue of the company, of Central Market. So that's how I got into grocery, coming through this portal from restaurants. And again, what an opportunity. It was a lot, it was a wonderful start to the career. I absolutely loved it. I quickly fell in love with retailing. Every day was something new and fascinating. I had thought restaurants were complicated until I got into grocery retailing, and realized that the margin of error is so slight. And you can do fabulous work in the grocery space, but unless you're highly efficient, and sustainable, then you really, there's, there's only a couple of pennies left at the end of that dollar. And that's the only way to keep any of them. So I spent about a decade with H-E-B, most of, about actually half and half, half with Central Market, half with H-E-B. Then I had an opportunity and I moved to Australia. I became the Head of Innovation for Kohl's Supermarkets, and spent some time in Melbourne, Australia. Loved it. Kind of helped them transform their go-to-market strategy. It's working across fresh, particularly deli and prepared foods and bakery and all these other projects. Then that sort of took me back to the US after a little bit of time. I started my own consultancy, which is Food Sport, which is what I'm running now as a CEO. Spent some more time, I ended up being back, you know, as a CEO of a, as a restaurateur, and then starting to consult internationally with grocers. Quickly fast forwarding, that led me back to another opportunity to move to Australia. This time I was recruited by Woolworths, Woolies as we say, Woolies is the competitor to Kohl's. I was pleased to do it, loved my time at Kohl's, equally loved the team at Woolies, so I moved back to Australia, this time to Sydney. And helped Woolies regain some of the market share that Kohl's has taken from them based on their resurgence. So, I've had two opportunities to do some incredible work and work with outstanding people and companies in Australia. Back here in the States, I've been CEO of a couple of different grocery companies. One was called Andronico's Community Market out in San Francisco Bay Area. The team and I turned that around and we did such a great job that the owners of the company ended up selling it. So that was a little bit bittersweet, but, you know, good on them. I had an opportunity to join Kroger. I joined as a president at QFC Grocer, Grocery, excuse me, up in Seattle. We turned that chain around and then I was promoted to Group Vice President of Fresh Food for Kroger and moved to Cincinnati. Whilst I was there, I also was promoted again to Group Vice President of e-commerce at a time that that was quite, still nascent. And actually running a lot of our Ocado business as that was starting to get off the ground. I then took another opportunity to be CEO again of the largest food co ops in the country. Probably not going to surprise anyone. I mean, I absolutely love Kroger, love them today. Stepped out of that because I have a real mission around triple bottom line business. People, planet, and profit. The co-ops I think are doing fine, but I'm now really running my consultancy because that enables me to work across retail, work across the technology that's transforming retail, making it greener, if I can still use that word, and to work with startups and turnarounds. So that is, that's about the best that I can synopsize it, Keith. Keith Anderson: Well, it's an incredible, trajectory and I'm glad I let you cover it because, I couldn't have done as nice a job. I didn't realize, actually, about your role at central market, when we used to run store tours in Texas, they were always a highlight of the store tours. And, I haven't been to Australia, but I'll have to make the trip at some point to see some of the work you've done there. Suzy Monford: You'll love it. You'll love it. I was just remarking, with some folks just last week, catching up, about some of the things that we had done at Kohl's, and one of the things I was most proud of when I first got there was I helped do product development for the very first clean label rotisserie, we say rotisserie chicken, for them it's a chook, it's a rotisserie chook. And, I was able to work upstream, downstream and go-to-market with the best, cleanest label, most nutritious, sustainable bird that we'd ever sold in Australia. So, just a few, a few of the things that I'm, I'm proud to have been part of. Keith Anderson: That's great. And, you know, we, we spent a minute before we started recording, talking about some of the points of intersectionality between these different you know, industries, both food service and restaurants and grocery and things like e-commerce and online grocery and other technologies that are digitizing, what, to your point, is a really razor thin margin industry that was arguably among the later to digitize, but is really you know, accelerating and, it, it's already had and continues to have a pretty transformational impact. Where do you see some of those points of intersection between, you know, the conventional ways of working in and doing the work of grocery retailing and the emerging focus on sustainability? Suzy Monford: Technology's the key. Technology's the key. I, I, you know. I get up every day and I'm always excited and happy and really eager to see what kind of new adventure is going to happen today. But with regard to the trajectory of retailing over the last few years, as much as I say every day, "oh my gosh, what an exciting time to be in retail and to be in grocery." Honest to gosh, now I think we are at this apex because we can go from idea to shelf so much faster today and so much more sustainably because we have technology. Now, what do I mean by that? Yeah, everybody's talking about AI, AI. Well, AI has been around. When I'm, so yes, I'm including AI. But I'm talking about a lot of the work that some of my clients and colleagues are doing to digitize stores. When we come in to a grocery store, for instance, and we replace the standard paper price tag which, by the way, is paper, and it has to be printed, there's always issues, so there's a lot of waste in that. But it's still printed on perforated paper, a human being has to tear them, and go and hang all these price tags, and then change them over again when they, immediately when they change. We're spending millions of labor hours, literally, every single week to update pricing, we're using, you know, paper, which we don't need to waste. Not to mention the fact that these don't help create a sustainable shopping experience. When you go to a digital price tag, the digitization enables dynamic pricing and promotion. And they also talk to the AI camera that's on shelf, the computer vision element, that can scan and say, hey, here's what you're out of, here's what you're running low on. And what that does is it synchronizes inventory and supply chain. Now, for everybody whose eyes have already glazed over or tuned out, this is really sexy stuff in retail. Because if I can bring the right product to the right shelf at the right time of day and make my customer happy. Then I'm eliminating waste. I'm eliminating wasted food, which has a lesser impact, carbon impact on the environment. And I'm not wasting very valuable, purposeful human labor hours that could be properly reinvested, both for that human being and for the business. So I get really excited about that, and frankly, it's that technology which is transforming retail today. And I'll just, without having a long run on sentence, and also... we are still, as much as the US is starting to speed up, we're still behind, just, just like e-commerce, just like delivery, just like doing click and collect, which I first experienced when I was in Australia in 2014. The US, North America were slow followers, but just as, as that happened, the Europe is way ahead of us in digitizing stores. Australia is ahead, is also ahead of us in digitizing and they've been the lead, one of the leading markets in e-commerce now for more than a decade. So that's what's the most, that's the fastest growing area in retail today, not just grocery but particularly grocery, but it's the grocery element that I get most excited about because that is where we have the most waste and therefore the most opportunity to improve. Keith Anderson: I, I think that's a really critical point that you're highlighting, where the profit and the planet intersect. That is, you know, there's actually a company that we had as a guest on the show, David Katt of a company called Wasteless that uses AI to enable some of that dynamic pricing. And one of the things that he was really, clear about is part of the way that that company is able to fulfill its mission is by delivering. material savings and EBITDA by eliminating some of that waste. And I think that's where in retail broadly, but in grocery in particular, there's so much upside to being more thoughtful and technology-enabled about doing things that just make good economic and business sense, but have all these other benefits that align with the growing priorities that so many of these retailers have Suzy Monford: Well, sure, and, you know, I took a rather myopic view just then of starting inside the store. But if I were going to open the lens and start at the point of the farm, there are companies that have been using AI. Driscoll's Strawberries, for instance. And I know a lot of this based on the work that I've done with Emily Ma and her team at Google on the Google food team. She's been leading that team for a decade. But they've been, so Driscoll's is an example of a grower that is using AI, has been using AI sensors and some emerging technology to determine and detect when berries are actually ripe or where they are on the scale of ripeness so that they're harvested at just the right time. They're harvested knowing here's how much time it's going to take to get from the point of harvest through the DC, the distribution center, and then on to the store shelf. So that it gets to the store shelf, in the case of strawberries, ready to be purchased, ready to be consumed, and still has approximately a week shelf life left to go. And that is just fascinating, because there's less waste for the farmer, which means their, their income, their revenue stream is up, and there's less waste throughout the supply chain, there's less redundancy going, flowing through the DCs, because any time product comes into a DC, a distribution center, and it's not sellable, then it uses more carbon footprint and more transportation to do what? To go back somewhere, it doesn't stay in the Dc. But if we can have a continuous virtuous cycle from farm to the consumer's home, then we've eliminated all that waste that's occurring. Then we just have to make sure that we continue to talk to consumers, we're all consumers, and highlighting the fact that most of the food waste, 30 percent is wasted at the point after which it's purchased and in the consumer's Keith Anderson: at the household. Suzy Monford: on the household. So I'm, I'm on a mission to help every little part of that, of that train, if you will, starting from the point of the farmer and then on through helping to educate folks so they can change their behavior. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I, I see, a growing interest in cross-industry cooperation. I think, you know, obviously you mentioned where we are as a country. There have been some interagency initiatives coming out of, I think, the FDA and at least one or two other big federal agencies. The UN is, is trying to coordinate a lot of activity, and I think Walmart and Kellanova announced something a few weeks ago. I think there's growing awareness in the industry about food waste, and I see more of the retailers and brands, campaigning to educate consumers sort of in the ways that you're describing. Suzy Monford: Yeah, absolutely. And, you know, as a proud ex Kroger executive, I'm proud of what Kroger has been doing. They really got there. Walmart, I think, was first, and I'm not comparing and contrasting, but Kroger stepped forward with their Zero Hunger, Zero Waste Foundation. They've been on a mission now, again, for close to a decade to eliminate hunger and to eliminate waste, because Rodney McMullen, the executive team, the foundation, saw the intersection of both of those things right from the beginning. And they've invested, I couldn't even venture a guess now how many millions of dollars into Zero Hunger Zero Waste to attack it from both sides. And through, by, through the foundation, through a partnership with Google, retailers, all of us, and they've done a lot of good. Keith Anderson: You mentioned that you were involved in some of the work with Ocado, and I don't want anybody to project individual cases to the entire grocery or retail industry, because context really matters, but one of the things that I, I know from work that I did on online grocery models, and one of the things that you're increasingly hearing some retailers and some brands talk about are, you know, when they reach a certain scale and when they're operated efficiently, some of the, both economic and environmental advantages to a sort of centrally picked, online grocery model. And there, there are. Parts of the world where that's the dominant, model, Suzy Monford: Yep. Keith Anderson: it hasn't really taken off in the US, the way that, you know, it has in Europe or parts of Asia. I'm just curious to get your thoughts and, you know, having worked directly on it, where do you see us headed in that area? Suzy Monford: Yeah, and that's, that's awesome question, and you're, you're smart to phrase it as you, as you did. So yes, this, so Ocado, for folks who maybe aren't as familiar, began as, it's the very, it's the first e-commerce only retailer in the UK, and solely by subscription base. And it start, and it's founded in London, where there's extreme density. I think, London actually is the most densely populated city in the world, 24/7. Meaning it may not be as large as New York City, but in New York, there are five boroughs and people, even if they come into the city, this is pre-pandemic, they would disperse out to the boroughs and that's where they lived. If you live in London, you live in London, you work in London, so high density, density, density. And Ocado was built, the go-to-market strategy was based on subscription and maybe Keith and his household would say, "Yep. We're going to order these groceries every Monday, Wednesday, Friday, or Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday," whatever it wants to be. That enabled Ocado to plan well, to purchase well, to inventory, you know, very smoothly to plan and then deliver JIT (just in time). When you can do that, when the retailer can anticipate the customer's needs down to the product, the day, and the time, then they can plan really, really well. And in all that planning, that's where the efficiencies come, and that's where they're able to optimize the profitability. Less waste, JIT, everybody's happy. Lower prices to the customer, and it's just a virtuous cycle. But it requires density. Same thing in Asia. I mean, I feel like I saw the future seven years ago in Shanghai, looking at the Hema stores and their use of e-commerce and rapid delivery scooters out the back of the store. I mean, it was absolutely amazing to see. Here in the US, you know, we're a bit, we're more spoiled for choice. We're at, and we, we have a combination of high dense urban areas and many, many suburban areas, and then lots of rural wide open spaces. So that's why you see the best retailers. Look at Walmart, largest, the largest retailer, the largest grocer, of course, is Kroger, followed by Albertsons, but the largest retailer who sells food, of course, is Walmart. Walmart leverages their own stores. They have, where possible, where they want to, where it's advantageous, they built their back rooms to be robotically engineered. You know, conveyors to, to fulfill e-commerce orders out of the back of their physical plant, their store. Other companies like Kroger invested into exclusive partnerships with companies like Ocado and built strategic regional hubs where they could pick orders very, very quickly, very efficiently, and then ship either to stores in their own network, or in the case of some of the projects I work on, ship groceries in states like Florida, in which they had no stores. So you see a variety of different go-to-market strategies. I think the right answer is yes, meaning you have to, modern grocery, you have to do a little bit of all of that. You need to be a great brick and mortar store, offer a fabulous experience, but you have to offer an e-commerce platform. Otherwise you can't grow and maintain your market share. Keith Anderson: Yeah. It's fascinating. Over around the same timeframe that you were working in those areas, I was doing a lot of industry analysis and consulting. And I think we have a friend in common, Tom Furphy, does that name ring a bell? Suzy Monford: Great friend. Yes. Love Tom. Keith Anderson: Yeah, so I, I used to be on the circuit with Tom, as the two of us proselytized, "grocery is going to be digitized, everybody," but it, it's always interesting to me to reflect on how close we were with some of our, I might call them scenarios in hindsight, but I think most people interpreted them as predictions. And I, I think as you just said, it's very clear the reason that the industry is so fixated on the term omnichannel now is it's sort of all of the above and particularly in a market like the US that was already pretty mature when these technologies emerged in contrast to some of the developing markets that could look at the future and could design from day one, you know, smaller stores, different store network and distribution models, last mile, retrofitting an existing asset base is in some ways more challenging, but there's, there's economic upside and there's sustainability upside where you can align what your, business will support with what the technology and customers will allow. Suzy Monford: Absolutely. And in my view, not only you can, but you must, honestly, I mean, why not? Why not? It's, it's much less, every day that goes by, it's much less expensive to make these types of investments. And every day that goes by, your customer demographic is changing. You know, you, your traditional customers, your oldies are aging out, and it's the Gen Y and the Gen Z and the Millennials that are your customer today and the future, and they're demanding that, but, you know, coming, stepping back from that, because I don't ever tend to preach and be pedantic about it, but, you know, with technology, we, you, you can do well by doing good. And I think that old, what is that old trite saying, it's our attitude that determines our altitude in life or something silly. But, you know, maybe I'll turn the table and ask you a question, Keith, because you've been in this space, you've been a pioneer. Why do you think the US seems to be such slow followers, generally speaking? Why does it, why, why, why doesn't the US you know, why don't these large chains, why is their imagination, not sometimes the large ones do, but the regionals don't, it doesn't seem to capture their imagination until it's become a well established trend. Keith Anderson: It's a really good question. My first, my first thought is, the geography, you know, both the geographic and the population diversity. I mean, you can actually point to parts of the country, all over, you know, in almost every state. You'll find examples that are really far on the maturity curve and, you know, in many cases raising the bar, but it is hard at, at the scale of the majors to move quickly enough to sort of point to the innovation, the way you see it when we're all looking globally for examples of, "Hey, here's, here's what's next." You know, I think secondly, we just have a different regulatory culture than some of the parts of the world that are a little, more inclined to use the stick than the carrot. And, I, I think that creates its own challenges, but, you know, I, I am, I pay very close attention at the moment to where the capital is being invested. And I do have to credit Europe. There, there is so much technology investment focused on retail and CPG, climate and sustainability technologies, you know, in, in the mainstream, you see headlines about, "are we seeding markets in some of the more macro clean technology categories?" I have the same concern, you know, sometimes, that we're not moving quickly enough in within some of the subcategories, like, industry-focused technologies, because I see so much happening abroad. That's not to the detriment of what's happening here. You know, there, there is a ton happening in places like Boulder and Silicon Valley, but I was sort of stunned to see how much of it is happening in Europe. I do think though, you, you know, to their credit, Kroger is certainly doing a lot with Zero Waste, Zero Hunger. Walmart, with Project Gigaton, you know, hit the target, I think six years ahead of schedule. And Amazon, with Climate Pledge Friendly and some of their other programs, you know, they're increasingly making it part of the engagement model for suppliers. And with Amazon in particular, it's pretty visible across the shopper journey. You see it on search result pages, product detail pages, checkout pages. I, I do think, you know, I, I want to turn the table back to you and ask you a question because I do think it feels to me like an inflection point in the industry, not unlike where you and I were in those early days of online grocery, where it's already happening. In parts of the world, it's a much bigger part of the industry. In this part of the world, it's not yet the focus in most executives' day, but I'm curious if there are parallels that you see or lessons you've learned about, you know, what it was like with responsibility for e-commerce in a big grocer when it was you know, when 90 percent or more of the volume was brick and mortar, and how do you engage the rest of the organization to say, "this is a little bit different way of operating. The economics look a little different, but the writing is on the wall. The momentum is building. With each passing quarter, it's going to be a bigger part of how we remain viable and keep winning." Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Well, Suzy, this has been really, again, a really exciting and interesting conversation, and I'm sure some of the folks listening would love to learn more about you and the work that you're doing. Where would you direct them? Suzy Monford: So, reach out, I'm, as I said, I'm running Food Sport, so you can find me on LinkedIn at Food Sport International. You can go, that's really the best way, just find, find me on LinkedIn. Always Happy to meet and connect and be of support. Keith Anderson: Wonderful. Well, thank you again so much for joining me. Suzy Monford: Thank you, it's been my pleasure. Cheers. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=v8w412rn…
In this episode of Decarbonizing Commerce, host Keith Anderson speaks with Minchan Park, director of portfolio selection at Unreasonable Group, a company helping scale growth stage, impact-driven ventures working on some of the world's biggest problems. They discuss the Unreasonable Fellowship program, the new Unreasonable Food collaboration with Mars, how Min and the team identify and prioritize companies for participation, what the experience is like for the entrepreneurs that are part of the program, and what Min is looking forward to next. Tune in to gather insight from Min’s perspective on these topics and more! Learn more about Minchan Park: Link to Unreasonable's website Link to Minchan’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 Episode resources: Unreasonable Food If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm Keith Anderson. And my guest this week is Minchan Park, director of portfolio selection at Unreasonable Group. Min is responsible for Unreasonable's venture selection process, everything from sourcing to diligence, and of course, selection, helping scale growth stage, impact-driven ventures that are working on some of the world's biggest problems. Before Unreasonable, Min worked at HG Capital, a leading European private equity fund, and previously was a strategy consultant at OC&C Strategy in London. If you listened to episode 19 of the show with Autumn Fox of Mars, you heard us briefly discuss the Unreasonable Food Program that Mars and Unreasonable Group are launching together. They've just announced the first cohort of Unreasonable Food fellowships, 15 companies that are going to be participating in the program. And Min and I talked about how the program works, how he and the team identify and prioritize some of the companies that participate, what the experience is like for the entrepreneurs that are part of the program and what he's looking forward to next. So we get into all that and more, and I'm excited for you to meet Min Park of Unreasonable Group. Min, thanks for joining the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Great to have you with us. Minchin Park: Hi Keith, thanks for having me on here. Keith Anderson: We're recording on a Friday, and if I'm not mistaken, you're five or six hours ahead of me, so appreciate you joining me on a Friday afternoon. Minchin Park: No, this is, this is great. The weather's brilliant in London, for once. It's finally turned a corner, so, you know, happy days. It's a wonderful way to finish off the week. Keith Anderson: Enjoy it while you can. Minchin Park: Yeah, it doesn't last very long. Keith Anderson: No, it often doesn't. Well, I thought maybe a good place to start would be, for those that may not be familiar with Unreasonable Group itself, maybe you can describe what the organization is all about. Minchin Park: Yeah, happy to do that. I think unreasonable is a pretty unique organization, if I can say that myself. We're not a traditional venture capital firm, which is what a lot of people think we are when, when they come across Unreasonable. We're probably closer to an accelerator, but we still don't use the word accelerator because it's a little bit different still. I would say at its core, Unreasonable is more of a community. Essentially a community of entrepreneurs, visionaries, capital movers, and corporate partners who all come together essentially to support these entrepreneurs with big visions and are tackling the world's greatest challenges essentially. We, you know, galvanize this community to draw direct and indirect investments into these companies, but we do so much more than just that. So we provide a lot of the relational support for these founders and to the ventures themselves to help reduce the friction to scale in whichever way possible. And capital is one obvious friction to scale, of course, that is front of mind for everyone. But there are other frictions to scale for a lot of these founders like, you know, setting up a strategic sales function as the company grows, or setting in place a really strong company culture, navigating, and helping set new regulation standards, or scaling up manufacturing. So, we, we help with all of those things through the network that we provide and the expertise of the people in our community. I would say we are an invite-only community. So we really, we are trying to find the next generation of solutions here today and tomorrow that are making a real dent in the world in solving the world's most intractable challenges. And once the entrepreneur has been identified and they're brought into the community, we we do everything we can on a personal level for the founders themselves, or professionally, for the venture to support these entrepreneurs to scale faster and further. This fundamentally goes back to the mission and the ethos where unreasonable essentially believes that entrepreneurship is the fastest way to solve planetary scale problems, using the power of capitalism in the right way. And essentially, you know, by doing this, I guess we're also out to show that, doing well in business and doing good in the world, like, don't really have to be at odds with each other. If you, if you go to Unreasonable's website, it's, you'll see this simple tagline called Repurpose Capitalism. What we're trying to say here is, you know, capitalism doesn't have to be associated with endless resource extraction or competitive advantage or costs to rise to winner takes all markets. We're trying to show that you know, the future here, can be one of abundant resources, and abundant outputs, and collaborative advantage. Yeah. So I'll, I'll pause there. And that's a bit about unre, what, what Unreasonable does. Keith Anderson: I think that's really helpful. Just briefly to play back a little bit of what I heard, some similarities to venture capital firms and to accelerators, but in addition to being a hybrid of both of those models, the invitation-only and sort of selective community component is one of the other things that differentiates you. Obviously, the mission, very focused on, as you say, planetary scale challenges and backing entrepreneurs and ventures in pursuit of making a dent in those problems. You know, I, I think that's a pretty clear summary. Minchin Park: Yeah. and then I think the primary focus of Unreasonable is always with the entrepreneurs and the amazing work that they're doing. But if I could add a secondary aim here, it's also about de-siloing the market. So, if you, if you zoom out, there are a lot of different players and entrepreneurs on such a small part of the playing field. There are investors and capital movers. There are also large institutional players out there. Like some of our corporate partners like Mars, Barclays, who have traditionally been associated with you know, large emission footprints. And in the case of Barclays, you know, funding coal, oil and gas industries. And so they don't particularly have the best rep, like, in the world. But, you know, these companies won't just go away. As much as the average citizens would love them to, they sort of need a way out, to re-strategize so they can become part of the solution, and certainly they have the size and resources to help the entrepreneurs, so, I guess the secondary mission here is, why not offer them a ledge? Why not instill this collaborative advantage that I was talking about and create a win/win situation for both the corporates as well as the entrepreneurs? And so I think that's also what we're out to do. So we, we essentially design initiatives, like the one with Barclays or the one with Mars. And we try to connect them to the entrepreneurs that are really solving these big challenges. And essentially help them help one another. And so, you know, we're not just proving to the world that doing well and doing good can be, done together, we're also proving this to our partners and sort of changing them from the inside. And yeah, with the goal of repurposingcapitalism. So that's, I guess, a secondary, goal that we have here as well. Keith Anderson: Well, I'm glad you mentioned some of those programs. As you know, we had Autumn Fox of Mars on the show, a few months ago and one of the things I've been looking forward to is hearing more from you about the Unreasonable Food Program that Unreasonable and Mars have launched together and, also about your role in it. You know, I, I think it would be great for the audience to understand how a program like that operates and what the objectives are. But then it would be great also to understand a bit more about, you know, how do you approach identifying the right profile of founder or early stage company and then what is participating in the program look like? Minchin Park: Yeah, yeah, definitely. So we have a partnership with Mars, Mars Snacking, it's called Unreasonable Food, it's a joint initiatives between Unreasonable and Mars. It's our newest partnership, I'd say. And the, and the context for Unreasonable Food really arises from this, like, big problem that I'm sure you and your listeners are pretty, pretty well, well versed in. You know, 25 percent of the world's food greenhouse gas emissions comes from the way that we produce, process, and package food. That's huge. And if you really think about, you know, the way that we've done this hasn't, it hasn't really changed much in the decades or centuries. It's sort of been efficiency improvements, but as it comes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, it's sort of been the same old, same old. And we're not simply going to reduce the amount of food that's being produced given the growing population. So it's a big challenge, but also a huge opportunity at the same time. And so that's the backdrop under which this initiative came about. And I think Mars is such a uniquely positioned player here, to make some drastic changes in the industry, and so not just within their own supply chain, but across, across the board, for a few different reasons. Especially Mars Snacking, you know, they operate in a more of an impulse category, you know, with their Snickers bars and chocolate bars and sweets, so they have relatively attractive margins, and more importantly, they can have a long term perspective about things because they're a privately owned company, they're probably one of the largest privately owned companies out there, and what's great as well is that Mars is so serious about sustainability. It's really refreshing from such a big giant corporation to be so serious about it. And you can see that it really stems right from the top. And I say refreshing because there are so many other CPG players and Mars's peers that have made these dramatic pledges, but really have done, haven't really done much to do anything about it. But when, when you speak to Mars and when you look at, when you unpeel the layers, they on the other hand have made some drastic pledges. So slashing emissions by 50 percent by 2030, net zero by 2050. So this is a big deal if you think about the size of the operations they have. Like you can literally find Snickers bars like anywhere around the world, like, there you go. So it's pretty huge. But really when you unpeel these layers, you can see that they've made some internal changes, like they're really serious about it. The leadership team, like, is very serious about it. Our, one of our main champions, I think Amanda Davies at Mars, she's the Chief Procurement and Sustainability Officer. So there's kind of the joint role there. Which sort of shows the dedication and fundamentally just the numbers, they've reduced emissions close to 10 percent to date, they've taken some initiatives within, and also, you know, they've, they've done the steps they can, but this has also led them to realize that they can't do this all alone, they've, they've realized that, you know, to get to net zero, that 2050 goal, they really require technologies that aren't widely available in the market today, so a new way of producing fertilizer or a new form of packaging that is not based on fossil fuels, so they need all of these, which aren't actuallyLJ widely available in the market today. So they've come to this realization that they can't do this alone. And their organization is structured in a way where they can have a long term perspective on things. So this, this unique backdrop, and kind of context for Mars and Unreasonable to, to work together, it is now really about, can we get the next generation of solutions that are out there, to work with Mars, to help them meet their sustainability goals? So that's what we're out to achieve. So there's, I guess, two goals here. One is, you know, can we use the resources within Unreasonable, and Mars to help these entrepreneurs scale their impact dramatically? Like I said, these entrepreneurs need all the help that they can get. And that's, a benefit for the world, really, the faster we can scale these solutions. And the second goal, by doing that, can we then help Mars reach their sustainability goals? And that's pretty evidently clear that they can. It's, I guess the big question is how and how quickly? So the success of this partnership is really around getting all of the people involved to build incredibly strong relational foundations for doing business, and ultimately get them to develop a commercial relationship with one another. and this is really interesting. This partnership is really unique, because it, it solves from the, it solves from the venture side of point, point of view, this sort of chicken and egg problem that is, that is so pervasive in the venture space. And so, for example, what I mean by that, this chicken and egg problem, say, say a venture with 20 employees, doesn't, you know, has the technology to potentially develop a product that could be used by a CPG giant, but don't want to devote the resource to developing a customized product without some guarantees that that products will be used. Because, you know, devoting, say, six employees onto a new product is a very, quite a risky way to spend your cash. But the CPG player doesn't want to provide a guarantee without seeing the actual product and seeing how it functions. And so it's, if you think about it, it's very, none of these parties want to move first in order for them to not, you know, take a potential hit to their, to, to, to their P&L, and this is a real problem and it kind of stalls and it's one of these frictionsto scale that I mentioned in the beginning, and, you know, or another example might be, it's the more classic one where, a CPG giant won't agree to an offtake because the price is too high for the product that's there. But the venture really needs the volumes from the offtake to recognize economies of scale to get the prices down. That's, that's a really obvious one that is, so pervasive, not just in the food industry, but across the board when it comes to making things. And so there's a lot of certain frictions to scale. And why this partnership with Mars is so important is because it creates this strong relational background for Mars and our fellows to give that commitment that yes, Mars really needs this. They think you have a solution to do so. So can we do this? Can we cooperate and not be waiting for the one person to make the full leap before making a decision? Let's sort of meet halfway. So that's sort of the idea around this partnership because, and one way that you can envision how this can speed up the process to scale for some of these ventures. So that's a bit about the Unreasonable Food Partnership in general. Sorry Keith, yeah. Keith Anderson: I was going to say, you know, you just announced, I don't know, 10 days ago or so, from when we were recording, the first cohort of ventures in the program. You know, people can go look up all of those just by searching Unreasonable Food. But, you know, maybe it's worth spending a minute or two sharing some examples of the kinds of ventures that were selected and how they align with what Mars is trying to do. And anything we can share about the kinds of criteria that go into identifying and selecting some of these ventures Minchin Park: Yeah, yeah. This is the fun part. My favorite. So, yeah, like you said, if, there's 15 companies in the year one cohort, that's available in unreasonablefood.com. You can see all the, all the full list of companies. Some that really jump out for Mars and to me as well. So as for example, Seaforest, this is a company, that is cultivating a type of seaweed, this red seaweed called asparagopsis. And this seaweed, essentially, when fed to cows, has the potential to reduce dairy and taric emissions, by 90%. So essentially stops cows burping. And it says up to 90%, but in some cases goes up to 95. So completely gets rid of this methane problem in cows. And it's so effective, and it only requires a very small amount in the feed. So 0.2 percent of the cow's feed needs to be this additive, to achieve these reductions. So it's a really game changing, technology and product. It doesn't really require any consumer behavior change, which is the beauty of all of this, and passes a pretty minimal premium through on the retail price. And Seaforest is an Australian company. They've just recently released the first carbon-free dairy milk, in Australia. That was announced pretty recently. That's a big That's a big move. And the potential for this technology is, is tremendous. And there's so many, cows out there in the world today. The dairy industry is massive. So really the question is around how do we get this production to scale? And how can say a, a company like Mars link Seaforest up with their dairy suppliers to, to sort of feed, almost inset their dairy emissions? And it's one of the biggest challenges, in agriculture today, but also for Mars, as dairy emissions is one of the largest footprints that Mars has. So that's a really exciting one. There's others like, MycoTechnology in there. It's a, it's an amazing company that's using mushroom fermentation, so, mycelium to create healthy and sustainable ingredients. They make, you know, mycelium-based proteins, but the one that is really exciting, that is coming out is the sweetener product. They can make a protein-based sweetener that is 1,500 times sweeter than sugar. That doesn't actually get ingested into the bloodstream, so it doesn't affect the glycemic levels in people, so it doesn't actually cause diabetes, despite having the same effect as, as, as a taste profile as sugar. So this has huge implications for CPG companies that traditionally rely on sugar. And of course, Mars relies a lot on sugar, so this is a big deal for them as well. I think you'll see other companies in there, like 80 Acres Farms, that is more about developing the future supply chain of food. So, this is more of a futuristic vertical farming technology that can grow crops year-round, superior yield, high quality, with using, using drastically less land, you know, 95 percent less water, 100 percent runs on renewable energy. So it's one of these futuristic, kind of technologies that are in market today. They supply Kroger for tens of million dollars worth of contracts and goods. And it's really healthy. It's non-GMO, pesticide-, herbicide-free. And so that's also really interesting, just the partnership opportunities that are available. So seeing what types of crops that could be grown using vertical farming is also exciting. Those are just a few names. There's 12 others. I've just listed off three. But yeah, there, there, it's a phenomenal cohort. But how they have been selected, it's a pretty broad criteria. But there's probably four things I would say that we look for in Unreasonable when we think about bringing an entrepreneur into the fellowship. So, first is impact. I mean, that's a no brainer, right? It has to be core in the business model. We need to be able to see clear, positive, measurable, social or environmental impact. One that is baked into the core business model such that the more revenues they make, the more profits they make, the better it is for the world. It's that idea around time doing well and doing good together. So we need to be able to see that as more or less a red line. Without that, we won't proceed. Second, we want to see growth-stage companies. One of the reasons why I said Unreasonable is quite different from, say, other ecosystems and accelerators is one of, there's many, but one of the reasons is because we focus on the growth stage, whereas typically these ecosystems like to focus on the earlier stage. So helping companies go from zero to one, whereas we're helping companies go from one to 10, 10 to a hundred. So we want to see, that. There are companies that are tackling large addressable market sizes, have de-risked the technology, and those are already in market today making revenues, typically in terms of fundraising around series A to series C, if that is, that's relevant, but it's all sort of different. I think making revenues is probably the biggest, green flag that we look for. So that stage is important. And of course, the differentiation, and the commercial wow factor. So, we want to see a technology or a service that's differentiated versus the status quo of doing things, and also the competition. So, sort of two things. If it's a new thing in the market, how much of an improvement is it based on how we've been doing it for decades and centuries. Obviously, that'll be huge, but, you know, if there are competitors out there, like, why are they the special one? Of course, it's always really difficult to pick a winner in the venture space, but, we like to have a view on why we think this horse is worth backing. So, typically, this really involves around being able to show a customer a commercial benefit in adoption, rather than just a sustainability play, so that the scaling this is a no brainer for customers. So if it's helping you reduce cost or reduce energy or it's cheaper than, then of course people are going to adopt it. It doesn't have to be a thing where you have to persuade them around the impacts of climate change, which I'm sure everyone understands and can in some cases can get behind, but really these are bottom line driven decisions and so to see that commercial benefit is a huge green flag for us. So essentially what we're here to do is to support and scale what and I guess the finally the CEO. The founder themselves is incredibly important. We... and by that, I think there's a, there's a few layers here. So founder diversity is also really important when we create like a cohort of entrepreneurs. So, we always try to build a community within Unreasonable that's diverse in experience, background and culture. And we like to support entrepreneurs that really level the playing field for those who might be historically underrepresented in business. So there's a, there's that element, but also just the quality of the human being. And this is more art than science. I wish I had a scorecard for how to judge a person's quality of the human. But it's to do with their fundamental character. Like we love supporting people who clearly believe in what they are doing, have a deep appreciation for humankind and nature as a whole, show humility, and, but also drive, and are willing to say and admit that they don't know everything, that they need help sometimes, because that's what we're here to do, to help them. So those, I think, four things are things that we particularly look for in a general sense whenever we consider an entrepreneur for the Unreasonable fellowship. But I think for this partnership with Mars, there's a fifth consideration, which is a very important one, which is the fit to their supply chain. I think because of the context of this partnership and being able to connect them with Mars and helping them work together, we really want to see, companies that can fit nicely within the supply chain, fit nicely into the type of crops that Mars works with, into the type of geographies that Mars works with, works in. So, Like Seaforest, for example, the company I mentioned earlier, they have a relationship with one of Mars's largest dairy suppliers. So that was always a huge bonus because it just makes the geography footprint. And sort of the relational aspect, much, much easier. And so those things are, I think, important when it comes to this particular initiative, Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Well, you've mentioned, a couple websites, the unreasonablegroup.com site, the Unreasonable Food, website. If folks wanted to get in touch with you, where would you send them? Minchin Park: Yeah, I mean, I, well, either to my LinkedIn, I'm pretty active there because I'm always reaching out to entrepreneurs that I think are really great, pestering them and getting them to speak to me. Or my, my email, minchan@unreasonablegroup.com. I think your, listeners are probably a lot of relevant people who would have a lot of interesting things to say and interesting discussions that we could have. So, you know, on email, always welcome as well. Keith Anderson: Well Min, have fun next month and good luck and thanks so much for joining me. Minchin Park: Thank you, Keith. This was really fun. Thanks for having me. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=r8kmq678…
Today's guest is Katherine Sizov, co-founder and CEO of Strella, whose hardware-enabled software as a service uses data to predict the shelf life of produce and allows everybody from distribution centers, packers, wholesalers, and retailers to make better decisions about when to ship, when to sell, and where to allocate what produce. Katherine joins Keith for a great discussion about how she and her co-founder came to start the business, some of the decisions they've made in terms of go-to-market and business model, the economic and environmental results that their customers are seeing, and how to get those yellow bananas straight from the farm to the shelves of supermarkets! Learn more about Katherine Sizov: Link to Strella’s website Link to Strella’s LinkedIn Link to Katherine’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 Episode resources: Agri-Fresh If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson. Food waste has been a big theme on the show so far, and for good reason. The global food system represents about a third of global emissions, and about half of those emissions are the result of food waste. And while households are the biggest driver of food waste, there's a lot that happens along the supply chain that the industry itself can address. And today's guest is Katherine Sizov, co founder and CEO of a company called Strella, whose hardware enabled software as a service, uses data to predict the shelf life of produce and allows everybody from distribution centers, packers, wholesalers, and retailers to make better decisions about when to ship, when to sell, and where to allocate what produce. We had a great discussion about how Katherine and her co founder came to start the business. Some of the decisions they've made in terms of, go to market and business model and the kinds of economic and environmental results that their customers are seeing. So I'm sure you'll find it as interesting as I did, and I'm happy to introduce Katherine Sizov of Strella. Katherine, welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. Great to have you with us. Katherine Sizov: Thanks so much for having me. Keith Anderson: Well, why don't we start with a bit about your background and how you came to focus on food waste and start Strella. Katherine Sizov: For sure, yeah, so my background is in neuroscience, so I was supposed to go to grad school and get a PhD, but something about sitting at a lab bench for another extended period of time wasn't really calling me, so I started reading whatever I thought was interesting out there, and I read the stat that 40 percent of food is wasted before it's consumed. That pretty immediately struck me because, first of all, it's a gigantic number and second of all, I quickly came to the realization that I had no idea where my food came from. So I didn't even know where this waste occurred and how it happened. So set out on a very long journey. What became a very long journey of learning about food waste. And then eventually that led to the formation of the company. Keith Anderson: So maybe we can take a few minutes and for those that aren't as familiar, just Strella does and how do you do it? Katherine Sizov: Yeah, so what we do at Strella is we can predict the shelf life of different types of produce, and we use that data as an input into making smarter decisions all across the supply chain. So as you can imagine, perishability is kind of a critical component, in food. However, that data has oftentimes been lacking or very siloed, and so what we do is we create that information. We started in apples and pears, which can be stored for a whole year before they get to a grocery store. And what we do is we decide which apples need to get shipped to the grocery store first, based on how mature they are. We also work in bananas, where if you've gone to the grocery store, you've probably noticed the bananas are sometimes way too ripe, sometimes way too underripe. So what we do is we make the color of bananas more consistent on the store shelf, which reduces waste, makes forecasting easier, and lifts sales. Keith Anderson: So you mentioned the color. Can you describe the technology? Monitoring the, you know, banana peel and that's how you're identifying maturity or is there more to it than that? Katherine Sizov: Yeah, so we monitor gases that produce, emits, which happens to be a proactive indicator . So for example one of the gases that we monitor is ethylene. So before color change or a starches to sugar change, basically fruit will be producing this and we can get a proactive indicator of a change. And this is great, because you get a window of opportunity to act on this information before the product actually changes in quality. Keith Anderson: And it sounds like you're doing what you do with a combination of hardware and software. What is the hardware like? You know, is this something that is tiny and is sort of at the individual banana level? Does it cover a bunch? Does it cover a whole storage space? You know, help me visualize what the hardware side of the equation looks like. Katherine Sizov: Yeah, so our current kind of hardware looks like a brick. And since we work in the supply chain, we work with pretty significant volumes. So we'll work with whole truckloads of bananas or roomfuls of apples, which could be anywhere from one to five million individual apples. So gigantic volumes. And yeah, we basically measure, things that are the level of resolution of the supply chain. So for example, the smallest unit is a lot, which is fruit that was picked on the same day by the same grower, from the same region of an orchard. And we can follow that lot all the way down the chain as it passes from hand to hand. Keith Anderson: And when you describe the chain, what are some of the major steps that you're thinking of? Katherine Sizov: Yeah, so we typically follow whoever owns, produce as it travels. So, right now our major categories are suppliers or packers, so those are folks who consolidate from the grower. So, fruit, for example, is picked off a tree, it's consolidated at the packing house, it's put into boxes and stored and shipped. So we work with packers and we also work with retailers and wholesalers and food service folks. So those are people that receive the product downstream and do the final mile distribution typically. Keith Anderson: And I imagine many of our listeners are closer to the retail side of the value chain than the producer side. So to help them think about where this might fit in their business model, is this something that would be deployed, in the back room, is it on the sales floor? How does it come to life for them? Katherine Sizov: Yeah, so we typically work at the distribution center level, because by the time an item gets to the store, there's really two decisions you can make. You can either mark it down or throw it away. Both options that are not great for retailers, and so what we're trying to do is capture data upstream so that we can make an informed decision to kind of prevent those two outcomes from happening in the first place. So for example, in apples, what we do with retailers is we always send the most ripe apple to the grocery store first from the distribution center. And what this helps is to reduce waste in the retailer's chain because they're always selling the most ripe apple first. In bananas, kind of similar story, but just focused on creating a bit more consistency, at the store level, so ripening the bananas at the distribution center so that every time they get to the grocery store, they're that perfect yellow color. Keith Anderson: And you've mentioned three categories of fruit that you're working with. Apples, pears, bananas. What's the sort of potential in terms of applications across perishables for the kind of technology that you've built and are developing? Katherine Sizov: Yeah, our technology applies to all different kinds of produce. So, you know, all of the things that are expensive and that you don't want to throw away. So avocados are an immediate next target for us, tropical fruits, even flowers, kind of have very similar mechanisms to produce items. And then looking even past that into meat and seafood, and just looking at the perishable supply chain overall. Keith Anderson: I'd love to spend a little time on the economics, in a couple senses. From the perspective of somebody that is deploying technology like this. Do you have enough accrued experience through pilots and customers to have a point of view on what the economic benefits are in terms of, you know, waste or spoilage prevented and incremental sales from perishables that you can sell instead of donating or landfilling? Katherine Sizov: Yeah, absolutely. I'd say our ROI is usually at least three to eight times whatever the price is that we charge. So, for example, with packing customers in apple storage, we charge $5, 000 per room per year to monitor apples and make decisions. And we save on average $40, 000 of food waste every single year. We've saved over 20 million pounds of apples from going to waste, so we're a pretty significant percentage of the U. S. apple and pear market. Keith Anderson: So it sounds like it's a, sort of a, I, I come from a SaaS background. So my bias is to say, it sounds like it's a SaaS model, but with the hardware component, it's not just software. Is that a reasonable way to think about the, business model on your side? Katherine Sizov: 100%. Yeah, we call it hardware enabled SaaS. I think the thesis behind the company is that there is not really any data to capture, and so we have to be the ones to generate our own data. But at the end of the day, we are focused on the data, so we're a data company. Keith Anderson: I can appreciate that. And again, you know, my inclination is to go deeper on the retail side, but if there are other interesting case studies or, or examples that you'd like to share, feel free to expand on them, but who are you finding is, using this and are they using it daily? I mean, my guess based on what you've already said is it's being used by maybe a combination of distribution center operations and produce buyers or produce managers. Who's using it? How often are they using it? You know, help somebody who is in the kind of roles that this might improve the lives of imagine what it's like to log in and use it. Katherine Sizov: Yeah, for sure, so warehouse people are the kind of daily users, so when they're making decisions about what to move and how. We help communicate that, but we also interface with the produce team typically, because they care about shrink and they care about sales numbers. So we work with them as well. Yeah, those are kind of our two major categories that we, that we work with. Keith Anderson: And you mentioned that you're a data company. Is there demand are you finding to align or integrate your data with other data sets or other systems? Katherine Sizov: For sure. It's a good question to ask and something we're thinking through now too, We certainly do. So there are ERP systems that we integrate into, warehouse management software that we integrate into. And there's kind of this ecosystem around different chunks of the supply chain and how that information is collected or how that information is currently transmitted. So we certainly work with a number of different partners all across the chain. Keith Anderson: Are you finding that there's demand with a certain profile of grocer? Is this something that you're seeing interest from, the majors, as sort of, they've already got food waste or climate initiatives and this plugs neatly into those, or are regional chains and independents finding it's something that might actually fall to the bottom line pretty immediately for them too? Katherine Sizov: I'll say that we never fall under a food waste or climate initiative. I think a lot of that stuff is very nascent for fortune 500 companies. So when we go into work with a retailer, we are always pitching the weight, the shrink reduction and the sales, top line improvements. So it certainly isn't kind of a climate draw that people have towards us. It's really more of a bottom line impact. In general, I'd say we focus more on the larger retailers because the larger the customer is, the more we, the more optimization we can do. So our sweet spot tends to be folks who are larger and have a lot of volume that they're moving that we can optimize. Keith Anderson: You, you touched on something that I think we often cover in these conversations, which is the positioning and the framing of the benefit, whether it's predominantly commercial and economic, or, you know, climate and sustainability, and, you were pretty clear, but how did you come to arrive at that, you know, positioning that the pathway into our prospective customers is to focus on the shrink reduction and incremental sales versus, hey, we just saw you issued a climate transition plan, and we want to align with your strategy? Katherine Sizov: I don't think they're, at the end of the day, companies make decisions based on what's good for the planet or some kind of charity situation. I think companies are out there to make money at the end of the day, and so aligning what they're profitability or incentives to become more efficient are always far stronger pulls for them. I also think a lot of this climate action stuff is pretty nascent. And so there haven't been a ton of resources really allocated towards those types of goals. There certainly is PR and there's certainly the desire to do something, but at the end of the day, I don't know if there have been true resources put into solving these problems. Keith Anderson: I would say broadly I agree, although I'm cautiously optimistic about some of the, you know, capital and, and people being allocated that go beyond just the annual PDF that's released or the, PR. Katherine Sizov: I, agree, especially if you have two decisions that are equal and one can be a positive one and one is neutral, then people will always pick the better option, but I do think it's important to try to align the economic incentives. And I don't think that's that hard to do, right? Food waste is obviously something that sucks all across the supply chain, and so it's not that difficult to show an economic value, alongside the sustainability piece. But I will say sustainability hardly ever comes up in sales conversations. Keith Anderson: I'm not surprised to hear you say that. I mean, food waste, for the same reasons that I think you mentioned on the site, and you were drawn to this space, because the scale of the problem is so profound, it's an area that we focus a lot on, and, you know, we've identified and been speaking with solution and technology providers, Working on the problem through, sort of sensors and predictive analytics, sort of like you, dynamic pricing and markdowns, which you've made reference to, protective coatings, surplus, food marketplaces, you name it. There, there's a growing solution ecosystem focused on this problem. And almost to a T, anybody I speak with says, yeah, you know, the food waste is a big part of why I got into it, but it's not a big part of the sales deck, if that makes sense. And it's like, I get it, you know, as you say, it's hard to sell something without a pretty compelling ROI and economic story. And, you know, you can listen to one or two other episodes of the show and you'll hear a very similar discussion about. Yeah, you know, when I'm pitching a big European grocer, my pitch is Here's the EBITDA that I can add over a year because I'm going to help you sell perishables that you otherwise would have landfilled. Katherine Sizov: Exactly. I also think in food, food waste is a little bit of a challenging topic because people point a lot of fingers. So, you know, there'll be articles that come out with, you know, where you have a ton of food waste and this person's to blame and that person's to blame for it or that segment. And I think the reality is that everybody's trying to do the absolute best they can. A grower isn't trying to, you know, have food waste. They put blood, sweat, and tears into the product. And so when that's happening, it's hurting everybody. And so I think the conclusion to draw from that is that. The supply chain as it currently stands is inefficient, and there needs to be new technologies and systems in place, but that doesn't mean that someone is doing a bad job. And so I think that's another reason why the whole food waste question is a little bit contentious in this space. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. If folks wanted to learn more about Strella or get in touch with you, where should they go? Katherine Sizov: Our website, strellabiotech.com, or feel free to reach out at info@strullabietech.com, or we're on LinkedIn, so feel free to follow our page. Pretty active on there. Keith Anderson: Well, we'll, we'll link to all those from the show notes and on the site. And Katherine, really appreciate you joining us. Super interesting work that you're doing and best of luck. Katherine Sizov: Thank you so much. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=4892qkwn…

1 Driving Traffic, Sales and Unit Economics with Amazon's Climate and Sustainability Programs with Keith Anderson of Decarbonizing Commerce 35:47
Relive a recent talk from Firstmovr’s JBPx Amazon eCommerce Growth Summit. The session was focused on two Amazon climate and sustainability initiatives for vendors and sellers: the Climate Pledge Friendly badge and Compact by Design. The session covers the programs' commercial benefits, guidance on how to qualify, and more. Learn more about Keith and Firstmovr: Link to FirstMovr's website Link to Keith's LinkedIn To listen to full episodes join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm Keith Anderson. This week, I've got something a little bit different for you. Instead of interviewing someone, I'll be sharing a recording of a presentation I gave last week as part of a Firstmovr virtual summit on Amazon. Firstmovr are old friends of mine and focused on omni channel education and change management for CPG companies. My presentation was focused on two Amazon climate and sustainability initiatives, the Climate Pledge Friendly badge and Compact by Design. So, if you're an Amazon seller or vendor and want to understand how participating in these programs can help you drive traffic to your products, increase conversion rates and sales, and improve unit economics, it's worth a listen, or if you're just curious about some of the commercial and logistical considerations of these two really important Amazon initiatives, I think you'll find this week's episode interesting. We do have some great guests scheduled for the coming weeks. So if you're interested in learning from others, you'll continue meeting some of the innovators in the industry. But I'm really happy to share this presentation on Winning with Amazon on Climate Pledge Friendly and Compact by Design. Chris Perry: So as we transition to our second session of the day, I'm very excited to bring Keith Anderson, who again is not a stranger to the stage at all, and has been probably the Wizard of Oz behind many strategies and frameworks from his early days at Planet Retail RNG or RetailNet Group before that, Profitero in many recent years, and then founded an awesome company focused on sustainability, which is, without even just e-commerce being the area of focus, is such an important topic, A, because whether you're a tree hugger or not, is the right thing to do for, for, for the consumer, for the earth knowing Earth Day obviously was yesterday, you know, what, what a, what a appropriate, you know, kickoff you know, event to, to focus in on this, but really excited about his, his organization, Decarbonizing Commerce, as he focuses on an area that maybe few people are really focused on and talking about and, and, and structuring around, but one that impacts all of us, our innovation pipelines, our promotion, our content, our go to market strategies, our partnerships. And so, through the lens of Amazon sustainability initiatives, very excited to have him talk to us about how we can build our businesses and grow. You know, Grow our, our, a sustainable business financially with sustainability initiatives. So, Keith, thank you so much for joining us today. I'm going to pass the baton to you and let you take it away, good sir. Keith Anderson: I really appreciate the introduction. I'm going to need to bring you as my hype man everywhere I go from now on. Chris Perry: I am available for weddings, and bar mitzvahs, and birthdays, and you name it, so. Keith Anderson: And I'm very grateful to you, Oscar, and Amanda for inviting me to participate today. As you say, Earth Day was yesterday, but that's not why we're covering this topic. You know, there, there are commercial benefits to participating in some of the programs that we're going to cover today, where it makes sense. Some of these claims come directly from Amazon. So, you know, take those with whatever skepticism you will. But Amazon itself says in 2023, products that had the Climate Pledge Friendly badge saw an average 10 percent lift in product page views. And as somebody who had done pretty rigorous analysis in my past lives of the value of badges like Amazon's Choice and Best Seller, I had assumed there was some kind of a commercial upside to some of these emerging credentials that Amazon is displaying across the shopper's journey. But I didn't really have a way to quantify it. And very helpfully, John Shea and the team at Momentum Commerce just a few weeks ago did their own independent analysis and they found an average 8.4 percent sales lift. Secondly, you know, on the conversion side, and I, I guess sales falls on the conversion side too, but Amazon reports that more than customers have switched more than 60 million times from products that are not badged to products that are badged as Climate Pledge Friendly. That's as of the end of last year. And then the other program that we're going to spend a few minutes on, the compact by design program. As you'll hear it will make you eligible for Climate Pledge Friendly, but it also, just by its nature, can improve unit economics by lowering costs for things like material, packaging materials, storage, fulfillment. So, I, I'm very grateful to Chris for the great introduction. My, my history is all in the industry and, and about two thirds of it was in industry analysis and advisory usually focused on emerging capabilities and forces that were changing the business of retailing and CPG. And when I left my last company, I did some research and diligence and saw one of the forces, in addition to things like retail media and AI, that is really high velocity and increasingly transformational to retail and CPG business models is what's happening in climate and sustainability, and I love the phrase sustainable growth in that last session. I, I know this isn't the way that it was used, but the way we look at it, and I think increasingly the way the industry looks at it is you know, number one, some of the effects of what's happening are happening regardless of how we feel about it. It's not something you can managed fully, it just is. And so there's as much energy increasingly going into adapting supply chains in the business to be more resilient. But secondly, none of what we do is going to have an impact or be viable long term if it's not economically and commercially viable. And so we really focus on what we call commercial sustainability, which to Chris's point is where some of the you know, climate or sustainability initiatives intersect with conventional roles and the work of portfolio strategy and packaging and branding, sales, marketing, and so on. And some of the most fruitful innovation and initiatives and ways to engage retailers like Amazon are in that area. You know, contextually, part of the reason that I started doing this and we'll only spend a minute or two on this, but I think it's important for everybody to be aware of what's happening. There are what are called science based targets that are being set at an accelerating pace by big retailers and grocers and CPGs globally. And the targets alone don't count for much but, you know, there are companies like Mars as one example that are deploying a billion dollars over the next three years to accelerate these plans. So it's hard to argue that it isn't beginning to impact the industry. And emissions are divided into scopes and scopes one and two cover basically your own emissions, what comes out of your own smokestacks and whatever you source indirectly in terms of energy. But as you can see that whether you're a retailer or a brand represents a fraction of your total value chain emissions and typically 85 or 90 percent of what a company is emitting happens upstream, which for a retailer like Amazon means they're direct own label suppliers and they're vendors, and to a CPG means ingredients and materials and other service providers. And generally speaking in the industry, there is growing focus on where most of the emissions lie, which is scope three. And what that means to all of us is, you know, sustainability and climate are not new things. The industry has been working on them for decades. Walmart famously has project Gigaton, which, you know, they, they succeeded through collaborating with their suppliers in reducing or preventing one gigaton of emissions six years ahead of schedule. So it's not a new thing, but what is a growing focus is this cross industry value chain coordination and collaboration. And what that means is a lot of the investment and activity is shifting from backstage to onstage. And what I mean is, you know, the, the low hanging fruit that the sustainability teams have been working on behind the scenes over the last decade or so was often happening in the production and storage facilities. Increasingly, it includes that, but is impacting things like M&A strategy. If you're an emerging CPG brand that wants to get acquired by one of the majors, part of that due diligence process is going to be looking at your climate footprint. Some of the retailers are starting to look at climate footprint at both a corporate and product level in their supplier engagement and assortment strategy. They're asking for new data. So I'm not going to cover all of these, but what's important to take out of it is it's increasingly encroaching on the work that we do in almost any... And it's increasingly influential to commercial outcomes and ways of working with retailers. So I, I think everybody has probably seen just exploring Amazon site and mobile app. They are nudging shoppers across the path to purchase with options like lower carbon delivery, you know, that is in most cases, not even a choice. It's just a indication Amazon is presenting to shoppers to let you know this item is in a nearby fulfillment center. And so if you buy this one instead of others, it will, it will be lower emission given the shorter distance traveled. Climate Pledge Friendly, you're going to hear a lot about that, so stay tuned. And then you know, fewer boxes, fewer trips, that sort of correlates with the Amazon Day, which is an opportunity to accept, if you can believe it, lower velocity delivery and consolidate shipments into a single delivery with fewer boxes and fewer trips, which saves on both packaging and material costs and on fuel. So this is just an indication that this is becoming an increasingly visible part of how Amazon is. Presenting products to the shopper at different stages of the experience. And, you know, there are roughly seven big vendor facing programs that have some climate or sustainability role to them. The, the two broad based ones that we're going to focus on for the next few minutes are Compact by Design and Climate Pledge Friendly. But, I'm sure all of you are familiar with ships and product packaging, the evolution of ships and own container, frustration free packaging. A few of the programs that may be lesser known, but I wanted to make you aware of them in case they're relevant. You know, in, in Europe, they have a launch pad accelerator for sustainability focused CPG brands and tech companies. And then, for really small and medium enterprises, especially on the seller side, they launched a climate hub that's basically a version of some of this stuff, just oriented to smaller businesses. And finally, if you're in categories where it makes sense, things like electronics, but also outdoor goods and clothing and, and a few other categories. They're pre-owned certification and pre-owned resale business is turning into a pretty scalable business in Europe alone, it's, it was more than a billion dollars in '23. So, if that's relevant, check it out. And, you know, what we did when we were researching and analyzing these different programs was we surveyed, I think it was, 25 Amazon teams, and particularly those that had some experience participating in these programs or had done diligence and decided not to do them, and we looked at them through essentially three lenses, you know, effort as the input and then commercial outcomes and climate or sustainability outcomes as the output. And that basically led us to the top two here that we're highlighting and going to unpack for you today. Because, you know, I think that's not to say that in a different context, any of these may not be a better choice. So your mileage may vary, but this is how we arrived at a focus on these two. Now, I'll give you a second or two just to memorize this equation. I'm just kidding. Every time I see it, I sort of think to myself, boy it's actually not as complex as it looks, but this is the compact by design equation. And I'm not going to ask you to study this too carefully here because we're going to unpack it. But in essence, what Amazon is doing with compact by design, is encouraging and incentivizing you to reduce the weight and volume of your product and to increase what they call unit efficiency, which, you know, is, is something that's standardized in each category to something, as it says here, like, loads for laundry detergents. And the idea is to increase the number of units in a lighter and smaller pack configuration on the site. So it, it, it, to take a step back, this is a certification that Amazon will grant products in the US and a handful of other eligible markets, including the UK and Canada for products that through that formula that we just displayed, pass their category by category threshold. So they've got unit efficiency thresholds for each category. That's a moving target that's available on Amazon's site. But, you know, the idea is to be more unit efficient than that threshold for your category. And then once you qualify essentially two things have happened. One, you've almost certainly reduced your packaging and material costs, the weight and so as we say, your unit economics on the cost side are almost guaranteed to improve if you take a product that is ineligible and make minor tweaks to make it eligible, but the second real benefit here is Compact by Design automatically qualifies you for the Climate Pledge Friendly Program. And so it's sort of a way to feed two birds with one handful. If you are in a category or within your portfolio have products that are high potential here, this is where we would encourage you to start. And so just to unpack briefly what these three levers are. You know, volume is pretty straightforward. You know, it's, it's dimensional volume. So, you know, height and width and length. And anything you can do to reduce the size of the product and its packaging, and in particular, to increase what's called the product to package ratio. That is, you know, you want the product itself to fit as cleanly within the package as possible. That's going to help you on that front. Weight, anything you can do in both the product or the package to reduce weight. On the product side, things like concentration or dilutable products in some categories like cleaning and personal care in particular are an increasingly common way to go at this, but you've seen it in beverage categories with hydration and others. You know, if you're in a product category where it's feasible without sacrifices in effectiveness, taste, other important considerations to especially avoid shipping unnecessary water or air around the country. You're going to have a higher chance of qualifying. Secondly, you know, packaging there, there's all kinds of complexity and I bet most companies have packaging teams that can help you navigate this. But generally speaking, if a material like glass is the preferred material for packaging in a brick and mortar environment, it may not be in this context because of the weight. There's a great image that I'm going to add to a future version of this deck from a European, I think, gin brand that just updated its packaging from a glass bottle to new aluminum bottles. And the picture speaks a thousand words because all they posted this morning was a scale that on the one side has the previous glass package and on the other side of the scale are six of the new aluminum packages. So, again, it's a nuanced decision to make, and this is just one lens through which you might look at what the right packaging is. But if you're trying to qualify for this program, you want to look at lighter weight packaging materials, which may be plastic, aluminum, or paper. And then finally, units per pack. We'll talk about ways to do this, but this is closely correlated with concentration but it can also be about just improving the excuse me, increasing the unit density of a given pack configuration. So, here are a couple examples you know, I'll share some that Amazon shares, and then a couple that we identified, but, you know, products that are in irregularly shaped packages, which, you know, consequently can't be as tightly packed into the Amazon boxes. And secondly, that our liquid, you know, in addition to all the issues with leakage and potential shrink, they're heavier. So you know, in a category like personal care, Amazon, and we would highlight BAR as an example of a product form and correlated packaging that are, that are likelier to qualify. And then the second example, I think really illustrates that product to packaging ratio concept. And this is one where particularly as you are growing your Amazon business, and, and by the way, I don't think it's realistic and, and nor is it necessary to go focus on endeavoring to be eligible across your entire portfolio for the programs we're discussing here. I think it's, it's a better approach to identify some high velocity items that do material volume on Amazon and that have some of the preconditions that make it commercially viable to go update it. But one of, one of the considerations that more and more of the brands that we speak with and work with are acknowledging is a lot of the packaging that is necessary for a product to pop at physical retail, as the frustration free packaging concept sort of pioneered, isn't necessarily helpful at the digital shelf. And so, you know, if, as in this example of the Clorox bleach toilet tablets, You know, the product itself, those two tablets, only occupy roughly half of the packaging for the retail version of the product. And so, if you have a commercially viable pathway to an e-commerce pack that, that uses all of the rich imagery and the digital shelf canvas to you know, pop up at the digital shelf, you can potentially increase the product to package ratio and reduce some of that retail-ready packaging for this context. And, you know, increasingly, there are other ways to sell at the shelf. And so, some companies in certain contexts are trying to solve for both channels at the same time. That's the Compact by Design program. And as we say, if you qualify for Compact by Design you are automatically gonna receive the Climate Pledge Friendly badge, which, as you saw earlier in the discussion, it's now presented on search result pages as a sustainability feature, but if your product has any of these sustainability features, you'll get a little green leaf next to your product in search results. And then on the detail page itself, it's displayed as, as you see here. And again, we don't know category by category what the impacts are, but on average, I think it's realistic to say you are likely to see a material increase in traffic and sales if you become eligible for these products or for these designations. The Compact by Design certification is just one of dozens of certifications that you can use, however, to become eligible for the Climate Pledge Friendly badge. So, if you... here are some of the examples. You know, you'll see it. They've got, I think, 16 discrete pathways to these products, including a sub shop, which I am guessing is not very heavily trafficked, but for shoppers that are so motivated, they can see all of the Climate Pledge Friendly products consolidated in one place, and then, as you can see across search result pages in the faceted search filtering. And on detail pages, you'll increasingly see the badge and iconography. Denoting products that participate. So as I was saying, compact by design is just one of dozens of certifications that you can use to qualify. The complexity of these is pretty significant. And so part of the reason that compact by design is one that makes sense is it, it naturally aligns your pack configuration with some of Amazon's preferences and some of the nuance of their fulfillment and logistics model. And so it's not going to be the right choice in all cases, but it's worth considering as a first line of defense. But from there, you know, you can actually click, you'll get the slides after the session. If you click the word here, it'll take you to the page where you can see all of the current certifications that will make you eligible and the complexity here is some of these take eight to 10 weeks for you to qualify. Some of them take six to 12 months. Some of them carry a considerable fee because somebody wants, somebody needs to come audit your production facilities. And sometimes those audits can be pretty disruptive, you know, actually shutting down the production process for a day or more. So it's important, depending on your category and your starting point and your overall objective to pick the path of least resistance. These, any of these will qualify you, but they're not all equal. And so, you know, start with the one that Amazon developed for its own business, and then look for options that are a little more efficient. As we say, you know, this certification landscape is crowded and confusing. If, if you're looking for help, we've partnered with the private label suppliers that helped Amazon develop its Amazon Aware own label, which is Amazon's attempt to raise the bar for sustainability in several categories, including health and personal care. And as, as part of that role that they've played, they've developed a very nuanced understanding of all of the certifications that Amazon accepts and have great guidance for where to focus. And on the compact by design front, unit efficiency can be a little confusing and complicated to calculate, and then identify the underlying drivers. They've got a calculator that is really straightforward. So you input some of your product's characteristics. It identifies whether you're eligible or not and streamlines an economical path to eligibility. And then finally obviously getting some of these credentials on the site is a big part of getting credit with the shopper. But it's an increasingly complicated landscape to communicate and, and get credit for what you're doing in these areas and embedding it in product imagery and detail page copy. And so that's an area that we can help with if you are looking for it. So just to close things out, and then maybe we'll have a minute or two for Q& A, you know, if, if you're looking to engage with this, like I say, there's so much upside with Amazon and so many areas to focus, this doesn't need to be your overarching focus, but I would start paying attention and doing something here because this year Amazon is requiring its private label vendors to set targets and start reporting. I, I expect within three years, maybe sooner, they'll be doing that for all of their major vendors. And this is one of the areas that is easy enough to get started with, with provable enough commercial upside that it makes sense to start here. Skip over the SME Climate Hub if you're not a small and medium enterprise. Programs like Frustration Free and Chips and Product Packaging we didn't cover because they make sense in a limited number of cases, although ships and product packaging is a huge focus. And in Europe, Amazon is essentially mandating it. Compact by Design. It does bring complexity, particularly if you are considering making changes to product form or have to adapt packaging you know, in ways that are going to require shifts in the status quo, but many of these decisions can be made pretty quickly and easily. That's it for my end. You know, if you want to keep up with the work that we're doing and, and what's happening across the industry with different retailer programs and investment and innovation in the space, visit our website. We've got a newsletter that hits every Monday, and you'll hear soon, we're hosting a conference in September where we hope to bring together, again, not just the sustainability experts and practitioners, but those of us that have decision rights and budgets and whose work is going to be informed and impacted by a lot of the work that the retailers and others are doing. So that's it for me. Chris, I don't know if we've got time for questions. Amanda Wolff: Keith, thank you so much. This is Amanda. Really, really great session. Love hearing your content as usual, but especially on this topic. And to your point, so close to Earth Day, it might be timely, but it should be a part of our conversation every day. So, thanks again for this session. I did have a quick question for you, and I'm wondering if you could elaborate with our audience a little bit. We have audience members on this call who may be in earlier level roles in an organization. They may be more advanced and have more influence in an organization, but can you talk to them in particular about how you can influence internally and what you would do if you were in their shoes to help kind of get some of the larger organizations that are out there to move forward in some of these initiatives that, while Amazon might be pushing, they can be difficult to make that kind of change, especially in a big CPG. Keith Anderson: Totally. A couple of quick thoughts. One, I think most companies, especially the big CPGs have sustainability teams. And I've, I've seen you know, varying levels of isolation and siloing versus you know, cross functional collaboration and embedding it as a competency across functions. But, I would say on average, it skews towards silos. And so, if you're trying to influence the organization, one starting point is to go walk the halls and set up coffee with the sustainability practitioners. Because, my observation as I've dug into how companies are organized, many of the companies that have these teams, don't have enough people to focus on activity at this level. They're doing great things. A lot of it relates to you know, more macro initiatives, but because this is increasingly on the minds of consumers, because the retailers are asking for more, if you go connect with them and share some of what the retailer is asking you for, maybe what some of your consumer and marketplace knowledge team has, has surfaced in terms of consumer demand and behavior, you can align what you're trying to do commercially with what the sustainability team is trying to do. They won't always come to you. In fact, they often won't. Because they're oversubscribed, but if you go to them with a relatively focused ask, they're in a position with your framing of the problem to help you. I think the other, the other thing that I see becoming really important in this area is that focus on commercial viability. That is, identify peers that can help you find the strategies, tactics, capabilities that will help you sell more or waste less and reduce costs as you're reducing emissions, eliminating waste. And I, I think conventional wisdom sort of suggests in most cases, this stuff is going to be more expensive, cost prohibitive, it won't pay out. And I think in a lot of cases that's true. But there are so many things that you can do that aren't already being done to sell more and waste less, that just finding those and advocating for those would keep most companies teams busy for the next two or three years. And in the backdrop, the whole industry will be working to change the economics of some of the more capital intensive, more dilutive things that still have to happen, but there's a ton of low hanging fruit. Just eliminating unnecessary packaging, reduce the, reducing the distance things have to travel and otherwise increasing efficiency or aligning with consumer demand. So, that's how I would approach it. Amanda Wolff: Thank you so much, Keith. I really appreciate it. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=v8w4y3qn…
This episode features Tessa Callaghan, co-founder and CEO of Keel Labs, which produces a fiber from seaweed material being used in the fashion and other industries. In addition to sharing her and her co-founder's journey to starting Keel Labs, Tessa covers what they experienced firsthand as designers in the fashion industry, some of the ways that the material they're producing compares and contrasts both to conventional synthetics and natural fibers, and where she sees the industry headed. Learn more about Tessa Callaghan: Link to Keel ’s website Link to Tessa’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to another episode of the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and our guest this week is Tessa Callaghan, co-founder and CEO of Keel Labs, which is producing a fabric from seaweed material that's being used in the fashion and other industries. And I continue to be really interested in emerging ingredients and materials, not only for CPG products, but consumer products, including apparel and, you know, among the most interesting materials, seaweed is really emerging as, an interesting and high potential material for a lot of reasons, which you'll hear more about as you get to know Tessa today, and you may have heard in episode 17 with Julia Marsh of Sway. So, you'll learn a lot about she and her co-founder's journey to starting Keel Labs, what they experienced firsthand as designers in the fashion industry, some of the environmental impacts of the materials that they had available as options and some of the limitations and shortcomings with those same materials, some of the ways that the material that they're producing compares and contrasts both to synthetics and natural fibers, and where she sees the industry headed over the next few years. So, I learned a ton from Tessa, and I'm excited for you to meet Tessa Callaghan, co-founder and CEO of Keel Labs. Tessa, thanks so much for joining us for the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Tessa Callaghan: Yeah, thank you so much for having me. Keith Anderson: Well, for those that may not be familiar, why don't we start with, you telling us what Keel Labs is and what it does and how you and your team came to start it. Tessa Callaghan: Yeah, of course. So, at Keel Labs, our whole mission is to take ocean derived resources, and use them to solve some of the world's most challenging and pressing crises. Our flagship product is called Kelsun, and this is a fiber that is derived from Seaweeds, and is applicable in textile applications in a wide range from clothes to interiors to basically anywhere that you see fibers used. And you know, really the core reason of starting this initiative and founding Keel Labs was around the need to address the waste, the pollution, the negative impacts that the fashion industry in particular has on our planet, and that have yet to be solved in its entirety. And so, my background, along with my co-founder's, was in fashion and in textiles and we're working in the industry and really experiencing firsthand the lack of options that we are being provided with and seeing some of the bottlenecks that were, you know, going to be occurring both as, you know, agricultural yields are decreasing and as the demand for natural fibers was increasing. And so it was quite a circuitous route for us, not necessarily, you know, I think, the intention that either of us had when we started in the fashion industry. But push really came to shove, and we saw that there was a really big opportunity to harness the massive potential that the ocean, and primarily seaweeds, have to help revolutionize these, you know, really resource intensive industries. Keith Anderson: The ocean is so hot right now, and so I want to come, I want to come back to that. Tessa Callaghan: Literally and figuratively. Keith Anderson: I know. I was very excited to drop that one when I spoke with you. Tessa Callaghan: Regardless. Keith Anderson: But, I'd love to spend a couple minutes, going deeper on sort of the two drivers that I heard you describe there. One of which was the environmental impact of fibers in the textile industry. You know, many of our listeners come from that side of the industry, but many are also in CPG and grocery. And, I know they all wear clothes, but they're not as close to the business of apparel. And then the second thing I heard that I actually wasn't expecting, but you mentioned was the demand for natural fibers and some of the supply constraints or challenges with diminishing yields, which, you know, we talk about that more and more often as a driver of shifting strategy across retail and consumer products. So much of the focus is on your first point around minimizing environmental impact, but increasingly what seems to be motivating companies to make changes even sooner is adapting to supply chain challenges and constraints by finding more resilient materials. So maybe starting with the environmental impact, can you share more about what you learned about the environmental impact of what your options were when you got into the industry? Tessa Callaghan: Yeah, that's a really great question. And I think, you know, really was one of the core catalysts when it came to our analysis and the reason that we ended up really looking to the ocean as a resource. So one of the primary things that we were seeing is that, shouldn't be a surprise, but, you know, various materials and, you know, industries obviously like to highlight, where they're winning and it's very easy to kind of harp on the singular challenges. So as an example, you know, polyester synthetics primarily deal with the fact that they're petroleum based and there's microplastic shedding. And that's kind of their core focus. And so when we think about, or when people typically talk about natural materials, it sounds like it's the solution in that, "oh great, it avoids all of those things and it's natural" and that's fantastic, but what's really underneath the surface there is there's mass amounts of water usage, there's mass pesticide fertilizers required, arable land degradation in a lot of cases, and a lot of chemical processing post cultivation. And so when we kind of look at the industry on a holistic level, it's not just carbon emissions and microplastics, it's chemicals, it's land, it's water, and so rather than saying we're just going to be able to compare and say, we're not using microplastics, how do we actually solve the underlying challenges of the industry as a whole? And I think that that really needs to be not just for us, but on a kind of planetary scale, how we evaluate the benefit and the drawbacks of various innovations. Keith Anderson: And that explains a lot. What about on the second point, you know, were you finding challenges with, quality, consistency of supply of some of the existing alternatives? Tessa Callaghan: Yeah. I mean, I think that I guess to their benefit because of, you know, in a lot of cases, hundreds, if not thousands of years of cultivation and industrial know how, less so on the quality side and more so on the understanding that the quantities, are not able to be, or will not be able to continue to be what they once were, or even what they are today. So there's kind of a combination of factors. One is that due to climate change and soil health and things of that nature, the yields we can see year over year in natural crop cultivations across agricultural systems is in a lot of degrees declining. And on top of that, not only because of certain, you know, policy implementations, and there's a lot of growth there, but also from a consumer demand perspective, and this, you know, knowing shift away from microplastics and fossil fuels. We know that we don't like those. So there's an increase in demand so the match of what the plan is able to sustain on a land based perspective and what the demand today and, you know, going forward is going to be, are just not equal. Keith Anderson: Got it. So you did some analysis and it led you to the ocean and specifically seaweed. How did you end up there? And what are some of the benefits? Tessa Callaghan: So for us, you know, as I was saying, we really started in this analysis perspective. I didn't grow up saying, "I'm going to find a way to use seaweed and it's going to be the way," it was really a matter of, you know, necessity. And so when we think about, you know, on one perspective, volume, we know that when we think about textiles and fibers, there's a massive consumption, which is a whole separate problem as a whole. But that we need to make sure that we have access to robust volumes and volumes that, are readily available and, you know, aren't requiring this like mass scale intervention. And so, seaweed is one of the most abundant and fast growing organisms on the planet and really diverse, and you know, found on nearly every continent. And so from that perspective, it ticked the box. Additionally, because of its fast growth and a number of other properties, it also has benefits for ocean and thus planetary health, from filtering waste runoff, to sequestering CO2, to, you know, new studies kind of leading to the, you know, deacidification of the ocean itself. And so there are all these benefits. And on top of that, even if we take all of those away, really what we're seeing is this is a crop that requires zero chemical intervention. We don't have to add fertilizers. We don't have to add water. We don't have to add pesticides. And so from that perspective, you're already starting from a clean slate. And so all of those kind of boxes combined for us to say, what a beautiful source. If we can just start clean, can we not continue to remain that way as much as physically possible? And to that end, already address all of those kinds of holistic components when it comes to overarching impact. Keith Anderson: This may be a naive question, but I'm comfortable with that. Is this a, sort of naturally harvested, source of material? Or are you, or is the industry effectively farming it? That is, you know, are there artificial installations where we're cultivating it? Are we, managing certain territorial sections of the ocean? I just don't know enough about how the supply is managed. Tessa Callaghan: Yeah, this is a really fascinating question. On one hand, all of those are true. And on the other hand, we're seeing a lot of developments in the space. So there are certain unknowns and certain things that are remaining to be, I think worked out on a global scale, but, you know, basically there are a number of different ways of, that seaweeds are currently cultivated or accessed. Some of that is just naturally. Ideally, you know, those people that are, you know, harvesting are ensuring, you know, we're taking very close consideration of the local ecology. There are strict measures in place. This is really, really critical because it is, you know, a backbone of a lot of these ecosystems. And there is also known, and a lot of it is, farmed. So whether that's on lines on the coasts or some of these new developments happening in, you know, deep waters, there's a number of different ways of basically growing and cultivating. Some of that's dependent on species. Some of that's dependent on kind of regional parameters. But it's really a fascinating sector outside of ourselves as a whole, because there is so much promise for seaweed cultivation and harvesting, and so a lot of new kind of technologies and regulatory practices and things like that will really continue to evolve over the coming years. Keith Anderson: Can you describe the technology or the process that you use to transform the raw material into Kelsun? You know, when I go to your website and look at the material, it doesn't resemble seaweed. So I imagine there's some magic somewhere in the mix. Tessa Callaghan: There certainly is some magic. Some people refer to that magic as science, but, you know. I like saying magic better, actually. But, but yeah, so basically how it works is that we extract polymers that are abundant in seaweeds. We then take those polymers, create a formulation, and then input that into existing fiber manufacturing systems. And so, with that extraction, again, you're not using raw seaweed and just, you know, chopping it up whole and making a sushi shirt. It's really about how can we work with these core polymers that are available to us? And also, how do we put this into the existing supply chain systems while removing the toxic chemicals that are typified in those systems? And so for us, we're able to work on and work with the same know how, the same scales, really the same frameworks that the industry is built off of, but replace that with something again that's fundamentally better than what it previously was. Keith Anderson: That plug and play characteristic, in many of the conversations I have, seems to be pretty important, just given the power of inertia and the capital intensity of changing production, processes and technology. So I imagine that works in your favor, you know. when you say it's a fundamentally better, approach, you've already identified some of the clear benefits. You know, it maintains many of the characteristics of conventional fibers, but it is lacking some of the toxic and problematic chemicals and microplastics. You know, when you're working with the industry to develop applications and use cases, how are they comparing and contrasting it, and, you know, what are the trade offs and decision frameworks that the industry is using to find out where to apply it? Tessa Callaghan: So this is really not only developed a lot over the last few years, but I think we're again, in all of these conversations, there's just a lot of change happening. On one hand, this is still a very new topic and workflow and interests of the textile sector as a whole. And so I think that there remains for a lot of companies, a level of evaluation and understanding of how to navigate a new material because we've been so historically reliant on, you know, these like primary categories of, you know, natural and synthetic. You know, natural being cotton or linen or more new viscose versus, you know, polyesters and nylons. And so when they're evaluating introducing a new raw material. The initial evaluations that we were seeing were just, "is this the same as this?," And are, "is this the same as polyester? Is this the same as cotton?" And although, relevance and similarities and understanding are key in those categories, when you're introducing something that is fundamentally new, like from a molecular level, it is not the same. You are going to have differences. Those differences can be beneficial depending on how you look at it. Or negative, depending on how you look at that. And so the way that we really position and view Kelsun is around this kind of new natural category. So again, we see a real uptick in demand for natural materials for a lot of those reasons. And currently there really is no fiber or source available that has, you know, the fundamental feel of a naturally sourced fiber. So like outside of a man made cellulosic or, things like that. And so our fiber looks and feels kind of like a combination of, you know, cotton and a linen, but with a really, soft hand feel of more elevated fibers and, you know, has a similar performance to man made cellulosics, even though we're not a cellulosic. And so I think the industry is kind of trying to wrap its head around "how do we interpret, how do we describe, and how do we validate things when they're intersectional?" I think you also touched on, what are some of the benefits and some of the drawbacks? One of the things that we typically have to, you know, work through and evaluate with potential customers is this idea of, you know, we want something that is compostable or biodegradable or, you know, even biocompatible. But we're also used to working with polyesters, so we want it to last forever. And having the conversation of, you know, so it's okay to, to have your preference, but we need to understand that if you want something to go away, it's going to have to go away. And I think that there are interesting conversations to that end that continue to evolve and that, you know, really we've seen a lot of change in over the last couple of years in terms of understanding and the kind of in depth knowledge required to navigate these conversations. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience. Plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Hey, it's Keith Anderson from decarbonize.co inviting you to join our brand new Slack community for retail, e-commerce, and consumer product professionals that want to keep up with what's new, interesting, and actionable in industry, climate, and sustainability action. and connect with your peers. As I got into this work, one of the things that I found so invigorating is how passionate and willing to help everyone is. But I haven't found a community composed of people across functions in the industry that are working in or want to work in climate and sustainability. And so we're launching the community to connect. Both sustainability experts and practitioners and people in conventional roles like product design, packaging, supply chain marketing, and merchandising to share their work, ask for help, connect about career opportunities. Keep up with the latest industry development and we'll be previewing who our upcoming guests on the podcast will be and giving you an opportunity to pose questions to our guests. So I can't wait to meet you and have you meet some of the other members of the community. To join us, you can visit decarbonize.co. You'll see a call to action on the homepage or use the intelligence menu at the top of the page where you'll also see a link to join. And, Tessa, if, you know, folks want to get in touch with you or learn more about Keel, where would you send them? Tessa Callaghan: Always get in touch and definitely reach out. You can absolutely follow us on Instagram, or on LinkedIn for those professionals. But we also have contact on our website, depending on what type of conversation you're looking to have, we'll direct you in the right place, and hopefully have a chat because it's really important for us to be connected with our community, hear people out, make sure that we're reflecting the needs of greater industries in the planet as a whole. So hoping anyone that wants to get in touch, we're here to have a chat. Keith Anderson: Great. Well, thank you so much for joining me. This was really interesting and, great to have you on the show. Tessa Callaghan: Yeah. Thank you so much for having me. This was a delight. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=p8m540x8…
Mark Rushmore is co-founder and CCO of SURI, a sustainable electric toothbrush company. Mark and his co-founder began their careers at P&G, one of the great incubators of talent within the CPG industry. With a long entrepreneurial track record and some exits, he and his co-founder had the opportunity and the idea to start a consumer product brand that doesn't compromise on effectiveness or performance, produces a product that's more sustainable, and educates consumers about how to use it sustainably throughout the product's life cycle. Hear Mark’s insights about decisions from product design, materials, packaging, and growing direct to consumer and and through retail. Learn more about Mark Rushmore: Link to SURI’s website Link to guest’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Hello, welcome to another episode of the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm Keith Anderson. I'm guessing like most of our listeners, you brush your teeth every day. I hope you do. And If you do, I think you're going to enjoy today's episode with Mark Rushmore of a sustainable electric toothbrush company called SURI, which is short for Sustainable Rituals. Mark and his co-founder began their careers at P&G, which I think many acknowledge is one of the great incubators of talent within the CPG industry. And After a couple exits, you know, long entrepreneurial track record and some exits, he and his co-founder had the opportunity and the idea to start a consumer product brand that didn't make any compromises on effectiveness or performance, but goes a long way towards producing a product that's more sustainable and really educating shoppers and consumers about how to use it sustainably throughout the product's life cycle. And in speaking with Mark, it's clear that he and his team have thought deeply about decisions from product design and ingredients and materials to packaging to distribution strategy through channels like Amazon, along with a direct to consumer and growing retail presence and, having used the product and, you know, going through the unboxing experience and seeing how, in essentially every touch point with the shopper, they are reinforcing the dual messaging of a product that really outperforms along with an approach to product design and usage that is lighter on the planet and, you know, ultimately leads to a business that's profitable, which, unlocks most doors. And economic sustainability really enables environmental sustainability. So I'm eager for you to meet Mark Rushmore, hear about his entrepreneurial journey, and learn from some of the choices they've made at SURI. Here's Mark. Mark, welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Thanks so much for joining us. Mark Rushmore: Keith, thank you so much for having me on. We've had multiple emails to get to this point and I know I've not been available a couple of times, so I'm just super happy to be here and really grateful. Thank you. Keith Anderson: Well, we're really excited to have you and, I know you've been busy. Congrats on the recent funding. You've actually extended a streak of ours. I think you're the fourth guest to come on the show within a few weeks of announcing fresh capital. So congrats. Mark Rushmore: Yeah, well, thank you very much. It's, yeah, no, it's really nice to have that done and now to, you know, refocus all of our time and attention back into growing the world's most popular and sustainable electric toothbrush. Keith Anderson: Well, maybe a great place to start would be a bit about your background and your co-founder's and what led you to this category and starting SURI. Mark Rushmore: Sure, would you like the, short or the medium version? Keith Anderson: How about medium? Mark Rushmore: Okay, medium. So, I grew up in, Scotland and from when I was a child, I was just really interested in business. I set up a rival catering company, to my school, and that grew quite, quite a lot by the time I was like 17. And then when I went to university, I studied history, but I really found my passion became alive when I set up a society for history students. I managed to get the sponsorship from like the History Channel and, you know, I grew a committee, we raised, thousands of pounds. And I realized like, wow, I feel so alive, like, wouldn't it be great to continue this in my life? But I'm also, you know, conscious that you should, minimize your downside, maximize your upside. So I thought, "what better place to start my career than Procter & Gamble?" You know, the world's largest manufacturer of, fast moving consumer goods. And so I spent a few wonderful years there learning all about the trade and ultimately I was managing Pringles when it was sold to Kellogg's. So I helped transition that business, which was worth over a hundred million dollars, successfully to Kellogg's. And then I took the opportunity and a rather generous payout to explore some other opportunities, that I wanted to. In fact, around the same time, unfortunately, an acquaintance of mine from university committed suicide. And I just thought, you know, the combination of having this like Capital for the first time in my life and realizing how short life can be. I thought, you know, I'm not going to wait until I retire to live out my dreams. I'm going to write a list of them and see if I can do them all now. So I wrote a list and one of those things was to set up a company. The other one was to do it like a physical challenge. And another one was to learn about digital marketing. So I became a ski instructor in Canada briefly, then I cycled from Canada to Mexico unsupported, and then I won a digital media competition to sail around the world as part of the Clipper Round The World Yacht Race. I actually discovered though on training, I'm not a massive ocean sailing fan, so I decided not to do that, but instead I set up a business. So I set up the UK office of a German experiential marketing agency, for my kitchen table and scaled that through to exit five years later. And during that time I won Oral B as a client as well as BMW and Jaguar. And so we manage their trade shows and I kind of really understood like how they engage with the dental profession and how important it is and how electric toothbrush sales work. And then during that time, I was invited, very fortunately to attend the Cannes Lions, which is like the Oscars of the advertising industry. And I had a chance meeting with the Unilever CMO, Keith Weed, who invited me to a party that he was hosting on an island off the coast of Cannes in the South of France. It's kind of like, you couldn't quite believe it. I had to pinch myself. But he said, "if you can get down to this boat at 1:30, you know, you can go across to the Island." And then when I got there on the boat, it was, my, my now co-founder. So I met him there, and we got chatting at this event and it turned out he'd also used to work for Procter & Gamble. I was in sales and strategy. He was in finance and marketing. I was in UK. He was in Geneva. He managed Venus Razors, so Gillette across EMEA. And we both just agreed that, you know, consumer products are so important and invaluable in our daily lives, but a lot more could be done to make them more sustainable and not as an afterthought, but from the beginning. But also to use e-commerce as a way to compete more effectively versus some larger FMCG people like Procter & Gamble. And that also experience was really crucial, you know, since the advent of the iPhone, I think consumer expectations in terms of the unboxing, the advertising, the customer service, have improved. So Yeah, so Keith and I, you know, got chatting, became friends. And then a few years later, once I'd sold my company and he'd sold his company, then we came back together and said, look, it's time we do something about this issue, which is that every year 4 billion toothbrushes are thrown away and end up in landfills and oceans. Virtually every brush you probably ever used, Keith, since you were a child, probably still exists and will do for a long time because of the materials they're made from. What's more, people don't necessarily love their existing brush. They haven't changed much in shape in 30, 40 years. You know, you get the gunk on the bottom. People complain about poor battery life and no one's using the Bluetooth apps in the research that we've found. So, we thought, "could we make a brush that's more sustainable and better for the environment? And this is the result. Keith Anderson: So, I like the medium intro. There's a lot to dive into there. You told me before we hit record that you haven't been to Colorado, but if you like skiing, you've got to visit at some point. Mark Rushmore: Oh, I would love to come to Colorado. In fact, a lot of people who order SURI in the US are based in Colorado. And I think it just speaks volumes to, you know, there's a lot of people with a shared, a value system and belief in, in the future of our planet and the outdoors. Keith Anderson: Yeah, Boulder in particular is sort of a, hub for sustainable CPG brands. Mark Rushmore: Definitely, you know. Keith Anderson: So, you know, you mentioned at least three areas that I want to get into, one of which was the product design. You know, one of which was the, channel strategy. And so, we'll come back to the third, but why don't we talk about the product design itself, because, you know, you've mentioned both the experience and some of the sustainability attributes. How did you approach deciding on materials and, you know, designing for both the product's effectiveness and position in the bathroom and its environmental footprint? Mark Rushmore: Sure. So we, we started with the premise that we didn't think sustainability should come with a compromise. I think in like, I don't know, let's call it sustainability 1.0, you know, you might have a product, but it wouldn't necessarily give you a great performance. You know, you were kind of compromising, "okay, this isn't going to wash my clothes as effectively as a regular detergent." And two, you might compromise on the design, on how it looks, on the weight or, or how it, you know, how it feels. And so when we set out on this, we thought, we just don't think that because something's made more sustainably, it should come with any compromise on performance or design. So that was the starting premise. But then when it came to like, "okay, how can we make a more sustainable brush?" So we, you know, we looked firstly at materials, you know, are there better materials than the multitude of plastics which are currently made in electric brushes? And one of the points we started with was with the heads. So obviously the heads get thrown out and you replace them. Dentists recommend every three months. So whilst billions of toothbrushes get thrown out. You know, the quantity of heads the even more enormous. So our head is made from cornstarch and our bristles are made from castor oil. Both plant-based materials that when they degrade, won't degrade in the same sort of quantity of microplastics as say, like traditional toothbrush heads. We also offer free recycling, in the US and the UK. We have this prepaid mailer bag, which in itself is compostable. So once you're done with the head, you just pop it in. We ask people to put four heads in, you put it into the post and it'll come back to us. We're working with the University of Exeter here in the UK at the moment on like how we're making new products out of the recycled material. But to your question, like how do we do that? Well, we looked at lots of different academic papers, lots of different, you know, research into different materials and this is what we determined was going to be the most effective way. Now, if you go to a factory, as we did, in fact, I think we went to 24 factories roughly, 23 of them told us that's not possible, you know, or just straight out laughed at us on the phone. They said, you know, "why don't you just take the ones that we have? Like, they're tested." We were told that this material wouldn't be strong enough, that it wouldn't pass certain tests. There's no point in even trying. Now, I think the thing is, most factories are, you know, are optimized for efficiency. So they want to turn out more of what they already have. And so it's, it's rare to find a factory that wants to experiment and test, but fortunately, Gibb is the most stubborn person I've ever met. I mean, he, he will, he just kept saying "it's possible, it's possible, like we will have to find someone else." I'll admit, like at various points, I thought, Maybe it's not, like, you know, maybe it's just not possible. It's like, "we can't do it. We have to look into other solutions." But fortunately, you know, he kept going. On the 24th one we found someone who was like, "okay, well, I'll do the test. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work." We said, "of course, like, if it doesn't, we're not going to try and push a product that doesn't work." And, fortunately, you know, after multiple iterations, we found a way of using these materials, which no one had done previously. And then additionally, our brush you'll see is about, it's about half the width of traditional electric toothbrushes. So it actually means we're using less material as well, which is another sort of fundamental part for reducing your footprint. The handle's made from aluminium, which is highly, recyclable, as you'll be aware. And then we also included this tiny screw on the bottom that enables us, unlike 99 percent of brushes, which are fully sealed, to be able to remove, you know, the battery and either replace it or to be able to strip it and then ensure that everything gets recycled appropriately, or that we can reuse certain components that we can either, you know, reuse the motor or different elements. So that's been an important part. But then also, you know, we thought about packaging. So our packaging is 100 percent plastic-free. You'll also notice about half the size of traditional packaging in our category. And it's been thoughtfully designed with FSC approved materials so that it's, you know, as sustainable as possible. But I'm going to put my hands up, Keith. Could we be better? Absolutely we could. And we are constantly looking. In fact, I've just come from a meeting right now. We found a way to, I think, reduce packaging, in our next iteration of the packaging by I think we're seeing 23 percent and we found some innovative space, you know, savings, but I mean, this is also a world exclusive for your podcast, but we've also got a better way of doing the insides with a new material which is even more sustainable than what we have currently. Keith Anderson: Inside of the packaging? Mark Rushmore: Inside of the packaging and also improves efficiency on the line. So like it's actually going to be faster, for packing, but it's also more sustainable and it's also a better experience for the consumer. So we are far from perfect. But we have this sustainability in our DNA, you know, we, we kind of, we'll constantly strive to see if there's ways we can do things better. And you know, it's, it's an ongoing journey that will, will never end. So yeah, that, that kind of covers some of the, the green credentials that have gone into the design of the brush and the packaging. Keith Anderson: It's, it's definitely a moving target and maybe it's a nice segue to some of the e-commerce discussion because as I listened to you describe even some of these more recent discoveries and potential enhancements, it calls to mind programs like Amazon Compact by Design and, you know, Amazon's own certification that basically incentivizes, lightweighting and reducing the package to product ratio. You've worked, with Amazon programs like that. Do you find that some of your channel strategies have led you to some of these decisions that are, are more space efficient and end up yielding economic benefits? Mark Rushmore: So it's a great question. And I must say from the outset, like I'm a, I'm a big fan of what Amazon did. They actually approached us pre-launch and said, "Hey, we're going to be running this accelerator. Would you like to be part of it?" And, you know, I'll throw my hands up when Amazon came to us saying, "Oh, we've got this sustainability accelerator." I was thinking Amazon and sustainability are not two words that you necessarily immediately kind of put two and two together. But as we sort of assess whether we thought, you know, "could we do the program?" You know, change in our opinion will require everyone to, you know, take part, not just small companies, but, you know, the potential impact that Amazon can make by influencing, you know, their supply chain decisions, et cetera, is so enormous. And then when we joined the program, we learned about all sorts of different initiatives that they're sort of taking part in. But also, you know, things like you, like you mentioned, Compact by Design, which then forms part of their Climate Pledge Friendly badge and certification, is really important. And what it enables, I think, lots of different brands to do is like At least have guidance towards making more sustainable decisions, and yeah, just kind of making that awareness. In the same respect, when we went through the B Corp certification, a lot of people say like, "oh, is it so great being a B Corp because, you know, you get the recognition with consumers?" But that's only really one part of it. The main thing that B Corp helped us with was it kind of steered us towards improving policies that we hadn't even considered, like in, in all honesty, and like to think about ways we could improve our business and methodologies. And it kind of provides a framework for how you could do things a little bit better. So, so yeah, so I mean, for us, our mission is to kind of constantly improve the sustainable nature of our product. In fact, SURI is short for Sustainable Rituals. And so we, we sort of grasp with both hands, any, any kind of framework or anything that people suggest, you know, might be useful and we assess it, work out whether it's something that we think will make a difference and then go from there. Keith Anderson: Well, and you, you mentioned, you know, some of the efficiencies that you're finding as, you continue learning and iterating. I think one of the pieces of, I'll use air quotes, "conventional wisdom" that I think sustainability 1.0 has sort of left as a legacy is the idea that even if the more sustainable product is on parity in terms of effectiveness, it tends to be, more expensive. And I think there's great data. In fact, you know, just, you know, 10 days ago or so, New York University Stern, School of Business did their annual conference on sustainability where, along with Cercana, they often report out, you know, "here's the share of products that are marketed as sustainable and willingness to pay a premium." But, you know, in terms of the competitive dynamic, what are you finding in oral care and how have you had to approach some of those choices about product design? Mark Rushmore: Totally. It's a really great question. And I think I would say from the outset, like, you know, ideally, you want to make more sustainable options available to everyone, you know, to absolutely everyone that, that's got to be the goal moving forwards. I think our product sits at a more premium end of the category. However, it does sit amongst a group of competitors who are charging the same or a lot more. I think some of our competitors, their products now are 500, 600, 700, 800 dollars. And we're competing, you know, ours is just over a hundred dollars. So, you know, it's, it's an interesting sort of point. Now, we would love to make a products which are more cost effective, you know, so that we can hit like a wider range of consumers at a different price point. Right now, we don't have that product, but you know, that's firmly in our, in our targets, you know? So I think we have a competitively priced product, which offers much more sustainable features as well as like great performance features, you know, so our battery lasts 40 days on a single charge, whereas a lot of toothbrushes last maybe three to five days. You know, we have 33 000 sonic vibrations. We were tested in Sallis Research in the US, which do the the clinical trials of a lot of big brands and ours was proven to be, you know, as effective or more effective. So yeah, so I think it is possible to create a competitively priced product, which is sustainable. Keith Anderson: And is there any messaging to shoppers around total lifetime cost of ownership? You know, I've seen in some categories that have a similar, you know, sort of handle and cartridge model, shaving in particular, some of the emerging brands that are plastic-free, actually, talk about, you know, yes, the handle may be more than the, just to use an example, Venus or MACH3, you know, that you're using today, but it'll last forever. And because the blades are so low cost, it'll pay back in 18 months, for example. Is that a conversation happening with products like yours? Mark Rushmore: You know what, Keith, it's a, it's a conversation that I'm going to re bring to the team, following what you're saying, because this is one of our major benefits. We don't talk about it enough, you know, because our price is actually already competitively priced versus these, like, throwaway products that you're going to need multiple of in the same time that you need one SURI. It's a real competitive advantage of ours, and I don't think we, we probably make enough of it. Keith Anderson: And I imagine, you know, with some of the potential repair characteristics, I don't know how big a component of the value prop that is, but if your product is designed for repairability and basically others are designed, to make it impossible, you know, that planned obsolescence has a cost also. Mark Rushmore: Definitely, definitely. And that's the thing, it's like, it's not just more economic, it's not just more sustainable, it's also much more economical, you know, to, to buy a SURI. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Hey, it's Keith Anderson from decarbonize.co inviting you to join our brand new Slack community for retail, e-commerce, and consumer product professionals that want to keep up with what's new, interesting, and actionable in industry, climate, and sustainability action, and connect with your peers. As I got into this work, one of the things that I found so invigorating is how passionate and willing to help everyone is. But I haven't found a community composed of people across functions in the industry that are working in or want to work in climate and sustainability. And so we're launching the community to connect both sustainability experts and practitioners, and people in conventional roles like product design, packaging, supply chain, marketing, and merchandising to share their work, ask for help, connect about career opportunities, keep up with the latest industry development and we'll be previewing who our upcoming guests on the podcast will be and giving you an opportunity to pose questions to our guests. So I can't wait to meet you and have you meet some of the other members of the community. To join us, you can visit decarbonize.co. You'll see a call to action on the homepage or use the intelligence menu at the top of the page where you'll also see a link to join. Well, I'll set the calendar reminder now and I'll, I'll check back in about a year. Mark Rushmore: Look forward to it. Maybe we could do it in Boston. Keith Anderson: That'd be nice. Or maybe on the slopes out in Colorado. Mark Rushmore: Yeah, love it. Keith Anderson: Well, Mark, if folks want to learn more about SURI or get in touch, where should they head? Mark Rushmore: Sure. So if you go to our website, www.trysuri.Com, or you can search for us on Amazon, or you can just type in "SURI Electric Toothbrush into Google and that'll give you some more info. And if you want to get in touch with me, my name is Mark Rushmore and you know, by all means, you know, send me, send me a hello on LinkedIn, mention the podcast and I'll give you a discount if you want to purchase the brush. Keith Anderson: Fantastic. Well, Mark, thanks so much for joining us. Mark Rushmore: You're very welcome. Thanks for having me. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=6nrk0my8…
In this episode of Decarbonizing Commerce, host Keith Anderson welcomes Matthew Isaacs, co-founder of My Emissions, to discuss the critical intersection of climate innovation and commerce, focusing on the environmental impact of food production and consumption. Matthew shares how his journey with My Emissions began during the COVID-19 pandemic when he and his co-founder sought ways to reduce their environmental footprint. Recognizing that food accounts for a significant portion of global greenhouse gas emissions, they developed My Emissions to help food businesses calculate and communicate product-level emissions. The platform aims to bridge the gap between emissions data and consumers, empowering businesses to make informed sustainability decisions while engaging customers through carbon labeling. Matthew highlights the platform's dual focus on emissions data and communication, enabling companies to navigate sustainability challenges and drive meaningful change and the importance of transparency and collaboration in achieving a low-carbon future for the food industry. Learn more about Matthew Isaacs: Link to My Emission’s website Link to Matthew’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm Keith Anderson, and my guest this week is Matthew Isaacs, co-founder of My Emissions, which helps food manufacturers, retailers, and restaurants calculate and communicate product- and menu-item-level emissions. And this is a topic that remains really interesting to me for a handful of reasons. Number one, food is a huge source of emissions globally, one of the largest sources of emissions within retail and consumer products. Secondly, the value chain represents a huge percentage of those emissions, and it can be challenging and complicated to calculate those emissions. And thirdly, labeling and communicating emissions for consumers with the objective of changing behavior is something that really interests me. You know, we've seen, nutrition and health and wellness schemes meet with varying degrees of success, and they have varying levels of standardization, country to country, retailer to retailer. And so I'm always eager to speak with anybody that is actively working in that space, or studying what works, and Matthew is one of those people. So, I'm very excited for you to meet Matthew Isaacs, co-founder of My Emissions. Well, Matthew, welcome to the podcast. Great to have you with us. Maybe to get us started, you can tell us a bit about how you ended up starting My Emissions. Matthew Isaacs: Absolutely. So our story began with the COVID 19 pandemic. Myself and my co-founder, Nathan, we just started exploring how we could reduce our own environmental impact. The two of us are longstanding friends. We were both at Cambridge University together here in the UK, and we've always been data-minded. We've always been thinking about what we can do to be more sustainable, to reduce our impact and how we can make a difference really to society. And in the context of having a lot of time on our hands, we have the concept of furlough here in the UK. And so we're working at the time, it really gave us the opportunity to start exploring what we could do to reduce our impact. And we very quickly realised that food is the biggest and best way that individuals can reduce their impact. What we see is that around one third, 33 percent of all global greenhouse gas emissions are coming from food right now. And what really excited us is this idea that we weren't asking people to spend tens of thousands of pounds or dollars on solar panels or buying a new car or vehicle, changing their holiday habits, things that are very emotive, things that can cost a lot of money. Instead, what we can do is suggest simple swaps that often don't cost more money. And through that, we can actually quite quickly and significantly reduced our carbon footprint. and that was our starting point. It was very much a personal, individual led, starting point. And over time we've really transitioned into being much more of a platform for food businesses. Because what we realized very quickly is that not only do consumers have this problem, but actually food businesses and companies that could be restaurants, brands, FMCG, They're all facing the same problem. And there was this, ultimately what we saw is this big disconnect between emissions data from food in a research environment, and that data getting across to not only consumers, but also to food companies. And now that's really the gap that we're trying to fill with my emissions. We're trying to be the provider that can bridge that gap, that can, that is willing to open the can of worms that is emissions reporting and emissions labeling and digest all of that information and come out with something that's pragmatic, that's simple, and that can scale. And that's where we've got to today. Keith Anderson: So, I hear there's sort of two, legs to the platform. One of which is the emissions data itself. And the second is really about the communication and the labeling. So, why don't we take those one at a time. Is there something unique about food as an industry or as a category that leads you to focus on that specifically versus some of the industry- or category-agnostic solutions? Matthew Isaacs: I think there is, and the first thing is food's wide impact, the second thing, and this is a real challenge, probably the biggest challenge in our work, is the fact that the majority of emissions are coming at the farm level. So when we look and measure the emissions of a product, we're looking at the emissions from farming, from manufacturing and production, from transport and distribution, and from packaging at a minimum. That we can also extend it and often can include your cooking emissions, your end of life and disposal as well. And, but the four that I said at the start, farming, processing, packaging, transport is the core of what we do. And the majority of the emissions for pretty much every food product we see is coming from the farming stage. And what we also have then is quite a, an interconnected and global food system. So we see a lot of our clients, sourcing food from all over the globe, being two or three steps removed from their suppliers, or from the original farms, I should say. And given that's where the majority of the emissions lie, it really does lend itself to having a food-specific solution, because what we can do is build up a really comprehensive database of food emission factors, taken into account the very limited data that we can often get from our, from our clients, as in from food companies. But we can also build really targeted solutions to fill those gaps and to start really unlocking more primary data across the food sector. Maybe to bring this to life in a really, simple way. We work with restaurants and we work with brands. And one of the common challenges, especially with so much new, novel, foods being introduced, was when a restaurant or catering provider started using a plant-based meat or a plant-based cheese, our key benefit, I guess, is the fact that we also work with a lot of brands. And that included some plant-based meats and some plant-based cheeses. So rather than seeing these quite novel foods and then having to go away and spend a lot of time researching those ingredients and those foods, understanding supply chains, understanding recipes, we're actually able to leverage the data we're getting from some of our clients and make it available and use it in a more generalist way for our other clients. And that was a real, challenge. value driver we're already finding for our clients, where because of our food sector specialism, we're able to unlock far more detailed and specific values, than maybe what your more agnostic sector, agnostic providers are able to offer. Keith Anderson: And when you say food supply chain data, and I suppose we ought to focus on the farm since that's where it sounds like the bulk of the emissions originate. Are you looking at averages based on a particular crop or ingredient in a particular country? Are you actually working with your customer to engage their upstream suppliers and gather more information or primary data? What does that look like in practice? Matthew Isaacs: So we start off by having regional databases. So we have a database that is appropriate for European Union, for North America, et cetera. We then look to, our goal whenever we work with a client is to try and get an initial mapping or an initial assessment as quickly as possible. That's not necessarily to say that that data is going to be the final value, but one of the biggest challenges we face and we see is companies taking six or 12 months to get to the real insight or the real, kind of the value from this service, which ultimately is how can we use this data to drive change and reduction? So we often recommend starting on a regional basis because you can get a high level mapping and also because the challenges of collecting data from suppliers and farms is really quite difficult. But once we've got an initial mapping, what that can do is we often have a conversation with our clients and say, well, here are the, here are the key ingredients that are, that we are identifying. Those can be because it's the highest volume of product or sales, or because they're the highest emission ingredients, or, based on the data that we have, the foods which might have the highest variance, and maybe something like lettuce or flour are ingredients where the range of emissions is much lower. Whereas via meats and dairies, it's likely that the range of emissions are much higher. therefore if we were to focus on one we would go for the latter rather than the former options. And then at that point, what we can do is start going down the supply chain. So we can engage, suppliers and they might be middle, middle range suppliers. They might help unlock things like what country of origins the foods are coming from, or what regions the foods being coming, are coming from, which maybe isn't data that our clients might, as a starting point have available to them. And they might also be able to loop us in directly to the farms and the producers. And ultimately if we want to get more specific data, we often say, we can do, we can do work modeling and mapping, based on secondary data, but really there's, there's not a substitute for that primary data at a farm level. Keith Anderson: Makes a lot of sense. And it sounds like the focus is really on product- and menu item-level calculations. Is that correct? Matthew Isaacs: Yes and no. We are looking to get assessmentss for the individual ingredients that are brought in, but it, but increasingly we're working with our clients to help them on their net zero reporting. Here in European Union, we've got CSRD reporting coming in over the next two years, which is requiring larger organizations in particular to report their emissions on an annual basis and include that within their financial reporting. And so increasingly we're finding ways with our clients to incorporate this data and convert it into a more traditional corporate reporting or, or, or as we might call it scope three emissions reporting, where we can offer some really granular data on the food side, which, because the emissions from food is often the largest contributions, for our customers as food companies, it's often where the most value is in having some really granular and detailed, data, which, which is exactly what our tool is built for. Keith Anderson: Well, maybe that's a good segue to talking about the second component of the platform, which is the communication side and the labeling aspect. You know, it sounds like, listening to you, there's demand for really both use cases, and I'm sure they work well together, but are you finding that there's more demand from companies that want to produce those sort of corporate level reports to appease shareholders and, remain compliant with regulation, or, or possibly, and is it as much about keeping up with consumer interest in understanding what they're eating and shifting their own behavior the way you and your co-founder were thinking? Matthew Isaacs: And is definitely the right answer there. And what we're seeing, we have some clients. Companies that have or want sustainability as a really core part of their brands or of their message, carbon labeling is really attractive because it's a really simple and crucially visual way that you can talk to your customers about carbon footprints. Actually we find the the biggest concern or, or, or, yeah, well, the biggest concern that companies often have when they come to us is what's going to happen if there's lots of e-ratings on their products or on their menus. But actually the data we're seeing is that the most effective campaigns or initiatives that we've got from clients are when they have a whole range and a whole spread of carbon labels and they use it as a conversation starter. They're able to talk to their customers about carbon footprints and the environment and really develop a strong brand image, frankly, on their, on sustainability. and, and that educational piece is really, really strong in creating that bonds with, with companies. We're often seeing customers as well, not just use carbon labeling purely on products or on menus, but also as part of an impact report. Rather than necessarily putting it on all menus, often it's done in addition, but sometimes we just have clients taking some of their hero products and putting it within their impact reports with maybe some comparisons or impact statements, or putting it as a dedicated sustainability page, bringing out some of those, hero items. And then probably my third and favorite example of what, what some companies are doing is they're going even further and they're aligning their promotions to the carbon labels and to low carbon products. So a really great example is a catering provider we work with here in the UK, they're part of Cambridge University down in college, catering. And what they've done is they've taken the traditional buy 10, get one free. And we give our, all products or meals a rating from A to E, A being very low, E being very high. And what they've said is rather than buy 10, get one free, they've said buy 10 A rated meals and get one free. What this is, is a really, really powerful way of linking sustainability and, a low carbon activation or activity with a promotion and a reward. And the response from students has been overwhelming in terms of the engagement that they've had and the ability to not just give a reward or like a feel good moment to them, but then actually linking that to sustainability, which for a lot of people increasingly is a, is a really key, key issue or point on mind, particularly in your younger generations. That's all on the consumer piece, but it is also worth noting that that reporting side, increasingly we're hearing companies talk to us and say, Our customers are asking us to report emissions on an annual basis. We've set a net zero goal or an SBTI submission, and we now need to find ways to reduce our emissions and then to report our progress on an annual basis. And in particular, with these, these reporting requirements like CSRD coming in and over the next few, few years, it's something that companies are already starting to get on top of. And I think this is becoming a second avenue for us now where, where we can use our tool. And we've just launched a purchase report module. We've just, we've just started, working with a lot more companies to do their full corporate assessments even. And, w e're seeing that with them, often the route goes the other way around, where we start in the corporate assessments, we start with maybe just, or even just focusing on emissions reporting for food, and we just take the scope three food emissions piece, and then maybe actually it's, we're starting to now see some of those clients go, actually, it's really interesting and useful for us to then convert that into a product assessment, put this onto their products, map the data again onto their products or onto their menu items, and then start communicating that as well. So it very much is a, an either an and/or rather than an either/or. Keith Anderson: Makes sense. And once you've got, in the case of a product-level assessment, I imagine there's value at different stages of the product life cycle. It's not purely what the shopper sees at the shelf or the point of consumption. You know, I think you mentioned before we started the conversation, there are clients of yours that are actually using that for new product development decisions. Matthew Isaacs: Again, it's a, it is one of the things that gets me really excited and probably the anyone who asks me about carbon labeling is asking me, what is the impact that this has on on consumers? But as you say, and point to, we're actually seeing that carbon naming is just as if not more useful internally within food companies, especially, so, so for us again, that, that A to E rating that we use, we've developed that to just make it as easy for people to understand as possible. A is very low, E is very high, A is green, C is amber, E is red. So it's simple traffic light colors, simple grading system. And what we've got some of our companies doing now is that during the NPD process, then that should becomes a three product shortlist often. And then, well, you start with a long list, three product shortlist, and then a final product and with, with some of our clients building solutions where we do a basic carbon assessment at the shortlist stage. So at the point when they're reviewing those three products. They're not just having a table which has taste, cost and nutrition, but they also have a metric on carbon and on sustainability. And again, by putting that in that very simple A to E color ratings, they could have red, amber, green next to the products and it will help them choose which, it will help them make the decision. It's not to say that every product needs to be introduced to be the lowest carbon. It's just bringing out that data and allowing people to make those more informed decisions and, at an NPD stage. And then finally, also once the final product has been, developed, or chosen, sorry, there can then be a final review of saying, "well, can we make any small tweaks to this product that will keep it the same, but reduce the emissions slightly?" We've had some clients or seen some of our clients who maybe had a sprinkle of feta on the products and go, actually, we can remove that and not lose the basis of the products, but actually reduce the emissions by 30 percent and reduce costs. And it's those kinds of, those kinds of, swaps or, or, or small changes that we can find that that, where there's a real opportunity to make some quick wins and quick emission reductions. Keith Anderson: Jumping back for a second to the labeling approach, when you say high or low, is that relative to products within the same category? Is that, you know, what's the consideration set there? Matthew Isaacs: So, we've made a decision pretty early on to use a single range and a single scale for all food products, well, all products, actually, not just food, food and drink, I should say. We're just focusing that in the food and beverage, sector, but the reason for that is because, ultimately, when we look at the spread of, emissions across different foods and across different products. There can be, there's certain fundamentals and certain like high level principles that we see, which is that, what's more important is what food you're eating rather than say where it's coming from or how it's been produced as a general rule. That's one of the, the things that the data tells us. So we thought it would be quite disingenuous to have ratings and an individual product rating and level, because it then doesn't communicate that there are some swaps that can be made, which more often than not, if not always, will be, will be true. Beef and lamb or red meats, for example, will pretty much always have a higher carbon footprint than white meats, your chickens and porks and turkeys, or other poultries. That's true if you're looking at high carbon chicken versus low carbon beef. On the scales. And so for us, we felt it quite important to do that. And I guess as a final point as well, we, we looked at how nutrition labels are set and more often than not, they're using a single scale rather than a product led approach, particularly here in the UK and European Union, that's consistent across pretty much all nutrition scales. So we didn't want to introduce something now, which likely wouldn't match what regulation looks like and in that sense wanted to give an open and genuine, rating to products from, from the start, rather than necessarily playing around with, with, with labeling within sectors. Keith Anderson: Is your labeling standardized across customers? I know that you've got customers in North America and Europe. Some are food service, some are retail, some are brands. Are they all effectively on the same labeling scheme? Matthew Isaacs: They are, yes, I guess one nuance is that our scheme is based on intensity. So we look at the emissions per kilogram of foods. We're aware that, for example, portion sizes in North America are generally slightly larger, than in, Keith Anderson: That's diplomatic of you. Matthew Isaacs: Okay. Keith Anderson: Significantly larger. Matthew Isaacs: But that, that isn't necessarily caught, in the changes. So it, what matters is the proportions and the core, maybe the proteins that are being used and those kind of pieces of what's being communicated more there. So there's some consideration there that, that it is somewhat comparable and, and, okay to use different, or the same metrics. Also what, it makes a difference how we've set those ratings. So for example, our C rating was decided based on the global average emissions from the food sector today. And the, A rating is set based on the Lancet Commission's Planetary Health Diet, which is a global assessment of what does the emissions or the impact of the food sector need to be if we have a 10 billion population on Earth, i. e. what does a healthy and sustainable diet need to look like? Those are both globalized metrics and therefore it made sense to have a globalized carbon rating scheme. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Hey, it's Keith Anderson from decarbonize.co inviting you to join our brand new Slack community for retail, e-commerce, and consumer product professionals that want to keep up with what's new, interesting, and actionable in industry, climate, and sustainability action, and connect with your peers. As I got into this work, one of the things that I found so invigorating is how passionate and willing to help everyone is. But I haven't found a community composed of people across functions in the industry that are working in or want to work in climate and sustainability. And so we're launching the community to connect both sustainability experts and practitioners and people in conventional roles like product design, packaging, supply chain marketing, and merchandising to share their work, ask for help, connect about career opportunities, keep up with the latest industry development, and we'll be previewing who our upcoming guests on the podcast will be and giving you an opportunity to pose questions to our guests. So I can't wait to meet you and have you meet some of the other members of the community. To join us, you can visit decarbonize.co. You'll see a call to action on the homepage, or use the intelligence menu at the top of the page where you'll also see a link to join. Makes sense. Well, Matthew, if people want to learn more about My Emissions or reach you, how should they get in touch? Matthew Isaacs: So our website is myemissions.green and you can search "free food emissions calculator" and at least as far as I'm aware today, we should be appearing number one on Google as a simple free calculator that we have available on our website, where anyone can put in a recipe and see what the emissions of their products or recipes are. Or you can email us at hello@myemissions.green. Keith Anderson: Fantastic. Well, thanks so much for joining us. Matthew Isaacs: Thank you very much, Keith, for the time. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=rnk0xkp8…
In this episode, you'll meet Ryan Lupberger, founder and CEO of Cleancult, a company making cleaning products that are better for you and better for the environment. Ryan shares his experiences and lessons learned from starting up to scaling up, discussing how to meet both retailers and consumers where they are in terms of education and behavior change, driving awareness with a different product form and unconventional packaging, as well as fundraising and other challenges. Learn more about Ryan Lupberger: Link to Cleancult’s website Link to Ryan’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and our guest this week is Ryan Lupberger, founder and CEO of Cleancult, a cleaning company with a focus on ingredients that are better for you and better for the planet and less wasteful packaging. And Cleancult is a brand that like many started in the direct to consumer channel, but has been expanding distribution in brick and mortar mass. And it was really interesting to me to hear some of Ryan's experience and thinking about how to meet both retailers and consumers where they are in terms of education and behavior change as they're trying to drive awareness with a different product form and unconventional packaging, drive trial and change behavior. So it's a very rich discussion. We also get into fundraising and other challenges of growing business in that category. So I'm eager for you to meet Ryan Lupberger, CEO and founder of Cleancult. Ryan, good to see you. Thanks for joining us for the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Ryan Lupberger: Thanks so much for having me today. Looking forward to it. Keith Anderson: Why don't we kick things off just by learning a little bit about your background and the founding story of Cleancult? Ryan Lupberger: Yeah. So, personally I'm, I'm crunchy. I was, born in Boulder, Colorado. So grew up with a lifestyle of better for you, everything, better food, better products. We looked at every ingredient list and it was just frankly like, imbued in the lifestyle of, of where I grew up. And the parents are out there. They, you know, were part of the Transcendental Meditation movement and, really also just prioritized wellness, right? So kind of grew up in this space, and then went totally different direction, right? So then went out actually to the East coast and went to a school called Babson, which is a entrepreneurial school focused on supporting big businesses, right? And family business to investment banking to consulting. But when I was there, I looked at the back of my bottle of laundry detergent and this was 2016 and I didn't see any ingredients listed. And, you know, I was still a Boulder kid at the time and basically said, "this doesn't make sense. Why aren't there ingredients?" There's ingredients on my food, on my shampoo, even. Why not our household cleaning products? So just at this big kind of aha moment, it was "why aren't some of the things we put on our skin, in our homes, and on our sheets, for example, regulated?" Right? So the more research I did to why there weren't ingredients, the crazier the industry became. And in the US compared to the UK, we allow basically over 1, 400 ingredients that are banned overseas. So it's just a, it's a pretty nasty space and, you know, I think we've seen this massive movement of in me, organic food. On me, personal care products. But now it's finally happened around me, right? And like 3 percent of the weight of your clothes is actually leftover laundry detergent. But people don't think about that every day. So the more research I did in this category, it was the more "wow." And, it always wanted to support businesses that could solve big problems. So we went down this whole big journey and 2016 to 2017, I looked at all the natural products in the whole category. But they're all covered in plastic packaging, right? For me, it was how could the better brands out there be better if they use so much petroleum packaging? And I walked Target, Kroger, Walmart, and it's a sea of plastic, right? And it was just this big cognitive dissonance for me. So I took a big step back and said, we got to do something better. And I tried dilutables, concentrates, powders, DIY vinegar. But it was all too complex, didn't really work that well, and we basically said there's nothing out there that works. So, you know, took a big step back and said, "could we deliver a better product with cleaner packaging, cleaner ingredients in a way that would meet shoppers and myself where they were?" So we did. So we launched the first ever, soap cleaners and detergents in milk cartons instead of plastic bottles and launched officially in, Jan 1 of 2019, so it's almost been five years now. Keith Anderson: Well, that's great background and context. And I didn't realize you were a Colorado guy. I grew up in Aurora. I grew up in Aurora and then went to Boston College. So not, not an identical trajectory, but sort of similar. Now, did you, did you say, silk detergent? Ryan Lupberger: Laundry detergent. So, no, just my typical laundry. And we tried, again, everything under the sun, but you, you just see that big plastic jug. And just for me, it never made sense. And, you know, the more research you do in this history of this category, the crazier it becomes because, really in the last only 20 years, have we started selling and making cleaning products in plastic products, 40 years ago, it was mostly in powder in a box, right? So this new plastic problem we have is literally originated in the last 20, 30, 40 years. So it's, we created a problem out of nowhere and now it's how do we get back to, frankly, where we were 30 years ago. So that's really what we're trying to, trying to innovate and create here at Cleancult. Keith Anderson: So, I'm interested, maybe, in starting with the ingredient side, you know, you mentioned we are a little more permissive with product formulations and some of our peers abroad. How do you define clean at Cleancult? Ryan Lupberger: Yep, so we have basically our no no list, right, that would align with a Whole Foods, a leading, you know, natural retailer. So that's a big, big piece that we follow. But we also try to look at ingredients that have less or no carbon impact on the whole, whole chain, right? So cleaning products typically now are all petroleum based. So they come really effective. You know, that blue bottle that works really, really well, but it has some negative downstream effects, right? And those petroleum polymers that are made really clean very well. It goes after dirt, grime, all these different pieces, but they don't dissolve very well when they enter the waste stream or the waterways, right? So. We have our no no list and our formulations are mostly based in coconut, so it's sodium colcosulfite, so just as effective as we believe the leading natural products, leading products generally, free from all the harsh chemicals, free from dyes, free from, really any phosphates, which are also caused with what's called eutrophication, in waterways, which means all the algae grows and it's really bad for, again, our different waterways, and then essential oils, right? So our, our formulation philosophy here is it has to clean. Has to be ingredients you can generally pronounce, has to be plant based and better for you, and wholly biodegradable. So that's the formulations that we've, we've created here across hand soap, dish soap, all purpose, and laundry detergent. Keith Anderson: And has that been consistent pretty much since the start or have you evolved it a bit over time? Ryan Lupberger: We've evolved it a bit, like every brand. I think we're on formulation, iteration eight, or nine, like every brand. But what we really figured out is, in this whole journey is, really, we have to meet the shoppers where they are. And I know I'll probably repeat that multiple times a day. Because when we started this, we had prices that were over, frankly, the leading natural or better for you cleaning products in the market, right? Even though we had a reduced waste package or plastic-free products, customers were not willing to switch en mass, right? So we built a big DTC business. We had some big fundraising rounds, but even with that, they wouldn't make the jump. And again, a small population would, but not the entire. So from us, our big evolution was we knew we had to be clean in packaging. We knew we had to be clean ingredients. We need to be clean in efficacy, but we also needed to be the same price, right? So it's almost taken us five years to get here and now is when we're seeing the wave, right? Offering a better solution, but at a similar price point, it's really been the biggest unlock for us. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I, I see a huge focus on product superiority on the one hand. Or parity, I suppose, and on the other hand, economic parity, you know. I think a lot of sustainable brands, however you define sustainability, are working hard to break through to the mainstream. You know, there's obviously a whole specialty channel and a lot of brands that have found their following with, you know, a sort of subscale population, but I think given the mission of a lot of brands, including yours, the focus is increasingly on "how do we reach the mass channels and start to change behaviors?" Ryan Lupberger: Yep. Agreed. And you know, I think the exciting piece is the retailers want it too, right, is one of the reasons we'll be in most, if not all, marquee retailers, is because they're putting their money where their commitments are. So it's actually been very encouraging to see is you have, you know, Target, Kroger, Albertson, Safeway, and then the big strategics, you know, Lever, Henkel, Procter & Gamble, all putting these very aggressive 2025 plastics goals as well as ingredients, you know, through and through. And they're starting also now to talk about regenerative agriculture through their entire supply chain. So what we're seeing is, if there's a way to crack the economic piece, there is demand both from consumers and retailers to actually start to shift all these categories. So it's been an encouraging time for us. Keith Anderson: I'm glad that you mentioned some of the incumbents. I mean, there have been some, to your point, there have been some really interesting developments quite recently, although I remember going back almost a decade, most of the majors that you mentioned had either acquired somebody or done some experimentation that, you know, one might argue was sort of, tucked away until either the consumer or the retailer said, "okay, I'm ready." But, you know, it sounds like you're finding the retailers are, you know, eager to add selection that meets some of the characteristics that your products do. What is the competitive dynamic like? Do you find this is, you know, growing the category, shifting the category? How do you think about the dynamic between some of those incumbents and a newer emerging brand? Ryan Lupberger: Yeah. Well, it may be broadly, but to, one of the reasons we enjoy these conversations and again, appreciate you having us on today, is, it's going to come from consumers, right? The only reason that these big retailers and strategics are, have made these commitments is because Wall Street and/or their investors or direct consumers are forcing them to, right? So one of the major big box stores just got really, frankly, criticized in the public markets because their plastic usage is increasing, right? And it was publicized, it was brought up on the earnings calls, so all of this is contingent on, like, you , the listeners, right? Without that, nothing's gonna happen. That said, I think the retailers, you know, they're starting to shift. So, I will say generally, you know, cleaner products have a better margin profile for the retailers, but they don't move as fast. So, usually it's accretive, which is why they like this. It's usually a higher income shopper, too. So, one of, again, a larger retailer wants to attract this more. And I think what we're seeing in these categories is it's all incremental because you have massive organic food categories that have grown to be 10, 15, 20, 30 percent of overall grocery. Whereas cleaning is sub 3, sub 4, you know, it hasn't matched that. So, we think it's just room to run. It's one of the reasons, again, why I think the retailers are, so open to this. And at what point does the fourth plastic natural cleaning brand move the needle, right? And what we've seen in this whole competitive dynamics, concentrates, dilutables, tablets, all these other form factors that have tried to reduce waste in the house of cleaning, they might work digitally because you can explain it to a shopper, they don't work in store. So all of these retailers, it's a, it's a graveyard of closeouts for every reduced waste form factor that's tried to shift behavior. So again, what we're seeing is excitement. I think there's frankly limited competitive developments right now that are meeting shoppers where they're at the same price point and still reducing waste and some negative, negative chemicals. So, but it's complex. It's hard. We've been at it for, you know, seven years. It's a hard space. Keith Anderson: Yeah its super interesting, though. I've never really heard or considered that point about the importance of educating somebody on, you know, transitioning to a different, not purchase behavior, but usage behavior for the different form factors and, you know, a lot of the way I approach things is, is sort of through the spreadsheet side of things, thinking about, oh, you know, concentrated powders have, have less weight and less cubed, but I think what a lot of folks that have been entrepreneurs in the space for a long time have sort of come around to, not only with their own brands, but even B2B services, you know, focusing on what works is a way to accelerate impact more than letting perfect be the enemy of the good. And I think there's probably going to be demand for different form factors for different consumers and, scenarios. Ryan Lupberger: Yep. Keith Anderson: Are you finding. Ryan Lupberger: tide lifts all ships too, right? Which is why you digitally certain form factors can win, in retail others can. And we all help solve this issue. So, yeah, we're supportive. Yeah. Keith Anderson: You're finding that the retailers are increasingly adding distribution for cleaner products in these categories. Are you finding, you know, you mentioned the in store education component of it. Is that a necessity in your case? And are the retailers creating, you know, wayfinding and other opportunities to help shoppers find and consider the products or is that stuff that you still got to do independently? Ryan Lupberger: Yeah, you knoww, I think yes and no. You know, we'd always love more wayfinding with all of our partners, but I think the way we've designed this model is, how do we be so obvious that it does its education on shelf? Right? So originally we just had our milk carton and it was ingredient first. So it focused on our coconut based ingredients. And frankly, it didn't work on shelf. There was a broad confusion of why and how and why is my cleaning products in a milk carton? So we spent two and a half years redesigning to solve for A, it's a cleaning product, B, this reduces waste, and C, it's premium. Right? And finally, we think we've nailed it, where there is no education on shelf. Of course there's some, because no one's ever seen a milk carton in these categories, but it's like, I get it's a refill, I get it's less plastic, I get it's premium, I get it's better ingredients. Right? So, a lot of what we do is education on shelf, and it's taken, what, seven iterations also packaging to get here. The other big piece we launched was the first filled and refillable aluminum bottles in the category. So when we started this brand, you know, five years ago, only refills. And we developed the technology, the intellectual property, and all of these pieces for the refills. But what we found is, even though we're winning amongst refills and cleaning, you have this whole ready to use that makes up 80, 90 percent of the category. Like, you don't start with a refill. So I think the other big piece is we launched our aluminum bottles. And that was, you know, a, an intentional sustainability choice for us, because truthfully, we don't believe in single use aluminum being a better sustainable form factor. We believe in aluminum. As opposed Keith Anderson: to what? Ryan Lupberger: Frankly, single use plastic, single use glass is, aluminum is, it's just like the reusable bags. If you're using a different reusable bag every time, it's a lot of carbon, right? It's, it's challenging to make. So, for Keith Anderson: Reused is different than reusable. Ryan Lupberger: Exactly, exactly. So, yeah, so we think we've cracked it, right? It is a filled and refillable aluminum bottle, right, that you refill using our cartons. And when people see it on shelf, they get it. So I think, you know, again, it's, it's, we understand there's a lot of education to this, but we're trying to be the least amount of education in the space. Keith Anderson: You know, how big of a factor is the conversation at retail... how big is refill in the conversation with retail? You know, do they view it as, a barrier? Is it a driver? Do they think about some of the impacts it might have on loyalty and trip frequency and some of those things, building a basket? Ryan Lupberger: Yeah. I think that's the good news here. In these categories, you refill and refilling, it's gaining a lot of momentum and it's, it's been around for a while, right? So hand soap refills today in the category represents, depending on your channel, about 30 percent of total sales. So it's, it's a lot, right? And you think about even the big brands have big plastic tubs that you refill your hand soap. So, and that's growing at almost 12, 14, 15 percent annual growth rate. So it's, it's going very fast. Dish soap, it's about 20%. And people have gotten used to refilling their islands, right? In dish soap and that's growing quickly. And with dish power spray, again, think about that blue bottle, there is a refill now. And frankly, the refill is, we believe a profitability play from one of the big strategics, because that big dish power sprayed trigger, it's very expensive, right, for them. But that said, it's still more sustainable, right? So dish refills are now growing at a clip never seen before. All purpose, it's a challenging category in refilling, because people haven't much yet. But there's more and more development of dilutables, right? So it's not a little cartridge or two ounces, but it could be, you know, 32 ounces that makes 128 ounces added to water. So we're seeing some movement there. And then laundry, you know, it's kind of the wild west right now because you're seeing sheets come into the market and completely disrupt liquids. You've seen pods come into the market. And our cartons are just direct dose, right? You just directly dose into your machine. We're seeing these concentrated laundry detergents come out 32 ounces, and it's really gaining momentum. So, we believe, again, it's, there's a lot of support from, from retailers, again, potentially because of the margin profile and sustainability. But we think there's a lot of momentum across refilling right now. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience. Plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. You mentioned earlier, you know, you've raised some capital. At what stage in building the brand and the business was it clear that that was the path that you wanted to take? Ryan Lupberger: For us, we had to. And you know, I think there's a case to be made for bootstrapping is, you know, you have freedom to do what you want to do and how you want to do, you know, there really was never a choice for us, fortunately or unfortunately, because our category is really hard. It's one of the reasons we're the first company in the world to do this. You can't put a non-food product on a food machine. And in cartons, there's no non-food manufacturers, right? So, because of that, there's no contract manufacturers that can help you spin this up. So, we literally had to buy all of our own machinery in the early days, and start from scratch. So, we developed our own machines. We customized our own machines. We have a lot of IPs, almost 15 patents, a bunch of trademarks. So, and it was expensive. In early days, 2019 to 2021, we had negative gross margins. We lost a lot of money because our floor was covered in soap because our curtains exploded and the bottom seal didn't work and, you know, the soap, when you run it through what's called a piston fill, it foams like crazy. So we had to figure out how to put soap in a carton at speed without foaming. So early days, incredibly painful. We raised our Series B in August of 2021 and haven't raised since then. But until that point, it was essential, frankly, to raise a fair amount, to get this business off the ground. Keith Anderson: And when you went looking for investors, were there sort of impact oriented investors that you were, searching for? How did you find your partners in the end? Ryan Lupberger: Yeah, I think in the end, everyone wants to, to do something better for the world, right? But it's really hard if impact isn't connected to returns, right? So pure impact funds that have, you know, no focus on returns, we didn't find whatsoever, right. Is I think there are few and far between, but there are so beautiful harmony of funds that see opportunities in sustainability that also want to support the world. And we don't think they're mutually exclusive. So our first, first investor was David Heath, the CEO of Bombus Socks. You know, they are on a crazy growth trajectory and he's a very smart CEO. And they're also, they've donated and changed quite a bit of policies related to homelessness, right? And also some of the donation structure nationwide. So, that was both, right? You saw the opportunity and also saw the benefit. In the early days, again, the first two years of fundraising, 2016 to 2018, we couldn't get a dollar. We spun our wheels. We did three accelerator programs around the country because it was the only way we could get capital. We partnered with the National Science Foundation, did a bunch of ingredient research for the national, basically, it's called the SBIR, grant funding. We did pitch competitions, like, you name it. We did it to get that scraped, basically, that first, let's call it, half a million to a million dollars to get this off the ground. It wasn't until we had this carton. And the first meeting I brought this carton is that this is where we're going, this is what we want to do. And it was just an unlock. It's "why hasn't anyone done this before?" And we shortly found out why no one had done it before. It's brutal, it's challenging, it explodes, shelf life is hard, you name it. But we did it, right? So After that, we went to, you know, kind of New York City angels. So we had only almost 40 investors in that round. Then we went kind of consumer funds in the late 2019. Then we had more of the growth trade side in 2021 and we've had a great experience, again, growing quickly, but also trying to change and like fundamentally transform this category. So, we've had a really good relationship with our entire investor base. Keith Anderson: That's great. What would you say that you're looking forward to most? You know, it could be something in, in the roadmap or, new innovation, or it could be regulation or something else. Ryan Lupberger: I think both. I think you hit it, frankly, the nail on the head there. On the innovation side, we just launched, our first ever laundry sheets in the category. And it's a really exciting space for us because liquid represents about 80 percent of the category, right? You know, our cartons will continue to win there. But monodose, pods, or sheets are growing like crazy. And you just have such an opportunity to compact formulations, but also get rid of so much plastic. So we just launched our new laundry sheets. So they are now on Amazon and will be the first laundry sheets in Walmart. That's all public information now. It's the first multi enzyme laundry sheets in the market. So enzymes are very effective at removing stains. We found out how to put multi enzymes on the same sheet. So that's probably my, the innovation I'm most excited about, because no one's quite figured out how to put laundry sheets in retail, and we believe we have the best and first retail ready laundry sheet packaging, because again, similar story, there's a lot of big digital brands in laundry sheets. But none in retail yet, right? And it's how do we kind of really create this space for us? And then on the regulation side, SB 54, we think it could change everything. So, no one quite knows what it is, or what it's going to do, or how it's going to be implemented, but it basically forces responsibility on to manufacturers, producers, and sellers, retailers, and brands for plastic. And, you know, we think it could change the face of US consumption in these categories, but there's a lot of loopholes, and there's a lot of ifs, ands, and buts, and there's a lot of interpretation to be done. So, I think, again, a lot of excitement there, it passed in California, and will then work its way east, just out of necessity, because California is so big. But we have no idea how it's going to play into the landscape, and I think that's going to be a big thing to watch for us. Keith Anderson: Yeah, it makes a lot of sense. I see, both relating to plastic and packaging broadly, but, climate and sustainability broadly, California, I guess, New York to a lesser extent, and definitely Europe are really raising the bar. And, and I think. I've almost seen over the last two years, some folks getting really heartened to see all the activity and now I'm starting to see people say, "okay, a little too much stick. We could use a little more carrot," or at least, you know, we need some decisiveness and consistency so that we have one standard we can go execute against. Ryan Lupberger: Exactly. And we're at the, you know, packaging shows nationwide with some of the biggest producers. And even they don't know what's around the bend, right? So I think it's fair. I think regulation is important. I think incentives are important. But I think you're right. There does need to be some consistency because right now it's, it's, no one really knows what's, what it means. Yeah. Keith Anderson: Yeah. Yeah. I do think I share your view that consumers are ultimately the driver of a lot of these shifts. I do think, the second biggest motivating force in many cases, at least in the U S is competition and what some of the retailers are doing, not only with their nationally branded assortment, but you know, a few of the majors that you've already named are doing interesting stuff with their own labels. And I think that is raising the bar in ways that, may accelerate things. Well, if folks want to learn more about Cleancult or you, where would you send them? Ryan Lupberger: You can find us on Amazon, Next Day Delivery, and we are the first, again, aluminum products now on the platform that you can price, same price as plastic products. Our website, Cleancult.com, and that's clean space cult. And then leading retailers, Albertsons, Kroger, Safeway, Walmart, all around you nationwide. And, I think our, our biggest ask is advocate at the retailers, because those are who will make the decisions. And if you demand shifting these products and the retailer will have to shift these products. So we're, we're really hopeful and we see a lot of, you know, opportunity. And I think it's just the beginning for us and also the industry. Keith Anderson: Well, thanks very much for joining us. Great to have you on the show. Ryan Lupberger: Likewise. Thank you again for having me today. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=mn4j1z1n…
This week's episode features Adhithi Aji, founder and CEO of Adrich, a smart packaging solution for connected e-commerce. Adrich takes some of the friction out of replenishing consumable products, helping overcome some of the challenge of changing behavior in the shift to more sustainable consumption models. Tune in to hear more about how it plays a role in accelerating behavioral change in areas like refillable packaging, other use cases and possibilities, and the unit economics of new technologies in the connected packaging space. Learn more about Adhithi Aji: Link to Adrich’s website Link to Adhithi’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. I'm Keith Anderson. This is the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Thanks for listening. This week's guest is Adhithi Aji, who's founder and CEO of a company called Adrich, which is smart packaging for connected e-commerce. And I had to spend a little time on the website and with Adhithi to understand what smart packaging for e-commerce is all about. But the more I learned, the more intrigued that I was, because, you know, we've had a few conversations already about the role of refillable and reusable packaging, both on the consumer side and backstage in internal logistics. And one of the big themes of the conversation we had with Mike Newman of Returnity, if you caught that episode, is behavioral change is really challenging. And even when somebody has an intent to make a choice as a consumer that is maybe more sustainable, inertia and habit play a big role in preserving the status quo, and so I won't steal Adhithi's thunder about how Adrich does what it does, but it takes some of the friction out and effectively automates some of the work of replenishing a consumable product that you might want to reorder and refill packaging with. And so in our conversation, we certainly got to know a bit more about Adhithi and where Adrich comes from, how it works, how it plays a role in accelerating behavioral change in areas like refillable packaging. But we talk about other use cases and possibilities. I'm always curious about the unit economics of new technologies like this, and we covered that. We talked about some of the categories where it's a better fit than others and much more. So, I think you'll enjoy meeting and learning from Adhithi Aji of Adrich. Adhithi, thanks for joining the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Adhithi Aji: Hi, Keith. Thanks for having me here. Excited to talk more. Keith Anderson: Well, so am I. You know, I discovered your company a few months ago, and the website has a lot of words that were interesting to me. You know, you characterize what you're doing at Adrich as Connected E-commerce, I thought maybe just to contextualize things for listeners, we could start with, you telling us what is Adrich exactly and how did you end up starting the company? Adhithi Aji: Sure thing. So, Adrich is a smart packaging enabled e-commerce, and connected e-commerce solution in that it has a hardware, which is a smart label, that tracks consumption of each individual unit of product in terms of the volume remaining. And, it has sensor-based smart labels and smart in the true sense that it's not RFID, it is not a QR code, but it's a sensor-enable label that tracks volume remaining and auto reorders automatically for the consumer or end user without having them to push a button or scan or do anything. And when they're down to 20% it detects that, it reorders, and it routes it to any e-commerce platform. So for you as a consumer, the next time you run out of coffee or shampoo, you'll find one at the door. And for the brands and retailers, it's really about increasing consumer lifetime value and improving the subscription programs that we have today. Because today, consumers, when they run out or when they opt in for subscribe and save or any such programs, you either get more product than you need or you run out earlier. And that is not very fun because they charge your credit card. We changed that to individual consumption based subscription, which means you'll get the next product only when you run out. Not early, not too late. And that way brands are reducing the churn from the subscription programs as well. Keith Anderson: I'm smiling because I have somewhere around a half dozen subscriptions that either get paused or a month gets skipped as we end up having a surplus and then we end up going a few weeks without, and you know, when, when I was getting to know your platform, it reminded me certainly of subscribe and save type programs and also of the dash replenishment button and dash replenishment service that Amazon introduced and has now sort of retired and rolled into Alexa. But I remember in, in both of those implementations, the idea was almost an extension of one click ordering for replenishable products to, again, reduce some of the friction of, getting what you needed again, right when you need it. And so, both from a commercial and a customer behavior point of view, this is a really interesting idea. Adhithi Aji: Right? On the note of the dash button, right, so we are integrated with Amazon on Alexa now, so think of it as the advanced version of the dash button. I think one challenge, with the dash button was, that consumers had to have these buttons all over their homes. And, an interesting, learning from that dash button was the kids were going on pressing the button because it was fun. And they'd just keep ordering, right? So the parents got a whole bunch of products. So, we're in fact working with Amazon to kind of introduce this as an advanced version of the dash button where it's zero touch. You don't even have to push a button. It'll automatically detect you're running out and auto reorder. Keith Anderson: Got it. So, tell us a bit about how, how did you end up, you know, working on this problem and creating Adrich? Adhithi Aji: Yeah, it's interesting. It started as a capstone project when I was studying in Carnegie Mellon. I did a master's specializing in innovation management, right? How do you bring high end research technologies to market? And, you know, during that time, came up with an idea. So I'm an electrical engineer by trade. And also I have a supply chain management and MBA in that program. And, so the last mile data was sort of missing, right? There was a lot of data up until the retail store, but once the product leaves the store, it's sort of a black box. Brands don't know how consumers are using the product, how much they are now, are they using it once and throwing it in the trash? That gap in that data set is probably why all the problems of supply chain, marketing, and in terms of inventory control, all of those problems stem from not having consumption data. So the idea, and honestly my passion circles, came together with electrical engineering and supply chain and product management in that our mission became to enable brand managers, retailers with usage and consumption data and that last mile data that could really empower them to build better products suited to consumer needs, make sure they get the right product to the right consumer at the right time. And for consumers, really, our days are so busy these days that we want some quality time and, just bringing convenience into the day to day life. That's really the key and doing that with sustainability in mind because we can enable this auto reordering for refills and not just single use plastic. And that way we are reducing reusing, re refilling, introducing refill and reducing single use plastics. Keith Anderson: Well, I appreciate you handling that segue on my behalf. That was where I was going to lead the conversation next, because, you know, that's one of the clearest linkages, I think, to what you're doing and some of the goals and targets that a lot of, certainly big CPGs, but not just the big ones, have. And as you and I were discussing, previously, the, the, a challenge, maybe the biggest challenge to several of these consumer facing refillable and reusable packaging initiatives has really been driving adoption and getting shoppers to, you know, be consistent in using the refillable packaging when the cost and convenience of single use, in addition to just being so widespread and more available, you know, the customer behavioral component is one of the bigger hurdles. And so tell us more about what you've learned about how this kind of connected label can accelerate the behavioral change of using refillables. Adhithi Aji: Sure thing. And Keith, honestly, I brought up the sustainability because that seems to be the top of mind for consumers, right? With environmental conditions changing, we've actually seen consumers becoming more cognizant of what they're using, how they're using it. And I think that's a big driver, market driver that, probably CPG retailers, all of them are, also seeing. And that's a good news, right? I guess it's now about using technology to really help bridge the gap in communication between the brand retailers and the consumers because brands have a purpose of introducing refill to reduce single use plastic and communicating that to the consumers could go a long way in terms of changing the behavior. We, in fact, are working with, Clorox, Unilever, Reckitt and the like across product categories to be able to introduce refill. And it could be refill at home or refill in stores. And how we're doing that is by embedding our smart labels. So I have a, example of a Clorox, which we worked as a pilot and, introducing this as a smart kit, a smart starter kit, which means we can even position it as a smart subscription program. We just talked about how, you know, potentially subscriptions get you more products. So consumers opt into this as a starting point saying, "Hey, I don't get the next product until I need it." So that's great news. So they buy into this and, because it's smart, it creates a sense of IOT experience, so it already creates that elevated experience, so they create a one time setup, and then they forget about it, and you can see the label is embedded behind the bottle of Clorox, and this is a bottle for life. Right? When they run out, it auto reorders refill, which is a diffuse pod, and consumers fill this with water, they diffuse it, and they're good to run out and do this whole thing again. So, by digitizing the system, we are detecting when they run out. But we also create a touchpoint to, to consumers and the brands to understand when they're refilling. So it creates additional points of engagement, which one informs the consumer that, "hey, you're running out," you know, "you're getting your next refill is on its way," or you can prompt them as to where they can get refills. But more importantly, when they refill, you can encourage them because every time they refill, you can probably communicate the carbon credits that they are saving and empower them with a push notification or a text to be part of this whole ecosystem change and environmental change. And I think that's very key in driving adoption because I think, you can also, once the digital link is created, you can communicate the brand purpose. You can communicate how they are helping with sustainability and broadly speaking, brands can also use the digital connection to drive the necessary behavioral change, by sending push notification and text automatically at different points of view. Does that make sense? Keith Anderson: It does make sense, and I encourage anybody, you know, some of the examples that Adhithi just shared are, you really have to see them to understand them, so I encourage you, visit YouTube, or we're now going to begin posting the videos to Spotify as well, but for those that are just listening, I just want to play back a little bit of what I observed so that if you can't see the examples, you sort of are able to follow everything that we just covered. You know, the first thing that we looked at was a really elegant, sort of, smart, kit that was packaged in, in well branded packaging that did a couple things. You know, it, it emphasized, the smart connection that the package itself has and had instructions on how it works and also featured some of the environmental and likely other benefits of working with this package. And then the second example was the refillable package itself and one of the concentrates. And, you know, maybe you can just take a moment, Adhithi, and describe how does the sensor that sits on the package itself work exactly and what are some of the contexts in which you've already demonstrated it accurately detects when it's time to reorder? Adhithi Aji: Sure thing. So it, the sensor has three, the smart label, and we call it digital IoT label because it has sensors. It has three main sensors in it. One is a motion sensor, so, right off the bat, it detects only usage. So every time you spray or you pour a product or you scoop a product, so it only captures usages and it eliminates any false positives to get technical, basically, if you just move around the bottle or take it from the shelf on the kitchen counter, those data points are eliminated. So, the motion sensor is used to eliminate, false positive and pick up only usages. Now, within that subset, we have, two other proprietary patented sensors on this label, and it, uses electromagnetic characteristics of the product. So, the label sends a pulse through the product from outside the packaging it takes, the reflection and takes the viscosity and the packaging type, so, whether it's a PET or a HTP and all of those material, characteristics, and determines whether there's product remaining or not. And that's how it uses some neural networks to actually determine volume remaining. So, it's the same three sensors, whether it's going on a spray bottle or a bottle of spirits or a nutrition pills. The difference is that we calibrate those same sensors to simulate the type of usage, whether it's a pour or a spray or a scoop. And from there, with the viscosity of the product inside the packaging, we determine how much is remaining. And then it talks Bluetooth, so anything in the home environment that talks Bluetooth, it could be a phone, it could be Alexa or a Google Home or it could be a smart refrigerator. So it's fully automated and then it comes to our cloud and we process it based on individual consumer patterns and it, once you run out, our cloud communicates to any other e-commerce and routes that order. Now, all of this is done through opt in, right? So there is a one time setup that consumers will do and they know it's smart. So, everything is done with privacy compliance kept in mind. Keith Anderson: My mind is headed in 10 different directions, so I have to, I have to pick one. What I'm really thinking about are, you know, the several use cases for a technology like this, and then the flip side of that topic is, well, what are the unit economics and how does it pay back, you know, why don't we start with the really fun stuff for a second, which is, what are the possibilities? Because I think, you know, we've been talking about refillable packaging, which, as, as you've said, is a, it's a topic of growing interest, although it's a very small percentage of all packaging today. And again, part of the reason that I was so interested to learn more is the behavioral change component of what would have to be true for refill to take off at scale is a big part of why the industry is, is, studying it so carefully. But I also think about, you mentioned pills and the sort of compliance component, and that actually got me thinking about, first, refill is so interesting to the brands because it allows them to reduce or eliminate packaging waste, and as in the Clorox example you shared, a lot of refills are concentrated and therefore have less volume, they're lighter weight, which also translates to additional savings on the emissions front in addition to savings from producing less packaging. But the waste component of the product itself is another one that I don't think we've discussed because I can imagine, you know, if you, if you have as you were describing the opportunities to communicate based on intelligence about the consumption pattern, you know, if you've got the expiry date for a product, I could imagine, I don't know what your pantry looks like. Mine always has a box of snacks or cereal or something that's hidden that we've forgotten about. And again, just for the sake of the hypothetical and, you know, exploring what could be possible imagine every product in the pantry and every product in the fridge was equipped with this. I'm not saying it makes sense. I'm simply saying, imagine you could notify me weeks ahead of, "hey, this cereal is going to likely be past its best by date three weeks from now, so maybe you want cereal for breakfast." You know, food waste in particular, but waste in any category is another big topic. And there's so many interesting approaches to food waste. This, this seems like an interesting possibility. Adhithi Aji: Yeah, to that point, yes, it opens up a lot of use cases for the consumers as well, you know, to your point, food wastage is huge and, also making it still lifestyle inclusive for the consumers, right? Today, probably you're storing cereals on a, in a airtight container. You're storing pet food in a container. So brands could probably, give some additional containers that are co-branded with our smart label and the consumers can store it in that. And then it still creates a digital communication where you can communicate the expiry dates and how fresh, you know, in case of coffee, how fresh it is. And, more importantly for consumers, they now have a refillable container that's smart, that'll auto reorder, and brands can ship a recyclable package that they can refill. So that is one area of still getting sustainability into the market, but keeping it lifestyle inclusive while giving additional, value to the consumer. So, expiry is being one, in case of nutrition and beauty, compliance or regimen building. So if you have to take vitamin two times a day, just make it a smart digital assistance around them to just nudge them on friendly reminders. You know, for beauty, if it's a night cream, you know, just a friendly reminder to be, to create those habits. So that's in the high involvement category and in the low involvement, of course, like pet food and those, you don't want to run out in the middle of the night and it just... plain convenience, right? Just when you run out the next refill or refillable package shows up at the door. So there are ways to bring about sustainability, reduce food wastage, but the value equation remains with the consumer that will help drive adoption as well. Because you are introducing new avenues in their existing behavior, not necessarily changing the entire lifestyle. So there is a reusability with your single use packaging as of today, but bringing in the refill using smart bins as a concept. Keith Anderson: And is that, is that being piloted in categories like pet food or anything today? Adhithi Aji: Yes, pet food, coffee, those are categories that, we have been working in, have got some great results. We've seenn across categories on an average at least 20 to 30 percent increase in auto reorders because of the convenience factor. And because it auto reorders, brands are getting a increased lifetime value. And we saw, incremental reorders from the same consumer up to 50 percent. So, because they don't run to the store and, and, try and buy some other product when they run out, you're able to, retain the consumers for a longer lifetime value and at the same time increase your, top line with incremental orders per consumer. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Well, if folks want to learn more about the capability or get in touch with you, how should they find you? Adhithi Aji: Yeah, I'm, of course, very approachable on LinkedIn, you know, it's, just a text message there, or I'm also available through our website, and our email is getintouch@adrich.io so, certainly, email, very accessible, but more than happy to collaborate and talk more about what we are seeing in the industry. I think they're very positive market drivers to take sustainability to the next level along with subscription business model for CPG. Keith Anderson: Well, Adhithi, thanks so much for joining me. Adhithi Aji: So thank you. Thanks for having me. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=08j434v8…
Join Keith Anderson as he talks to an old friend, Chris Perry, CEO of Firstmovr. He is not only a trusted advisor to the industry, but he's been in house at world class brands like Reckitt, WellPet, and Kellogg's. Chris tells us about his perspective about some of the challenges that the industry that wants to make it a priority faces in reaching out and persuading colleagues in conventional commercial roles. He also shares an interesting point of view on the impact of emerging brands and insurgents and how innovation can play a role in accelerating industry shifts, and talks about the importance of communication. The conversation closes with us thinking a little bit differently about strategy as it relates to sustainability and retail and CPG. Learn more about Chris Perry: Link to Firstmovr’s website Link to Chris’ Perry’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: DCC_Ep20_Chris Perry_YT Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Thanks for listening. This is the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I am your host, Keith Anderson. This week's episode features an old friend, Chris Perry, who is the CEO of a training and education company called Firstmovr. And I've known Chris a long time, in fact, we even worked at a few of the same places, I guess one of the same places, but in contrast to me, he's got experience not only as a trusted advisor to the industry, but he's been in house at world class brands like Reckitt Benckiser, now just Reckitt, wellPet, and Kellogg's. And I wanted Chris to join me to tell us a bit about his perspective as a non specialist in sustainability about some of the challenges and headwinds that the side of the industry that wants to make it a priority faces in reaching out and persuading colleagues in conventional commercial roles. He has a really interesting point of view on the impact of emerging brands and insurgents and how innovation can play a role in accelerating industry shifts. He's got a great mind for branding and we talked a lot about the importance of communication, and we sort of closed out by thinking a little bit differently about strategy as it relates to sustainability and retail and CPG. So, it was great to catch up with Chris and get his input, and I'm eager for you to meet and hear from him also. So, let's meet Chris Perry of Firstmovr. Chris, good to see you. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. Chris Perry: Keith, thank you so much for having me. Keith Anderson: Yeah, we've, we've known each other for years and years, sort of crossed paths directly and indirectly, but not everybody knows you as well as I do. So to kick it off, why don't you tell folks listening a bit about your background in CPG and what you're doing now at Firstmovr? Chris Perry: You bet. So it, my, my career actually started in brand management at Reckitt long ago, it seems, if you, if we take e-commerce years into consideration, but back in 2010 and 11, there were these opportunities, projects as if they were going to end one day to get into e-commerce in the early days of CPG. And, like a true, true. Change agent or nerd, as some people would probably call me, I volunteered as tribute into that and really found my home in trying to drive change for what, and for some categories is still a small part of the business, but the majority of growth and the majority of the influence sales and impact on the market. And then took my, my career from Reckitt to, you know, helping build the team there and center of excellence there for several years to Wellness Pet Company. Then actually ended up going to Kellogg's and then ended up essentially, and where Keith and I, you know, you and I know each other so well is I had to fill your unusually large shoes, at what was originally Planet Retail Net Group or Planet Retail RNG. And then became Edge by Essential and now is Flywheel and now acquired by Omnicom. So there's like, you know, the artist formerly known as going on and on and on. But, a long line of wonderful people that have led change even, even before I started leading change. And so, and then I got to spend some time leading executive education at Edge by Essential, where I found my passion for that. And then during the pandemic, there was this huge opportunity for both virtual education for the, for the broader community, but also custom trainings and certifications and advisory for companies. And so one of my former colleagues, Oscar Kaszubski, who actually hired me at Kellogg's, was consulting at the time. I saw an opportunity for the education. We paired up, and launched Firstmovr and now are what we like to call, you know, your omni partner for education and change management. So we do everything from public events that are free for leaders, you know, virtual events that are free for leaders to join any time on various strategies and key retailers to, again, custom programs for CPGs, agencies, and retailer audiences. And a lot of advisory, temp services, project execution, really just trying to plug into centers of excellence or become the center of excellence for smaller teams that may not have that head count. So, and it's been a real ride for now four years and we're just excited about the next areas of change, including sustainability, which is a fun topic, but it's an imperative topic. And one I'm, I'm excited that you're taking charge of as a true change agent here. Keith Anderson: Well, Chris, of course, can't refer to the group he was part of as the RB mafia as I can, and it's a metaphor. It was all above board. But Chris was part of a team of folks who, you know, when he says they were in the early days of CPG commerce, I think that Reckitt team was probably the first organized team, you know, professionalizing the work of doing business with online grocers and selling CPG online. And basically everybody that I ever met from that cohort has gone on to do pretty interesting stuff. And Oscar was actually a guest on the last podcast that I hosted. And so, I'm glad that you're beating him to the punch this time. Chris Perry: Hey, no, I, well, like I said, we nerds come from a long line of nerds. There's a legacy of nerdity, but, but what, what it's, it's a, it's a fun role to play because it's, it's an opportunity to truly challenge the status quo, get out ahead. It doesn't mean you have all the right answers, but you're not afraid to fail many, many times and then hopefully find the successful path forward that then everybody else can leverage. And whether they remember you or not is not the point. It's that you felt good knowing you made that impact along the way. Keith Anderson: Well said. So, you know, when you and I were, comparing notes about how to approach the conversation, I think we both see the commonality of a force of change in the industry that sort of starts small, but has outsized impact and implications. And, you know, I'm sure we'll spend a little time on that, but one thing that I thought was interesting about your thinking was you sort of started with the challenges and the headwinds. And so maybe we can start the conversation there because I definitely find a lot of the conventional wisdom, where there is any, you know, when I, when I tell people what I'm working on or tell them what I'm covering, you know, a lot of people either sort of are shocked that anyone is focused on it, or sort of have some pity. So, you know, tell me in your view, you know, why is the headwind and the challenge of working in this area top of mind? Chris Perry: So, and I'll, and I'll disclaim it by all means, cause I know we have fans of, and, you know, change agents for sustainability across the board coming from different angles, but I do believe sustainability is a, not only an amazing opportunity, but also an imperative imperative and the right thing to do, right for mother earth or whatever, however, however, however much of a tree hugger you want to articulate yourself to be, sustainability is very, very important. That being said, though, knowing that we have a lot of leadership, you know, of all levels trying to decide when and where and whether to lean into sustainability, I think sometimes it's helpful to talk about the challenges and the headwinds first, because that's what really motivates most people to change. Unfortunately, here therelots of opportunities in this world. E-commerce was an opportunity, and when framed that way, I often, and I learned a lot over my years of storytelling, when talking about and cheerleading this awesome opportunity, e-commerce was often compared to, I kid you not, to like a pallet skirt at Costco or Sam's Club, you know, it was like, or, or a rollback at Walmart. And you're like, "no, no, no, those aren't the same things." Yes, in the short term, the sales size might be the same from the lift that you get from those, but one is the future of your business and whether you have one. And the other one is whether you got 20 percent upside in the quarter. Right. And so, but, but I realized at the time when framed as an opportunity, it couldn't be considered any more than the other opportunities where an imperative is a little bit different. And so this isn't about scaring or, you know, you know, just trying to create fear. And I don't want to be the boy who cried wolf, but the fact of the matter is, like with e-commerce as an entire channel, quote unquote, evolving and disrupting the space, the wolf is here, it's eating your lunch, and then it's going to need another meal, and whether that meal is you, or another thing you fed it because you got out ahead of preparing the meals the wolf wants, we need to get out ahead of this. But by all means, it is an opportunity, and it's an important thing to be doing for shoppers, for retailers, for the environment, but, you know, and Keith, I know you're seeing a lot of this too, but we are at a place where arguably And this is early, early days now, but there are some major retailers who are actively elevating brands, whether it be through badging or merchandising or, or other, other tactical placements, they are elevating brands that already meet those needs, are already serving more sustainable goals and initiatives. We've got shoppers actively looking for those. So when those are elevated, they see them and then they connect and that aligns. But then in the case, and I'm not picking on any retailers because some of these are really amazing initiatives. So I'm glad they're doing it. But like Target Forward is a great example of one where the first pillar in their priority strategies is to elevate, yes, but also design sustainable brands. So in the absence of a brand doing it for them, who partnered with them for the last 30, 40 years, they will design them in their stead, and that will take a place on the shelf. So before we even get into other third party competition that challenger brands, the retailers are looking to do this so that they can hit their own sustainability goals. So there is a little bit of a, of, of a, a risk of not being left behind, but not even existing on a shelf. and you and I both know the digital shelf is shrinking because we don't even necessarily see but the top row or the first few in on a mobile device, and that's before AI might replace the search results all together with just a recommendation. And who's to say that the AI doesn't say, "Hey, you know what? I want to predictively control the choices to help," you know, if we think about how Skynet and all these wonderful AI, you know, AI inspired movies tried to control for human error and poor human decision making. Who's to say AI wouldn't just recommend sustainable brands too? So, there's a, some of this might be silly things that you think, well, I don't need to worry about that today. You may not have to worry about it in 2024, but if we don't lay the groundwork today, in 2026, you might not even be on page one, recommended by AI, at the retailer altogether. And so there is this, there's this, true sales imperative, which I hate to think is the most important thing for us, but as commercial leaders, we do have to care because that's our business. Keith Anderson: Yeah, and some of the things that you mentioned, I think are, at least in certain categories, already a factor. I mean, one of the things as I started really studying what the retailers were doing in this broad area, what I noticed was, to your point, that they are raising the bar with their own labels. If you look at whatever targets they've set in areas like climate and packaging waste and, you know, even things like biodiversity, almost any of their climate and environment objectives, they're setting more aggressive targets and making progress more quickly for their own labels. And to your point, you know, they're, they're filling slots in their assortment, with options that they own and, you know, not always, but in some cases giving their own brands preference preferential shelf presence. And Chris Perry: and the, I don't want to say the worst part because this isn't against them, but private brands in a digital omni environment, where again, even if I buy in store, my, my omni journey started online and often on a retailer's site, private brands or exclusive brands aren't sitting next to your products like they used to in store as a comparison, they are sitting in front of, because they bump you down or to the point that you don't exist. I mean, I, these are long term industry stats, but knowing some of our sustainability folks out there might not have heard these before, you know, it, 64 percent of Amazon clicks go through the top three search results. 70 percent of sales on Instacart go through the top row of search results, right? So arguably, you know, the sad joke is, you know, you can hide a dead body on page two of a retailer's site because nobody goes there, but irrespective of what your proposition is, if you're not winning you don't exist. And so, but what will naturally win will be things that shoppers are seeking. What will be helped along and accelerated will be the things the retailers are promoting and elevating. And to your point, Keith, you know, retailers are happy to, there's a, there's also a wonderful margin play in there for private brands. If you can create one that isn't just a cheap copycat version of the other brand, but it's actually a better proposition because it does, it does the functional benefit and it's got an emotional sustainable side to it as well. And obviously we know sustainability, obviously, can go even beyond, there's the social sustainable side of things too, you know, around causes and charity and local sourcing and other things that help the workforces, you know, of our countries and markets and small farms and other things depending on what category you're on. So sustainability can mean many things beyond obviously the environmental side, and all of those are being elevated and accelerated by the retailer for, again, their sustainability benefits, their commercial benefits, and maybe the other imperative, and you and I were just talking about this just before we kicked this off, but it's the, it's the government imperatives too. Like, at some point, some of this is voluntary. I'm getting out ahead of, or I'm getting out ahead of industry, you know, best practices or benchmarks, you know, of setting like the 2050 or the 2040 versus 2050 goals or things like that. But what happens when the government step in and say, "Hey, companies need to take a more proactive step," like something is going to light the fire under retailers who are already doing a lot and under those who aren't doing anything. And when that happens, I would hate for a lot of these wonderful brands that, you know, you and I've worked with for years to be on the back foot, you know, trying, trying to respond to it. And again, the hard part is a lot of the leadership that we've worked with aren't the ones who, who are like actually driving the full ship. So it's not something, it's not a matter of will or interest. It's whether I can get the entire bureaucratic organization to pivot on a dime. "Why, why do we need to pivot on a dime? Why can't we pivot on a really large, silver dollar or something?" You know, with that analogy, if we can get out ahead of it and turn more slowly, but, but more thoughtfully and then, you know, correct our course over time. Keith Anderson: Yeah, yeah. And I think a lot of what I see happening, particularly at the large, what I call incumbent CPGs is, you know, they, they are looking for ways, I suppose, at the margins to make those incremental changes. As many of them, and the retailers even more so, are the first to tell, you at their scale the absolute impact of some of those changes is pretty profound and it gives them, you know, helps them buy a little time to find a way to, make some of the more fundamental transformational change they're going to have to make over the next decade or two. Chris Perry: One thing that's always interesting to me, Keith, and this is, and I, and I'm originally a marketer, but I will tell you that Reckitt forced every marketer to become a P&L expert. So I'm really dangerous. And I, my finance analyst used to like, not, it was like, Oh, well, Chris is working on that, so he had taken all those courses at Reckitt made a stake on our P&Ls, but, I got really good at it, but I'm not perfect, but I'm good at it. But my, the one challenge I have is that this, there's this general immediate fear of like dilutive investment. It was like, "Oh, e-commerce is dilutive, right?" Okay. Well, well, sure. Sure it is on day one when you actually put money for it. Like, and it didn't help that in the early days of e-commerce, if we, if we go back a little bit to one of those first waves of change that e-commerce was like just growing because of distribution, right? "Hey, I got on Amazon and I started to grow, but then suddenly, and it was a creative until I had to invest to keep growing because everyone else got distribution too. Well, now, well, now that everybody has content, now we need to do media. Now we need to do search. Now we need to develop e-packs. Now..." like, once you actually have to put real money into it, yes, there is going to be a period of like, like with any startup or, or new, you know, if you were launching in China for the first time, the first few years might be in the red or like with a glide path to profitability, but you have to look at like the life cycle of the investment. And again, some, some folks out there who are investing in packaging, you know, for, for sustainability or, or econ packaging, even if it's not sustainable, might be able to say, "Oh, Chris, you know, I've actually already looked at this and there's never going to be a time when we actually get back to, like..." you might know better on that one specific piece, but on a, on a whole, though, we almost have to look at it like, if I was trying to drive trial on a product, I might try sampling. Well, sampling means me giving away product for free at no, no profit, right? Knowing that I'm going to get someone to try the product, use it, love it, hopefully share about it. But if not share about it, use it themselves and then buy at full retail price with some margin. And then over time, my long term customer lifetime value is going to pay me back. We need to look at this that same way and I literally had talked with a, a team just a few months ago around like, well, the, you know, the E, EPAC packaging and the, you know, the SIOC, ships in own container type packaging, you know, is, is going to be really dilutive and you're like, well, yes, but like, that's because you're trying to retrofit your, your, your you're line internally that was used to doing it one way to a new way without actually activating any efficiencies. But if I know what most CPGs are really good at is figuring out efficiencies after they do something. So, like, I can tell you my first year as an assistant brand manager at Reckitt, I helped get rid of 72 inefficient SKUs in SKU rationalization efforts. Like, like, we had a lot of... from a base business, we had a lot of rationalization and Reckitt was an already very lean organization with that same kind of rationalization efficiency thinking. So, to find 76 potential items that we could remove to make room for future innovation or renovation, that's going to happen, but you have to get over that initial hump. And so, I'm not saying go and just splurge on, you know, every random sustainability thing that you can get your hands on, but so many things that we can do, and if we look at like a two year, three year, five year P&L, won't the ROI have been there because we still exist and have the right to sell anywhere, let alone, you know, in year one with status quo as, you know, with it just kind of starting to build up? So It is funny. I feel like in some realms, companies look at like a glide path approach, but then in some areas they don't. And this is one of those areas where I feel like there's still this barrier to like, "well, we're never going to get efficiencies here. This is dilutive." Maybe on year one, but if you actually made a concerted effort to pivot here, this, you figure out ways to make this very efficient and actually very advantageous for you too. So I think there's, but there may be some long term costs. I mean, everybody may have to compress their margins a little bit. But that might be the new norm, because we're doing the right thing for all parties involved. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I think in some cases, and I'm glad you brought up SIOC, you know, in some cases you sort of have to annuitize the cost of the change over that longer term. But particularly when it's a retailer or, as is increasingly the case, a government mandate, it's not always a phased approach. You know, a lot of cases, the band aid gets ripped and, a switch is flipped. So, you know, to your point, those are, I think, for many companies, the more painful because it does have a fairly immediate impact that takes time to adapt around. But I also think you're right. Big companies are very skilled at wringing efficiency out of those kinds of transitions. And I think you see more of them working with each other to help influence the legislation and in areas like extended producer responsibility and deposit return schemes. Those are both sort of packaging focused, but especially in Europe, packaging is getting a lot of attention at the moment. You know, the lobbying effort is as much about clarity and consistency in many cases as it is "please don't do this." You know, a lot of what I think is creating complexity at the moment is from market to market standards are really inconsistent, and so, particularly for the big multinationals, it's getting increasingly challenging to stay in compliance, you know, globally. You know, I think the other, the other interesting thing that, we haven't really hit on, but it's sort of the flip side of the incumbency coin is there are a lot of emerging brands that have the advantage of designing business model and a product and packaging, you name it, from the future back. And we've sort of seen what competition looks like in the early days of digital commerce growing, you know, there were companies from the beginning that were launching digital first, if not digital exclusive and growing, you know. How do you see that dynamic playing out today between brands that are being founded and funded in 2024, and the interplay of how they compete with some of the, you know, century old brands? Chris Perry: So, it's interesting, and, again, like, you can double click into all of these, but, we've got... digital lowers the barrier to entry for everyone in general, because obviously, Keith, you and I, if we had a product we could sell, even if it was handmade goods on Etsy, we can start a shop and start selling them, right? Like, I mean, now, are we going to be successful overnight organically without pain to be seen breaking through the clutter? No, I mean, we're going to have to do all the normal marketing things. And, you know, commercialization and go to market strategy, the smarter we are about how we bring that to market, the faster we might be able to crack the code. And sometimes you get that like luck of the one hit wonder where something just hit right on the trend, or you got picked up by the right influencer without even meaning to. But digital lowers the barrier to entry because of the third party marketplace, because of D2C, because of social commerce, and so, but no matter where any one of those channels is, right? Like we've seen a lot of D2C. D2C was like this hot topic. Everyone needed to have it. But then a lot of people did it poorly or didn't understand how to differentiate what they were doing in D2C versus if it was a big company versus what they were doing with the rest of the market. So they didn't figure out their unique value propositions or, you know, we saw obviously some of these D2Cs got really big valuations and big CPG bought them and then didn't know how to do it. They just used their old, dusted off their old playbook and said, "we're going to distribute you everywhere," but then didn't figure out how to make sure they differentiate, what was online only versus, you know, with them versus what they were selling, you know, broadly in, in other retail channels. And so. Whether D2C is the, like, is a large part of the CPG's portfolio or not, D2C, social commerce, and even the 3P marketplace, are platforms for incubating, right, potential exclusives, new innovations, testing things, by all means, they might end up becoming really meaningful, I mean, when you think of, like, you know, Lego and Keurig and, you know, you've got some big companies that have some really meaty D2C businesses, and they use those obviously for brand building, for marketing and content and, you know, innovation testing for loyalty plays of giving their loyalists, you know, early access. I mean, they're getting insights. They can already prove things and then go to a Walmart and say, "Hey, I already have something that's proven 90 percent of my, my loyalists love this, and it already serves these five benefits versus the traditional products." So they've got like, and I'm not just picking on those companies, but, but companies with established D2C or any other platforms as an incubation platform become really interesting. So those channels obviously offer challenger brands a way to make the case for not only their brands, but the sustainability movement. And to your point before, I don't think that goes unnoticed to other retailers who are looking at the trends or looking at the, what, what, that's why a lot of those, you know, Target and Walmart have invited so many digitally native brands and many of which are sustainable or more thoughtful to the environment or social causes than the traditional brands. So I do think the challenger brands, they might not be big overnight, in a way that like would be noticeable. They're not going to pop up and completely disrupt your share within a month, but they could within a year or two years or three years. And again, it's not a matter of you not being on that Amazon shelf. It's that you don't exist to them. You're not, you don't have, you have no share of mind because you're not at eye level and then you're not at, you know, smart speaker recommendation level or AI assisted, you know, Rufus, you know, Amazon Rufus, your recommendation level, because you're not meeting maybe like table stake needs that, and again, we don't know what AI, like I only bring up AI because aI is both has a positive side from a personalization, but it also has a very disruptive side from a, I don't know what's in that black box, and I don't know what determines what is recommended for Keith when Keith starts typing in, and I don't know what, I don't know what may be like the foundational bias, and I don't use bias in a bad way, it could be a positive bias, right? Like, "only recommend things that are really good for the environment that also meet the shopper's needs." Right? Who's to say that doesn't fall into it somewhere. If the retailers are initiating these search engine optimizations that don't favor things that qualify, they might then be the only recommendation you get. So, so brands that proactively design themselves to be that way and get over that, challenger brands have that benefit because that's their only route to market. But the big companies almost don't treat this as an innovation. You said one other thing a minute ago, that was really important. It, for some reason, when we launch innovation at a big CPG, we're willing to overspend upfront on that amazing quality. And then rationalize it very quickly after. I was literally part of that myself. We launched with the best packaging. It was the, you know, the foil packaging that shines off the shelf. It was embossed. It was great. Like we spent extra on all this and literally as soon as it launched, then it was the rationalization team was on how can we cut, how can we squeeze the product? So the funny thing is we're really good at squeezing, but we're also okay with launching unusual quality. At a minimum, I'd like to say, let's just keep quality, but either way, why don't we approach it with that same mindset? Like treat this as an innovation. That's the right thing to do. It's on shopper trend. It's on retailer trend. It has massive implications long term if we do or don't do it, not to mention against competition. And yes, there will be ways to squeeze it later, but the squeezing will be off the right base because we're already going to be, we're not going to squeeze it by making it less sustainable. You know, we're going to... Most of the squeezing was removing packaging. So it'd be a way to make the packaging even more sustainable, if you will. So I think there's just, it's a mindset shift, and knowing like how many times do we have to see a change that started small, that even when it's still small for some categories, actually is really big in terms of share of growth, share of influenced growth, share of, even share of mind with the retailer who is making decisions about what they carry anywhere. In store and online based on what is winning, and winning will be defined by whether you've done some of this as well. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Well, Chris, what, what a high energy and fascinating conversation. I know that there are going to be folks that are going to want to hear more from you. Where would you point folks that want to get to know you or Firstmovr better? Chris Perry: If you want to reach out to me directly and get the same level of high energy, because I'm naturally caffeinated. I do not drink coffee. You can reach out to me at chris@firstmovr.com and Firstmovr doesn't have an E in it because technically there's no E in e-commerce because it should be just commerce. And we should come up with something cool for sustainability, for that long term as well. But, I invite all of you out there to any of our upcoming events, you can find all of them at firstmovr.com/events. We have events again on every type of strategy, every type, all leading retailers. They're all free. They will stay free. They're virtual. They can fit your schedule. You can obviously go back and watch them on demand. And we bring, we really source the best quality. We're hoping to get Keith on to several of our events so that we can maintain our top quality, you know, thought leaders in all these different areas. But we would love to have you and you can obviously engage us there. And we host a lot of great speakers from the brand, agency, solution provider, retailer side, to speak to the next level strategies for those areas. So we'd love to have you join us. And if we can help you further, we're, you know, you can reach out to us about ways we can collaborate more custom, in a more customized manner. Keith Anderson: Awesome. Well, thank you, Chris, for joining us. Chris Perry: Thank you so much. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the decarbonizing commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of decarbonizing commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=qn02y5ln…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

Join Keith Anderson as he meets and learns from our guest this week, Autumn Fox, Climate Sustainability Senior Manager for Mars. Together they discuss the company’s roadmap to net zero emissions, looking at how far they’ve come and how they, and the rest of the industry, might continue to move forward. Together they touch on plans that affect agriculture, retail, packaging, and logistics. Learn more about the Mars Net Zero Roadmap Link to Mars’s website Mars Pledges Fresh Climate Action to Achieve Net Zero Emissions Across Full... To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. This is the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm Keith Anderson. Thank you for listening. Last fall, the Mars Company published details of its Net Zero Roadmap, which is among the most ambitious decarbonization plans I've seen in the industry. Mars has a climate footprint, roughly equivalent to the country of Finland. And they've already reduced emissions by 8 percent from a 2015 baseline, despite increasing sales within 60% over the same period. But their new net zero target is to reduce their full value chain emissions by half by 2030 versus the same 2015 baseline, and by 80% by 2050. They've committed a billion dollars over the next three years, and they estimate that it'll take roughly 1 percent of annual sales to get to that 50% reduction by 2030. And Mars is a food company, so as you might suspect, a huge percentage of the emissions reductions that are planned are in agriculture and land use, but some of their plans also affect retail, packaging, and logistics. So, I was really excited when I had the opportunity to interview somebody from Mars that worked directly on the Net Zero Roadmap. And our guest this week is Autumn Fox, the Climate Sustainability Senior Manager for Mars, who, in her role, leads the climate and land impact areas for the Mars Sustainable in a Generation Plan. Autumn has been with Mars for more than a decade in a variety of roles, sales, R&D, and commercial. She was previously a sustainable sourcing manager in the Mars Wrigley business, where she chaired the SAI platform, Sustainable Dairy Partnership, and Autumn has a background in biology and is a published author in ecology and cancer biology. Like I say, I think this is a really great example of where the industry is ultimately headed and I was delighted to meet Autumn and learn from her. So let's meet Autumn Fox of Mars Incorporated. Autumn, we're recording on a Friday morning, so happy Friday, and thanks for joining the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Autumn Fox: Thanks, Keith. Thank you for having me here today. Keith Anderson: I've been very excited for this conversation and, I'm really excited to learn more about you and, and what Mars is doing in this area. You know, last fall, when the company published the Net Zero Roadmap, I was, I, I dug into the detail for longer than I expected to when I opened the PDF. And so, I think it's going to be a really fascinating discussion for listeners. Maybe we can just start by, learning a bit about you and your journey to working on climate at Mars. Autumn Fox: Yeah, I'm happy to share. So my journey to this started in college. Part of my biology degree was that I worked on a research study, and that study was looking at the effect of natural gas drilling out west in the US on elk and mule deer. And while I was out there, I was spending time in this relatively remote part of the US. It looked very forested and natural, but what I learned was that it was dissected with all of the development and the roads to access the natural gas wells. And it was apparent that this was really a deeply impacted and fragmented landscape, and it created this interest that I have now in the overlap between business and ecology. And I ended up at Mars. I've been here my whole career, essentially, but I've been in a variety of parts of the business. I've gotten to be in sales and work on the performance metrics of our sales team. I've gotten to be involved with our innovation project process. I've gotten to be involved with our innovation process in R&D and looking at how we procure sustainably for ingredients like our dairy, our tree nuts, our vanilla. And so all that then has brought me to this place now. I'm part of our corporate team on sustainability, and I lead our work on climate change, land use, and deforestation and conversion of natural systems. Keith Anderson: I think that rotational experience in different parts of the company is, it's somewhat common in CPG companies from what I've seen, but I don't know how common it is in climate and sustainability. Is it something that you pursued, or is that something that the company does with intent? Autumn Fox: You know, one of the things I love about Mars is that it's really focused on development and really gives some freedom for associates to chart their own path and really work through the career path that they're interested in. So I've had a lot of support over the years from my managers to keep developing. I, I do think in Mars, at least we see a lot of this. We have a lot of people in sustainability who are coming, especially from procurement or R&D and bringing a lot of the skills that are needed to excel in those areas to work on sustainability issues. Keith Anderson: It makes a ton of sense. I mean, that, that is, as we discussed briefly before we were recording, so much of our focus is at the intersection of all of these commercial decisions that impact both climate and commercial outcomes. And so I think it's really interesting and important to see that kind of cross pollination happening inside the business. Well, I think the main topic for discussion today is the Net Zero Roadmap that I know you played a key role in helping develop. I imagine some folks listening aren't totally clear on what "net zero" means. So can you define it? Autumn Fox: Absolutely. I know there's a lot of confusion out there on terms like "net zero" and "carbon neutral" or "climate positive." It's a real jungle right now. Net zero is a concept that, you know, really was defined by the United Nations and a group called the Science Based Targets Initiative. At its most basic, net zero means a balance between greenhouse gases that are emitted to the atmosphere and greenhouse gases that are removed from the atmosphere and stored somewhere. That's at a global level, and we're pretty far from that, to be frank. At a company level, net zero means the same thing, but with a certain order of operations. So first, a company needs to dramatically reduce the emissions associated with their value chain on the order of 80% to 90% depending on the industry. Then once the company has really dramatically reduced their emissions, there's going to be some residual emissions that last 10 or 20%. Those might be very difficult or impossible to, to stop. And so those can then be neutralized or offset using carbon removal credits. Keith Anderson: Makes sense. And can you tell us about the Net Zero Roadmap and what some of the pillars of it are? Autumn Fox: Absolutely. So, the Net Zero Roadmap is a publication that we put out last fall, after we had announced our commitment to cutting in half our emissions by 2030 and achieving net zero by 2050. And in the roadmap, we're really laying out our plan to 2030 in a fair amount of detail, and we've done a lot of analysis to support this, to assure our business leaders that this is the right choice to make. And the great news is that we found that cutting our emissions in half by 2030 is achievable. We can do it. The solutions are available, they're ready to be deployed, and we really just need to deploy them at scale in our supply chain. The other thing that we found is actually that it's also affordable. It'll cost us, we think, about 1 percent of sales annually. And I know that perhaps could be debatable whether that is affordable or not, but when we think about an investment to address the really most existential threat to our business and to our families, you know, that's pretty affordable. And what we're seeing is that actually there was a study recently, just this week I saw, a study in over 100 countries that found that 70% of people would be willing to percent, willing to spend 1 percent of their household income to stop climate change. So, we really need to recognize that this is something we all. No is a, is a big threat and we need to just invest it to get it done and to change course. Now, when we think about our Net Zero Roadmap, we have a few fundamental concepts that are really important. The first one is that companies need to include all of the emissions associated with their value chains. And that's because in the end, you know, it might be nice to exclude one bucket of emissions that's difficult to to address, but it doesn't work like that for the atmosphere. What matters to the atmosphere is what is actually emitted. And so we need to be including everything so that we can make strategies that truly do what's necessary to slow this down. The second thing is that we need to have interim targets. Company committing to net zero by 2040 or 2050, that's so far away. Businesses act for the most part on much shorter, you know, year to multi year time frames. And so we have to have those five year targets to make sure that we're on track. And as we look at our targets, we need to think about performance. That's what really matters, right? The atmosphere doesn't fundamentally care. If Mars has a GHG policy, it matters whether our emissions have actually gone down. And so we have to have a really laser focus on performance and actually reducing our emissions over time. At the same time, we have to think long term, right? And in particular, that means thinking about decisions we're making now that lock us in to a certain emissions pathway. For example, if you're installing a new asset, a new piece of machinery at your factory, you know, typically those are going to have multi decade lifespans. And so you might be making a decision now that will affect your emissions profile in 2040 or 2050, and identifying those decisions and taking particular care with those decisions is, is really important. And the final, you know, fundamental, that we have of net zero is this idea that once we get down to that small level of residual emissions, the last 10 or 20% that we can't really do anything about, in order to neutralize those with carbon credits, we really need to be focused on the quality of the carbon credits. Of course, there have been a lot of challenges in carbon markets recently that have been quite public. And so looking at how to ensure that you're really procuring and supporting high quality carbon credits projects is, is absolutely vital. Keith Anderson: There's a couple things that I want to drill down on there, but I think that's a super interesting overview. The first is, you know, I like the way you frame the sort of primacy of the atmosphere because you really can't work the ref or move the goalposts in a, in a topic like this, you know, I've, I've sort of been saying in some cases, the consumer is king, but, you know, sometimes laws of thermodynamics take precedence and, and I think that's something that many of us in business are still coming to accept because you know, for decades, we've been so singularly focused on, "well, if a consumer accepts it, then it works, and if they don't, then it doesn't." And I think we're broadening our thinking. Autumn Fox: So perhaps "physics is king" is your, your new catchphrase. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I'm not known having pithy or memorable phrases, but I'm searching for something that I can Autumn Fox: Well, let me know if you find it. But we, we really do try to bring that approach with the business. It's what "does the science say is necessary?" And we use that to set our environmental targets, not only on climate, but also on water and on land. Keith Anderson (2): Yeah, it makes sense. And, you know, the second thing that I think is really important and I'm glad to see is, certainly you're focusing on the quality of offsets and credits, but the majority of what you're planning to achieve is actually reducing emissions in the value chain. And, you know, I know there are some major buckets of emissions that represent big percentages of full value chain emissions. Maybe we can start with agriculture, which you know, my read of the report suggests is probably the biggest. Autumn Fox: Agriculture is absolutely one of our biggest areas, and that's because for Mars, as, largely a food business, the footprint of the raw materials that we purchase, is, is over 60% of our footprint. And so it is the must win area. And in the short term, you know, the absolute top priority there has to be stopping deforestation and conversion of natural ecosystems. This is crucial that any food company be taking action on this now. It has to happen this decade. And so to work on that, you know, we start with really tracing our supply chains. A step we call map. We've got to map back to the land where our product was sourced from. And then we need to look at "how do we manage and make sure that we are setting the expectations for our supply chains in terms of ensuring that they are on land that is, it's free of deforestation and conversion after a cutoff date?" And finally, then we need to monitor to make sure that they remain compliant. But as we do this, you know, what we really see is that often we have to actually redesign our supply chains. Sometimes you can, you can apply it to your existing supply chain, but often you might find that the supply chain hasn't been designed with this kind of transparency and compliance in mind, and you need to take a different approach. And one example where we've done that is in Palm, where a significant part of our volumes are traced from an innovative model where we, we really have, you know, a single plantation, a single mill, supplying us. Then beyond stopping deforestation, there's all the emissions that are associated with the agricultural value chain that includes, you know, producing fertilizer, it includes the emissions from the land, the emissions from the animals, the emissions from the farm operations, as well as then any emissions from logistics and processing. So there's a broad swath of emissions, very diverse set of emissions that are in this category. And the way we're tackling that is largely through climate-smart agriculture. And the way we understand climate-smart agriculture is really that it has three pillars. One is reducing emissions across all of the sources of emissions and ensuring that you are protecting nature and regenerating soils and natural ecosystems. And that's where sort of regenerative agriculture fits in. And finally, that you're working on resilience, recognizing that climate risks to supply chains and to farms are significant and working to increase the resilience of those supply chains. And so we, we tackle this in very different ways in different supply chains because they have really an incredible diversity of contexts, but it ranges everything from classic regen ag programs that are looking at things like no-till and cover crops to working with dairy farmers on how they manage their manure and to do that in a more sustainable way, to looking at how we improve the, the processing of the actual ingredients that we buy. Keith Anderson: It's really interesting and, and there are, I think, a handful of other categories that are more directly chopper and, and retailer facing in some ways. Do you think that there could be implications for ways of working with retailers and consumers in some of the agricultural initiatives that are part of smart climate or climate-smart agriculture? Autumn Fox: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, the first place to start is with your, your comment on the consumer being king, right? Absolutely. The consumer often has some interest in how the product that they're purchasing was produced, right? And so there's an opportunity from a sales and reputation perspective to engage with the consumer and to share with them the story of what we're doing in those supply chains and to really bring that to life for them. Then the retailer can also have an interest in that because that creates a shared marketing opportunity and a way to grow the category. Right? But in addition to that, the retailer may also have some interest in partnering with us to, to work with the farmers because of their own goals and commitments and targets. So, there's several ways that this could come to life with retailers and consumers. Keith Anderson: Makes sense. What are some of those other major buckets? Obviously none quite as significant as agriculture, but still areas that the plan requires you to focus on. Autumn Fox: So, related to agriculture is product formulation. And this is one of those things, very few things, that is in our direct control, right, so it's an enormous opportunity where our choices affect both the upstream footprint of the ingredients that we purchase, because we're choosing whether to buy beef or poultry or soy protein, and also the downstream footprint of how the consumer uses and disposes of our products. And so to work on product formulation, I think first is important to note that it does require a fairly high level of data availability, right? We need to be able to give the product scientists the information they need to make effective decisions. It also requires a really excellent collaboration with the procurement team. Because, you know, what ingredients are going to be in the product obviously affects how the procurement team prioritizes their work. And the ways that other raw materials will be improving in sustainability over time also affects how R&D thinks about what materials to put in and which not to. And so there needs to be a really strong collaboration between R&D and procurement teams to make this really come to life. Keith Anderson (2): Speaking of R&D, and this may be out of your wheelhouse, but I think Mars just announced the opening of a new R&D facility in Chicago. Is that linked to this topic? Autumn Fox: So, I'm based in Chicago. So, yes, happy to be very close to that. Yeah, so that's really about making sure that we have the right innovation support to be able to really do effective pilots of, of new products, and so that is you know, really making sure that we have the infrastructure to be able to effectively test as R&D is working on "how do we reformulate and how do we develop new products to make sure that we can pilot those effectively before we bring them to market?" Keith Anderson: Yeah, I, I see a growing focus across the industry in product effectiveness and, you know, while we're all trying to improve the sustainability and reduce the footprint of products, making sure that we're giving the shopper and the consumer choices that they feel good about making, seems increasingly important. What about some of the other areas like packaging, retail, logistics? Autumn Fox: So maybe we start with packaging because that's also very closely related to product formulation. Packaging is a great example of an area where we can't have climate tunnel vision. And I'm our climate lead and I'm saying this, right? The mentality we need to have is that we are part of nature and our lives are fully dependent on nature being healthy and vibrant. And in the case of packaging, the impact on nature has to be the top priority, which means that our priority is to design packaging for recycling and reuse, which is also known as designing for circularity. And so that's what our packaging teams are really fully activated on right now. As you design for circularity, there are a variety of actions that you work on. That can include redesigning the packaging to have fewer layers to make it more easy to recycle. And it includes innovating with new materials that are easier to recycle or compost. And it also includes working externally to scale up the recycling infrastructure that's needed to then actually recycle or compost or reuse those materials. The great news is, in our analysis we have found that those actions to design for circularity, in aggregate, they do lead to reduce to... in aggregate, they do lead to reductions in our greenhouse gas footprint, which is excellent news. There is a synergy and we're driving for both together. But that won't be the end of the story on sustainable packaging. Once we've moved to that circular packaging, then we need to get on with fully decarbonizing those packaging systems and doing all the work to make sure that those supply chains are, you know, are dramatically reducing their footprint as well. So it's really going to be a multi stage process in packaging, starting with designing for circularity. Keith Anderson: It's interesting how many of these transitions come back to the design phase of the entire value chain. Autumn Fox: They do, and we're really thinking about that entire value chain. And particularly when it comes to retail and logistics. In retail, what do we need to think about? The emissions that are coming from that retailer, perhaps transporting and warehousing the product, that are coming from the footprint of the retail store itself, such as the electricity to power the lights and the refrigerators, maybe gas that's producing heat, etc. And then even transporting the product all the way to the consumer's house, whether that's happening in a consumer vehicle or, in a, you know, some form of direct to consumer delivery platform. And that was the key insight for us on retail, that we really need to be thinking all the way to the consumer's house. And that helps us to really look at which systems are most efficient and how to drive decarbonization, even in how we sell the product to the consumer. What's clear is that our first two priorities in this area are working on the, the retailer logistics, and looking at how we move to renewable electricity in retail as quickly as possible. Keith Anderson: Yeah, it was a brief mention in the roadmap, but one thing that really leapt off the page to me was a comment that digital commerce, on average, and of course, you know, it depends on so many details, but on average, it tends to have a lower footprint than conventional brick and mortar retail. And, so much of my focus is at the intersection of digital commerce and climate work. I thought it was an interesting point that, you know, a company like Mars is even looking at those kinds of channel strategies in a sense, as influential to outcomes like a Net Zero Roadmap. I think there's more and more opportunity to consider the way these topics can support each other, you know, as you're trying to grow while decoupling that growth from emissions. Autumn Fox: Yeah, and, and, I mean, interestingly, that comes because when, if you think about driving to the store and picking up a load of groceries, when you come home, your car is not full. There's a lot of air in your car, right? Whereas with DCOM, you can really optimize the capacity of those vehicles, but it goes back to the point on including all emissions, because when we include all emissions, we get the full picture of what's happening, the full picture of how our business strategy affects our footprint, and that leads us to ask these kinds of questions and get these kinds of answers. So, the process of including everything actually helps us get smarter and be a more competitive business. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Keith Anderson: Well, Autumn, I really appreciate your time and, and insight. You know, I think the work that Mars is doing in this space is really important and is, is going to serve as a benchmark for some of your peers in the industry, we'll include links in the show notes to both the roadmap and some more detail on S-LoCT if people want to learn more. Autumn Fox: Thanks very much, Keith. Keith Anderson: Yeah. Thanks again for joining Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=5nz97938…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

1 Increasing Efficiency and Lowering Emissions at the Last Mile with Mike Robinson of The 8th Notch 32:19
In this episode, join Keith Anderson as he meets and learns from today's guest, Mike Robinson, who is part of the founding team of The 8th Notch, a software platform helping retailers and carriers essentially do what they already do, but more effectively and cost efficiently--incidentally, reducing emissions in profound ways. Together they discuss the outlook on the future of delivery in e-commerce, touching on a report by the WEF, and what The 8th Notch brings to the table in this area. With more than 25 years of leadership experience in the retail industry, Mike shares his thoughts and outlook in this episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Learn more about Mike Robinson: Link to The 8th Notch’s website Link to Mike’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 Episode resources: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-the-last-mile-ecosystem/ If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm Keith Anderson. Logistics is one of the areas, one of the parts of the retail e-commerce and consumer products value chain, where things you do to lower emissions can often have a positive economic impact. That is, if you're able to eliminate waste or operate more efficiently, Not only do you reduce emissions, but you lower cost. But it's also one of the most complex because the shopper has been conditioned over the last 10 or 15 years to expect first two day, and then next day, and increasingly same day delivery, often free delivery. And so we can already see with studies from folks like the World Economic Forum that, you know, the outlook, given the rising demand for e-commerce and urgent delivery, there's going to be a profound increase in emissions and road congestion driven by e-commerce. And that's why I was so interested to meet and learn from today's guest, Mike Robinson, who is part of the founding team of The 8th Notch, a software platform focused on sustainable last mile deliveries. The headline on The 8th Notch is they are a software platform helping retailers and carriers essentially do what they already do, but more effectively and cost efficiently, which incidentally reduces emissions in ways that can be pretty profound. And Mike has more than 25 years of leadership experience in the retail industry. He has expertise in digital retail growth, product management, and technology delivery. He's held these roles at companies like Macy's and The Gap. As well as IBM and PwC. And these days, he's a strategic advisor to several early stage startups, and an independent board member of Vista Outdoors. So, I'm very excited for you to meet Mike and learn about The 8th Notch, who's working to decarbonize the last mile of e-commerce delivery. Mike, welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Good to see you. Mike Robinson: Good to see you as well, Keith. Happy to be here. Keith Anderson: You know, I, I often start the show by getting to know the guests a little bit, but in this case, I actually would love to start with, your company's name. Tell us about The 8th Notch and what that means. Mike Robinson: Yeah. The 8th Notch is not, is not a name that you would think of, but, but it's an homage to the founder's father who was in the railroad industry. And the 8th notch is the most powerful setting on the engine itself, and it identifies efficiency and it identifies power. So it's a little bit of a, you know, homage to his dad, but, but also the notion of, you know, "how do you take advantage of the things that we already have and make them better?" Which is really what we're attempting to do at The 8th Notch. Keith Anderson: Super interesting. Well, maybe we can start then with, what you are doing at The 8th Notch and it would be great to better understand your background and how you got involved with the HNOT, with The 8th Notch, once we've given folks a sense of what it does. Mike Robinson: Yeah, I'll give you, I'll give you the nickel tour of my background, right? So, for the better part of the last 25 years, I've been focused on retail. I, I often describe myself as an accidental retailer because it's not what I intended to be, right? I came out of college with the intent of going to Wall Street and one thing led to another and I ended up in consumer products. Then I ended up in consulting. And then I stumbled into retail and, and especially it was at the beginning, pretty much at the beginning of the dawn of the e-commerce boom, right? In the, in the, in the late nineties, it was with a, a consulting firm here, here in the Bay Area. And we were really, you know, building the first generation e-commerce sites for a lot of the large companies in America. After that, I, I recognize that I like the nature of retail. I like the immediacy of it. I like the, you know, the understanding of the customer. I like the psychology of how do you help people, you know, either buy things that they need more effectively, or how do you turn, you know, you know, wants into needs to actually get them to consume, right? Which is the great, you know, retailer dilemma in many cases and the calculus that most retailers go through. So, after that consulting agency, I ended up going back to the PricewaterhouseCoopers where I'd been before and I operated in biotech and high tech for a period of time, but always had this longing to get back into retail and had an opportunity to go into it from an industry background. Joined the GAP in the mid 2000s, helped them rebuild their e-commerce business from a technology standpoint and a process standpoint. Spent some other, spent a few additional years at the GAP, you know, helping a large retailer kind of turn the ship a little bit. And then I got tapped on the shoulder to go to Macy's to do the same thing. And it was, you know, Macy's was a, $700, so 700 million e-commerce channel by the, when I got there, it was 7 billion by the time I left. Now I'd like to believe that I had a positive effect on it over those, you know, eight years. I've been told I had a positive effect, but I know it was also, it was, we timed the market perfectly and we timed the investment strategy perfectly. And we, and also timed the consumer as well, who was having a changing behavior set. as they moved away from stores to e-commerce to omni-channel. And, and then I left there, in 2018. It was, you know, that was the completion of my journey. And in 2018, I started, I had this notion of "should I keep going down the large operator role, or should I do what I really love, which is advisory roles?" And I've done a series of advisories for smaller startups in the retail industry area. From a consumer experience standpoint, cetera, with, with some successful exits associated with it, sit on a public board company for a company that is, you know, primarily consumer products, but transitioning to being much more direct to consumer. And then my buddy tapped me on the shoulder and said, "I got this idea for a company." And the origin story really goes as simple as this. The founder, Jamie Sapp, who's been a long time friend of mine and a very smart person on the logistics side, looked at me and he said, "how often does a delivery truck come down your street?" And I said, "every day. In fact, they all come down my street. You know, the Amazons, the UPSs, the FedExes, the OnTracks of the world." He goes, he goes, "does it seem like it's too much?" I said, "sure. Every time that, you know, the fact that I'm getting five deliveries a week and they're coming all on different days feels like a lot" and he goes, "I want to fix that. I want to build a business around that. I want to fix that. I want to unlock value associated with that." And that was the beginning of what we wanted to do, which was "how do we, you know, minimize the number of times that a delivery truck comes to your house, but still maximizes the number of deliveries that are intended for you?" It's just the combination is different and we use time differently. So it's not happening five times a week. It could be happening three times a week or two times a week. Keith Anderson: Got it. Yeah, I mean, that, that general problem area has become a bigger focus for a lot of the industry that I think is grappling with rising demand among consumers, but acknowledging that the growth of omni-channel and e-commerce is adding to congestion, increasing emissions. There's a World Economic Forum study on last mile logistics that opened my eyes, sort of show something like, if by 2030, we stay on the trajectory we're on, you're going to see a roughly 25 or 30 percent increase in both road congestion and emissions, unless we do something differently. So, it seems clear to me there's a compelling backdrop to work on this area. Mike Robinson: Yeah, I think there's a compelling backdrop on both sides, right? I mean, I think if you look at it through the consumer lens, I mean, you know, I've seen studies as well that talk about, you know, so, you know, three quarters of consumers would say, "I'd do something differently if it was offered to me," right? If, if I, if I had the opportunity to have things delivered, and it's specifically around delivery. If you gave me something and made me feel like I was making a conscious, eco-friendly choice, I'm all in, right? And we're seeing Amazon do it, right? I mean, anytime you check out at Amazon right now, you have the opportunity of being able to say, you know, instead of delivering, you know, Monday and Tuesday, deliver it all on Tuesday. And there's, you know, because it's better for the environment. So, you know, I, I like to say we are attempting to bring to the rest of the retail industry and the carriers that support it what Amazon is doing for themselves. And Amazon is conditioning the customer just like they conditioned them that free and fast was important which they no longer, you know for I I think it's a myth. It's a mythos at this point What they're trying to do is saying coordinated and sustainable is a better option. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I, I, that Amazon day option, I, I find one of the sort of canaries in the coal mine in the last mile logistics space, you know. I don't view it as the only thing Amazon is doing, but they are trying to nudge shoppers with both the option and the incentive. I mean, I think if I'm not mistaken, I get Amazon digital credit every time I choose a, Amazon day shipment or a slower shipping speed. You know, you, you, you mentioned the, the consumer response to surveys, I, I wonder whether those kind of incentives are going to be necessary to really change the behavior because so often I see sort of a gap between what the consumers intend to do or say they're going to do and what they actually seem to do. Mike Robinson: Yeah well, we asked that question of ourselves too when we started The company and said, you know, where is the best place to inject ourselves? And we took the path of least resistance, which is after the consumer is already involved, right? It's when that, that implicit contract has been set up between the consumer and the, and the retailer in terms of "you bought it and I said, I'm going to get it to you in the next 5 to 7 days," right? We take that window of time and just use it more effectively. Instead of what retailers are doing is they're trying to use the front end of that to do surprise and delight, which I'm not sure anybody is surprised and delighted on it because they're surprised, right, in some cases. And we're trying to use the back end of that to say, "can I create value out of it by connecting another package and having two items delivered at the same time?" And it could be from, from another retailer. I mean, that's the beauty of this. It's not just, it's not just split shipments of the same retailer. But it's everything that's coming to every address in America, right? Because we are primarily North America based. We are, we are looking at everything that's in motion and trying to connect this purchase to one of those things just because of the sheer volume of what Americans buy and have delivered to them. And so using the, using the full time frame, you know, it, it's already been committed by, by the retailer. Right? And the surprise and delight piece, look, for your most loyal customers, absolutely find a way to do that. But, but for the ones that aren't loyal to you, or don't purchase from you frequently, then, then there's a real opportunity to create, to unlock value and unlock the carbon savings as we've talked about. Keith Anderson: Well, I, I wonder if it also varies by item. I think, as you mentioned, Amazon helped condition consumers to expect everything. You know, in two days, then the next day, if not same day, a huge percentage of what you might choose to order online is not for immediate consumption or usage. You really don't, if you take a moment to pause and reflect, need it with much urgency. And so, I can also imagine this being effective if you maybe prompt shoppers to think about, you know, when do you really need this? Mike Robinson: Yeah. And, and that's why we started post checkout. Our goal is to go in to checkout, right? And actually give that opportunity and, and we've got, one or two retailers that are contemplating it as, as an alternative to how they, how they position free shipping, right? "Right. I'll give it to you free, but you got to give me more time to look for opportunity, right? To be more eco friendly. If you need it faster, I'm going to charge you a surcharge. I'm not going to charge you the full amount, but I'm going to charge you a surcharge." And so they're contemplating some A/B experiments around that with that, which I think is really smart. You know, because my, my thesis is Amazon's making it very, very clear to people that you should start thinking about this. There's no reason why the rest of the retailers can't start thinking this way as well. If they got conditioned to go free and fast, they can go, that they can be conditioned, if their customers are being conditioned to think about coordinated and synchronized. Keith Anderson: So maybe it's worth taking a step back and just unpacking for listeners in a little more detail how you do what you do. So we, we know now you're inserted after the checkout, you sit between the carriers and the retailer. Mike Robinson: I, I we sit in between and from the carrier, we have a view into their network of everything that's in motion over the next eight days, right, going to every address in America. For, from the retailer, I now have the orders that are being created in that day and now I can analyze them to understand I can find a match, or I can't find it. If I can't find a match, I do no harm and I just will let, let the order go and it, and it's processed the way that the retailer would. If I can find a match where something is going to, you know, connect with another package to be delivered on the same day as another package that's already in motion, and it still lives within that commitment that the retailer has made to that customer, then I schedule when that order should be pick, packed, and shipped. And that's the change. What usually happens right now is retailers get orders and figure out how to process them as quickly as possible because speed is king. And what we're saying is there is a percentage, 15 to 20 percent of your orders, that have an opportunity that if you waited a day, maybe at max two days on a couple of those, you can connect it with a package that's already in motion and unlock dollar savings and we'll talk about the carbon savings as well. But, but we're talking about scheduling when orders start their journey instead of what is really a FIFO or first in, first out model that most retailers follow right now. Keith Anderson: Well, maybe we start with the dollar savings and just talk about the, the operational considerations here. So, I would imagine if we're starting a little bit later and consolidating orders at scale, does this mean fewer trucks on the road or how does this sort of cascade into dollar savings? Mike Robinson: Yeah, yeah, you've, you've really hit the nail on the head and it's, and it's, and it's, lowest unit of measure is a delivery stop, right? If the truck used, used to come to my house five times a week and now it comes three times, it doesn't have to stop here twice, right? And each time and, and the carrier that we have the strategic relationship with, they've done the analysis that says that every time that that truck doesn't need to stop, the driver get out, drop something off, get back in, move to the next stop, there's a, there's a multi dollar savings associated with it. And, and what we what we, convinced the, the carrier to do was if you can, you know, and if that's important to you, and they said, "absolutely, delivery density is absolutely crucially important to us for us to be able to manage our network more effectively over time. If you can do that, we will share those savings with the retailer. And we'll share them with you because you've changed the behavior." So the retailer ships on the date that we tell them to. We told them the date that they needed to ship on. And as long as those two things happen, both of us benefit. The carrier benefits because they, they don't have that stuff. Now, you fast forwarded, right? Doing that at scale, right? Ultimately takes trucks off the road. And back to your original comment around, you know, the impact by 2030 is that it's about route compression, right? It's maybe my driver doesn't drive down my street five days a week. He drives down three days a week, right? Because his route has become so, so synchronized that it's Monday and Wednesday he comes down my street. Or he only drives on Monday and Wednesday, right? And they, and they change their entire approach to it, which is right now, they're just keeping up. We're talking about giving capacity back in a more intelligent way. Keith Anderson: You said earlier that somewhere between 15 and 20 percent of your orders on average might fit this profile. Are you seeing patterns in what types of orders or what types of items meet those conditions? Or is it purely about where the item is and where it's headed? Mike Robinson: Yeah, I think the pattern that we're seeing more is around at, is around the address level. There are clearly, you know, households in America that consume more than others, right? It, it, it's just the nature of the beast. I, I, I would put my, I mean, I, based on the addresses that we've seen, I know I'm pretty high on that list myself, right? You know, as, as I, as I, you know, adopted that obviously as an e-commerce, individual, but also someone that went through the pandemic when there was the permanent step function up, right? I think the piece that we haven't unlocked and the one that we're trying to is subscription models. Right. Right. When it's, when it's drugs or coffee or dog food or something of that nature, where there's a clearly defined set date that they, that they know, but it, but it has the wiggle room. What can we do around that? Right. And in terms of being able to find things, but I'm going to go on, you know, I'm going to do the Pareto analysis and say that there's probably 20 percent of the addresses that get 80 percent of the deliveries. I don't think we're, I don't think we're as refined on that right now as we'd like to be. But it's clearly trending in that direction. And to your point, but it's category agnostic, right? I mean, I don't, I don't personally care. I mean, it's got, it has to be, you know, it has to fall into a specific service level for the carrier to do it. And so, you know, it's part of their ground delivery service. And so there's package types, right? There are other package types that fall out of that. But actually, one of those options is we're thinking about, bringing some of those package types back into it because the truck is already headed there instead of handing it off to the postal service for that final mile, which many of the carriers have done. It's, you can keep that in your network and actually have it ride along for free at that point. Keith Anderson: Two things you said, have sort of prompted some follow up questions. One, on the subscription side, one of the things that I really I think it's notable about subscribe and save type models, you know, the reason that you're able to pass the savings on to the consumer is with the advanced notice of when the item needs to get to the doorstep, you can basically always use ground transport. So your cost of logistics is lower, and you can pass some fraction of your lower cost on to the consumer. And it had me thinking a little bit about the extra day or two you referenced as you're working to consolidate these orders, does that in any case ever lead to a mode shift here also? You know, that is an item that would have been delivered, from the point of origin to at least the last mile by air transit. Does it in any case end up on a train or a truck instead? Mike Robinson: Yeah, I don't think we've run into that yet, right? Right. I think the, I think the, I think it's more the other way of it's a small enough package that it's hand, you know, the final, the final mile is handed off to the Postal Service to deliver. Just because of size and weight, right? And because, you know, I don't, you know, I can add that day associated with it. Now it becomes something that becomes more predictable and also the traceability of that. And the, because once it leaves the carrier network and it goes into the Postal Service it's kind of lost in there for a bit and you, you know, it's very, very hard to track. That would be the mode change, I would think, rather than the other option. But, you know, I also look at it and think that we're still at the beginning of the, of the journey on this, right? And, and it's because I, I think the final mile is the one, it's the one node where, you know, trying to optimize and synchronize hasn't gone all the way to the address level. And I think that's the piece that we are looking to change more than anything else. You optimize the truck, right, you stack it out based on the route, but you don't base it on the address. And so we're bringing that unit of measure down one level lower. Keith Anderson: So I know you're, you're early in the journey. You're working with a, a major carrier and I imagine you've got retailers engaged also. Are you seeing patterns in terms of the types of retailers that are engaging? Mike Robinson: Yeah, I mean, the beauty of being with a strategic carrier that carries, you know, roughly half of the package delivery in the US, you know, gives us weight, right? It's positioned through their accounts with, you know, top 40 retailers in the US. We're seeing traction with them because they're looking at it through that dual lens. I need operational savings, right, because this becomes pennies of EPS if done right. And I need carbon savings as I think about it, because I haven't really thought about the delivery component as a place where I can drive sustainability and answer ESG questions. I think the other is, they're all public companies. Right? And so they all have ESG commitments, and they all have boards to answer to, and they all have programs that they need to bring forward, whether it's for the 2030 or 2040 or 2050 you know, timing, whether it's the type 2 or type 3 emission, you know, issues. There's a lot of complexity out there. This is a simple thing. That is a simple change that says if you allow us to schedule, and which means use time more effectively still inside your customer promise window, and we can unlock value, and that stop that I mentioned, that delivery stop, that 800 grams of carbon, right? You start to multiply that, right? That becomes, you know, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of metric tons of carbon that just are never created. That's why I call it carbon avoidance instead of carbon reduction. It's just the carbon creation event never happened, which is that delivery stuff. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I, I think one of the pieces of sort of conventional wisdom that I encounter all the time in sustainability is, "boy, it, it just doesn't pay back. It's... Almost everything we want to do is going to be cost prohibitive." I think logistics is one of the areas where the fruit hangs pretty low because so many of the things you can do to avoid or reduce carbon tend to move in close connection to lower costs. Mike Robinson: Well, and that was really the, you know, we have, we have some really smart investors, but the one VC, the first VC that we accepted money from, is one that is focused on, you know, climate tech, right, or sustainable practices. And the thing that the principle said that, that really struck with me is like, "you deserve to be in business because you're creating efficiency out of inefficiency. You're not asking anyone to do anything dramatically different. Just do it better." Which is what we really need in many cases. All the answers are in front of us, right? From a sustainability standpoint, especially on the logistics side. It's just how do you take advantage of the information that's available to you, assemble it differently, and make better choices? That, to me, I think is the difference of what we are offering versus, but I think every retailer has to figure out whether it's, you know, a change in the, a change in the energy they use, a change in the materials they use, a change in the manufacturing process, et cetera. This is something they're doing already, just make this very simple change of use time more strategically. Keith Anderson: So, in that sense, what do you think is going to accelerate adoption across the industry? And I guess the flip side of that is, what's holding it back? Mike Robinson: Yeah. I, I would love to believe it's a foregone conclusion. I know it's not, right? Right. These are, these are tough choices. And, you know, after spending 25 years in retail, I know it's very much a, you know, "show me" type of industry, but it's also a, "I don't want to fall behind my competitors" type of industry as well. Right. And, and the, and the margin of difference is usually pretty small. I think adoption solves all problems. And, and the, and the adoption curve that we're on right now is a pretty good one. It needs to be better. It needs to be better. And that's Mike Robinson not only talking as a business person, but Mike Robinson talking as a, as a citizen of the world. It needs to be better because I think we need to impact what that metric, what the study showed about 2030. I think that we have a real chance of being able to impact that. I don't, I don't believe it's going to be regulatory at this point. I think there's going to need to be choice, but I think what need, what, what, what retailers are starting to see is "my customers are asking for this," you know, every, you know, that they're, that they're, they're starting to, you know, they're, they're clearly voicing their opinion in these surveys. "At some point, they're going to choose with their wallet. And if I'm not there, right, if I'm not showing action, if I'm not taking advantage of everything that I do from the moment I conceive a product to the moment I deliver a product, then I'm probably going to lose in that," right? For those that are conscious and, and the consciousness level is raising. Now, my generation, you know, I'm 58 years old. We're probably not going to change a significant amount, but the generations, you know, younger than us are already, already doing this, right? I mean, this is the, I think that is what is driving these metrics of that's that three quarters of consumers want to see something and 50 percent of companies are saying, "I want to do it, but I don't know how." And so what we're offering is a simple path in. Adoption will help, but I think it's just, you know, consumer consciousness and the, and, and the, and the eco-conscious consumer will force this to happen in some way, shape, or form. Keith Anderson: Yeah, a couple of quick thoughts. I mean, I, I know in most, retailing consumer product businesses, we think of the consumer as king. The one thing in my roughly 20 years of experience I've noticed motivates a lot of retailers even more than the consumer is one of their major competitors. And so I think it's helpful in the sense that Amazon is setting an example and raising the bar and, you know, they're iterating. I can see them iterating, you know, over time, but if, if any of what they're doing to nudge behavior sticks, I can see that being a motivator for competition. Mike Robinson: Yeah. I think it's going to be more and that's competition with both the carrier and the retailer, right? If you think about Amazon, they're both, right? I mean, you know, that they're, that they've effectively developed their own. And, and those, and those services on the fulfillment side, they're offering to other retailers. And so at some point it becomes something where they offer it through an eco lens as well. Right. And so I think, you know, I think the voice of the consumer, I think the number one competitor for, for both and the behavioral changes that they're showing and just how loudly they shouted, right? And, and they haven't shouted it yet. I mean, what was it just seven or eight months ago that all of Amazon's advertising was around their commitment to 2030, right, and what they're doing, but it was more vehicle-driven, right? It was more facility-driven, right? It wasn't necessarily this conversation, but I sense it coming. And as soon as they start shouting it, Everybody's going to perk up and say, "well, I better be there too. How do I get there?" That's where we come in. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Well, Mike, if people want to learn more about The 8th Notch or get in touch with you, where would you direct them? Mike Robinson: Sure I would. Yeah, our website is out there. It's, it's not the most information. It's intended to be an informational website. It's www.t8notch.com. We're on LinkedIn as well under The 8th Notch. You can contact me directly at, M Robinson, R-O-B-I-N-S-O-N, at t8notch.com but, but we're open for business. We're looking to onboard retailers. And, you know, if you are a customer of the carrier that I have not mentioned, we will help to make, you know, help, help to get the introduction moving forward. Or if you're not a wannabe, we'll definitely make the introduction for you. But, you know, this is a call to action as clearly as I can make it as, and we started in the preamble, Keith, about a one man megaphone. I want others shouting this as well. And that's, and that's the push that I'm on. Keith Anderson: Well, Mike, thanks so much for joining us. Mike Robinson: Absolutely my pleasure. Thank you, Keith. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=r8k0lqpn…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

Keith’s guest this week is Julia Marsh, the co-founder and CEO of Sway, a biomaterials company replacing plastics with regenerative materials made from seaweed. As a designer, Julia spent over a decade building brand and packaging systems for consumer goods companies, tech startups, and design studios, winning the Closed Loop Partners Beyond the Bag Challenge in 2021, and a finalist for the Tom Ford Plastic Innovation Prize in 2022. Join this conversation as Sway announces a $5 million in fresh funding, and Julia brings an incredible perspective on the role of design in packaging and solving problems in sustainability, why seaweed is such a high potential alternative to petroleum-based plastics, the state of and outlook for composting infrastructure, where Sway's packaging works best, and what's next for Sway. Learn more about Julia Marsh: Link to Sway’s website Link to Julia’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Hi, and welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson. Our guest this week is Julia Marsh, the co-founder and CEO of Sway, a biomaterials company replacing plastics with regenerative materials made from seaweed. As a designer, Julia spent over a decade building brand and packaging systems for consumer goods companies, tech startups, and design studios. In 2021, Sway won the Closed Loop Partners Beyond the Bag Challenge. In 2022, they were a finalist in the Tom Ford Plastic Innovation Prize. And just a few weeks ago in 2024, Sway announced $5 million in fresh funding. And Julia brings really incredible perspective on the role of design in packaging and solving problems in sustainability. Why seaweed is such a high potential alternative to petroleum-based plastics, the state of and outlook for composting infrastructure, where Sway's packaging works best, and what's next for Sway. So I'm really excited to welcome Julia Marsh, co-founder and CEO of Sway, to the show. Hi, Julia. Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce and congratulations on the funds you just raised. Julia Marsh: Thanks, Keith. It was a huge effort and we're really happy to celebrate. Keith Anderson: Well, you're the second of our guests so far to join us within a day or two of raising a round. So, and, and in both cases, I didn't realize it when I invited them. So, hopefully it's a pattern that continues. Julia Marsh: You've got the Midas touch. Yeah. Keith Anderson: That's what, that's what I'd like potential guests to believe anyway. Well, maybe a good place to start is, why don't we tell the audience what is Sway and how did it come to be? Julia Marsh: So Sway is a materials company. We are replacing plastics with seaweed. And it came to be through my love of materials of the circular economy of design. I'm a designer by trade. I spent about a decade building branded packaging systems. So working with CPGs and design studios and tech companies to make their visions a reality. And I'm at... I was oftentimes sourcing materials or involved in implementing or making those materials beautiful. And it was just sitting at total odds with my background as also an environmentalist and someone who grew up in California. So, we started the company just a few years ago and we've made a lot of progress since then. Keith Anderson: So, it sounds like plastics were sort of, a driving factor behind it. Why are plastics such a problem? They're so pervasive and they've got, you know, some, some benefits that I think are tough for certain industries to quit. Julia Marsh: Everyone, I feel like, yeah, everyone knows a bit about the plastic problem. It's kind of one of those, "please don't tell me any more about the plastic problem" situations. So I'll, I'll just be brief here. There is no industry that is immune from plastic or the generation of plastic pollution. It's something everyone's confronted with in some capacity, and unfortunately, demand for packaging is only increasing. It's made from petroleum, and more than likely, it's going to go into nature or into landfill or it's going to be incinerated. And what we have to do when we're thinking about plastic is think "why do we continue to use it?" Well, it's very good at its job. That's why it's been so hard to replace. And then, like, "where is it actually necessary?" I would say that about 50 to 60 percent of plastic is completely unnecessary and can just be cut out of the equation entirely. When you look at thin film plastic, which is what Sway is focused on, these are necessary plastics. They're usually for hygiene or to prevent products from being damaged in shipping. They're also the most difficult to recycle and they're the most difficult to replace. So, I think looking at necessary plastics that are doing a real function, that's where we need to focus our time and innovation. And that's also the, yeah, the hardest problem to solve. Keith Anderson: Yeah. Yeah, I, I mean, it's, it's been such an interesting space for me as an observer because you're exactly right. I think everybody on some level acknowledges the problem. And there have been different approaches, recycling, composting, a lot of the industry, it seems to me, is continuing to place bets on recycling. And again, talking about infrastructure that they'll invest in and develop, but, you know, even some of the most forward looking companies and their coalitions have been lagging the targets they set for themselves. And so, then I think in parallel, when you look at compostability, it, it's got its own challenges. You know, you're much closer to this than I am, obviously. How would you characterize the state of play now and where do you see things headed? Julia Marsh: Huge momentum towards recycling. Of course, it's easier, it's more straightforward, and there's a lot of incentive for plastics manufacturers to continue working with the material they already know. Big oil is also betting on plastic to save itself, so there's some definite agendas playing out. BP projected that over the next 20 years, 95 percent of net growth and demand for oil would come from plastics. So... Keith Anderson: How much of that is packaging? Do you know? Julia Marsh: Packaging makes up, I think, about 40 percent of all plastic produced, something like that. Yeah. Keith Anderson: So non-trivial part of that growth story. Julia Marsh: Non-trivial for sure. Yeah. And again, the sheer volume of plastic and again, like specifically focused on flexible packaging is just, it's unfathomable for the brain to calculate. Five trillion bags, wrappers, pouches, plastic bags are produced every year. That's 160, 000 bags every second. Another second. Another second. So just the sheer volume is huge. You can't recycle your way out of that problem. It's going to take multiple types of solutions. So while recycling may be good for certain applications, we also need to just remove packaging entirely in certain places. And then there's a role for compostable packaging to play as well. We would argue it makes sense where the material's coming into contact with food and it's being contaminated, it's not going to be recycled anyway. It might even help alleviate food waste by encouraging people to compost. Or in use cases where there is access to compost infrastructure. Or where there's a high likelihood that behind the scenes, the brand can actually collect that packaging and compost it. So I think it's a, it's very like use-case-specific matchmaking. Keith Anderson: Do you see infrastructure investment or scalability of that end-of-life component happening in composting? I mean, I see different approaches. There's new national household startups launching. There's municipal composting. Where I live in Boston, there's three or four services that service my neighborhood, but they're all private and opt-in. And then there's a small minority of folks in the area that have their own backyard compost. You know, what's your projection of what the landscape will look like over the next three or five years or so? Julia Marsh: In the United States, I do believe composting is an inevitability. In the same way that we need to realize recycling only properly began in the 70s, we can absolutely adopt commonplace composting behavior. It makes a ton of sense, not just from the packaging perspective, but again, from the food-waste perspective. It makes no sense that any biological material should be going to landfill. It should all be literally biologically recycled. So I think that's an inevitability. There's lots of reasons why that will continue to scale and there are a number of investments going into expanding domestic infrastructure. We also know that these systems can work because they're successful with it in Europe. Italy is extremely great at composting. It's just a normal part of everyday life, or you see expanded programs in New York, or like you mentioned, for people living in cities, things like below me, or the mill bin, where there is just this routine of, yeah, not throwing organic waste into the trash. So, I think all those different avenues give me hope, but, yeah, most people today, they don't compost. Keith Anderson: Well, I suppose since we're talking about that end-of-life stage, you know, what happens with Sway packaging if someone is unable to compost it? Julia Marsh: So, we've designed to give the consumer optionality. The best use case is, you compost it in your home bin. Mix it in with your backyard compost. We adhere to the TUV Austria Home Compost Certification, which means less than 180 days, it'll decompose naturally. If you have access to industrial compost, it'll degrade even quicker, less than 48 days. And then if you don't have those options, We put it in the trash bin, but it'll decompose similar to a fruit peel. So while that may not be better or ideal, it's, it's a reality. And for now we can say this is better than the alternative, which is that material kind of living in existence for all eternity. In one form or another. Keith Anderson: Yep. Can we talk a little bit about if we were to compare and contrast some of these bioplastics to the conventional materials, you know, on technical factors, how do they compare and where are strengths or weaknesses? What do the economics look like? You know, I think in many cases, the environmental considerations are what draws people to the topic of packaging and then as the seats at the table get filled by people in branding or supply chain or operations, all these other questions pop up. Julia Marsh: that's true. I've been in the position again of selecting materials. So I understand the trade offs and the considerations that designers and packaging and sustainability teams are making. The most common alternatives to plastic come from corn, potato, sugarcane, wood. And a lot of these alternatives fall short in one way or another. Maybe on performance, maybe on timeline for decomposition, or maybe they're not really that plant based, like a lot of alternatives are maybe 10 percent plants and then the rest is not bio based. And then most of them are way more expensive than traditional plastic. So, depending on what your priorities are, it makes one of those solutions better than another. A lot of brands are turning towards paper, that's the overwhelming strategy, is "we'll just turn to paper while we wait for a better solution to come." But in some cases, you really do need the properties of plastic. You need transparency, heat sealability, stretch, moisture resistance, oxygen barrier. These qualities that makes plastic so great in the first place. And so what we look at doing is understanding the customer need. Has plastic been over engineered to solve the problem they're focused on? For example, packaging for toilet paper? Like, if you go to Costco and you buy a big bag of toilet paper, that's seven layers of film. It looks like one, but it's seven layers of film. It could last forever. It's so completely mismatched with what the actual use case is. So, like, really teasing out what performance is actually necessary, and then how do you prioritize impact? Are you thinking about end-of-life? Are you thinking about sourcing? Are you thinking about livelihoods, like the S in ESG? And we try to understand that piece and then we can make recommendations on which of our products are going to check those boxes. But, to answer the question, these materials come at a premium. We're a startup, we're growing, so of course they come at a premium. But in the long term, we really see a path where we can be competitive with all these alternatives. And eventually, as we hit commercial scale, competitive with a lot of different types of plastic. Keith Anderson: Maybe it would be worth going into a little more detail on why seaweed? You know, I think that there's been a little momentum building with seaweed and sort of ocean based materials. And I think you're, you're one of the leaders building momentum in that space. Why is that a superior option versus some of the prevailing bioplastics? And I'd love to learn more about how it plays into the idea of regeneration. Julia Marsh: Yeah, so there are so many interesting alternative feedstocks. Seaweed is the most compelling for basically every reason. So where the alternatives fall short, seaweed exceeds. For those who don't know, there are 12, 000 species of seaweed, maybe more that we haven't discovered in the depths of the ocean. They come in reds, browns, greens, and they contain natural polymers, which you're possibly already using in your daily life. Seaweed is in your toothpaste. It's in some of your facial creams. It's in your donut glaze. It's a sneaky ingredient that these natural polymers are around, and that's the same component of seaweed that we use in our packaging materials. It wants to gel. It wants to stretch. But the seaweed sourcing story is what is creating so much momentum around seaweed as a, as a, feedstock. You don't need fresh water. You don't need land. You don't need pesticides. You don't need much time. It grows 20 to 30 times faster than corn or sugarcane. And we live on a blue planet. The majority of Earth is ocean. So there's seemingly infinite space for us to cultivate this material to not subtract from, you know, food crops. And then to also require very few carbon-intensive inputs. That makes it very compelling. There's the coastal livelihood component. So people living on coastlines who are affected by overfishing, they can turn to seaweed as a reliable source of income. There's this burgeoning blue economy that really people are very excited about. All of those benefits contribute to this idea of regeneration, that a feedstock actually gives more than it takes. And then that's not even all of it. So while you're cultivating seaweed, you're actually filtering excess nutrients, you're mitigating ocean acidification, which is one of the negative effects of climate change. You're actually potentially improving biodiversity by creating habitat for biodiverse life. They're all, yeah, there's just like so much goodness baked into seaweed and that's just at the source. And then you get to process it, turn it into something that biodegrades naturally, that actually adds nutrient content after it's used. And some companies, like mine, are able to engineer these materials to perform really well, so the consumer has a great experience. It's just kind of checking every box, like no matter which way you spin it, seaweed is really going to be the future for a lot of materials. Keith Anderson: It's so interesting. The bioplastics world, I think, has immense potential, and just starting to understand some of the different approaches and considerations across that spectrum of, you know, consumer to sourcing is really interesting. Let's talk a little bit more about some of the applications that are already out in the wild and where you're starting to see traction. Who's interested, what's working, maybe just to, to start, step through some of the types of packaging that are in your portfolio at this moment and the kinds of products or use cases that they support. Julia Marsh: Sure, so we have three buckets of products today. We have our first wave films, which are being used primarily as windows in retail boxes. We have an ingredient, which is a thermoplastic seaweed resin. We call it TPC, that can be used by plastic manufacturers in all kinds of use cases. And then we have a thermoplastic film, which we call TPC Flex. And this is a flexible film that can be used for all different types of use cases, bags, wrappers, pouches. We're starting with a focus on fashion. Keith Anderson: in fashion, is it, I assume it's primarily bags. Julia Marsh: Poly bags. Yeah, so we Really wanted to focus on ubiquitous materials that, for whatever reason, cannot be eliminated from supply chains. And polybags are a really, pronounced issue in the fashion industry. There are 180 billion of them used every single year in the fashion space alone. It's a huge issue. Last year we won first place in the Tom Ford Plastic Innovation Prize. This was a global competition to find solutions for this really, really ubiquitous type of packaging that keeps products safe while they're being shipped that, you know, is necessary, but unfortunately is almost exclusively plastic. That was a, that was a big focus for us. And so far we've seen great traction with brands like J. Crew and Burton and smaller brands as well. And, we actually just launched, more access to these materials via our website. Keith Anderson: And you also just launched a, a seaweed window. Can you tell us a bit about the use cases and why you made that? Julia Marsh: Yes, I'm so excited about this. So our team wanted to find a way to really address sneaky plastics, the ones that maybe you don't think about, but that are all around us. I encourage you as you're going down the grocery store aisle next time to just observe how many product windows there are. It's this piece of plastic that there really is no desirable end-of-life for. It's not going to get recycled. It's just going to landfill and they're everywhere. So we partnered up with EcoEnclose, who's a leading sustainable packaging, provider here in the States and designed retail boxes with seaweed windows. So they come with a 100 percent recycled fiber box. The window is 100 percent biobased, primarily seaweed, and we have two stock offerings that we launched so that anybody can get access to these materials. I think a lot of folks in the world don't feel like they can access innovative materials, so we thought it would be special to just let them be available at the click of a button. And then we also do custom collaborations. So the most recent activation we did with seaweed windows is with a sustainable swimwear brand called Le Club. And we designed this custom box for them. I love the box form factor because it gives you so many dimensions for messaging, for storytelling. We did a custom circular window and really played out this overlap between the oceans being a source of the solutions and people who love to swim and purchasing the product should be investing in those solutions. So yeah, it really just was such, such fun and really just the beginning in terms of how we're creating customized solutions for brands. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. And you mentioned, the website, you know, if, if folks want to learn more about the product or the material or get in touch with you, where would you send them? Julia Marsh: Yeah, if what I've described is interesting, if you like the oceans, if you're interested in composting or just using new renewable materials, you can visit swaythefuture.com. We have inquiry forums. If you're a company that makes biobased or biodegradable or compostable products. We have an ingredient called TPC that you can blend into those products. So, we're really looking for folks to come play with us, to explore, to experiment. We also have those packaging solutions I described. So, swaythefuture.com, come say hi. Keith Anderson: Well, Julia, this has been really incredible. I appreciate you joining the show. Julia Marsh: Thanks. Love chatting with you. This was the most natural flow. I really enjoy it. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=18230w3n…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

Join Keith Anderson and Santiago Navarro, founder and CEO of Packamama, a company reimagining wine packaging to lower emissions while winning at the shelf and preserving tradition. This episode is an interesting case study covering the importance of packaging from a transit perspective, the unavoidable risk of breakage, and the consumption experience of wine. Learn how Packamama has approached creating a package for the future with those and other considerations in mind. Learn more about Santiago Navarro: Link to Packamama ’s website Link to Santiago's LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Hello, welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson. Many conversations about sustainability and climate in retail and consumer products disproportionately focus on the role of packaging, and understandably so, it's among the most visible and tangible elements of a product's environmental footprint. But life cycle analyses often reveal that in many categories, packaging is a meaningful but not a primary source of emissions. But today's conversation is about the wine category, where the glass bottle actually is the single largest source of emissions. That is, the energy required to produce, move, and recycle wine bottles accounts for almost a third of the typical wine's climate footprint. And so I was really intrigued and interested when I discovered a company called Packamama, which is reimagining wine packaging in the context of the need to prioritize lowering emissions, as well as a retail landscape where digital commerce is a growing part of the equation. And, you know, wine is, is I think a really interesting case study because the packaging is important from a transit perspective, because there's always the risk of breakage, whether you're at the digital or the physical shelf, it's a really key part of how shoppers discover and choose which wine to drink. And naturally, the consumption experience has, a lot to do with the packaging also. So I think it's a really interesting case study to look at and learn how today's guest has approached, creating a package for the future with those and other considerations in mind. And I think wine is also a really interesting category because it's among those that is already facing significant impacts from rising temperatures and extreme weather. So I'm really excited for you to listen to today's guest, Santiago Navarro, founder and CEO of Packamama. Santiago, we're recording on a Friday morning, where I am, I guess, closer to the end of the work week where you are, so, happy Friday. Do you already know what wine you'll be enjoying this evening? Santiago Navarro: Not too sure yet. It's been a busy week, but yes, likewise, happy Friday to you. I am speaking to you from central London. So I'm sitting across from Big Ben, actually. So very central London for those who know the City of London. I'm Santiago Navarro, CEO and founder of Packamama. Packamama stands for Packaging Protecting Mother Earth, or Pachamama to some indigenous peoples. And what does Packamama do? We offer sustainable wine bottle packaging to the wine industry. Why sustainable? Because Shape Innovation allows us to pack these bottles like books or to cross pack them. So very spatially efficient. We get about double the product in the supply chain. Very lightweight because they're made from recycled PET. That's the plastic we use for drinks bottles. And finally, recyclable in most recycling systems across the world. So, we, we offer this packaging to the wine industry, and I can immediately explain why, or if you have questions, Keith, please let me know, but, I think the context to why we do sustainable packaging in wine and why wine needs to decarbonize is a fundamental place where to start this conversation. Keith Anderson: Let's start with that, you know, why, why did you end up focused on wine and, and why was packaging where you focused within that industry? Santiago Navarro: Yes, so I first came into wine as a wine retailer, and that's, gosh, nearly 15 years ago now. And I was offering wine as most people do and the packaging in which it's come. But actually when you take a moment to think to why does wine come in the packaging it does, you start to realize that actually, wine companies in 21st century are using 19th century packaging, which is an incremental innovation over 17th century packaging. So the round glass bottle as a wine bottle is a British invention in the 17th century by a gentleman called Sir Kenelm Digby, who came up with the glassblowing process to make wine bottles strong and at scale. So pre that point, wine was moved around in other containers. But Digby came up with the bottle that's known as the Onion Bottle, and that has informed the wine packaging for the last 400 years. 200 years ago, the French Adapted Digby's Onion bottle to the bottle of shapes we know today. And if you pick up a wine bottle in California or New York or Florida or in Con in Europe, the UK, et cetera, these, these are the bottles that actually spread with the noble grape varieties, which are the principal grape varieties that have spread across the world, the world of wine. And with them came these two shapes. Actually, this bottle is informed on the Bordeaux, claret in some cases called. Then there's the Burgundy bottle with the more slopey shoulders. And so, it was whilst trying to build an online business in wine where I came to realize what a challenge using 19th century packaging is, because I know we might be here to talk about decarbonizing, but let's start with talking about being successful. Wine is the ideal product for online sales because it's got a long tail, like books or, or music. And so, the possibility to sell wine online makes sense from a logical perspective, but actually wine has not been very successful online compared to the big retailers as much as it should be. And so, that's in my view partly down to the problem with packaging. If you try to send out wine in round glass bottles successfully, D2C using couriers or third party delivery companies, it's a real challenge. It costs a lot of money. It requires a lot of packaging. If it breaks, it's a health and safety issue because of, because of shard glass. And so, you know, wine needs a packaging refresh, and so it took me working in the wine industry to start to realize, that wine probably needed a bottle upgrade, and so that's what I decided to do is to launch that bottle upgrade, looking at all the aspects that are relevant for successful... I mean commerce, you know, space and weight or volumetric weight, as it's called, if you look at a, UPS or DHL or FedEx or whatever. And Keith Anderson: Sure. Santiago Navarro: how do we make best use of the space available in a carton, in a truck, in a, in a, in a, container and how do we light weight? And so then that extrapolates actually into cash savings can convert also into carbon savings. And, just a final point on that. We can elaborate more in a second, should you wish. The, wine industry has, a hotspot, or there is a focal point, which is the majority of wine's emissions. And that is its current round glass bottle packaging. Its manufacturing, movement, and recycling. So, yes, whilst glass might be considered the status quo, it is contributing the majority of wine's emissions, US studies, European studies, Australian studies, all show the same thing. And so if wine wants to get serious about decarbonizing in a climate crisis, it's got to change its bottle. Keith Anderson: If we can spend just a minute or two, I think it's really interesting that part of what led you to this business was the, the, sort of, what, what made wine a good fit for e-commerce, but some of what was holding it back, and I think it's just worth unpacking for a minute some of the trade offs between the, let's call it the prevailing packaging and, and what we're talking about here. Obviously, lightweighting and reducing cube, or volumetric weight saves space. You know, you'll have both material cost savings and, and other logistic savings. You'll also, I would imagine, due to using plastic instead of glass, have potentially less shrink in the sense that you're going to have less or no breakage, so all that I think makes a lot of sense as it relates to e-commerce. Are there, are there scenarios where that packaging makes equal sense for a brick and mortar environment, or were you thinking of this as way that wine could, mature in, in e-commerce the way that other categories have by rethinking product design and formulation, packaging and other factors to be more compatible with that model of retailing? Santiago Navarro: Yeah, great question, because initially I thought our greatest successes and advancements would be in e-com or D2C, but then I realized actually till consumers understood what they were potentially buying, it was better to be in bricks and mortar, so people could actually grab the pack, identify it, and then reorder it online, so, my preference nowadays, we're available in nine countries, we're launching in the US in the middle of this year, across the US actually with a big retailer, so, by, by middle of the year, we'll, we'll be widely available. Yeah, I've come to realize that we're probably better starting in bricks and mortar and then evolving into D2C, but there are instances where there has been an entire D2C deployment and it has been successful. One such example is, end of last year in Australia, Australia's largest organic wine producer, Tamburlaine Wines, produced just sort of 30, 000 units and put them up on their popular website and shared some of it at Cellar Door, but certainly through their website. And we were sold out before the festive season started. So, really a very good pickup for tens of thousands of units very quickly and sold out really well and, and delivered really well, which is important because, as you correctly pointed out, costs of delivery when you have breakages, when you have expensive packaging, because it's heavy and very volumetrically large to make up all the padding and other things required for fragile glass. That doesn't, it's not helpful for wineries and I know that in the US, D2C is very important for wineries and actually wineries in the US are really good at bringing people to cellar door and signing them up to newsletters and then selling direct. So there is, you know, there is a need to have better packaging there, but in answer to your question, my preference for the time being, as we're still new kids on the block, is that people can see us in bricks and mortar retail and, and can, you know, engage with what we do. We regularly see on social media, people having discovered our product in some retail store somewhere and needing to share it with their community or their followers and these are just consumers so not somebody in a sort of professional environment but more in a social environment say hey look what I found and look at this how interesting it is it's it's flat back etc and that's I think important also with packaging that works in summary so just use the term works for multiple facets it's engaging it should stimulate people to you know, pick up that product and stand out from the crowd. And that's also important in wine, because even in bricks and mortar retail, it's usually a quite a big selection. And so, having a competitive advantage through visibility on the shelf is important. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I want to come back to the consumer perception and, and, you know, attitudes and behaviors towards it. You've mentioned retailers a few times, when you're working with retailers, are these for their private label or own label wines, or how do you work differently with a retailer versus a winery? Santiago Navarro: Yeah. So we've been really grateful to those retailers who have positively engaged with us and helped us to navigate how we potentially get more wines into their stores. We recognize that, wine producers... well, getting wine producers to push is far, far harder than getting retailers to pull. And what I mean by that is if a retailer says, "We're open to seeing what brands might be interested in this bottle for our stores" and you take that to producers they're of course really excited that there might be an opportunity to get a new listing or listings whilst if you go to producers and say "will you use a novel packaging that's, you know, not got all the data you want to prove that it's zero risk and will you use this and pack into it and then offer it?" Most will say no because I want to prove demand before I take supply. And so, yeah, the, the engagement retailers is super important. It's mostly been branded to date. There is some own label coming up in 2024. But, but yeah, ultimately we should end up doing both. Because, the big retailers have become very good at own, own label, wines and, and they can be very large volume and that's where we can have the biggest impact on reducing emissions is, once again, Packamama stands for Packaging Protecting Pachamama or Mother Earth and it's really important that that's what we do. We take all the aspects, the other aspects of packaging super seriously, like protecting the goods that are inside it, being of the best quality, all the food contact approvals, all those matters are taken for granted. And, frankly, if nobody's doing those basics, then they should not be in business. But there, in our view, there needs to be another layer and an important layer that's not just some icing to the packaging cake, but it's the foundational items of what you do. And that is being a benchmark example of all the levers you can pull that are meaningful to reduce emissions, because we're in a climate crisis, but also because wine is more deeply impacted than most by global warming. The vines that give us wine, vitis vinifera, as it's called, so it's one strain of the, of the very varied number of grapes used, including, eating grapes. They are very sensitive to temperature. And for 8, 000 years, they've been, they've enjoyed consistency. And now they get inconsistency. And that is freak cold, drought, blistering heat. It might go from blistering heat to freezing cold to blistering heat again. So it's these extreme weather events that freak the vines out to avoid getting geeky on technical terms. And they're not good for wine. A couple of years back, France paid out 2 billion euros to producers because of a freak cold snap in, in April. Bear in mind that that's in the run up to summer, where, where the vines, you know, the grapes start to ripen and then, then only harvest at the end of summer. And traditionally, actually, Europe has harvested its grapes at the end of summer, but now harvesting comes right into mid summer and August because it's been, so incredibly warm so soon, et cetera. So yeah, there's more I can share on that. I don't want to get into too much detail on it, but I think it's important to realize that wine has a far larger existential threat risk from global warming than some other products we eat and drink. And so wine must over index in its, meaningful actions to slash its emissions more than others do, because it should do it for its own survival. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I think it's a great point. We, I come from a background in consulting. And so I love a nice 4 box chart that that sorts things into quadrants. And one way we've been looking at categories across the industry is on one dimension, action you take to mitigate the future impacts of, emissions and warming, and the other is adaptation. And, you know, there are a half dozen categories that are rising to the top of the list, cocoa is one, you know, wine, I think is likely to be another one. Olive oil was one. We interviewed Berk Bahceci of Heraclea, which is a family owned olive oil producer, but he was sharing similar, anecdotes about some of the really significant impacts on yield and surety of supply. So, in, in some categories, what you're doing is really, trying to reduce emissions so that the problems facing all categories, all retailers and all brands, are, are not getting any worse than they need to be in the future. The flip side, though, is the adaptation part of the equation, which is, because of the growing volatility and uncertainty, you know, some categories are being impacted much more directly and, it's happening today. So, I think it's an important point that you share. Santiago Navarro: Yeah, there is, thank you for that, Keith. There are two things discussed regularly in wine about adaptation, not mitigation, and that is grape varieties and location. So, on the grape variety front, in a warming planet, more people can plant the grape strains that have, from let's say southern Italy or Sicily, that have become really, I guess well adapted to blistering heat. But the reality is the beauty of the world of wine is the cooler climate, chardonnays or pinot noirs from Burgundy, or the wines from Oregon, et cetera, we can't, the, the world of wine loses its beauty. If we suddenly have just a few great varieties delivering a very similar flavor profile, then we have this huge diversity that makes the wine industry unique, not rare, unique in terms of the variability and the beauty it offers. So, so that's the grape issue. We can't, you know, ignore that. And then location. Of course, there's a possibility to move to where it's currently cooler and abandon where it's warmer. But once again, Australia is a good example, so Tasmania is a cooler part, and south of the mainland continent, but there's not enough space for all the producers to move to Tasmania. The Northern Californians can't all go to Washington State, which is also good for grape growing and it's more, more than so likely to be cooler. You know, Northern Italy, Tuscany, you know, very beautiful part of Italy. You know, whole communities have subsisted for generations on the wine industry and olive oil. They can't all move to continental, sorry, the Nordics or to the UK, which is higher up on the European continent. So, yeah, it's, it's, it's, you know, there's already a big growth in the English wine industry because, the climate here has become warmer. But can all French and Italian wine producers move to the UK? Makes, no, it doesn't make any sense. It's, so adaptation needs to be looked at. But, yeah, if your house is on fire, put out the fire first, not start to look to buy another house. I mean, and that's, that's the reality of how you handle a fire in your house. You put out the fire first. Keith Anderson: Yep. Well said, I want to, I want to jump back if we can just to the dynamic that you were describing between. The retailers and the producers because I think it parallels something that I'm seeing in many categories, which is, the retailers naturally have some leverage because, well, direct to consumer and marketplaces have really, lowered barriers to entry and made it easier to, you know, hang a shingle up reaching, a critical mass and scaling still happens mostly through retail. And so decisions about assortment and merchandising and marketing, often, you know, how you work with leading retailers is, big driver of your success. So, what I'm, what I'm seeing are retailers that have made commitments and are increasingly shifting their attention to scope three emissions. And so they're looking upstream and downstream. And most of what I'm seeing at the moment is more encouragement and incentivizing suppliers to, you know, take action that will align, their, their approach to doing business with some of the retailers climate and sustainability commitments. But, you know, what I'm seeing, the reason I asked about Unlabel was, before I understood the approach, I'm seeing some retailers. Move most aggressively with their own labels to create choice within a category that looks the way they'd like to see things in the near future. And then in parallel, they're doing things like introducing you know, dedicated sections, endcap displays, badges, or other designations that show up online at the digital shelf in store in the physical environment, but ultimately the retailers are increasingly using their position of leverage to try to influence what their suppliers are doing. And if I understood you, that's a dynamic that you're seeing play out as it relates to how you are engaging the industry. Is that, is that correct? Santiago Navarro: Yeah, so, so a couple, yes is the short answer, but it requires a bit more context. So firstly, you're right, as the retailer being the, gateway to the consumer's wallet, has the power. So, so they can influence change far, far quicker than those who are further down the supply chain, including the very big CPG, multinationals, who will be obvious to those listening to the call, I don't need to mention who they are. And then if you look at, research done on the emissions from the big international retailers, scope three is where it's all at. So, the last time I saw a presentation on this was from the, great, ladies and gentlemen at Rabobank, the, the, well known international bank. And they were showing high 90 percent across a number of global retailers in terms of what was scope three emissions. So, retailers have to work with their supply chain to, to reduce their emissions. There's no, no way about that. In terms of the own label versus branded. I understand why probably to date we've done mostly branded, but now we have two big own label projects coming together, which are, you know, all agreed and being put in place in terms of production, et cetera. I think wine is probably more branded than most other products. We, whilst there is own label products, if we go into a, you know, if we look at an average basket of goods, grocery goods, wine is probably one of the more branded and the expectation is to show selection because the consumer has a view that the wine industry is all these little producers or probably harvesting by hand. Of course, the wine industry looks very different than a commercial and than it does in the sort of romanticized pictures. But it's that romanticized picture of the world of wine that partially makes people feel that it's all warm and fluffy. But yeah, the, the own label must, join the branded. And frankly, there just needs to be a shift in packaging. It's really important that I highlight that my view as an organization that has a focus area on the type of packaging we do. We believe in better bottle packaging. We don't believe in alternative packaging, because in our view, wine is consumed at dining tables with friends and family. And so having a product that looks good is fundamentally important to the experience. But there are other formats like aluminum cans and, and bag in box technology that have been successful. And I applaud them and I wish them the best of luck. I also wish Lightweight Glass the best of luck. I just believe that the wine industry, if you look at a pie chart in the next few years of the types of packaging used for wine, it should look more like a fair and equitable split across the pie chart, because at the moment It's one big slice and a crumb at the end for anything that's non glass, and that's not a proper split of a pie in any sense of the imagination, and, and, okay, we could get into discussion, by the way, of should you need mineral water that's bottled, but if you do look at mineral water that's bottled, it's available in glass, it's available in PET, it's available in can, it's available in carton. These are the technologies that exist, that, that work for various reasons, and they satisfy different commercial and sustainable goals. And so, yes, you can see these, and if, and that's the same that happens in most other drinks, but wine. Wine has existed in this bubble. My view is that bubble is no longer remotely possible, let alone sustainable. So, we will continue to offer a solution that is respectful to heritage and tradition. This is a cross section design of this bottle shape that is designed exactly to replicate the most popular of the two bottle shapes. We will release a burgundy shape and flat pack also, because that bit is not broken. It's the part that connects the certain grape varieties that, That came from those two popular regions in France, Burgundy and Bordeaux. But, but, yeah, we just need a diversity of packaging to fulfill different consumption occasions, but different commercial and sustainability goals, not a one size fits all. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I think that's, that's an important and refreshing perspective. In a lot of, in a lot of the aspects of sustainability that I've dug into and packaging and materials seems to be where some of the discourse is most polarized in a sense. You know, there's a lot of, a lot of focus on "we need to transition everything to this approach or that approach." I think part of what we're uncovering here is, as you say, different consumption occasions, different, commercial and distribution models have different considerations. I think it's, it's really interesting in any of these packaging scenarios to talk about the consumer and not only what it's like when they're at the point of decision, am I going to buy this one or that one? Which is why I'm glad that we got into some of the brick and mortar and sort of retail experience discussion. And then secondly, at the point of consumption, this is where I see so much of the tension and, sort of stalled progress in a lot of the big multinationals, candidly, because they're struggling to get all of the functions aligned on, you know, our, our packaging is how we stand out at the first moment of truth. And. It has all of these other important, factors like preventing waste and preserving freshness and protecting the product and, you name it. And so, when, when there's an emerging solution that is sort of singularly focused on the climate or sustainability benefits, there seems to be a lot of resistance if these other factors that we've been talking about aren't considered. Santiago Navarro: Definitely. I mean, I should be clearer and maybe have said this further up in the conversation that, in our view, sustainability is triple bottom line. When I say sustainability, I don't mean environmentally friendly or eco friendly. That is the planet pillar of sustainability. But when I say sustainability, I mean planet, people, and profits. You've got to work. You've got to be scalable, you've got to, you know, deliver benefits to the consumer, to probably the most demanding person in business, the chief financial officer, and you've got to, you've got to work for, for Mother Earth, as our planet is, is, so unwell. So, yeah, I think that's, that's, that's an important one on the triple bottom line, if you cannot, show that you can be pleasing to all those three, then you're probably not going to significantly scale. But I also want to add to the point you mentioned before, I mean, anyone who says they've got a solution that addresses everything in a, you know, global marketplace or in a, a global industry like wine, 32 to 35 billion bottles annually, that's probably, frankly lying or they don't know what they're talking about. Santiago Navarro: The Coca Cola company is a great example. You know, they went from the iconic glass bottle to PET packaging and aluminium, but they kept the iconic glass bottle and that is served in fancier drinking occasions. If you order a Coke in a fancy restaurant or hotel bar, they will bring it to you in the iconic glass bottle. They will not serve it from PET or a can. But if you buy it on the go, you're going to get it in one of the two measures and you'll normally see them side by side depending how much Coke you want to drink because that packaging works far better on the go than than glass will, including the fact that you don't need a bottle opener, but in the glass format you need a bottle opener. So if you take that out and you know, don't have one of those on your keyring like some people do, but not everyone, then, then you're stuck. How do you get it open? So I think it's important to look to those who have been phenomenally successful, not just successful, and look at what they've done in packaging and how it's worked. Because rest assured that if there was another packaging format that allowed success, the Coca Cola company would have deployed it. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=q8023048…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

This week Keith talks to Irina Gerry, CMO of Change Foods and a sustainable foods industry thought leader, using precision fermentation to commercialize a new way of producing real milk proteins and dairy foods with biotech. Irina's also a founding member and vice chair of the board of the Precision Fermentation Alliance. Together they walk through her interesting (and in some ways improbable) career in grocery and CPG marketing with a background at iconic plant-based brands, including Silk and So Delicious at Danone. Tune in to meet and learn from Irina about the world of Precision Fermentation and Biotech in food. Learn more about Irina Gerry: Link to Change Food’s website Link to Irina’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Hi, and welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson. When I'm speaking to people in the industry, one of the things that I'm emphasizing is that different categories are going to experience a different speed and intensity of change as a result of climate change and action in response to climate change. And this week's episode is about one of the categories that's already seeing a lot of activity and I think it's going to see Even higher speed and higher intensity change over the coming decade. At last year's Goldman Sachs Global Sustainability Summit, Walmart Chief Sustainability Officer and EVP Kathleen McLaughlin said, "We all know about the 80/20 rule. In emissions, it's like 99 to 1. You don't need to measure every item to know it's beef, it's dairy, it's electronics. We know what they are." And this week's episode is about dairy in particular, and when I think about some of the alternatives to conventional dairy that are on the market and are on the horizon, I think of a three-legged stool, the first leg of which is plant-based, which is probably the most mature and which I imagine most listeners are familiar with. And plant-based has certainly undergone some setbacks and headwinds over the last few years. The second leg is cultivated meat, and I, I think, that too has faced some headwinds, both in the US and Europe, despite it being a category that has barely come to market. But just this week, the New York Times had an op-ed on some of the tribulations in that subcategory. But there's a third leg of that stool, which is precision fermentation. And precision fermentation is, as you'll hear in today's episode, not a brand new technology, but it's a technology that hasn't widely been deployed in the kinds of grocery and food categories that we're going to talk about today. And I, I really wanted listeners of the show to hear from somebody with a perspective on the current and the future outlook for precision fermentation, dairy products. And so I'm really delighted to have Irina Gerry on the show today. She is a sustainable foods industry thought leader, CMO of Change Foods, which is using precision fermentation to commercialize a new way of producing real milk proteins and dairy foods with biotech. Irina's also a founding member and vice chair of the board of the Precision Fermentation Alliance. And she spent, a really interesting and in some ways improbable career in grocery and CPG marketing with a background at, iconic plant-based brands, including Silk and So Delicious at Danone, and also has spent time at Procter & Gamble and Deloitte. And I won't keep you much longer because I'm eager for you to meet and learn from Irina, but to me, precision fermentation is such an interesting topic and technology as it relates to this area because, you know, it addresses some of the challenges that some of those other subcategories I mentioned have faced. And yet there's a long road ahead to drive consumer awareness, understanding, trial, and adoption. And a lot that's happening at retail and could happen at retail as those two examples I shared start to suggest. So this is almost certainly not going to be the last time we cover the topic of precision fermentation, but, it is the first, and I'm really grateful that we have somebody so experienced and thoughtful to review it with us. So let's meet Irina Gerry, CMO of Change Foods. Irina, thanks for joining the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Great to see you and thanks for being here. Irina Gerry: It's great to be here. here Well, you know, this is a topic that, really fascinates me for a lot of reasons. And as I was scoping out who is best positioned to help me and the audience understand it, you sort of rose to the surface. Keith Anderson: Would you mind just telling us a bit about your background and the work that you're doing now with Change? Irina Gerry: Absolutely. You know, I started my professional career in consulting. But then during business school, I transitioned into consumer marketing, CPG world. You know, I loved for me, the connection between the product and things you're working on, and just that the tangible product that ends up on the shelf or in your refrigerator and, you know, the combination of the creative and the strategic and the tactical aspects of what it actually takes to make that happen. So, you know, I jumped in, kind of both feet in and, and spend some time at P&G, the big training ground, and then transitioned into food, and worked on Silk brand for over five years. I actually came in when it was still WhiteWave Foods. So it was a private, you know, smaller company out of Boulder, Colorado. And then during my tenure there was acquired by Danone. So I kind of have a large blue chip, smaller, you know, acquisition, type of experience. And then was working a lot on the innovation, actually a kind of a long range innovation and discovered this new technology called precision fermentation, and we'll dig into that, and saw such tremendous potential that I actually took a leap and, and joined a tiny, tiny startup, was a third person to join the startup to commercialize that technology. So now I've been an entrepreneur for over three years, really working to not only build, you know, this company, but also this new technology and essentially a new category within food. So that, that's been my journey in a nutshell. Keith Anderson: Well, maybe that's a nice springboard to get into what precision fermentation is and, you know, why it's so helpful for the, the broader challenges that you're working on. Irina Gerry: Yeah. You know, actually before we dive in what precision fermentation is, let's talk maybe a little bit why that even matters. I think it's helpful for people to know the context. So, you probably, you know, I'm assuming you talk a lot about decarbonization and a lot of people know about energy, right? But food is right up there, after energy, is the second biggest sector to decarbonize. And when you look at food, every way you slice that, you come up against animal source products as the number one category within food that needs decarbonizing, and cows tend to be by far the biggest slice of that pie, given the fact that they produce a lot of methane, naturally, and the fact that they just require a lot of resources, right? It takes about three calories in, sorry, a hundred calories in to get about one or three calories out in terms of meat and, you know, a hundred calories to 17 calories in terms of milk. So it's a kind of inefficient way of using resources that also happens to be very carbon intensive. And so when I looked at that and, you know, working on plant-based, alternatives was obviously a huge and important part of the solution, right? We could say, "okay, well, if animal based foods are problematic what can we do?" Right? Because we still want to enjoy the foods and the recipes and kind of have the experiences that we have with animal products, but maybe we need some other ways of doing that. And so focusing on plant-based made a lot of sense at the time. And, you know, I, I'm sure you probably have tried silica products. I've been, you know, a huge fan before I even joined the business, and obviously worked on it. For, for a number of years with, with a great degree of passion because I felt like it offered both a much lower carbon footprint, but also, you know, a great product experience. However, what I found is that there's some categories where it really works, like milk, I think does a great job and we have a lot of options. And there's some categories where it's very challenging, like cheese, right? Where the product just doesn't deliver. And the more I dug into it from kind of an R&D perspective, "why does it not work as well?" What I realized is that milk proteins have very particular structure, very particular function, right? At, when you look at it kind of at a food science angle, and that it's really hard to replicate it with plants. And this is how I kind of landed on researching and looking into, "well, what's, what else can we do, right? What other technologies and alternatives exist?" And so I found precision fermentation. So let me kind of explain to you what it is. Precision fermentation is different than plant-based because we're not actually using plants as the source of ingredient, but rather we're using microorganisms as tiny machinery to produce the exact same molecules that, say, a cow would. So double clicking on that, it's, it's a combination of, you know, traditional fermentation, so what you already kind of know and love beer, kombucha, yogurt, microorganisms doing the work, but combining that with biotechnology right? Now, where we have, you know, an intersection of genetic engineering tools, AI, CRISPR, et cetera, where you can actually program the microorganisms, right? It's not new, we use that in medicine, we use that in, in various other industries where, you know, we create vaccines this way, we create insulin this way, but it's combining that and taking that into now saying, "okay, well, if we could make any molecule, why not a food molecule? Why not a milk protein?" Right? So it's kind of extending this technology into food and what gets me kind of excited about it is that obviously because you're using microorganisms and not macroorganisms, your climate footprint is drastically smaller, right? Not only in terms of carbon, water, land use, et cetera, but you're producing the same exact thing. So the analogy I like to make is kind of solar to fossil based energy, right? It's the same energy. You flip the lights and it's bright in the room, but it's made through a different technology that's more efficient. And that's probably the closest analog, because these microorganisms get, you know, get programmed essentially to produce milk protein. And then you use that milk protein and you could make a variety of products. In our case, you know, cheese was kind of the, the big, product to go after because there's such a massive gap in terms of nutrition, in terms of stretch and melt and kind of the consumer experience that is holding it back. And so it's newer word, I guess, in, in the ecosystem, precision fermentation, but that's essentially what it does, right? It's using microorganism to make the exact same ingredient in a very specific and precise way and deliver a massive climate benefit in the process. Keith Anderson: That was very clear. I do have some follow up questions. Irina Gerry: Please. Keith Anderson: So is it, it's something distinct from cultivated meat, which is another term, Irina Gerry: Mm hmm. Keith Anderson: you hear a lot about, is it not? Irina Gerry: Yes, it is. So, Cultivated Meat is kind of a different pillar, I call it, of kind of this big technology evolution. In cultivated meat, you take an actual biopsy, usually from a live animal, right? It's a tiny brick, they don't, you know, it's not harming the animal in any sort of major way, right? But you take an actual cell biopsy where you get a number of cells, and then you place those cells inside what, you know, in the industry, it's called either a cultivator or a bioreactor, and you feed them nutrients. So you're essentially replicating a process that happens inside the animal, right? Because when the cells are inside the animal, they get nutrients delivered to them, you know, through blood flow, and then they grow and they replicate. And what you're doing is you're taking that outside of the animal, because you could deliver the key nutrients in a more efficient way, and you're only growing the cells that you want to grow. So instead of growing, say, the entire cow with the hooves and, you know, the skin and everything else and the organs that we don't tend to eat, you can just grow the muscle tissue, right? You can just grow a particular part. And again, the the difference there, you're taking cells and you're replicating the entire cell, and you will be eating the entire cell, right? In precision fermentation, you're still working with cells, but you're not actually consuming the cells. You are consuming the product of the cells. So think of it as one is the product, the other one is the machinery. It's kind of how I would delineate the difference. And the other big difference is obviously when you replicate the whole cell, you get all of the biochemistry of the cell, right? So all of the various components that are naturally there. When you're using precision fermentation, it's kind of like a sniper rifle technology. You're producing a very specific molecule almost one at a time. So if you think of the difference there, obviously, it's going to have a nutritional difference. It's going to have, difference in terms of the level of complexity, right? Growing cells is much more complex than growing microorganisms that crank out just the one particular compound that you need. And the other difference I would say is, you know, the use of genetic engineering. I know it's a hot topic and a lot of people have opinions about it. What I would say is while genetic engineering is used in the process, right, so those cells are programmed using genetic engineering techniques, the product is not genetically engineered, the protein itself, because it's exactly the same kind of a copy replica of a milk protein. And at the end of the fermentation, you filter out your chosen protein, so milk protein using filtration, much like you would in the dairy industry, right? That's how you get to a whey protein. You filter it out from, from milk, and you discard the organisms that made it. So that would be kind of the two big differences in those two technologies, Keith Anderson: So, I think I understand you that, with precision fermentation, the microorganisms do the work, the output is the protein. What is the input? Irina Gerry: The input is the, so the microorganisms themselves, right? So you, you take the microorganisms and you do a, you know, kind of a programming program where you get these special microbes, right, that now when fermented will crank out milk proteins. And the inputs are very simple, right? When you look at biology at a biochemistry level, you need a source of carbohydrates, you know, a few vitamins and minerals in a particular conditions, right? So temperature, acidity, presence or absence of air, et cetera. And so the, the precision part of this is controlling for all of these different components, right? The exact nutrient mix, the exact temperature, the exact timing of fermentation, et cetera, that kind of takes what you know as traditional fermentation, beer, right? It's more of a wild process, right? Where you take the microbes, you throw in, you know, the yeast, the sugar, and, and you kind of spin them around at a certain temperature, but you dial it in in a much more precise way. And again, the product is the filtered component, not the entire fermentation broth. Keith Anderson: Got it, got it, that clarifies. And you said something in the setup that I think was really important, which is some of the, you know, products on the market today that are positioned as alternatives or substitutes, you know, meet some of the criteria, maybe in terms of resource intensity, but I, I tend to think of, especially in food, although it's, it's a framework that's extensible to a lot of categories, some of the other, you know, components of the value equation as being in food, does it taste, as good or, better, you know, secondly, texture, thirdly, nutritional profile, and, and fourthly, you know, what's the price and how does it compare to what I'm used to paying? So maybe we can spend a few minutes just unpacking, the sort of current and maybe the anticipated future competitive dynamics in a sense of some of these precision fermentation offerings on those dimensions. Irina Gerry: Which one do you want to talk about next or first, I guess? Keith Anderson: Well, I mean, taste, if I'm understanding you, I'm guessing is almost indistinguishable. If it's the same, same protein derived a different way, is that fair to say? Mm Irina Gerry: That's, that's the biggest unlock, right? And that's why I got excited about this because dairy is obviously a massive category and, and as we said, you know, milk is, you know, plant-based milk has been around for, for a while. It's an established part of the category. Other segments are much newer, right? Whether it's cheese, whether it's yogurt, creamer, etc. And when you look at the dairy industry, right? Only a fraction of that is actually sold as, you know, your liquid milk, right? Your milk you buy in the grocery store. A lot of it is those kind of secondary processed foods like yogurt and cheese and ice cream. But then there's also a massive part of that, that's ingredients that are in the food system that you don't necessarily maybe notice or think about, you know, starting with the most obvious, you know, isolated dairy protein, whey protein, we all, you know, are buying tubs of that now and adding it to our smoothies, but there's also, you know, dairy proteins in all kinds of foods, right, to add nutrition, to add a particular mouthfeel or flavor, that have really all been processed and, you know, repackaged in a way that is, I call it kind of like under the surface dairy, but it's actually a massive component of our food system. And so you could think of application of this technology kind of up and down that ladder and the further, up you go, the easier it is to replace it because, you know, if we're just talking about milk protein, then it becomes a one for one replacement. Like, think of your nutrition bars. Right, whey protein to whey protein is a direct replacement with no taste or texture difference versus if you think about, you know, cheese and yogurt and ice cream, there are other things in it. Of course, there are fats, there's, you know, other components that may be slightly harder to replace one for one. And so your taste might vary a little, but I would say, you know, when looking at cheese and that was the problem I was highly focused on, There's such a huge gap that is specifically unlocked by the protein itself, and that's what the struggle has been. And I actually worked on a So Delicious plant-based cheese while at Danone and having access to, you know, some of the best resources within the R&D and ingredient sourcing, it was just still really hard to deliver on consumer expectations with plant proteins alone. So that's where I say the unlock is, is huge, right? If you look at yogurt, same thing. Dairy yogurt has a high amount of protein. That's what gives it the creaminess, the texture, the nutrition that people love. And that's, this is the technology that allows us to do that in a much more sustainable way. So I would say from a taste perspective, am I going after, you know, the Parmigiano Reggiano with all of its complexities and, you know, traditional processing and artisanry? No, but I could do probably a heck of a job with, across the other components of, of cheese business, right? Where it would be nearly indistinguishable. Keith Anderson: And as part of the precision, is it possible and do you think that it's likely that there will be any, engineering of the nutritional profile, as just an example, you know, after recent conversations with my physician, I'm, I'm avoiding saturated fat when I can, so is it realistic to expect that, a precision fermented cheese might have a reduced, saturated fat level? Irina Gerry: Yeah. So that's interesting what you're asking, right? Because when you look at, again, milk, cheese, yogurt, et cetera, it's not just protein. There's fats. Well, saturated fats is a huge part of that, right, cholesterol. The benefit of working with microorganisms is that it's kind of ingredients up rather than milk down. When you think of how you make cheese, you take milk, you remove 90 percent of water, and then you coagulate it and you remove, you know, whey proteins, etc. You're working ingredient down. So you're kind of stuck with the saturated fat and the cholesterol and the hormones, everything that kind of tags along from milk. With precision fermentation, you're going to ingredients up. So we're not replicating cholesterol. We're not replicating saturated fats. We're not replicating a lot of, you know, obviously the, the, the naturally occurring hormones that come with dairy milk product. We're just focused on protein. So you could see how it allows kind of this designer food, in a way, where you could say, "well, I want all the protein, and maybe I want more vitamin B12, and maybe I want the calcium, right? But I don't want the cholesterol, or I want less saturated fat." You, you might end up with some saturated fat, because even if you use plant-based sources, for example, coconut milk is still a source of saturated fat. But it's different than dairy fat. So it kind of gets complex, but also interesting and promising, right? Where you could say for your particular needs, you might be able to find the cheese that still has the same protein content or more, but a lot lower saturated fat and no cholesterol. And I think that then starts to create a, not just the taste value, but also now a nutrition value, which is, you know, kind of the second thing you mentioned, like, what about the nutrition? And I think that's really, really fascinating. The third thing I'll put to you, and that's more of a future, but replicating is just the beginning, right? To say, "hey, we just want to make the exact same molecule. And we wanted to replicate the familiar cheese mozzarella," but because it's designer, we could say, "what if we made it better, right? What if we remove allergenicity?" How many kids are allergic to milk protein? What if we're able to remove that, but still deliver the nutrition? What if we improve the calcium carrying capacity and deliver more calcium than dairy could? That opens up an entirely new spectrum of nutrition. That's not just parity, but actually better. Keith Anderson: That's an interesting, interesting point. So I think we covered taste. I think we covered texture. I think we covered nutrition. You know, now we start to get into, position in the market. And, you know, when I listen to some of the comparative advantages in terms of resource, resource intensity, less water, less land, less energy, you know, on the surface, my guess would be economics might have some advantages, you know, help, help us think about where the technology is, on the maturity curve. You know, it feels to me just as an observer, like we're subscale at the moment, I don't see a ton of these products dominating the categories that we've been discussing, but, you know, where do you think we are on that maturity curve and, and how quickly are we going to scale it? Irina Gerry: We're definitely subscale, right? So again, as I mentioned to you, the precision fermentation as a big platform technology has been around since the 80s, right? It started in pharma. This is how we produce 99 percent plus of insulin today. You know, a lot of the latest vaccines are produced that way. Drugs, pharmaceuticals. So it's been used there first because it's, you needed, you know, fewer proteins or ingredients per unit of fermentation, right? So as the tech was expensive and it was still small scale, it was economically viable in pharma and not in other industries, right? But then we, it went into materials, right? Biofuels. It's now used in cosmetics and when you think about it, it's kind of the unit economics are, we usually do it in, you know, dollars per kilo of product, of fermentation product, right? And so you may have started at a thousand dollars a kilo in pharmaceuticals, and then it's maybe viable, you know, 200 a kilo in cosmetics. But if you look at food, you need to be in kind of the, the 10 to 20s range. We're talking commodity dairy, right? So if we're trying to say whey protein, casein protein, which are available to buy from a cow today, that's where you are. You're kind of in these, you know, 10 to 20 dollar range. There are obviously companies working on that, but that's going to take some time to get to that level. However, what I'll tell you is the cost curve reduction pattern is following other patterns that we've seen with technological development, right? Whether it's genetic sequencing, your computing power, et cetera, that continues to develop and as these price points get unlocked, we're seeing these Technologies enter into the categories. So, say, between cosmetics and, you know, exact dairy, commodity dairy, there's also, you know, adult nutrition, baby formula, medical nutrition. So food, but maybe specialty kind of food where there's a willingness to pay for a particular ingredient that maybe delivers a greater value or greater purity that you can get in market today. So I would say commodity dairy, we're definitely still sub scale, but I believe that this industry is headed that way within the decade, right? So the projections, I would say that by 2030, these products would be competitive with commercial dairy. Keith Anderson: In some ways that's sooner than I would have anticipated, just based on how, you know, some of these emerging technologies and, building the distribution channels, driving awareness, trial, all those things, so many of these industry shifts that feel like overnight changes, you know, take decades in some cases to play out, so that's really interesting. Are, are there, markets globally or, individual grocers, restaurants that are particularly, aggressive in, in supporting or pursuing this? Irina Gerry: I think the climate conversation is happening in many markets today. Right? So if you look at, you know, the United States is obviously one of the world's largest, economies and polluters and a big consumer of animal products, right? Our per capita consumption of animal products is far and away higher than everyone else. So I think the conversation on climate is highly relevant. We're seeing markets that have maybe Less access to land resources that are very, very open minded to this. Place is like Israel, places like Singapore, where there's not a massive land, right? Because we talked about carbon, but land use in animal agriculture is a huge topic. You know, globally speaking, we use about a third of ice-free land on this planet just to feed the animals. That'd be a third. And, and the demand for animal products is projected to go up about 70%. So at a planetary scale, that's an unfathomable equation, right? We're just, we're out of earth to, to do it, to produce animal products the way we've been producing them. But when you scale it back to even individual country levels, you're seeing that some countries are saying this is an unsustainable way, an unsustainable technology, and we are land short anyway. So it creates a much bigger openness to this technology. And the third pillar, I think, of geographies I would point out is those that are water stressed. And actually that's going to start including the United States. Colorado on, you know, west is extremely water stressed and guess who the biggest consumer of water resources is? It's animal agriculture and it's predominantly cows. So when we look at what's happening in California and, you know, Arizona, Nevada, et cetera, you can't ignore the cows as part of that equation. And so that's becoming a topic. Obviously anywhere in the Middle East is another great example where they do have land, but you know, not much water and a population that continues to demand higher quality, you know, animal type foods. And so we are then seeing kind of a third wave of interest from those countries as well, and then I would add on a layer of what we call food security, and I know it's probably a bit further into, you know, off of people's mind and in kind of US retail, but food security in the next decade is going to become a topic. I think we've all had a taste of that with, you know, the Ukraine crisis and crops and oils, et cetera, between climate instability and political instability. I think that's going to be an increasingly important topic and being able to localize supply chain of important food ingredients like milk proteins is very appealing. So when I look at it globally, I, I see kind of several concentrated hot markets where those factors come together. And I think U.S. is one of them. Absolutely. Keith Anderson: It's interesting that you highlight the stability and purity of supply. I think in my first wave of inquiry in this whole space, I saw a huge amount of energy and focus on the decarbonization side and mitigating additional warming and emissions. But increasingly, what I see the retailers in particular talking about is whether it's localization or other strategies for stabilizing supply chains, which to me is, is sort of the adaptation side of the coin. I, I think it's going to be a growing focus and in some ways, easier for companies to prioritize in the near term, because if they're already experiencing material disruption, as they did from the pandemic, as some retailers are openly stating, they are from more extreme weather and, you know, crop yields and, and quality are more volatile than Irina Gerry: And pricing fluctuations, right? When you look at big impacts, and again, let's just look in the U. S. on, in one hand, it We feel food secure because it's such a massive country with so much farmland. But on the other hand, we are seeing huge water stress across the southern half of the United States. We're seeing huge heat stress coming from the heat waves, right? It impacts our corn belt. Guess where corn goes? Guess where soy goes? It is all part of animal feed, so it's an upstream impact to the supply chain. We're not as food secure as we feel today, and when we go to these global markets, again, they're not either. So I would say food security, again, maybe not top of mind, but, but will be, rather rapidly and the benefit of these ingredients, because they're identical, they, it's kind of a plug and play, right? So if I'm making nutrition bars with whey protein, I could source whey protein and be subject to market price fluctuations of global dairy market, or I could potentially have a, you know, a facility in the Midwest that produces it that's independent of, you know, water, climate, heat, stress, et cetera. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Well, this has been fascinating and informative. Really appreciate you joining the show. If people want to learn more about Change Foods or get in touch with you, where would you send them? Irina Gerry: I would send them on, on LinkedIn, I guess. I'm, I'm, a frequent user. I love the platform. So find me there. Keith Anderson: Perfect. Well, thanks again, Irina. Irina Gerry: Thank you so much. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize. co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=qn02x79n…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

Introducing Mike Newman, founder and CEO of Returnity Innovations, a partner to retailers and brands for reusable packaging, Keith Anderson talks to Mike about his venture and lessons he’s learned. With a blend of entrepreneurship as well as environmental science and policy experience, Mike has a practical view of the immediate impact that reuse can have in commerce. You'll learn about some of the reasons that the internal logistics leg is one of the most viable places for reusable packaging in commerce today, and some of the challenges and barriers and opportunities and what would have to be true for reuse to be economically and operationally viable in some of the other consumer-facing areas that we continue to see interest and innovation. Learn more about Mike Newman: Link to Returnity’s website Link to Mike’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm Keith Anderson. And today I've got Mike Newman, founder and CEO of Returnity Innovations, a partner to retailers and brands for reusable packaging, mostly in the internal logistics leg of the supply chain. And I don't think we were recording when Mike told me he's sometimes referred to as the 'reuse realist.' And having spoken to him for a while, I can appreciate why. Mike's background is, a blend of entrepreneurship as well as, environmental science and policy experience. And that's one reason that I think he's got a realistic view of the impact that reuse can have in commerce, but I think. Another reason is the, the part of the supply chain that he is most focused on, and where he's guided returnity. And as, as you listen, I think you'll, you'll learn as I did about some of the reasons that, the internal logistics leg is one of the most viable places for reusable packaging, in commerce today, and some of the challenges and barriers and opportunities and what would have to be true for reuse to be, economically and operationally viable in some of the other consumer facing areas that we continue to see interest and innovation. So, here's Mike Newman, founder and CEO of Returnity Innovations. Mike, good to see you. Thanks for joining the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. Mike Newman: Great to be here. Thanks for having me. Keith Anderson: Why don't you tell us a bit about Returnity and where it fits in the reusable packaging landscape? Mike Newman: Well, Returny really helps brands and retailers to reduce the impact of their packaging, certainly from a sustainability standpoint, less material and less waste, but also, more operationally efficient and ideally and ultimately less expensive. Usually what we focus on is what would be called secondary packaging. So it's the packaging that the brand uses to get the thing to the customer, shipping boxes, reusable shopping bags, and the like, and they're really just innovating on how to implement those in a way that can work on all levels for the retailer. Keith Anderson: And how did you end up in this business? Mike Newman: Well, my background has been in sustainability and growth companies. I've always had a passion for the space. I did an environmental policy degree as an undergrad. I spent five years at the Sierra Club as part of their D.C. lobbying and legislative team. And then for the last 20 years, just working on supply chain and logistics. Returnity actually had a bit of an atypical origin story. It was originally a reasonable shopping bag business. Just making shopping bags for companies primarily to use as like swag at corporate shi at like conferences. And thredUp and James Reinhart, which has become this publicly traded huge company focused on apparel and sustainability, asked us if we could make them a reasonable shipping bag. So it was actually his impetus, and he was the original investor, liked what we came up with as a reasonable bag for shipping, and here we are over seven years later now, keep, keeping on innovating in the space, but it, it actually was his first, request that sent us on this journey. Keith Anderson: Some of the most interesting businesses come directly from a customer request, and sounds like this was a pretty interesting one. Mike Newman: Yeah, I love, you know, you, you love that sort of, "I don't know, but let me try" and, that, "I don't know, let me try" moment led us down this path that's been really quite fulfilling. So, we, we, every time I see him, I remind him that, it's all, it's all that one ask that he had and how much we appreciate it. Keith Anderson: So secondary packaging covers, both, I guess, customer facing, you know, direct to consumer or even indirect e-commerce, but I suppose also internal logistics. Mike Newman: Yeah, that behind the scenes is, is, obviously not something consumers will see, generally, but it's an enormous amount of packaging use. In the U. S. we use enough cardboard boxes to pave a cardboard road from New York to L. A. and back three times a year, so, you, it's a shocking amount of cardboard, and just what's used to get goods to stores alone, is billions of, of dollars worth of packaging, so. It all adds up, what, what every leg of the supply chain, you're, you're seeing packaging being used. Keith Anderson: And are you seeing any, any split in interest or demand among retailers and brands that you work with, are they responding more to consumer interest and want shoppers to be able to see something, or is just a pure operational efficiency play in the internal side where the action is? Mike Newman: I think it's been an evolution. Certainly they, they're aware that consumers have a sort of broad frustration with packaging so that, you know, if you poll consumers and say, "are you, do you prioritize brands that offer more sustainable packaging options? Will you spend more on more sustainable packaging options?" The consensus, and growing consensus is, 'yes,' that's a, that's nice in a poll. In practice, I think, the evidence is much more, wanting. So brands are having to, like, confront this duality of, expectations from their end customers of what, you know, how they're addressing sustainability issues, but not necessarily taking personal action as individuals. And so figuring out solutions that can kind of align to that, but still make sense economically has definitely been a journey. And then our ability to support them through that has evolved too to figure out, you know, what's the right path. Keith Anderson: Well, I know you're going to help me unpack these topics much more reusable packaging, really, I think of two challenges in a sense. One is the economic side, which you mentioned, which don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's by definition a challenge. It's just a different economic model than single use. And the other is sort of the behavioral side. So I'd love maybe to take those one at a time and potentially, in each of those different contexts, that is, on the consumer side and on the internal side, you know, in your experience, how are each of those stakeholders, approaching reusable packaging, at least as you're delivering it? Mike Newman: Well, I think that the, there's a lot of flirtation with reusables for e-commerce over the last five years, and those have largely, kind of tailed off for the reason that it just doesn't work, frankly. It, Keith Anderson: Why doesn't it work? Mike Newman: Yeah, it's a, you know, there's isolated cases, like, you know, clients like Rent the Runway, rental brands, things like that, where it's going to come back, because that's part of the business model. But that's, few and far between. In an open context e-commerce setting, you really need to get 75, 80%, ideally 90% of the packaging returned from the end customer to make it work environmentally, let alone economically. The evidence is, is that generally it's going to be about 50 percent or less of consumers will return it, even If they opted in at checkout, even if they paid a premium, which some, some companies have tried, you're still just not going to get it back enough. So, on top of all the challenges for an e-commerce brand, now I have to have paper or cardboard and the reusable, and I got to train my team to remember which stock to pull from, depending on what the customer, it just creates a lot of challenges. And given that it's more expensive and you're not going to get it back enough, unfortunately, it's just not really proven viable in that context. So, you know, brands have just learned that, you know, as they all know, it's very hard to change consumer behavior, particularly at scale. To do it as an individual company is almost impossible. These are sort of society-level evolutions that we need to be thinking about. And so, putting it in a reusable to ship you your order is not victory. Victory comes when it keeps getting reused. It just doesn't happen right now. So, they've had to look at other applications where reusables can actually be viable. Today, and, and fortunately, you know, we, that's been a challenge for us too as a business to make sure we have, have, a growth and a future. And fortunately, we've been able to find those applications, but they tend to be internal logistics, employee or employee-managed processes rather than, than consumer behavior driven. Keith Anderson: Yeah, in the past life, I used to say, "it's a lot easier to get people to use what we're making when we're paying them as employees than if we're asking them to pay us as customers." And it's an interesting point in terms of adoption and viability. If what you're really doing is reengineering an internal workflow, you know, and it is part of your training and can be measured as a KPI, it's a lot different than something you're asking a busy household to handle. Mike Newman: That's right. And you know, if you ask people how they feel about packaging, they'll tell you, "I don't like packaging," but people don't interact with packaging, like this broad concept that they individually, they impact, interact with a package and then another package, another package, they're busy, you know, the, the kid needs a diaper change, they got to run to work. It's very hard to expect consumers to really profoundly change how they interact with every individual package at every moment. It doesn't mean we shouldn't consider that as an important evolution as we look at our impact as a society. But look, I got to run a business that makes money today and that serves my clients. And today consumers just aren't ready for this, no matter what they might respond to in a poll. So you have to adapt and, and, and adjust. Keith Anderson: So, you said something interesting, which is, you know, putting something in a reusable package isn't the, the win, it's hitting the reuse rates. How do you define success in the context that your, that your business has sort of gravitated towards? Mike Newman: Well, I think that, you know, we use these three pillars of economic, operational, environmental, the environmental it's contextual, you know, what are you replacing and what are you replacing it with? How far is it being driven between locations and things of that nature? But generally, as long as you can get the reuse rate up above 90%, every life cycle assessment and study that's ever been done, you know, private or, or there's a number of them out there that are public show that it, it creates a profound environmental benefit. So, not having to keep making new packaging when you can keep it in circulation 10 to 20 cycles is clearly better from a climate standpoint, water use and so forth. So then it just comes down to like, you know, does it work economically and can your operation absorb it? And so, it has to work on all three. We look for those cycles and those segments where we know the circulation rate is viable and possible, and then make sure that we're designing the system and the package so that it does become cost efficient. You know, you got to use it. It's reusable. It's going to be more expensive to manufacture up front, but over time, you know, you'll start to benefit. And our pitch to retailers and brands is we're only going to do this. We've learned we should only pitch you if it's going to save you money. So, you know, can we go in and say, "look, you're wasting money on single use. You're going to save money when you switch to reusables." Or when you didn't have a choice, because regulations or sometimes C suite, directives forced you into reusables, but, companies are just not going to switch to reusable unless it's economically viable. And generally they're not going to do it unless it's cheaper. Because they don't do anything unless it's cheaper. That's the whole point, is, you're trying to optimize your business. So, we have to find those segments where it's going to save you money, really. Keith Anderson: And is that sort of long term payback something you find, everybody understands and is, is willing to come with you on that journey for, or are they just used to unit economics that are, listen, the cost of single use per unit is so low that it's easier just to keep doing what we're doing? Mike Newman: It's usually not that hard to get a first meeting. But, sustain... because, like I said, it's packaging, spend, and impact, it's, there's a lot of attention to it right now. So, you know, I think companies are really aware that they need to show progress, not just for the optics of it, but these are humans who read the climate news too. It's not, you know, that, and it's not like it's the sustainability team that's like dragging the purchasing department around. Like we're finding that the purchasing group is also open to the conversation, but the realities of the implementation challenges can't be overlooked. And, you know, a very common thing, for example, is if we are implementing reasonable packaging for, say, a retailer, and they're using it from their, you know, shipping from their warehouse to their stores, the team that manages that leg has their own P&L and their own budget, and then the store team has their own budget. And what our companies who use us have learned is that they save a lot of labor in the store because our boxes are a lot more efficient to open up and break down and the retail team doesn't have to spend nearly as much time in the store just opening boxes and taking out merchandise. So they get this labor savings, but that's usually on the retail team's budget, not on the logistics team budget. So the logistics team has a budget for cardboard. And we say, well, look, here's one of the really compelling reasons to switch. And they're like, well, that's not my budget. I'm not going to get credit for that. That goes on the other guy's budget. So those are the real, I mean, that's the real nuts and bolts of it. You have to, you know, you have to understand and address those things straight on. And that's where a lot of this stuff either moves faster, moves slow, is that just day to day challenges of individuals in large companies. And what they manage and control and what their personal impact from taking on that project might look like. And sometimes it's maybe not compelling enough for them in their seat and you have to figure out a way to move past that. Keith Anderson: I was smiling because in my past life consulting, we worked with a lot of retailers that were early in the omni-channel evolution, and were starting to offer things like fulfilled from store, order online, pick up in store, and the exact same dynamic was a big part of it. Their labor was going to be used to pick and pack the order. But the online team got all of the credit for the sale. And so there was a lot of internal tension for years about how do we incentivize people just to do the right thing for the business and the customer. And then, you know, we don't want them working against their own comp model, but our current comp model doesn't incentivize the desired behavior. So it is interesting though, again, because to all the good points we've made about consumers, you can influence behavior in an organization through a lot of those, you know, how you define and measure success and, you know, what you're incentivized and compensated to do. Mike Newman: Yeah. And at the end of the day, everyone likes being a hero because they save money for their company. So. You know, leading with that is usually a good place to start, and we've been doing it long enough now to kind of be able to identify where are those, those cycles within the logistics of a brand that we can create, you know, hero moments for them. And, and so when, when you have that, you have that product market fit and can just really lean in hard on selling it there. That's, that's when you're feeling good and, you know, it only took us seven years, so, yeah, but here we are, so. Keith Anderson: So, looking at some of the clients that you list on your website, I, I see some patterns, but where have you found that density of, demand or a good fit? Does it, does it? Is it stuck in a certain profile of product category, you know, how would you just characterize where you see the pattern of interest? Mike Newman: Yeah, I think today, it's sort of settled in most prominently in two use models. One is that internal logistics kind of warehouse to store or store or the reverse, for product returns. And generally for apparel and shoes, I mean, those are high volume product categories, obviously, they don't need a lot of specialized packaging, usually they tend to just use the same size cardboard box over and over again. It kind of lends itself to a first adoption. It's a lot harder. We work with Target and Walmart and others, but they sell everything ever made anywhere. And so that's its own logistics challenge of if it's a bicycle or a snowblower or a you know, a bottle of Coke, like, it's a little bit harder not to crack from an op standpoint. Today it's mostly shoes and apparel for that reason, though, you know, we have examples otherwise. And just set a cardboard, it's going back and forth, and reusables, and they can keep it in circulation and save money. The other application is, frankly, reusable grocery bags, because single use grocery bags are getting banned, which is often a good thing, but can have these knock off impacts that still are a challenge, so, you know, instead of getting a really thin, single use plastic bag, people are using dozens, hundreds a year of reusable shopping bags that they don't reuse, which are more plastic, so they're sort of consuming more plastic in these reusables than they were in single use and now retailers are having to kind of figure that out. And that's where, you know, we're, we've been stepping in to kind of create these loops and reuse cycles that can allow it to, to make some sense. Keith Anderson: And, and did you participate in the Closed Loop Partners initiative on that front? Am I remembering that right? Mike Newman: We've done a couple of different projects with them. Yes. A project through them with Walmart and, and one just this past year with CVS and Target and, all around that. And, and obviously, you know, look, it's happening at the same time that. In store retail, particularly for grocery, has been evolving so much as well because now you have, obviously, you have in store shopping like you always did, but then you have people buying online and driving up into a parking spot to get their order brought to their car, and you have home delivery through, Instacart and other vendors. So, there's all these different customer journeys that are happening for the retailers, and the absence of single use shopping bags only complicates those journeys. And so, I like to say that packaging, reasonable packaging, becomes both an enable, enabled by and an enabler of a lot of this evolution in retail because you have this tool. You got to give them, particularly if they're pre-buying it, you have to transfer it to the customer somehow. You're giving it to them in something. It's no longer a single use shopping bag, so how are you dealing with that? That's an example of that segment I said where, companies are being forced into reuse whether it made sense or not economically and operationally and environmentally. Oh well, you know, that's the reality like in New Jersey. No single use shopping bags, period. Not even paper, since last May. So you gotta do something. So that's where we're coming in to help those brands and others to sort of implement reuse systems that can, that can work within that constraint. Keith Anderson: Yeah, got it. So, just stepping back to apparel and footwear, you know, if I can observe a couple characteristics, just to echo a little bit of what I heard you say, those are obviously non perishable, solid products, so they're not going to leak, they're not going to spoil, they don't need a lot of secondary packaging, higher price point than the bottle of coke that you referenced. Do you see other categories with similar characteristics that may also have potential? Mike Newman: I mean, really, you just need just, but you really, well, you need two things for reusables. You have to get them back a lot and you have to get them back cheap. And so cheap is never one at a time. You know, that's the big problem with a lot of those e-commerce models is that I'm buying a pair of jeans. It's sent to me in a reusable. I'm mailing you back one reusable package at a time. Very expensive. And also, as we touched on, consumers just won't do it enough anyways. But anyway, they did. It's, it's, I'm taking a 20 cent poly mailer bag or a dollar cardboard box and I'm replacing it with an asset, a reasonable package, and I'm paying UPS three or four bucks to get the thing back. It's just way more expensive. So, you have to be able to get them back in bulk, and you have to get them back a lot. And retail footprint creates a lot of attractive opportunities for that. If it's an employee managed process, they're taking all the empties and putting them all together and sending them back at once. So the cost is really reasonable. And then like those reasonable shopping bag programs and similar, they're being returned to the store. So now you're having this consumer-led re-aggregation. You can bring it back in bulk. And so it's, it's actually less important what the thing is that's being shipped and what kind of package. We've done wine. We have reasonable wine box that we've done, for a company in Europe. Certainly electronics and others, you know, the, the box works. It's the, it's that logistic system that has to underlie everything. Keith Anderson: Yeah, as you're talking I'm thinking of all these programs that I've seen piloted. And some have worked, some haven't. Most of my focus has been in grocery and CPG, and you, you know, the value of the store in that logistics equation, I think is pretty profound. You know, one example was Loop by TerraCycle. When I first participated in the pilot, it was a doorstep delivery program and it's since evolved into, Brick and mortar only, integrated model. And I think a lot of what has been learned over decades of online grocery in general, in terms of the superior economics of having shoppers do a lot of the work versus having, you know, picking, packing, and delivery done by the retailer, it, it, it helps to have the store as a central point of logistics for the customers and the, the operator. Mike Newman: Yeah, it's just, you know, this is the, the real, the real, it's just math. It's just, you know, like, at the, at the end of the day, it's fun to work in a category on a product that has the potential for social value and reducing impact, but it only happens with scale and scale only happens if it's a good business and it makes economic sense. So those are the sort of building blocks of how you create scale and how you have economic success is logistics are expensive. You got to figure out your way through that. And, and having a consumer play a part is, has been one important strategy. Keith Anderson: Are there other things that you can do to increase the, number of circulations? Is traceability a big part of this? Are, are you, you know, do you track individual assets and say, "hey, we actually know where it is," is that, does that pay back? Mike Newman: Somewhat. It has to be the icing, though. It can't be the cake. So, that kind of stuff like data and tracking, is, I think the instinct of a lot of reuse companies has been, well, the basic model isn't cost effective today, so, we're going to create other sources of value like through data. And it's so you're over, you're just adding complications and layers to the process. And, if the, and that's usually not a very good business strategy is like, "well, my basic thing doesn't work. So let me make it more complicated and harder and more expensive. And then somehow I'm going to reach some point where I'm crossing a threshold and all of a sudden it's victory." I try and run in the exact opposite direction and say like, what is the dead simplest thing we can do here, to make this a viable approach? You know, cardboard is dumb and cheap and easy, which is what makes cardboard really great. You know, it's not like, so if I'm going to compete with dumb and cheap and easy, generally, I need to be dumb and cheap and easy. So like the base foundation for, I think, reuse needs to be like, "no, it just works because it works." Then you can layer in things like data and customer engagement and things like that, you know, ways of building a brand loyalty that just make it even that much better. They better be the icing. Otherwise, I think, you know, the evidence is pretty strong that it, it's not sufficient to take a bad model and make it a good, it takes a good model and it makes it a better model when you have that in place. So, and the other thing I would say is that if you have a really highly effective circular system in effect. The tracking becomes like a lot less important because they just stay in circulation. You don't need to invest in a lot of active management of the asset because the asset is doing what it's supposed to be doing. So a good system negates the need for a lot of active management and that's our goal because it's cheaper. So in general, everything is individually barcoded. We have RFID packaging for some clients, etc. But that becomes sort of the fallback rather than, you know, the star of the show. Keith Anderson: Fair enough. So what is it then that defines a functional efficient, you know, in the absence of those things, what sets you up for success? Mike Newman: I, I think it, it is that, it's a simple process that, you know, the, the users are trained on and then they just execute. And, um that's true, certainly for the internal logistics, you know, clients like Vuori or Happy Returns that UPS just bought who use our packaging for the forward and back. You spend 10 minutes training them on what you do with the box, and then they just do it. You know, and that's that, and they keep going, and we have, you know, we have, with Happy Returns, we have boxes that we made for them three, four years ago that are still in circulation. And I know because I'll go into one of their drop locations and I'll see the box behind the counter and I can tell by the design that that's one we made over three years ago for them because the designs have evolved and the branding's evolved. And so, and they don't actively track each box and keep an eye on how many cycles it's had, right? Because they've just learned it. They don't have to. And on the consumer side, it's similar, like with the reasonable shopping bag programs. The initial instinct was okay, "we need to have an app, and they're going to download the app, and there's going to be this whole thing, and they're going to have a coupon, and they're going to scan, and we're going to scan the bag out, and we're going to scan the bag in, and everyone's going to know all the stuff," and that just adds a lot of layers of, of, of cost and, and organization and training, and it doesn't move the needle that much, you have to just align it to how consumers are living their lives, and they're going to do the thing, they may do it less, and but the cost of implementing it is so much lower and the cost of running that program is so much lower that you're, you're ahead of the game compared to some profound behavior change app-driven Silicon Valley dream utopia future. It just, it's not generally going to pay off. Keith Anderson: Even if there's augmented reality involved? Mike Newman: I know it's a, well, the internal joke Keith Anderson: What if it's powered by AI? Mike Newman: I had a joke with the, well, I had a joke with the team that I said, "I wonder how long it'll be until somebody in the reuse community posts about how they're implementing AI for their reuse." And it was not even a day. I mean, that was the thing that was insane. It was not even a day until I, someone saw someone posting how AI was somehow magically now going to make reuse work where it hasn't. Good luck. That's not, that's not what I'm doing. Keith Anderson: Yeah. I don't want to take the conversation too far in that direction, but there's, there's always a buzzword that finds its way into pretty much every business model. Mike Newman: Well, yeah, I mean, before we were, we had people asking us if we were using blockchain. So, yeah, it's the same. It's always something new. Yeah. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Well, this has been fantastic. If folks want to learn more about Returnity or get in touch with you, where would you send them? Mike Newman: We'd love for people to check out our site. It's returnity.co. You can email us through there and reach out. You know, I'd love to, love to chat about anyone interested in the space. And yeah, thanks for all the great questions. Keith Anderson: Thanks again. Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=xnykvyjn…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

Learn more about David Kat: Wastless’s website Link to David’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 Episode resources: Tackling the 1.6-Billion-Ton Food Loss and Waste Crisis | Boston Consulting Group Why is one-third of our food wasted worldwide? | UC Davis If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm Keith Anderson. And when a guest tells me one of the things they're most looking forward to over the next few years is the dawn of 2D barcodes. I know we have a winner on our hands. But seriously, this episode has something for everybody. AI, dynamic pricing, electronic shelf labels, 2D barcodes. My guest is David Kat, SVP Business Development for Wasteless, which is using AI to dynamically price and mark down perishables, helping grocers sell what they otherwise might have wasted. David has been with the business nearly since its founding, and he's got a really informed perspective on the challenges and the opportunities of using dynamic pricing and markdowns to, help mitigate food waste in brick and mortar grocery in a way that is really accretive to earnings. So I'm excited for you to hear from David and get to know Wasteless. David, good to see you. Thanks so much for joining the show. David Kat: Thanks, Keith. Great, being here, from, Amsterdam. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I appreciate the time difference. Scheduling is always an adventure and it's good to have you with us. So I thought you could kick us off just by telling us a bit about how you ended up at Wasteless in your career. David Kat: Yeah. So I've, so I'm an Amsterdam native. I lived in London for a couple of years in Paris. Started in publishing right when, at the advent of the internet. So, I worked with a company that eventually bought AC Nielsen, and I was, an online publisher there. And then like working with data started a couple of, companies of my own. And then I was approached by one of the, one of the founders of a company a founder. who I knew from a previous company, and he asked me to help him. And, it's Odette Omar. He had just, exited a data for foods company, an IoT company. They sold it to AB InBev, the biggest beer brewer in the world. And he told me of his, findings in data for food, told me that, data for food is, can be extremely profitable, but that, he was not, in this world to make big, brewers even more profitable, in the long run. So, and he saw that in the food system, there's a couple of, real issues that are hurting the entire planet, and we'll, we'll, we'll go into that in a second. And he said food waste, even in, in, in the beer, like bars and restaurants is a huge thing. And then he started investigating, where, how the causes are of food waste. And he discovered that, in grocery retail, about almost 90 percent of food waste is caused by products running out of expiration date. And when you're a date of a food person and you hear the word expiration date, you might think that might be a date problem. There might also be a date solution. So, so they investigated and they come up, they realized that, if you go to your local supermarkets, there's, food with different dates and the same price. So different values, but the same price. And that's, that's really driving food waste. So he asked me to investigate and, well, lo and behold, before I knew it, I joined as, right at the start. We had our first beta and I've been with the company now for six years. Keith Anderson: That's great. So for those that may not be as familiar with what Wasteless does, can you just walk us through the technology and where it fits into a grocer's operations? David Kat: Sure. So, you know, grocers, there's a lot to admire in what grocers do. it's a tremendously, it's a, it's it's a tremendous job to get all these products at the right time, at the right moment in a, grocer to keep the shelves filled. But in this tremendous, Herculean, labor, something goes tremendously wrong as well. Supermarkets, grocers know about the inventory, know about quantities, and they have no visibility whatsoever on the freshness of their fresh produce. And that's a, massive problem that surely we'll, discuss. We are solving that massive problem by applying dynamic markdowns, optimal pricing. So we're looking at the vintage, the expiration date that is most likely to expire on the shelf. And we do price experiments, multiple per day, per item, where we're trying to get an item sold. Rather than let it expire on the shelf, and there is billions for supermarkets to be earned by selling foods that they would otherwise discard. Keith Anderson: So, I heard you say fresh. Are you focused entirely on perishables or are you also working with shelf stable foods that have an expiry date or a best by date? David Kat: So, what we're seeing is that, food waste is a massive problem, and it's also a massive opportunity. Food waste is mostly, it occurs mostly in products that have a shelf life of between two up to 30 days. So our algorithm, our reinforcement model, so it's, an, it's self improving machine learning model. Gives like the, low hanging fruit is really in, in perishables. Shelf stable is kind of a, like a bonus, but we, were not going to make those kind of return on investments,, on, on the cookies that we would be, that we would do on, on, meat, dairy, ready made meals, convenience food. Keith Anderson: Got it. And you said that the grocers don't often have an idea of when these goods are going to expire. I, I assume in a conventional operating model, they've got staff that are going and inspecting the produce on a daily basis. Where does the data in your platform come from? David Kat: Yeah. So, I love it where you, that you're very familiar, obviously, with, with the way crosses work. So they're sending staff on a daily basis to, to check on the, inventory, meaning that they, that you're going to make the same mistakes day in, day out, the, problems that you're finding today in, expiring products, you're also going to find tomorrow. So it's, it's very repetitive. We have a, various ways of, of, of, sucking up that data from the system, from the, retailer system. So we're going to be, we're using replenishment data. We're using letdown messages. So we know what goes into the shelf, onto the shelf, into the store. Stores typically lack level granularity where you can see not just quantities, but also the time dimension of your inventory. And to prove a business case, we have to collect the data manually, which is a 10, 15 minute job per day. It's really part of the gross routine. That way we prove a business case that gives an ROI of 10 or 15X. And then you get into, a conversation, a partnership with a retailer where you're, where we're showing that actually that manual collection of data is unnecessary and we're going to be integrating in more parts of the business to understand, to actually get automatic feeds of stock in and of stock out, meaning, replenishment, onboarding, but also, POS data and sales data. Because if we know that a, an item that we mark down is sold, we see that as a successful price experiment and it reinforces our model. Keith Anderson: So. I think many folks may be familiar with some of the, sort of third party, customer facing platforms that are, doing dynamic markdowns, through a stand alone application or something. Let's talk a little bit about how this comes to life through, an online grocer's own site and, then secondly through the store. You know, this is, happening when somebody is browsing the online grocery site and they're seeing, depending on the, how close to the expiry date, they're seeing these prices in the context that they're typically shopping in, correct? David Kat: Yeah. Well, we, are focused on, on, brick and mortar, grocery retail. Because there, the food waste problem is a, lot more pressing than in, well run, online, grocers, you know, a company like Ocado or Picnic here in the Netherlands, they actually know exactly, they have a lot more data and a lot more insights and they do the picking themselves. The real problem occurs. When you have a, physical shopper, a consumer that goes onto the shelf, your neatly stacked shelf and is like going to the back of the back of the shelf, rips everything apart because they don't like the shelf life that's left on the, customer facing, side of the, of the shelf. So we, and we see that in those retailers, not only is about 90 percent of their food waste, caused by products running out of expiration date. It's a massively costly problem. If you go in the US, and this is Refed Deloitte data, the, this is data from 2019, the cost price, the purchasing price of the foods that US retailers,waste, is, oh, it's like around, it's around $18. 2 billion. However, if you compare that to the EBIT, the combined EBIT of those US retailers, the EBIT is only $9 billion. So the purchasing price of what they're throwing out is double their EBIT. Well, then you have a, if I tell this to a, CFO or a CEO you, get their attention. Because what we do is we don't just sell the wasted foods, you don't just sell it at cost price, you sell it with a margin. So we're actually able to, to sell it with a substantial margin. We just mark down by 20, 25 percent on average. And we prevent more than half of the food waste. So that's a, significant, positive impact on your bottom line. to put that in perspective, EY or Sinyan. In Germany calculated that grocery retailers with dynamic pricing, like we do, can improve their EBITs by 10%. And we're, actually, with US retailers even, we're, showing that it's more than 10 percent EBIT growth. Keith Anderson: You know, it's interesting, you mentioned the EY study. I also saw an academic study. That, I think was done in partnership with Mariano's and Roundy's here in the U.S. that similarly found that, dynamic pricing was more effective than some of the other approaches to mitigating food waste. I don't know if you saw the same study. David Kat: Yeah. From, out of, U. S., UC Davis in San Diego, I think Keith Anderson: I think so. I'd have to check my notes, but, I think so. So David Kat: We contribute data to that. I mean, if it's UC Davis, we contributed, data from our retailers to, to actually substantiate those, those, those claims. Keith Anderson: gotcha. So in a brick and mortar grocery environment. One question I have is about the price execution. That is, you know, if you're somewhat dynamically marking down, it, it strikes me if you're in a chain that's got electronic shelf labels and you can link to those, it's pretty straightforward, but how is it happening in the formats that don't have those yet? David Kat: Yeah. So, electronic shelf labels really make this straightforward and those are often difficult, investment decisions. And we are obviously changing the paradigm on the, return on investment on those, if you manage to leverage them. In US retailers that we're working with at the moment, in the Midwest, , we're, using, we were actually, upgrading their existing markdown process. So where they would usually put a sticker with 50 percent discount or 40 percent discounts. They're scanning the, items, they're telling us the, actual inventory and the, shelf life of that, inventory, and we then print the stickers. It's by no means ideal because it's, you know, it's, you need staff training, et cetera. However, we're using this to, to prove a tremendous business case where we're, we're increasing margins substantially. And then you can take additional steps to actually get more data into the food system. And I wholeheartedly believe that more data in the food system will help this, tremendous industry to, to make, a next step. And it's a required next step, because margins are low and it's, all, okay because the volumes are so massive. But, imagine you you can lift your margins by. 20, 30, 40, 50 percent. Then suddenly the entire paradigm of food pricing and, paying suppliers and even food waste are, changing. And this is something that we're really seeing happening slowly, but pretty surely. Keith Anderson: Have you learned much about the consumer response? That's the other thing that I, see about some of these, dynamic markdown and pricing models is, particularly in certain economic environments, there seems to be a lot of consumer demand for product that's, still good, but they're finding it at a savings. You know, we, just did a episode with, a recently funded company based in the U. S., Marty, that's sort of a national, closeout platform for shelf stable foods. But when you look at their value proposition, it's so focused on the pretty extreme savings they're offering to shoppers. Are you seeing something similar? David Kat: You don't even need pretty extreme savings on, fresh food. But this is exactly what we do. So we gauge all the time the price elasticity of perishable fresh food, fresh produce, not just, but with a, with the additional insights of, of shelf life. So we call this freshness sensitivity. It's the likelihood of a consumer to forego a little bit of freshness or a little bit of shelf life for a slightly lower price. And we run price experiments on a continuous basis. If you have electronic shelf labels as a retailer, we would do this three, four times a day. And we're trying to find the sweet spot where price and consumer appetite meet. And it changes all the time, and it's specific per store, per product, time of day, of the week. And we're, we're, and this is where really, where reinforcement learning and AI steps in, because it's humanly impossible, even if you're a very, experienced supermarket, associate to exactly price those thousands of items, at the exact right time. And that's what we do. And AI can, can do this, can support the, associates. And can, if you, if, retailers integrate, can actually do this completely automatically so you can free up associates to deliver more services, because that's, that's what, AI ideally, obviously, achieves. Keith Anderson: Well, that raises a good point. I, I confess, I'm not up to speed. The way I once was on dynamic pricing, but that balance, between sort of, human intervention and, autopilot for as long as I've been working in this area has been an interesting topic. Are there rules based, constraints that your customers are putting on what the platform can do? Are you looking at cross elasticities with other products or on a basket level? I mean, this, dynamic pricing world can get pretty sophisticated and complicated pretty quickly. David Kat: Yeah, So human intervention or business rules,, are typically gut feel, so we try to dissuade them as much as possible. Obviously, we won't, mark down beyond a certain discount percentage, so that would, there will always be like a threshold there. But for example, you know, the influence of the weather, you can't write a business rule what happens if there's a blizzard or there isn't a blizzard. It's because Imagine, like, then you would have to kind of weigh, if the blizzards last 12 hours, what's the, weight factor as opposed to 24 hours. And when it's like, you know, so it's, so we tend to use as little business rules as possible. The core of the matter is that it has to always fit with the strategy and the policy and the philosophy of the retailer. So the retailer has a certain way of dealing with this customer. That's what they really know best. And that's really their, that's a tremendous asset that we will leverage. And then we leverage it with our data insights where we try to, mark down as little as possible. And as little as, like, so we try to extend discounts that are, the minimum that we can get away with. And at the exact right moment, because no, no retailers interested in, in, in extending discounts in the blind. Keith Anderson: Yeah, beyond where you David Kat: By the way is what they're doing at the moment. They're discounting food that they don't really have to discount just because it's policy. Keith Anderson: Yeah. Yeah. And when you say, you know, they've got their strategy and it integrates or it aligns with their strategy. Does that include things like competitive pricing? Are you linking in any way to a loyalty program? To to David Kat: We haven't yet, but obviously that's really where the, sweet spot is. So once you have data in the food system, you can leverage the data, upstream and downstream. Imagine, you know, I have two daughters. Imagine that, every Monday night, I shop and I don't, I buy four times the minced meat amount that I buy on any other day in the week. It's because my girls come back from, soccer training and bring back four friends. I'm, cooking pasta bolognese. That pasta bolognese doesn't need a shelf life of another five days because it's going to be devoured in four hours time. So if you add loyalty card data, you see that I am, my appetite for discounted food, in large quantities is bigger on a Monday. So, and you can extend, if you're not talking about meat, but other foodstuffs, you can extend points for sustainable purchasing behavior, or you can, you can actually, send people, messages that their favorite food is at the discount if you shop tonight. So there's, once you work it into the loyalty program, then, individualized, personalized, policies that take freshness of, perishable items into account suddenly become a reality. And that's, that's where we're headed, but we haven't done those cases yet. So if any of your, any of your, your, your fan base is interested, we're, we're, extremely keen as well. Keith Anderson: Opportunity to be a first mover? You've mentioned the, David Kat: be a good, mover. It's just, it's not just about being good at first, it's about being, doing it right. Keith Anderson: Fair enough. Yeah, I, I agree. You you've mentioned the value of data a few times, and we've, we've really focused so far on the grocery side of the equation. Is there value in this data for suppliers? David Kat: Definitely, and the low hanging fruit is for integrated supermarkets. Where they're over dimensioning, food production because they, you don't, you know, you don't want, empty shelves. So an integrated supermarket is losing every step of the way if you're going, going upstream, because of this lack of data. So we've been talking to CIOs of some of the largest retailers in the world that have really, they really got this, that you could really, we had a discussion, they asked a couple of questions and they suddenly understood that they could actually turn part of their supply chain around into a more demand driven production system. But also we're, seeing that a lot of producers, and this is, maybe difficult to wrap your head around, but a lot of suppliers, know that a substantial part of what they're, what they're producing is never going to be, consumed. But they also know that if they start consuming to match demand in a better way, that they can actually produce less and, and obtain higher prices per quantity per unit. So, it's a bit of a perverse system where you're just, focused on, on. quantities and production and sales. Once you start understanding collaborating around data, there's a tremendous opportunity that, by the way, Boston Consultancy Group calculated already in August 2019, they calculated that more, collaboration around data in the food system is a 400 billion opportunity. It's a very useful study and, I'm, I'm, I try to quote it at least once a day. So, I ticked my box for today. Keith Anderson: I can't believe that I, haven't come across that one because, I, I've also spent a lot of my career focused on data and food and CPG, David Kat: I'll share the report so maybe you can, you can stick it in the notes for the podcast. Keith Anderson: That would be great, along with the other study that you mentioned, you contributed to anything like that, that you think would help enrich, listeners understanding of this topic and what's working. I think we're always happy to include. David Kat: That's a very valuable remark because this is not just marketing fluff. It's not just PowerPoints and, and, and, you know, there's a scientific basis underpinning it. So also our models are, developed, by a professor in, UC Davis. And that's why we contribute a lot of our data to academia because it's, no good that a supplier like us, you know, like a software company, blows their own, trumpet. It's really about verifying data, because that's the only way that we'll become smarter and get rid of this scourge of food waste, one day. Food waste, you know, the WWF calculated that up to 40 percent of all the food produced is never consumed. And, then if you do the math, you understand that about 11 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions are wasted food. So, so every, you know, every, tangible, scalable impactful reduction that we can achieve as, there's a lot of leverage, a lot of minus there. Keith Anderson: Yeah, agreed. it's already emerged as, one of maybe five major themes and what we're focused on and as I'm sure you know, a huge percentage of food waste happens at the household level, but there's a lot that happens upstream and so much of what I think we find fascinating are these, mechanisms that are easily integrated and embedded in the food chain. Ways that we already know, people shop and buy and consume that, you know, are still economically and commercially viable, and in, in some cases, not just viable, but, you know, really accretive to margins and earnings and, work with, work with existing behaviors. So, obviously, some of what we're going to have to do is going to involve significantly changed behavior, either on the consumer's part or the ways that we work. But these are really interesting areas where you're not changing what you're doing so fundamentally, but you're still able to make an impact. David Kat: Sure. And the beauty about the food system is that as a consumer, you can make a decision three times a day and basically preventing food waste is, there's a double, it's, you know, it's a double whammy. Because you save money and you can feel good about it as well. So there's really this, dopamine rush, by finding a good offer, finding a good discount for something you want to eat anyway, or that you, that really whets your appetite, but that you also know that it's, completely, or not completely, but it's, guilt free. It is less guilt than I'm not the, I shouldn't even talk about guilt, but it kind of, you know, you're doing, it, you're doing something good while you're also taking good care of your family or your friends. Keith Anderson: I mean, that, that actually highlights something that I hadn't thought about until you mentioned it and we haven't discussed. Is this being communicated to the shopper in any way beyond simply a different price than earlier in the day or yesterday? David Kat: Typically it is so, and, and we help retailers with the marketing idea of it. So we have marketing in Spanish and Italian and in all these countries where we're active. But not always. Some retailers, they don't really want to talk about sustainability. They don't really want to talk about food waste. They just want to talk about value. But more and more demographics are also in the U.S, are interested in, you know, getting a good deal for doing something, for doing a good act. So, I really think it's very strong. Being sustainable, it doesn't make things more expensive. You know, you don't have to buy a Tesla to be sustainable. You can also just eat differently. And, and, and, and actually the impact is a lot larger and a lot more immediate. So it's, so, so saving money and saving the planet is really within grasp of, of large swaths of the population. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I, I wonder if there are examples that we can share with, the audience of what it looks like, that might be interesting. And, David Kat: show you some photos. I'll show you some photos from Germany. From Italy. Yeah. It, sounds really beautiful in Italian. It's like sprezzatura alimentaria, food waste. That's sounds a lot more poetic, doesn't it? Keith Anderson: Well, and, I think it's interesting, even if there's no reference to food waste or sustainability, part of my curiosity is, are shoppers aware that the price is lower? Is this all based on their own mental price anchors? David Kat: They're made aware because you're, you give them the, option. Do you want a product with a longer shelf life? That you can stick in the back of your fridge or are you going to eat a sandwich anyway today or a piece of meat anyway in two days and you don't really need it to have another five days Keith Anderson: Yeah, I got it. David Kat: and that's really what we do. So the freshness sensitivity is making people aware of how special it is that we have, that we're able to put food on our tables. How that it's, not just, it's not just a given, it's really something that, that, that, that has to be valued. And, we're, we're showing that, that price reflects that freshness, as well. So it's, it's purely economical, but there's also a very strong psychological, marketing angle to it. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Keith Anderson: Well, I wish we had more time, David, because now you've got me thinking about hunger and how that fits into all of this, but unfortunately, we're going to have to leave it there. If people want to connect with you or learn more about Wasteless, where would you direct them? David Kat: You can go to wasteless.com or email me at david@wasteless.com or, look us up on the, on LinkedIn. But we're going to be at, I just returned from NRF in New York. We're going to be there as well. We're very active in the U.S. So, um, Keith Anderson: Will you be at any other conferences over the next few months? David Kat: My CEO, was just at, was at FMI, this week, last week. I'm thinking of going to a Refed conference. Yes. So any suggestions that anywhere where you're going and where you think we should, we should be, continuing this conversation with a couple of decision makers? Keith Anderson: This is not an advertisement, but I'll be at Shoptalk in Vegas in March, and, they have a sister event that is typically in September or October, if memory serves. Well, that's true, but they run another one in the U.S. called Grocery Shop, that's even more targeted. There's food tracks at the big one, but, you know, that's one to our discussion before we started recording. You, you won't typically find sustainability practitioners or a big focus on sustainability as a discipline, but it is one of the events where a lot of the folks, to your point, with decision rights and budgets, convene. And so, anyway, David Kat: Well, I, anyway, I prefer to talk about enhancing performance of retailers by preventing food waste rather than the other way around. It's food waste is really, it's really where you can make a tremendous financial impact and reduce your carbon footprint. But it's the financial impact that is really the driver. So let's, see if we can get something together for, forDavid Kat, SVP Business Development of Wasteless grocery shopping, after the summer. Keith Anderson: There you go. Maybe we'll see you there. Well, David, thanks again for joining. David Kat: Thanks very much for, for inviting us, for having us, and, I'll, I'll make sure that there's some, links, to, to research, in the, in the line of notes. Thanks very much. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=68rk2w6n…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

In this episode, Keith Anderson interviews Kari Morris, co-founder of Martie, a venture-backed online surplus discount store specializing in shelf-stable groceries. Kari shares the company's inception, emphasizing its mission to address surplus in the food industry. The conversation explores Martie's rapid evolution, its retention mode, and the strategic balance between discount and higher AUR items. Kari also discusses customer engagement through live shopping events, the role of influencers in their model, and Martie's unique approach to capturing a new customer base. Learn more about Kari Morris: Link to Martie's website Link to Kari's LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e-commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm Keith Anderson, and my guest today is Kari Morris, a serial entrepreneur, but most recently co-founder of Martie. Which is a just venture backed, online, surplus discount store for the moment for shelf stable groceries, but who knows what the future holds. And I find this entire, surplus grocery space so fascinating because in the landscape of solutions for Decarbonizing our industry, they are among those that are the most commercially viable. That is, consumers love them because, as you'll learn about Martie, they can get great food products anywhere from 40 to 60 percent off. What they're, maybe even more, what they're used to paying in conventional brick and mortar grocery stores. The suppliers love them because they get to recover some revenue of inventory that otherwise might have gone to waste. And it, it's a good business for Martie as well. And all of that is independent of some of the, climate and environmental benefits. So I was really eager to learn more about Martie and how they arrived at the business model that they're in and where they see it playing alongside some of the other models that exist. And I learned a ton. So I'm excited for you to hear more from Kari Morris, co-founder at Martie. Kari it's great to see you. Congrats on the fundraise and thanks so much for joining us. Kari Morris: Thanks so much for having me. Keith Anderson: Well, fundraisers are always exciting. And when I first saw the news, I was mistaken. I thought the company was just launching, but in fact, the company's been around for a few years. I thought maybe to start, you could tell us a little bit about Your journey to co-founding the company and then as we get to the funding, maybe talk a bit about the evolution from then to now. Kari Morris: Yeah. Yeah, of course. So, Martie really is, uh, born out of necessity. My background really is in food production. I had a brand called Morris Kitchen in New York about 10 years ago, producing small batch syrups, cocktail mixers, and, sort of found my way to Los Angeles after selling the company. I met my co-founder, Luis Fritjofsson, and she and I, started working on some concepts in food, building CPG brands, that were direct to consumer, and really sort of like pushing, pushing that envelope of what we could do with, with influencers, which was, which was, which was interesting. We found ourselves in December sitting on quite a big load of ginger holiday cookie mix, which we knew come January, we weren't going to have a place to sell it. So we sat there and we thought for a minute and, and, you know, our goal always was to really push the envelope in the food industry. Really do something that was meaningful, impactful, was going to We wanted to be a way to bring better for you brands and quality ingredients to the masses. We sort of knew at that moment that we weren't going to be able to push to this next level, with our own sort of CPG brands. We sold off the holiday cookie mix and the wheels started turning. And about four months later, we had created, the first sort of iteration and, and deck for Martie and went out to fundraise on this new concept. And about four months after that, we launched our site. So I think that's, that's sort of like the, the initial phase, the push into, concept to reality. It happened pretty quickly for us in 2021. Keith Anderson: Four months is pretty quick. Kari Morris: Yeah. Yeah. We, we move fast. We move fast. And so we really set, we, we set out really to, to find brands that had this product to really create like the value prop around needing to offload, but also this is still good quality food and we can offer it to our customers at a discount. So better for you brands, but really like. Meeting, meeting the masses where they are, offering discount. At the time we were going through COVID, there were supply chain issues. There was a lot of inventory available. People were getting very comfortable with shopping online. And so we sort of hit this spot where we loaded an inventory. We put it up on the site and we, you know, we kind of instantly found our, our customer. And started to then build out, you know, the value prop even more to say, well, what are the products and what's the product mix that we need to sustain within this, to really get people to come back every month? Like, what is that retention model that we have that's really sticky? And Martie is a shelf stable. We, we are grocery first and foremost. And. So within that, we really stuck to like, those core shelf stable grocery items that we knew people would come back for. Your coffees, cereals, nut butters, jerkies, fruits, nuts, like snacks. So much of, you know, that CPG marketplace, especially with better food brands, is dominated by snack. And so, we leaned into that pretty heavy, and Really, yeah, built out the model on that, first and foremost. Keith Anderson: So, you've already mentioned the retention model and driving that return trip. Doesn't look like there's a membership at the moment, is that something you considered? Kari Morris: Absolutely, yeah. Yeah, it's, it's, it's something that we believe will benefit our customers. If not today, in the near future. In terms of what, you know, adding more value and sort of creating. Creating the ability for, for members to have more perks, whether it be discounted shipping rates or, first dibs on limited products that we have. Those things all sort of get baked into the model, but for now it's really, as we build that SKU count and, you know, find our footing there, I think it's, it's more important for us to allow people to come in and shop and learn what Mart Keith Anderson: Makes sense. And you mentioned building the skew count. Roughly, how many skews are in the assortment? I'm sure it's a moving target, just given the nature of the model, but roughly how many skews? Kari Morris: Yeah. Right now we're, we hover around 500. And so for, for grocery, that's quite small. When you think about like center store shelf stable, it can be, you know, up to 3000. So we're, we're, we're just sort of crack cracking that, and figuring out what are the things that were critical to the model. Keith Anderson: And how do you think about what optimal might be? Is it a function of What you can source based on who has surplus inventory, is there a sweet spot where you've got enough selection that, you're driving the Return frequency that you're looking for, or? Kari Morris: It's a, yeah, it's a, it's, it's a good, it's a good question. And it's sort of a moving target. You know, we, we need to, we need to put every order in a box and send it to your house. So as you can imagine, we have to sort of optimize that box. So we're looking to sort of have a product mix that allows us to get people great value, whether it's through discount or, you know, lower priced groceries. But then also some higher AUR items that help balance out that basket and get us to a place where. All of a sudden the unit economics makes sense for us to then put a label on it and ship it to your door. So core categories like we've talked about are, you know, essential, coffees. Bars, higher AUR items. We always want to have, plenty of these items so that when you come back to Martie, if you've bought it before, the site is going to optimize to show you that again. We have implemented some tools in the site experience, so when you are logged in, based on what you've purchased in the, in previous, orders, we'll start to feed you things that are more customized to you. Do you have kids? Do you have a pet? Those things will start to be in your feed more, so sort of like learning who the customer is and then feeding them the right product mix. That is a retention play, but also. Yeah, just looking at like that mix of AUR and making sure that like, when you check out, we've done our best to try and get you into one single box with a high AOV. And then you're going to go through that in about 30 to 45 days and come back. We kind of think of it as like shop Martie first. So of course you're not going to get your produce or you're frozen. But if you scan the site before you go to the grocery store, chances are you're going to be able to fill your basket with things that you would otherwise buy. And you're going to have a really nice feel good moment when you say, I just saved 50 or you know, whatever that moment, that total cash value is, it's real and it's a really like kind of fun moment to fold that into the shopping mix for the customer and really see that value. Keith Anderson: I, I think you've definitely got the treasure hunt, dynamic going for you, and I think that there's all kinds of discount models, but as I browse the site, to your point about the, materiality of, of the savings, I think it, it's a clear contrast to a lot of the discounting that You see these days in the sense that it's a pretty significant savings per item. You mentioned building baskets and unit economics. There's no order minimbut there is a minimum for free shipping. Is that right? Kari Morris: So it's 25 to check out Keith Anderson: Okay. So there's a 25 minimum. Gotcha. Kari Morris: then 50 for free shipping. Keith Anderson: And are there any other behavioral nudges or incentives you're using to keep growing the basket? Or is it for the moment, mostly about inspiration and personalization? Kari Morris: Yeah, there, there, there's some tools that we have in terms of, as you're checking out, we, we have sort of built in suggested for you, sort of moving inventory through that, you know, isn't slated to sell through those will get discounted. Those higher discounts always move very quickly for us. So we use those as incentivizing tools and emails and push notifications to sort of get people, over the line, if you will. And then using back in stocks as well on like brand level or category level. Keith Anderson: Oh, got it. So if something that I saw and was interested in, is no longer available, I can set a notification or is it happening automatically? Kari Morris: Um, It's not happening automatically yet, but it's something that we will push out as we get things back in. So, Peace Coffee sells out really well. When we get it back in, we will send out a push notification for those who purchased in the past. so much for Keith Anderson: And I, I also see things like, you know, Kari Morris: we look Keith Anderson: the detail page. So somebody that is on the fence can see if, if they don't act now, they might miss it. One aspect of the model that you've mentioned that, I'd love to learn more about is the influencer side of things. I see the live shopping, section on the site, but maybe you can talk a bit more about the role that influencers play in the, in the model. Kari Morris: Mhmm, yeah. Uhm. What we actually... we, we use more of an affiliates model. We, we've seen a lot of organic growth through those channels. Uhm. The, the live shopping is really cool. It is, for us it's like a way to really engage with the customer and I think the way that I like to think about it is like at Home Shopping Network, modernized. But really it's a way for people to get to know some of the products we have. Because they're such a deep discount, I think it's important for us to really showcase those products and, give people an opportunity to ask questions and sort of validate that these are quality products. Just at a discount because they need to move quickly or, you know, needed to find a new supply chain channel. So it's, it's, the live shopping really is like a, it's a, a marketing play if you will. And it's sort of like an open, place for our, our community to come and ask questions and learn. And then, yeah, affiliates, influencers, you know, that, it, it, it's a steady growth, and the more that we get out there, the more that it sort of snowballs and takes. It takes on a life of its own. We do use a referral program. So there's a give 10, get 10. Which is an easy way for people to, to kind of latch on and try before you buy. Or, you know, try the product and try the service. And, yeah, get a little cash back in your pocket for making the recommendation. So, yeah, all of these sort of play into our, our overall capturing new customer model. Keith Anderson: And think I saw in the fundraise announcement that there may be ambitions or plans to broaden into other categories. Is there anything you want to share about that? Kari Morris: Yeah. It kind of goes back to that, product mix and talking about what is our customer looking for? Where are they looking to save? What helps us continue to offer the best discounts on grocery and still make the model work? Right? So you think about like health, beauty, home goods. Typically the margins there are much stronger than you'll see in food. And so as a whole, as a basket, when you balance those out, it helps everything come together in a more sustainable way for, for us as a business, because at the end of the day, we really want to continue to offer quality foods at a great discount. In order to do that and ship it to your home, we have to continue to innovate what that means to us as a company and how we can continue to add value, keep those discounts incredibly high for the customer. And yeah, work on that, that, that AOV basket mix. Keith Anderson: Yeah, it's sort of the story of, modern retailing history in a sense. You know, marrying the high velocity consumables with the high margin non consumables or non edible consumables. So the, the slogan or the tagline is savings for the pocket and the planet. Maybe we can spend a little time unpacking what role some of those principles play in, you know, everything from how you've decided what to carry to how you operate and what are some of the savings for the planet. Kari Morris: Yeah. Yeah. So big picture, I think, you know, these numbers are, are pretty staggering, but 38 percent of food in the U. S. goes unsold or uneaten, right? So there's a lot of opportunity to improve that. And we all play a part. A lot of that's happening, you know, at the farm, foods that don't even make it to market, some of it's happening, sort of more in our bucket, which is, post production and on the way to grocery channels, and that's where Martie really has an opportunity to help, and then, you know, some of that's happening at home. So, I think, for me, Martie plays, plays a role in this in part by educating the consumer about why this food exists here. It fell off the supply chain for a reason, and it's perfectly good food, and you're getting it at a discount, right? So educating the consumer about that, and as well as, expiration dates for Best Buys. And sort of giving, like, empowering our customer to know that, like, just because something says Best Buy, It doesn't mean you need to throw it in the trash, right? So we can get more comfortable with pushing those limits and opening up, like, what we're comfortable with in terms of best buys. And I think there's a lot of education that can still happen there. And so that, that's something that we really like to push through the site experience, through Martie, who is our, our Earth mascot, you know, the idea is really that he's there to help guide you through and learn about food waste and, and how to really like feel like you have a part that you can play to help, move the needle here. And on the vendor side, the supply side, you know, that a lot of these brands we work with are just emerging. They're, they're finding their footing within this, this landscape of food and they've chosen to really invest in, in more sound. Sustainable supply chains, ingredients, packaging, et cetera. They, they're, you know, they're competing with, the larger CPG portfolios that have the shelf space. They're paying to, you know, to be on the shelf and to hold that space down and, It's, it's challenging, right? So, Martie is a way for them to reach new audiences, which they wouldn't, might, might not otherwise reach, and really to take excess inventory, from a failed purchase order from a store, seasonal products, or things that just didn't sell through and have kind of come to their last, expiration date. Line where it can no longer be sold in a traditional grocery store. So we're talking about maybe 60 days to expiration or best buy. That product through Mari, they can realize some cash. Typically if they were to donate this product, there wouldn't be like a tax benefit. At, at early stage, you know, CPG brands. So we can turn around, pick up the product. Give them cash, allow them to continue to sustain their next production run, focusing again on the products that are thriving for them, right? So there's always going to be a need for balancing inventory, in this space. And, so for those brands that are investing in better ingredients, It's, it's really an opportunity for them to thrive. Keith Anderson: Is, is there a set of criteria that you've established that, a brand has to clear in order to play on the platform. Kari Morris: We kind of let our customers drive that, you know, what are they looking for? What are they coming back for and asking for? That will help us decide whether or not we want to bring a brand on site. We do have some larger, more commercial products. And. You know, from where we sit, that, that's okay. We don't, we don't discriminate on food. We want to get as much food as we can into as many hands as we can. So while we might focus on some quality, we're not going to say no because, because of a specific ingredient, you know, we have our values, but we're, we're really here to say food should not go to waste. It shouldn't end up in a landfill. It should be distributed and eaten. Especially at a discount when people need it, Keith Anderson: Yeah, as I, as you and I were speaking before we started recording, one of the first things that occurred to me when I was getting acquainted with your model was it seems to sit nicely alongside some of the local store based, surplus food marketplaces like Flashfood, like Too Good To Go, even Olio, which is sort of a peer to peer, at least in the U.S., there really hasn't until, until Martie been sort of a national ship, centrally fulfilled, shelf stable, surplus food platform with, this kind of selection and, and, Value proposition. Kari Morris: right? And, and, you know, I'll say, like, closeout liquidation, opportunity buys, it's not new. It's, it's always been around. I think, and I'll speak for myself, being on the other side of it, it was, it was just sort of an icky word. And it was something that as, like, a supplier, a vendor, you wanted to stay away from, and you kind of wanted it, that inventory to just disappear or go away, and I think what Martie is doing is really taking the idea that surplus food or this like liquidation doesn't have to be, you don't have to be ashamed of it, it exists, and we can, you know, we can interact on the internet and talk about the discounts we have and why we have them in a way that, I think brands can now celebrate and instead of saying like, I'm going to just try and sell this off and I don't want to see it, it's going to be a, you know, lower price, we can talk about what we're doing here, you know, we're we're making a difference in, in, food waste, carbon emissions, you know, we can break it down to all the things that, you know, having food just end up in landfill does. And for our brands, you know, we can deliver back to them, you know, metrics around what they've done and how they've contributed and, and that's a fun share back for, for them as well. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Kari, if people want to, get in touch with you or learn more about you, where would you send them? Kari Morris: Gosh, good question. LinkedIn or, yeah, through the site, you can always get in touch with me, through our customer support. Keith Anderson: Very good. Well, thanks again so much for joining us. Kari Morris: Thanks so much for having me, Keith. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=68rk1jqn…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

Today's guest is Francesca Hahn, vice president for digital commerce, U.S. At Mondelēz, the multinational snack leader. Francesca is responsible for the strategy, vision, execution, covering everything about how Mondelēz brands are discovered, shopped for, purchased, fulfilled online, including two direct to consumer sites. Before Mondelēz she had roles of increasing responsibility in category management and sales, at Britax, Colgate-Palmolive (including the Hills Pet e-commerce team), Acosta Sales and Marketing, PepsiCo, & Diageo. Mondelēz recently added sustainability as its fourth strategic pillar, and Francesca is a sponsor of the sustainability team for the U.S. In this episode we discuss introducing sustainability across such a large enterprise, the intersection of sustainability and climate work and e-commerce. Learn more about Francesca Hahn: Link to the Mondelez Website Link to Francesca’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Subscribe to the Decarbonizing Commerce newsletter Learn more at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm Keith Anderson, and today's guest is Francesca Hahn, vice president for digital commerce, U.S. At Mondelēz, the multinational snack leader. And in that role, which, she started in April of 2021, Francesca is responsible for the strategy, vision, execution, covering everything about how Mondelēz brands are discovered, shopped for, purchased, fulfilled online, including two direct to consumer sites. And she's got a great career, even before Mondelēz with roles of increasing responsibility in category management at sales, at Britax, Colgate Palmolive, including the Hills Pet e commerce team, Acosta Sales and Marketing, PepsiCo, Diageo. And I was really interested in having Francesca on the show because Mondelēz recently added sustainability as its fourth strategic pillar. And Francesca is a sponsor of the sustainability team for the U.S. And I was really interested and curious to learn more about what it's like trying to, introduce sustainability across such a large enterprise, including to so many people who don't have sustainability in their titles, they aren't sustainability experts or full time practitioners. And given her personal interest and passion for the subject, I really wanted to hear from Francesca, how she thinks about the intersection of sustainability and climate work and e commerce. So we talk a lot about her own journey and trajectory into, roles dealing with sustainability and, how she and the rest of the organization are working to bring sustainability into the roles of everyone at the company. So I'm really excited for you to learn more from Francesca Hahn of Mondelēz. Francesca, good to see you. Thanks so much for joining us for the show. Francesca Hahn: Thanks for having me, Keith. Keith Anderson: Well, as regular listeners know, I love to start just by, helping people get to know you a little bit and your current trajectory and specifically how you became interested and involved in sustainability. So why don't we start there? Francesca Hahn: Sure. I have grown up in consumer packaged goods. I early in the career did category management when it was just exploding and then moved into sales leadership and center of excellence roles, did some company integrations, worked on some amazing brands at PepsiCo, at Colgate-Palmolive, at Britax, carseats and strollers, and now I'm at Mondelēz. I got into e commerce by accident about eight years ago. I was in Germany doing an integration of two companies, and we needed to create a little e commerce strategy, which became a Europe e commerce strategy, and then became a global, because at that point it was still fairly new. And, ended up doing e commerce for Hills Pet Food as my job, as it was emerging as a big thing at that moment, and have really enjoyed doing that for the last eight years. I now lead digital commerce for Mondelēz, the company known for Oreo, Sour Patch Kids, Toblerone, and many other amazing snacking brands. And I am responsible, or my team is responsible, for anything to do with finding, learning, buying, and fulfilling products online. And it's really been, of course, an amazing journey in that sense. There's a lot going on there. And I got into sustainability early when I started working with Amazon as part of e commerce and it's just been a passion point ever since. Trying to make sure that as we're making choices that we're doing the right things for our people and our planet. Keith Anderson: And how does it intersect with your role now at Mondelēz? Francesca Hahn: So for sustainability purposes, I have two major roles besides the everyday work. I both support our DEI initiatives in terms of being an executive sponsor of the Women's Sales Leadership Network, which is a group of about 800 women and allies. And we work to advance, attract, and retain, women and their advancement. And then I'm also the sponsor for the U.S. Sustainability Team. Keith Anderson: Can we talk a little bit more about what it means to sponsor that team? Francesca Hahn: The U.S. Sustainability Team is activating sustainability initiatives in the U.S. And of course it's supported by a global sustainability team. We actually call them the Global Impact Team. And so they're thinking short term, mid and long term initiatives to support our business and think for the future. We ultimately want to create a future where together the people and our planet can thrive together. As a sponsor, I am helping to give advice on how to think and influence the organization. And if you can imagine, with digital commerce, it's very similar. It's trying to ensure that everyone is thinking about it, making it front of their minds in everything that they do. Keith Anderson: Yeah, I mean, that was a big part of why I wanted to have you on the show. I see so many parallels between the way that e commerce has grown and evolved within the CPG industry and what's happening now with sustainability. And as you just said, the role of influence is huge. I I'm sure it's shifted, but when I was in my past life consulting, we used to say. In your first year as director of e commerce, roughly half of your effort is going to be spent selling internally. That is, you may be responsible for selling online through and with retailers, but to do that, you've really got to, shift thinking and behavior internally as much as externally. Francesca Hahn: Well, and if you think about it, digital commerce is an end to end game. You've got to think about all the areas of what you look like on the shelf. You have to think about your packaging. You've got to be thinking about. How you're advertising, how you're efficient, with everything that you do. And, and that's, I mean, from example, I, when I started at Hills Pet Food for Colgate as leading their e commerce, we were trying to ship bags of pet food, 35 pounds of kibble across the country efficiently. And that was a really big challenge. And, Amazon actually brought us together. To show us that our bags were getting pierced in distribution centers and causing hazards by the product, of course, rolling around on the floor and, it had oils on it. So it could make it slippery. It could be, mice or something else could be, a challenge with it as well as, ensuring that it was, packed efficiently in boxes with other products. So we were tasked to try to find a solution. And we did a ton of test and learns to figure out what the solution could be and ended up in a, with a bag in a box solution. And not only did we do that, we also added a shopper message to it, to the pet parent to say, you know, tell them that they've got this and they're doing the right thing by choosing the Hills Pet Science Diet product for their pet. And it ended up getting highlighted by the sustainability team because they felt like it was such a nice combination of doing the right thing, making it a more efficient experience, and then also an amazing marketing brand opportunity as well. Keith Anderson: Yeah, as, as you and I were, speaking a few minutes ago before we hit record, I, I mentioned In one of our, research reports on Winning with Amazon on Climate, we actually feature that Hill's case study and you shared with me, that was you so. Francesca Hahn: It was my team, a big team that figured it out together, but it was really cool that I was able to be part of that. And it became an example, which I think is positive to inspire other brands to do the same. Keith Anderson: Yep. Well, you've had experience in a pretty diverse set of, CPG and consumer product categories. What have you learned about, where CPG and sustainability intersect and, you know, where to focus and what some of the biggest challenges are? Francesca Hahn: I think typical in a big CPG is you need goals, things that you can strive for. And of course, we have our own goals from a sustainability perspective. And then you need to develop a path to reach it. And, and, and it's important that the whole organization is pointed in that same direction. And when you think about Mondelēz, it's a massive company. And so, it's so important that everyone is moving towards that same spot, because if not other business priorities can come up. Obviously we had COVID, other things happening at the same time, right? So how do you ensure that as an organization, you're still working on it together? I'm really proud of Mondelēz as in their path to our vision 2030. We added sustainability as the fourth pillar. There's a growth execution culture, which we've been talking about for a few years and we added sustainability to it. And why that's so important is then everyone is inspired or motivated or, you know, expected to have objectives that are moving towards that goal. And in 2023, we started creating objectives as part of your, it's your everyday performance plan and in some cases, that was easy for some people that were closer to sustainability, but for others, they hadn't had the chance to read our ESG report or understand really what does it take to win? And then how does my job interact with that? And, and so how can I help in that sense? And so I think by making it an objective for everyone, then we all are lined up together and really making much more genuine impact together. Keith Anderson: If I'm in the e commerce organization, or any part of the business, but just for the sake of proximity and familiarity, let's stick with e commerce. Maybe I'm, you know, involved in, I'm on an account team, or you probably have a better example than I do. What is that process like of identifying objectives for somebody who's a non sustainability specialist or practioner ? Francesca Hahn: Well, it's typical objective building or thinking about what's our priorities for next year. It's saying, okay, like, let's look at what we're doing and are we doing enough? Are we taking it to the next level of sustainability? So let's, as an example, an easier one is customer service and logistics. How am I making an impact with sustainability? And then you look around and you go, okay, are there areas that I can already amplify? Example would be Dropship or direct vendor shipments. And, and for those not as familiar, that means that when you order online, the product doesn't ship to a DC, a distribution center, and then to the shopper. Instead, it directly ships from the manufacturer warehouse to the shopper's home. So in that case, you are taking out a one line of transportation. And so you're being more efficient in that case. And by the way, also you're eliminating damages, potential products, you know, that could get lost or something could happen to it on the way. So it's just a more efficient overall. So experience. So if that's that customer service and logistics, if we can lean into that, or how do we, you know, make that more prevalent with other retailers, then you're helping on the focus of getting more sustainable customer service. Keith Anderson: Yeah, you had mentioned how much of what's going to have to happen in sustainability is going to be long term and, sort of heavy lifting in a sense, but I think with examples like those, it gets clearer and clearer that there's a lot that's immediately actionable and tends to align with commercial objectives as well as climate and sustainability goals. Francesca Hahn: There are little things that pop up all the time, and you don't, you can never underestimate that. Small choices are being made constantly. For example, packing a box. for e commerce making sure it doesn't have plastic in it , it has paper you're, you know, easier to recycle, is, is an example. There's so many little choices that if you're more aware of, of these things, you can be making more impact every day. Keith Anderson: I'm glad you mentioned that one. Because I think it'll serve as a nice segue. This year, both Amazon and Walmart introduced new programs or initiatives specifically related to omni channel and e commerce fulfillment. They're both getting more focused on right sizing. They're both doing something I think is pretty cool with automated box printing. If you've never watched the videos of these, it's pretty fascinating to watch. Everybody has opened a box and found, you know, a tiny product inside and wondered, why am I getting such a huge box for such a small product? And You know, the logisticians have started, working on that problem through on demand box printing that aligns the size of the box with the products in the order, and they're also shifting to more, Paper and other, you know, non plastic forms of secondary packaging. And the reason I say I think it's an interesting potential segue is, so much of what is happening is really. The result of work between the retailer and the brand. I mean, take the example you shared between Amazon and Hills earlier. How do you think about the relationship between CPG and, and retailers as it relates to sustainability? Francesca Hahn: Well, I'll go with your example there about, about the, the box printing and forming to the product's exact shape. Our products, we, we also sell chocolate and, candy products that have multiple challenges during the summer in the U S and so having a relationship with the retailers, because it's in their best interest and it's in our best interest, it's stated goals, everyone's working towards it. We've been having conversations about how to do cold ship more effectively. In nature of cold ship, it's not been very sustainable. So we need to work towards. Better solution. So by being partners, I mean, we'll get there quicker. I have a lot of, faith that, that we will get there, but yeah, so being partners, I feel like there is so many opportunities, and frankly, retailers need CPGs because they're really a house of brands and so they need us and then we need retailers. Because they're both the way our products are delivered to the shopper. So how do we do that the most efficient way? As well as, I think there's a lot of opportunities as well for them to be recycling centers too. You know, when you think about some of the big retailers, they're often in environments where there may not be a recycling infrastructure yet. I think of my, actually my dad and my parents are in an area that they are. Not having recycling coming at their pickup at their house still, which just kind of blows my mind still that you don't have recycling. And so they have to take it somewhere. And so when you think about retailers, they can actually be that point to help in an environment where the infrastructure is weak. Keith Anderson: Yeah, yeah, I, it's been an interesting three or four years in, in the recycling infrastructure. Landscape. I, I think the retailers, some retailers are, you know, headed in the right direction. Others, I think, are in a holding pattern trying to assess how do we do this at scale in a way that is going to work across different packaging formats. So I'm glad you called that one out. Francesca Hahn: I think it's another synergy or analogy to, e commerce, right? There were some retailers that were slow to the game and they let. Other retailers get ahead of them and, and get their, you know, get their website online in a way that really made sense to shoppers and others. There were people, retailers, that did not have websites early, if you can remember that, Keith. And, and so, it's the same thing with sustainability. We gotta, everyone needs to be moving towards it. It's again, not a perfect path, but you've gotta be making steps. And, and to your point, I think there's some retailers really, innovating here. They have chief sustainability officers who are very influential and are great connection points for, for CPGs to come in. And, and partner together. Keith Anderson: Do you see those retailers? Gaining commercial advantage because they're moving earlier and sort of the flip side of that coin. Do you see upside for CPG companies that are leaning in? Are the retailers rewarding you in some way? Francesca Hahn: Yes. And yes, Amazon is big focused on Climate Pledge. There's a filter online. So if, if, a shopper, that's incredibly important to them, they can click that button and you're only seeing the products that are. Marked Climate Pledge. Now, it's complicated to get Climate Pledge acceptance. Maybe we talk about that later in our, our, double click, to your, your detailed audience. But, it's, it's a challenge, from that perspective, but, but yet. It is something that they're offering and it allows people to find and get the products that they're looking for and thus the CPG who can qualify wins and there is reported lift percentages if you can achieve that. Keith Anderson: Ooh, from, from where? And I only ask because Francesca Hahn: They've been published a few times, Keith, Keith Anderson: By Francesca Hahn: don't want to quote it. Keith Anderson: No, of course. Francesca Hahn: it's, some other third parties have published that there's a lift associated when you have that. I mean, like any badges that you would often get, it attracts your attention on the digital shelf automatically. And then, and of course, now that you have this filter, I think it's, it definitely helps. Keith Anderson: Well, I, I was going to say, in my past life, I did analysis on the list of those badges. Not the Climate Pledge Friendly badges, but Amazon Choice, Best Seller, and so I, I know based on data that those both drive traffic by attracting people from search result pages to product pages and can increase conversion. The open question that I'm trying to get more facts on is, well, what about Climate Pledge Friendly? So if anybody in the audience has seen hard data on that, let Francesca and me know because, uh. I think it's a safe assumption that it has an impact on You know, how many people see and buy, but I like data. Francesca Hahn: Me too. Keith Anderson: Well, while we're on the topic, do you want to go any deeper on, the complexity or some of the challenges of, of qualifying for some of those things? Francesca Hahn: Well, there, I think at this point, there are some general big challenges and you've talked about it in your other podcasts, but of course the recycling infrastructure is major challenge for us, as we mentioned earlier. Also materials. And when you think about the size of Monsali's, if we make a major change in packaging, as an example. It causes, a real challenge in availability of that, of that supplier, materials that we need. So I think working with suppliers to have a long term plan on how to achieve these, so I think, you know, again, keeping your own partners very close on that journey that you're taking so that you can implement those changes so that you have more sustainable products. It's very important and there aren't that many vendors in general. So it, it, so I think it's going to be a continued challenge as we're all navigating towards this, that we, and it's why I love the things that you're doing here, Keith getting kind of the word out, is we need more vendors, suppliers that can produce the, the, the source materials so that we can achieve these all 100%. Keith Anderson: Materials, ingredients, packaging, yeah, I mean, you mentioned, you mentioned some of the, complexity of making shifts in the production process. I, I've been looking at, a universe of roughly 400 companies that have basically raised capital for some sustainability related solution oriented to retailers and brands. And one Interesting pattern I've noticed among a subset, especially those that are focused on packaging and, and, you know, largely packaging actually is where it's the case they're plug and play. That is, it increasingly looks like,, success factor. To be able to directly substitute for an existing material or ingredient that you, need a replacement for without having to adjust or adapt other processes, other machines and systems and, you know, to your point in a majority of cases, looks like Longer term planning is going to be necessary in many cases, but I am starting to see companies promote themselves as, hey, we've got something that you can drop into your existing production run today. There's not a lot, but it's an interesting point to me, because especially for the larger CPG majors, you can't just, switch a material out if it doesn't have most of the same attributes and characteristics as. Whatever it's supposed to replace. And the other, the other factor I'm noticing is some of the, suppliers that seem initially promising, as you peel back a couple layers of the onion, they just don't have the scale to move the needle at this stage. So there's a lot of early stage, you know, pioneering work being done, but. A lot of what I think is going to happen over the coming 5 to 10 years is seeing what clears the stage gate and actually ends up reaching a critical mass that can become part of the CPG majors way of working, as opposed to so many of these things that sort of get stalled in pilot test and learn stage. Francesca Hahn: I'm hoping that because we, and many other CPGs are publishing these long term plans, that it's motivating for more positive change on the vendor side. And, and, and also there's examples of regenerative farming and, and, and. You know, as we engage in and drive more farmers to think that way, we can drive more, you know, more expansion and, and people see that the possibility is there to, to drive something that's also good for the planet, but hopefully also good to drive their own business. Keith Anderson: Yeah, where do you or where do you see the industry searching for those kinds of. Partners or suppliers are their full time dedicated roles the same way that many companies now have e commerce capability leads or or similar? Is it the corporate venture team, sustainability team? You know, how do you even go searching for those kinds of cutting edge capabilities? Francesca Hahn: We have a sustainability team and locally, and then also globally, that they're both chasing the bigger innovations and, and, as opportunities. So sometimes it's partnerships. These sometimes come through from retailers, sometimes they come through from government, author authorized groups that are pushing, and giving opportunity. For example, we are now part of a cargo. Owners for Zero Emission Vessel Group, it's a group that brought, was brought to us from a retailer and now it, now we're part of 35 or so freight buyers who are focused on zero emission ocean transport. I mean, it's not something I would have known or heard about before, but it came to us via a retailer and now we have signed in on it and we are focused on container utilization. Opportunities as, as well as reducing distance traveled. So again, trying to do the right thing for the planet, but also trying, you know, it's also more efficient for business as well. So I think those are some of those opportunities that come to us and, and you need a team who can focus on these. If you, you know, this is where you need, you do need the specialists who can focus and, and understand it, and then they can teach the rest of us, to understand. And then also we can talk about it, with other retailers and try to encourage the same kind of behavior. Keith Anderson: You know, I've, I've definitely seen an acceleration of those kinds of consortia and cross industry initiatives. The NRF just launched a center for, for sustainability. The UK, there seems to be a lot of activity too. They just formed, for the major grocers there, just formed a group to try to develop standards for product level, carbon footprinting and labeling. And I think with so many of these. Bigger, longer term challenges, part of what's held it back is, you can go try to do it in a vacubut if nobody follows you, it's almost destined to be,, certainly destined to be a cost center and nothing more, it's not going to reach the scale to move the needle, it's not going to change chopper consumer behavior, so the appetite for participating in these Sort of pre competitive or on some level collaborative initiatives to accelerate getting to a standard across the industry. I just see those things proliferating pretty quickly at the moment. Francesca Hahn: I agree. I think it helps everyone raise up together. And I love the ones that are both CPG and retailer, cause then you're collaborating on all parts end to end. of, of the whole, supply network. And, I agree. I, I think it's hard. There are a lot of groups. So, you know, our team spends a lot of time analyzing if this is the right choice. And, but. You know, I see us signing more and more agreements where it makes sense globally and locally. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Thank you for listening, and we hope you've enjoyed this episode. If you find value in what we're doing, we really appreciate your support. Please consider leaving us a review on Apple, Spotify, or your favorite podcast platform, or share this with a colleague to help us reach more listeners. To hear the complete episode and find more news, insight, analysis, and to join the Decarbonizing Commerce community, please visit decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening, and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=q802mq68…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

Keith speaks to Catherine Conway, Director and Reuse Lead for GoUnpackaged, one of the UK's leading consultancies specializing in reuse and refill packaging. Catherine has been working in the reuse refill space since 2006. We discuss her work with the Refill Coalition, which is a group of UK based retailers that are working together to develop a standardized, but also modular and adaptable approach to reusable and refillable packaging.We also talk about some of the drivers and barriers as it relates to reuse, refill and some of the pending legislation in Europe and beyond. Learn more about Catherine: Link to GoUnpackaged’s website Link to the Refill Coalition’s website Link to Catherine's LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Hello, and welcome back to the Decarbonizing Commerce podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and today's guest, Catherine Conway, is Director and Reuse Lead for GoUnpackaged, one of the UK's leading consultancies specializing in reuse and refill packaging. Catherine has been working in the reuse refill space since 2006. So, certainly one of the most experienced and tenured people working in the space. She and GoUnpackaged caught my attention because of the work they're doing with the Refill Coalition, which is a group of UK based retailers that are working together to develop a standardized, but also modular and adaptable approach to reusable and refillable packaging. And in our conversation, we certainly get into that initiative, but talk about some of the drivers and barriers as it relates to reuse, refill. And even some of the pending legislation in Europe and beyond. I think reusable and refillable packaging is a topic that we're going to continue to talk about and learn about together. And I'm really delighted to have kicked the conversation off with Catherine Conway of GoUnpackaged. Hi, Catherine. Great to have you. Thanks so much for joining us on the show. Catherine Conway: Hi, thanks for having me. Keith Anderson: Well, I'd love to start by asking a bit about your background and how you ended up doing what you're doing now. So maybe you can tell us a bit about GoUnpackaged and your path there. Catherine Conway: Happy to. So GoUnpackaged, we are a specialist consultancy in the UK, focusing on the transition to reusable packaging. And we do this through sort of three different ways. So we kind of dream up solutions. So we actually dream up reusable packaging systems and get them into reality. We do consultancies to any type of business or brand that wants to do something within the world of moving from single use to reusable packaging. And then we do lots of policy and research work as well. So helping NGOs, government trying to sort of understand what the regulatory framework needs to be for reuse to thrive. So those are sort of the three kind of elements of our work. I have been doing it for 17 years, so I now have two co directors who work with me, but 17 years ago I set up the first modern zero waste store, because I had this, well, I used to go and refill things in lots of different shops, so I would go to somewhere and refill my olive oil and somewhere to refill my washing up liquid, and I just remember standing there going, why isn't there one shop where everything is refillable? So I took, you know, I'm not saying I ever invented the concept of selling things loose, but I took the solution of selling things without packaging and married it to an environmental narrative of, we've all got too much single use packaging and we need to make a change and sort of put the two things together. And that's how the original unpackaged shop was born. And we went through market stalls, shops, and then I started working with Planet Organic. So we've got concessions within Planet Organic, who are a chain of 12 organic supermarkets in London. And I guess that was the first foray from having an independent shop and trying to do it all myself to becoming a consultancy where we've got, so my colleague, Helen is an innovation expert. My colleague, Rob is a supply chain, expert, and I'm a reuse expert. So between the three of us, we can actually have a lot more impact than we could when I was just running my little shop. Keith Anderson: Well, it's exciting and am I correct that this year there's been a bit of an evolution of, of the consultancy? Catherine Conway: Yes, so the brand, so we used to be called Just Unpackaged, and we have evolved to GoUnpackaged, which I'm still getting used to saying, obviously, after 17 years of saying unpackaged. But yes, I think it reflects, it reflects who we are, it reflects the three of us and our partnership, and it reflects what we want to do in the world, which is to work on these sort of much bigger, bigger impact, cross supply chain projects, because if everybody, you know, our clients keep trying to do little individual reuse trials. We're never going to get to system change. So the refill coalition project, which I can talk about later is the sort of best example of that, where we've got a load of retailers to work together, a load of equipment suppliers to work together on a big, global logistics brand. And together they have all worked to get, to create a standardized, solution for bulk. And it's those kinds of projects that we really want to work on as a team, because that's where we can have the most impact. Keith Anderson: I, I'd love for us to go deeper, about the refill coalition and, and maybe as a set up to that, a bit about why those kinds of value chain and cross industry efforts to collaborate and standardize things. It's so important, just as an observer, and, you know, certainly, an observer over a shorter timescale than you've been working in the space, it's clear there's been a lot of, what I would characterize as experiments and pilots, and there's also a lot of brands in certain categories, you know, particularly in cleaning and personal care, I think some of the, refill at home models seem to have gotten some promising adoption, but, the, the prevailing attitude among the multinational retailers and brands seems to be without infrastructure and standardization for this to scale in either brick and mortar retail or e commerce, the economics are not favorable . So, what would you tell us about some of those barriers and what are you optimistic about in some of these cross industry initiatives, especially the one that you're driving? Catherine Conway: Okay. Lots of things to tell you. So I think the first of when we talk about just for the benefit of your listeners, when we talk about reuse, when I talk about it, I'm talking about it in its widest sense. So you use some of the language in, in our industry at the minute. So there's, there's really sort of four different reuse and refill models. So there's refill at home, which as you've mentioned, which is something like a pouch. So getting something like head and shoulder shampoo in a pouch that you then put into a bottle at home. There's refill in store, which is you bringing a container down to some sort of bulk bin and filling it up in a store. Then there's return to home, which is a bit like the loop model, which is the company maintains ownership of the packaging and you either pay a deposit or, or some sort of a way of having access of it, and then you return it, and then there's return on the go, which is, you know, you might pick a reusable coffee cup, I'll put a McDonald's and return it to a Burger King, the dream. So those are the sort of four different, models. So I'm just going to pick on the, I'm going to pick on refill at home for a minute, just because you say that brands have got a lot of adoption and they have, but the problem with most of the refill at home models is, they are still based on single use. So they have really, you know, usually switched from a rigid plastic bottle into a multi laminate pouch that is totally, you know, and the rigid plastic bottle was probably a mono material and very easy to recycle, and the multi laminate pouch is absolutely not. And they're pretending that it's a, a reusable model. So, there's an argument that you've got to take consumers on a journey, so I think a refill at home model using a single use pouch could be seen as a way of taking a consumer on a journey, but I would caution that it is not the end result of a, of a properly reusable system where, you know, the same bottle is being reused over and over again. So, as you say, there's lots and lots and lots of pilots going on. And I think whilst I would love it to be different because I'm the eternal optimist and I think we should all be going further and faster and, you know, I always want more than I'm ever going to get in this space. I think everyone probably did have to start with pilots and experiments because everyone sort of went, Oh God, we've got a problem. We need to do something with reusables. There wasn't sort of big systems that they could buy into. It wasn't the, you know, like the World Economic Forum or, you know, Consumer Goods Forum or any of these people were coming along going, Hey, here's the scheme. Just come into the scheme and you'll be able to have access to reusable. Nobody had anything. So I think it was. Incumbent on brands and retailers to set things up themselves. And I think the real value of setting things up themselves is they started getting learnings from it. And also they put them out there so consumers could see them. So a lot of these trials have a very nice front end for the consumer to see, and a bit of a hacked backend because, you know, you can't suddenly change a whole automated supply chain, just for one trial and that's fine. It's, it's, it's not about saying that that has to be perfect back of house. But it makes them really inefficient, and therefore the problem is it becomes this sort of slightly self reinforcing circle that they do a trial, the trial is designed inefficiently because it's effectively a hacked version of what it could be, and then that you can't build a commercial case around it, so it's almost seen like the trial or the pilot has failed, when in actual fact it wasn't designed for scale. However It is very hard if they said, okay, great, so how do we design for scale? Well, that's the chicken and the egg, because the thing we need to get to is a shared infrastructure of washing and logistics in the same way that we have a shared infrastructure for recycling. So, you know, Tesco, all use the same recycling trucks and same recycling company. They don't each have their own recycling service, which is sort of what we're doing with reuse at the minute. So we know what we need to get to, which is a shared infrastructure, but that doesn't exist yet, so the setting it up is also going to cost money, so we're in this real catch 22 at the minute, where I think lots of retailers and brands have realized that they can't keep doing these small experiments, and they want to do bigger things. But there aren't that many projects for them to get involved with, although they're starting to happen. So the Consumer Goods Forum are doing something in Canada. We're doing the Refill Coalition in the UK. EMF has just done a big piece of modeling in France. So there are these, the UK's doing something with milk. Like there's lots of these kind of collaborative projects that I think you're now, I think this is the next wave of reuse is going to be cross industry collaborative projects. So, what that means in practice is, so for, let's take Refill Coalition, for example, is we, you know, I went from having a zero waste shop where I personally sat and cleaned out all of these dispensers by hand to keep them clean and hygienic. And when we started doing those kind of projects with big supermarkets, we almost had to do it the same way. And I could see from the off when we first, when we first started working with Waitrose on the, on the big refill project that lots of other retailers then sort of copied on the back of. And I remember saying to them, we don't want to have your staff manually washing these hoppers in store because your, like supermarkets, you know, their, their staffing structure just isn't set up for it. And they said, yep, we get that. But right now we want to get it out there. We want to test the consumer reaction to it. So that's how we're going to start. So that we started like that. And then this is sort of what we do at Going Packaged. We thought, right, well, what is the solution? If there was a solution, what would it be? So the solution is taking the hopper that in your, in your listener's mind's eye, they can probably see, which is some sort of, you know, plastic dispenser with a handle in a store that you come along and dispense products out of. And what we've done is effectively split that in two. So the main bulk of the hopper almost becomes like a beer keg. So a standardized vessel that can go around the supply chain that anybody can use. And then the front, the nice dispenser is a bit like the fancy beer tap that stays in the pub and has the nice branding on it and everybody knows what they're buying from. So that's what we did, which sounds so incredibly simple and is so incredibly hard not only to create but then to sort of birth into the industry. So we've had various retail members of our coalition over the last three years. And our current members are Aldi, who are leading on this in store piece, and then Ocado, which I can talk about in a minute, who are leading on a sort of smaller version of it. So we call it mini bulk, but it's actually a returnable, so it'll come pre filled from, from the Ocado warehouse. So Aldi has launched, in October, initial results are really favorable, so they're hitting some of their targets with some of the products already. Most importantly, there's been zero downtime, so the equipment has worked 100 percent of the time, which is never a given when you're installing these kind of new systems. And it seems to be, popular with both staff and customers. You know, because you are asking staff to do different things than just putting things on shelves and collapsing cardboard boxes into a baler. So, so yeah, so that's what the Refill Coalition is. And what sits at the heart of it is how do you get four or five competitive businesses to work together to create a change, because this idea of changing from single use to reuse, this system change, is not a first mover advantage, you know, if only one retailer does it, they don't win anything, they just win a load of costs, but if they can work with their competitors and work with the supply chain, then actually that's how we can drive up volume and drive down costs and try and bring this in for the same price or cheaper than the single use equivalent. Keith Anderson: Yeah, that, that point in particular seems to be thematic of almost all the postmortems that I've read, and I think it's consistent with so many sustainability initiatives. The behavioral change element of all this is pretty hard if the expectation is people are going to have to pay more for not even necessarily something that's not as effective or as positive an experience. Just changing it all, is, is a hurdle. So I think, at least getting to parity, if not creating an incentive is something I've seen many retailers start to emphasize. Catherine Conway: Yeah, and it, it can and it should be better, so I'll give you an example from my colleague Rob who does the supply chain modelling. So if you think of a cardboard box with 12 bottles in it. And you think of the shape of the necks of those bottles. You're transporting about 20 percent air in every cardboard box. If you were to suddenly redesign that with, you know, our vessels that are designed to cube out on a pallet load, then the idea is on every, say, every pallet load, you could transport 20 percent more stock. Now then you're taking 20 percent of your transport costs out, you're taking 20 percent of your, CO2 emissions out, and then at scale, you should be able to pass that saving on to your consumer. So I think it's when we compare, you know, lots of people talk about reuse and they say, Oh, but you know, it's going to cost loads more money because you've got washing and cleaning and extra logistics. And yeah, yes you do, but let's not forget that there is waste. Both in terms of sort of financial, environmental, and operational in the current supply chain. The linear supply chain in many ways is amazing and is also not perfect. So the shift to reusable packaging is a huge opportunity to redesign some of these things. You know, I found out that most lorries, you can't double stack pallets on them because the cardboard all collapses. Now what would happen if we could actually double stack rows of pallets on every lorry? You know, we would, we would massively reduce our freight emissions. So, so I think there's a huge opportunity. And I think it's certainly our job as consultants working with our clients to make them aware of where those opportunities might lie beyond this kind of just a sustainability play, which is the, oh God, we know we should be doing something about plastics. And, and our customers are writing to our customer service emails saying, can you do something? There are actually huge potential efficiencies, that can be gained by redesigning some of this stuff. Keith Anderson: Well, and, and you've brought me back to the earlier conversation about the refill at home model because, what I had in mind when I mentioned it were some of the concentrated products that, to your point, you know, so much of the product in personal care and cleaning is basically shipping water or water and air around the country, if not the globe. And so, I, I see the same sort of, multinational examples that are in, flexible plastic, but are still liquid. And I, I don't view that as the end game on any level. How do you think about the relationship between product formulation and product form and packaging, as part of the overall, evolution that might unlock, more, more economic benefits? Catherine Conway: I think one of the things I've learned over doing this work is I am amazed at how many people design a product without ever really thinking about what packaging it's going in and what's going to happen to that packaging at its end of life. You know, I spend a lot of time at packaging conferences and nobody talks about it or is thinking about it, which to me has always been fascinating, and that's because of the way the regulatory economics is set up that nobody pays for, so we call them the negative externalities of packaging waste. So that's the cost of disposal. Whether it's recycling, burning it, exporting it. So we've got a huge problem in the UK that we export so much of our plastic waste to other countries who have even less capable infrastructure to do things with them. And then we dutifully record that all as recycled, just because someone's ticked a box saying, yes, it'll be recycled in its end country. So that's an absolute, sham that needs to be stopped. But yeah, I'm, I'm sort of, I, I love the ingenuity of packaging and packaging designers, the message I take to those conferences is, is that people like me don't think it's the end of packaging, it's just we've got to now redesign packaging to make it fit for purpose in a world with a growing population and dwindling resources. And the fact that we have quite frankly, in the West, got away with shipping our waste to other countries so we don't have to deal with it, or look at it, or know about it. So I think if we can start being transparent about what's really happening with waste, what's really happening, you know, we know that most plastics are not actually being recycled. You know, we've got this huge challenge that we don't want people to stop recycling, but everybody feels like they're doing the right thing when they're filling their recycling bins with all of this waste. And so much of it is flexible plastics. It's just impossible to recycle. There's no market for it at the minute. And then, yeah, so much of it is exported. So reusable packaging has a double hill to climb at the minute in terms of the commercials, because you've sort of got the commercials against this very efficient linear supply chain that we've engineered over the last 50, 60 years, but then you've also got this sort of end of life, sort of lack of well, it's now called extended producer responsibility, that there has been a lack of EPR on brands and retailers who are selling this stuff. So traditionally in the UK, brands and retailers have paid 10 percent of the cost of waste disposal of all of the packaging. And we pay 90 percent of it. We as consumers pay 90 percent of it through our council tax and how that gets paid for. So government, the direction of travel around the world is, is that governments are no longer prepared to pay for that. And there is this, trend within all regulation, wherever you are, which is coming towards what they call a polluter pays framework, which is, if you create this stuff, you will ultimately be responsible for its disposal. Now, I think the more that we can change that EPR, Extended Producer Responsibility framework, Then that will start to make the economics of reuse work, because if we make it more expensive in the same, you know, in the way that we are at the minute in the UK with the plastics tax, you know, we make it more expensive to put quote unquote bad packaging on the market, by which I mean single use packaging that is unrecyclable or isn't recycled, then that should start to tip the the balance in favor of reuse. But we urgently need that and it's being forever delayed in the UK by the government. Keith Anderson: Fair enough. I love the example or the analogy you gave a few minutes ago of the beer tab and it leads me to, in my mind, almost comparing and contrasting some of the retail attributes of the status quo approach to, packaging and merchandising product. At the point of decision, that is, you know, what P&G once called the first moment of truth, and what I sense is, a big part of the resistance among some brand marketers to a departure from the conventional, you know, glossy, single use packaging that you see at many retail displays. So, what I'm thinking about is, okay, if I were a brand marketer, fast forwarding 10 or 15 years, and we had ended up in a world where if reuse isn't the dominant approach, it's at least mainstream and a significant percentage of the way people buy. How have we approached some of those considerations about, brand differentiation and, and attracting, engaging, and converting shoppers in the retail environment, how does it change the dynamic in a category? Does it impact the amount of selection or choice that we're able to offer? Does it lead to concentration of sales to the brands that are willing and able to provide a refillable option and, raise the barrier of entry for those that, choose not to play? I, I know that's a lot embedded in a single prompt, but, you know, I'm just thinking a lot about if I were a category manager or a brand marketer or a shopper marketer and everything that you're hoping happens, happens, how does my job change? Catherine Conway: Got to get more creative, that's how your job changes. It's a really good and important point. I think there's some truths in it and there's some, excuses that are made for brands to not have to go down this route. So I think, I think brands have a job on their hands in general. Because since the pandemic, there's, there's been lots of rationalizations of shelves, you know, retailers not having such big spaces, not wanting so many different options on, on shelf. There's that. There's the growth of the, the Lidls and Aldis doing their own brand. And there's the growth of own brand in general. So I think that, that brands, I think it's coming up to a moment of truth. They call it the moment of truth. I think there's a moment of truth of really sort of what brands are and how they fit in this world moving forwards. Because I think traditionally they have commanded a large premium. And I don't know how interested shoppers are when they're facing a cost of living crisis. In paying such a premium for what they're starting to perceive as quite a similar product. So I think all of this fits into the general anxiety that brands have got at the minute in general. I think lots of things for, how brands can and should engage with reuse. I think we have to remember that there is so much standardized single use packaging in the market. You know, whether it's 33 centilitre bottles, whether it's aluminium food cans, whether it's beer cans, you know, brands are very capable of using standardised shapes, like a tin can that's filled with soup, or a standard jar that has pickles in it or something, you know, they're very capable of using that and personalizing it enough to feel that, that their brand is, is, actively promoted. So I think the idea that if we move to some sort of world of standardized packaging for reuse to succeed, which we have to, standardization is an absolute key to making reuse scalable. Then I think there is a huge scope. of products that already exist in standardised packaging that could just literally be labelled, you know, it's all about the labelling and the colours and the marketing that goes around it. Now then, the question is, is what do you do with your brands that do have distinctive bottles, you know, the Coca Cola bottle, but Coke is doing very well in terms of what they're doing in Latin America. They've standardised across their brands, so they've got a standardised bottle that works for, I'm gonna pull brands out of, you know, I don't know if they're all, but you know, like Fanta, Coke, Diet Coke, Coke Zero. So they've managed to do some standardization within their own business, which is, you know, the size that they are is, is a huge step forward. So I think if you standardize reusable packaging and you get to what we need to, which is this super infrastructure to service it then you'll suddenly find you have packaging suppliers that can supply reusable packaging, you'll have people that can wash the standardized packaging and you'll have logisticians that can move it around. And that will enable your smaller players to have the same kind of access in the same way that I can go and get something filled into a flexible bag in the same way that, you know, a muesli company can go and do that. It's just going to cost me more because I'm smaller. So I don't think we need to think that only the big brands will, will sort of win in that scenario. But I do think that brands are going to have to consider what their position is and the type of businesses that they want to be, given this direction of travel and how much that it It can keep costing them because EPR is going to happen, whether, you know, they're all lobbying against it. Now that might delay it by a few years, but governments don't have any money. They especially don't have money. You know, they don't have money for social care and old people, let alone trying to deal with packaging waste. So EPR is happening. And I think forward thinking brands are the ones that are thinking, what could my brand portfolio look like if I achieved what needs to be, which is sort of 30 to 40 percent reuse. But this is, this is slightly the hilarious thing about it that's, if it wasn't hilarious, I would cry, but all the other way around, is the fact that even when we're talking about reuse targets, no one's even mentioned higher than 50 percent yet. I mean, maybe they have in terms of transit packaging or B2B packaging, but you know, we're still talking about a scenario in 2030, 2040, where we're sub 50 percent reusable. So if I was a brand and looking at my packaging, I'd be like, right, well, we've got a load of products that are already in standardized packaging. CAMs and what have you, well let's convert those ones to a new standbys pack and then we'll deal with the really complicated personalized brand shapes afterwards. So I think there's a lot of excuses that are going on because people don't want to change and this is where I would say that legislation in favor of reuse, and there's many different ways it could be done, is actually the key enabler to this. So I think those, there are lots of people who are lobbying very heavily in Europe at the minute against any reuse targets at all because they're seeing it as a blocker and red tape for business, and it's a hugely pushed by the paper packaging industry as well, who I think don't see a role for themselves as much in reusable packaging, and I understand the risk, but, you know, they're creating this narrative that somehow we're going to displace, you know, all of these industries that already exist, you know, even in a scenario that you had a 40 percent reuse reusable packaging in, in, in major brands portfolios, you'd still have 60 percent single use so you'd still have an entire need for the single use packaging industry, the recycling industry, you know, we've got to work out how everyone's going to coexist. So yeah, so I have I have some sympathy with brands of the complexity of what this transition is going to look like, but I don't have a huge amount of sympathy of those that are really lobbying against it very heavily in a way that's bringing such an amount of negativity towards reuse, when we know it is the only solution. You know, so we know we have to reduce resource consumption. All right, we live on a planet with finite resources and growing populations. We simply don't have the resources. And we need to reduce the pollution arising from it. Now to do that, you've got two options. You either stop selling it, which none of them want to do. Or you shift a huge amount of it into reusable packaging and treat it like an asset that you really design well. And that's where the opportunities for brands come up. Brands know how to sell us a lot of things that we don't need. They do that extremely well. So they could be putting that creativity working with their packaging designers to really make this stuff attractive, like you could be telling stories of how your products are made. You could be, you know, all of this extra stuff that, that consumers now love, where they can engage with products through QR codes or, or websites, or, you know, even like whatever AI is going to bring to this. It's like, you could be creating this huge, compelling relationship between your customers and your brand through reusable packaging because it's something that you can invest in, as a long term asset. And that's my message to, to brands is that's the way you should be thinking about it rather than just thinking that this is a drag on things. You just can't keep doing business as they've already always done it. We're beyond that point. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Thank you for listening, and we hope you've enjoyed this episode. If you find value in what we're doing, we really appreciate your support. Please consider leaving us a review on Apple, Spotify, or your favorite podcast platform, or share this with a colleague to help us reach more listeners. To hear the complete episode and find more news, insight, analysis, and to join the Decarbonizing Commerce community, please visit decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening, and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=4n9xl6j8…
In this installment, host Keith Anderson sits down with Danielle Jezienicki, Founder of Impact FWD, a consulting practice specializing in sustainability and impact. Danielle brings a wealth of experience, having previously served as the Vice President of Sustainability for Grove Collaborative, a pioneer in plastic-neutral retail. During this insightful conversation, Danielle shares her remarkable journey from an MBA program to leading sustainability programs at renowned brands like Williams Sonoma and Grove. Together, they delve into the intricacies of sustainability in the consumer packaged goods industry, addressing pressing issues such as the plastic crisis and discussing the transition from Sustainability 1.0 to Sustainability 2.0. Learn more about Danielle: Danielle’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co Danielle's curated product recommendations for a more sustainable household: Here are some recommended products that help you reduce your plastic footprint at home and in your routine: Compostable (and very cute) Swedish dish cloth (saves approximately 1M paper towels per toddler) Recycled or bamboo toilet paper (many traditional products are sourced from the Canadian boreal forest, one of the world's most valuable ecosystems. P&G continues to face criticism for this and refuses to change their practices, drives me nuts!) DYPER and the compostable diaper service in SF - Redyper/Earth Baby Also check out Healthy Baby , their products are great and EWG certified. #1 way parents can make a positive impact / avoid a negative one, plus you do not want your baby's bum near any of the chemicals in traditional diapers... If you do nothing else, compost your food scraps! (I like this bin and these bags ) Concentrated cleaners (just add water) system and refillable hand and dish soap system, and a refillable wipe system . Reduce the plastic in your period care routine through applicator-free tampons , period underwear and menstrual cups . The world's best laundry detergent . For kids - shampoo bars and bubble bath that gives back . Personal care splurges: lotion , refillable lipstick , face highlighter . TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Hey folks, I hope you've got a cup of coffee for today's episode. My guest is Danielle Jezienicki, founder of her new consulting practice, Impact FWD, where she supports investors and brands as a fractional head of impact and sustainability. Before starting Impact FWD, Danielle was vice president of sustainability for Grove Collaborative, the world's first plastic neutral retailer. There she built their sustainability program and the industry's first plastic intensity metric. Channeled all measurement and was managing all ESG disclosure through the company's IPO. Before that, she was Director of Corporate Social Responsibility at Williams Sonoma. And in our discussion, we cover Danielle's journey to starting her own consultancy and what her experience has been from her MBA through the Williams Sonoma and Grove experiences, and we talk about in a CPG company, how to prioritize your sustainability efforts and initiatives, we go pretty deep on the plastic crisis and where the industry is falling short in many areas. We talk about phases of sustainability and how she views Sustainability 2.0 as something distinct from Sustainability 1.0. And we even spend a minute or two on the COP28 Summit that's happening now. Strap yourselves in. This is a fun one. Let's meet Danielle Jezienicki of Impact FWD. Danielle, great to see you. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. Danielle Jezienicki: Thank you so much for having me and great to see you too. Keith Anderson: Well, we often start the discussion just by learning a little bit more about, the guest's career and what brought you to where you are and since you've got a recent career transition, I think that's a really interesting place to start. Danielle Jezienicki: Yeah. Great. So, you know, kind of walking through a little bit of history. I think like many people you interview or in sustainability, it is a little bit of a lifelong passion. It was kind of what you were always going to do. The question was how you got yourself into it. And that's definitely my story. I started my career, I mean, really started my career as a ski instructor and then, Keith Anderson: Where were, where were you as ski instructor? Danielle Jezienicki: I was an instructor in Park City, Utah, after college. Okay. Keith Anderson: I'm from Colorado. That's why I had to ask. Danielle Jezienicki: Oh, okay. Yeah, well, you know, the funny thing is I grew up in New York City, and I just, loved the outdoors, loved outdoor activities, and didn't have a ton of access to that growing up. So, as soon as college ended, I wanted to go on this kind of adventure and try something really different, as every one of my classmates, you know, went into investment banking pre recession. So, started that off and I actually think it was really a formative experience in that I realized how much I liked, you know, kind of meeting people who didn't go to the same schools and same, you know, kind of path growing up. Spending more time outdoors and, you know, kind of really connecting to, you know, this bigger picture of meaningful work. You know, so from there I did go back to New York and was unfulfilled and and then I eventually moved out to California to, to really, I think, balance those two things. And in California, I worked, I started my career in corporate communications, which was really excellent training, just understanding, you know, market moving situations. And, just, I mean, I think it's just a crash course in business to tell you, you know, to summarize a lot of, like literally overnights in the office. So started in corporate communications, refined that focus to investor relations, worked with clean tech companies out of this passion for sustainability and kind of figuring out what a career path that would tie to sustainability looked like, and in working with pre IPO companies, clean tech and, and traditional tech, I realized there wasn't really much of a distinction between the two in that you can have a semiconductor company that is much more energy efficient and, if you put it in a set top box of every, you know, every cable set top box in the us, you're gonna save a lot more energy than an electric car battery company that is, you know, using a coal-fired grid. So, you know, by digging into Cleantech kind of realized. There was a lot more to learn, there was, you know, a lot more nuance. You had to really think in systems, and, and that distinction was something that really interested me. So, I went back to get my MBA in Sustainable Management. I did the program at Presidio and got great advice from a mentor saying, you know, MBAs are kind of a dime a dozen. If you want to do sustainability, go get some experience and, you know, put your money where your mouth is. And so that program at Presidio was wonderful for me. It was very experiential, really hands on, because there's only so much about sustainability that you can understand in a classroom. So you have that classroom focus, but in my time at Presidio, I got to work with phenomenal companies, BlackRock, News Corporation, Acumen Fund, and really refined my focus on impact investing, you know, in, in kind of pursuit of that question of why do we not talk about sustainability when we talk about long term value? And that's really what I think I was you know, the most curious about like what really led me to, to, you know, and, and still continues to drive my passion for the topic is like, how do we really integrate sustainability with long term value? And so worked in impact investing for four years after grad school and worked as an impact analyst. So, so really dug into what does impact look like in different asset classes, in different categories. And from there, wanting to get that hands on experience, you know, I think in a lot of ways, it's easier to be an investor and ask questions of why aren't you doing this? Or how come you haven't set a science based target? But, you know, I did understand the nuance that, you know, there are operational challenges that I didn't understand yet. So that's where I spent the last eight years or so working in corporate sustainability for phenomenal companies. First at Williams Sonoma, managing sustainability for the West Coast Brands, so the Pottery Barn Brands, and the Williams Sonoma Brands, a few others. And then you know, Williams Sonoma, really values aligned company, global supply chain of, you know, tens of thousands of vendors, no shortage of challenges related to material sustainability, and that was a phenomenal experience. And actually, you know, I didn't plan to leave Williams Sonoma, but the opportunity came up to join Grove Collaborative as the first head of sustainability and build a program out, you know, kind of from scratch to some extent for a mission driven, values aligned company and B Corporation. So in 2019, I joined Grove Collaborative. As the first head of sustainability and built the program out, managed everything, you know, through the IPO and beyond, and, just left a couple of months ago to start my own consulting practice, which I've named Impact FWD, just kind of looking ahead to the future, answering that question of sustainability and long term value, and now I'm working as a consultant, working with a blend of investors and brands as a fractional head of sustainability, or on a project basis, really helping implement sustainability. So, anyway, I share that long winded story because everyone in sustainability has this kind of like circuitous path, and I always give this advice of like, you know, you don't have to take, like there's, we put so much pressure on ourselves to take like the perfect job and the perfect job. And I kind of think of it as like, what do I want to learn next? And like, that's really been my focus. So I hope I haven't lost all your listeners yet. Keith Anderson: No, it's a much better introduction than I could have done. So thank you. And, you've used the word sustainability three or four times already, and, it's, it's heard me here a lot. How are you defining it in your new practice and how do you think about it? Danielle Jezienicki: Yeah, I think of it as, when I think about sustainability, I think it's really, you know, this concept of materiality and externalities, like just taking a proper account of what is coming in and going out. So whatever resources you're using, where are they coming from? What happens to them at the end of life? You know, I think kind of a more realistic accounting for the environments and people touched by everything we do. So that's kind of how I think about it, but it's a good question because it really does, we do kind of throw it around so much and, you know, I have started thinking more about like, you know, I, I purposefully didn't include sustainability in the title of, you know, in the name of my consulting practice. And I focused on impact because I think that's really what we need to kind of orient ourselves towards is impact and regeneration and just thinking about, you know, what it is that we're trying to achieve. Not this like blanket term for feeling like, oh, we've done sustainability, we're done, but rather, you know, really kind of, let's be more specific. Keith Anderson: Well, and that's, that's part of why I was curious about it. You, you used another word that I see more and more regenerative and I'm starting to see people debate. So is that a successor to sustainability? Or is it just a related concept, but part of why I'm interested in the vocabulary is sustainability is a discipline. It's a function that a growing number of companies seems to me that a lot of what is likely to be necessary over the next few decades is, that function extending its purview across to your earlier point. Operational parts of a business and really embedding itself in different parts of the business. Danielle Jezienicki: Yeah, no, I think so. And I think that's what we're shifting towards. And I think a lot of the policy changes that we've seen lately will help us get there. When you start talking about integrating climate related risk factors, all of a sudden sustainability isn't like, what charitable nonprofits, you know, like, what is our charitable giving? But it's really about like, okay, where are our physical assets? Like where, where's our supply chain? What are our risk factors? And I think through that lens, we start to understand that what we've called sustainability is really a term that explains material, non financial risk and opportunities, right? And so like, I get so frustrated. I actually like, cannot listen to this garbage debate about like ESG, this and that, and even on like educated. People, like people you expect to understand the topic. I heard like a pod, you know, whatever, I won't like point fingers, but I heard like an educated person on a podcast being like, Oh, this ESG thing is these ESG stocks think they don't need to be governed. And it's like, what are you talking about? Literally, we're talking about material, non financial risk factors and how to measure them. And it's so frustrating to me as someone, you know, kind of in this space, that all we're talking about is like accurately measuring our risks and our opportunities and things that we just traditionally haven't shown up on a balance sheet, right? Like, do you have a factory on a Florida coastline? And how close is it to the ocean? Like, you know, like the, sure, call it sustainability or don't, but like, at the end of the day, those are dollars and like, you know, so it's, it's kind of head scratching as to why we're debating these things. But anyway, here we are. Keith Anderson: Well, I, I think you're right that the more you see it pop up in financial disclosures and earnings calls, the harder it's going to be to misinterpret it. Kathleen McLaughlin, Walmart's head of sustainability, said something at a Goldman conference in September that I've been sharing with anybody that will listen, she was just talking about supply chain and how they're already seeing issues with yield and surety of supply and when you have a retailer like Walmart starting to talk about it in terms like those, I do think it starts to anchor people that may not otherwise pay attention to what this really means. Danielle Jezienicki: Yeah, exactly. And it really connects the dots, I think, between the financial, you know, and what we've traditionally kind of bucketed under ESG. And I don't think we have the language and the tools to totally kind of appreciate the shift of that change. Like, you know, when those horrible floods happened in Pakistan a long time ago, I just remember thinking, like, I wonder how this will affect all the textile retailers and how do they communicate something like that? Because when you start thinking about a global supply chain, you know, in your company and textiles, a lot of cotton comes from there. So it's, you know, connecting these extreme weather events to the global supply chain. I mean, it only takes one event for people to connect the dots. And unfortunately, these are pretty catastrophic, catastrophic events. But I just don't, you know, I think that's what's emerging now. And that's where the policy hopefully will be helpful in helping us build tools out to kind of more accurately measure that risk. But yeah, I mean, I think it's interesting. And I think for people who have kind of been in this space for a long time. It is encouraging to see things moving so quickly finally, you know, even if that's unfortunately the result of, you know, catastrophe and, and necessity, but you know, we have to get here. So, I don't know. I guess we knew this. I don't mean to be like super dark. I don't want to be like, I told you, you know, the world, I told you climate related catastrophe was coming. But, yeah, anyway. Keith Anderson: I imagine it's hard for anybody that's been paying attention not to feel that way sometimes. Danielle Jezienicki: Yes, absolutely. Yeah. Keith Anderson: Now, when you say that it's moving so quickly, are you talking about the actual changing temperatures and extreme weather? Are you talking about the way industry and, and business is moving faster? Because you mentioned the regulation. Danielle Jezienicki: I, I met businesses actually in legislation and just kind of the way, even five years ago, the way you saw companies kind of thinking about sustainability reporting compared to now, I think there's been a real sea change in terms of like pressure to disclose and, you know, kind of meet global standards in the EU and the US. But obviously I do think extreme weather has played a part into that and kind of lighting a fire under everyone. Of being like, oh, actually, you know, this is happening now. We really do need to take this a little more seriously. But, you know, I say that, and then like, we have COP going on right now, led by, I mean, what, what was it that like the fossil fuel, what, there Keith Anderson: There's no, there's no science, supporting a case for phasing out fossil fuels. Danielle Jezienicki: Right, Keith Anderson: As I understand it, he's walked it back a couple times, but I don't know what you expect when you have a fossil guy presiding over COP. Danielle Jezienicki: I mean, I would expect better PR preparation, like just like sticking to the talking points. That's pretty egregious. I don't know. Like, you know, you would just think they would pretend to be like playing nice with the climate people, but, I guess good for him for being explicit. Keith Anderson: Yeah. Yeah, I mean, that, the role of, that industry and the transition I think is such a huge topic that I'm almost wary of opening that can of worms because, It's a huge one. Danielle Jezienicki: Mm hmm. Keith Anderson: Well, you've, you've been in the sustainability function at companies in fairly diverse categories at Williams Sonoma and Grove. How did you think about, or how do you think about really establishing a function, defining a strategy, prioritizing where to make an impact based on not just category, but maybe other factors that I'm not even asking about? Danielle Jezienicki: Yeah. You know, I think my approach is generally to assume I'm the least educated person in the room because you come to a company like Williams Sonoma, you know, I mentioned like the depths of the supply chain. If you think about all the categories, like we were talking about, like Easter baskets for kids all the way to textiles, furniture, you know, I mean, you can't imagine just the number of products that comes out of a company like that. And so, sure, I lead sustainability, but I'm never going to be an expert in all of these categories, right? Same thing with Grove. Like, Grove creates its own products that, you know, largely household essentials focused on cleaning, but it's also a marketplace for third party brands. Everything from pet to diapers to, you know, hair care, everything. So, my approach is always that concept of, like, let me bring everyone together, all these experts together and try to understand what is this concept of materiality. Like, what is the most important, you know, kind of organizing factor, for this group? And I think it's, you know, similar, similar process, William Sonoma Grove. I mean, the general concept is, bring these experts together, have them explain to you, like, what are the nuances? Because I, I think what doesn't work in sustainability as a leader. Is to come in to a company where people have been doing things and say, okay, now we're going to do this. Like, I'm not interested in what, you know, why this hasn't worked or what's been tried before, but we need to decarbonize and so we're going to do X, Y, and Z. So, you know, I kind of try to take a backwards approach to that and like, tell me about your business. Tell me about the challenges. What have you tried? What are your goals? You know, like walk me through the process because I think a lot of times you do have a lot of motivated people who have tried to make changes and they've hit obstacles. And so your job as a sustainability leader is to help them dismantle those obstacles, to make the business case for doing that, to escalate things to leadership, to set goals and kind of help them dismantle those barriers. You know, so my approach to sustainability has been focused on that and tying that concept of, you know, kind of removing barriers to the most material sustainability issues in the business. And so I think like that's where I come in and can offer some expertise of saying like, okay. William Sonoma, we make, you know, all these home essentials. I mean, obviously the goals predated me. So my responsibility was organizing the teams around the largest material inputs of, of wood and cotton. And so it's, you know, thinking about the supply chain and how to get better traceability and, and create tools so that people can, you know, do their jobs and integrate sustainability within those jobs. And so similarly at Grove, I think the challenge was. Yeah, a little bit different actually, because like Grove, Grove is, for those familiar, it's a B Corp, it's a mission driven company. The whole reason that Grove exists is to offer sustainable products. So in some, you know, it's kind of a funny challenge to come into because you're like, oh, we're already doing it, right? Like we have sustainability. And that was the mindset when I joined. And plastic was a big topic. And obviously, for the CPG space, plastic, you know, single use plastic is. So I think that was kind of like the biggest issue and that was on everyone's radar at Grove, but, I don't think, I think where I was able to lend some influence is when I joined Grove, they wanted to be plastic neutral. So to collect one pound of plastic for every pound that we shipped out to customers. And my feedback was, you know, that's nice. What are you going to do? How are you just going to keep shipping plastic? Like you've already acknowledged plastic is a problem. We can't just keep shipping it and say like, oh, we're going to pay someone else to pick it up. So, you know, I pushed pretty hard and, and was able to make progress on having growth set some real goals around plastic and acknowledging that for that industry, plastic is the single biggest challenge, you know, in terms of aligning the business, the business case with sustainability. So I think when you come to any business, what you want to do is decouple the negative impacts of the business from growth. So, and, you know, and ideally connect the positive impacts to growth so that as a company grows and succeeds, you have additional positive impacts. And so when you apply that lens to Growth Collaborative, a company that's providing home essentials to people, what you want is for people not to be shipping more plastic, even if they're collecting it. That's, you know, what I call, like, sustainability 1.0, right? Like, we do bad, but we pick it up. Okay, good. That's better than not picking it up. Sustainability 2.0 is Okay, well, how do we just do better to begin with? How do we design ourselves, you know, like design into the solution? And what that looks like, I think, is, you know, not sending a box full of stuff that goes into the recycle bin, even if it is going to get recycled. So, you know, it's more of like the concentrated formats and the innovations and the plastic free this and the refillable, reusable. You know, kind of moving into that circular business model. And so I don't even remember what your original question was, but anyway, that's, you Keith Anderson: It doesn't really matter because you've touched on, I think, a couple of topics that I'm certain are of interest to our audience, and maybe we can just expand on them. You mentioned that in CPG, plastic is probably the biggest issue. Can you just talk a bit about why? Danielle Jezienicki: Sure. I mean, yeah, I can spend the rest of the podcast talking about why, so, you know, this ties, I think, back to the, what the fossil fuel, I mean. You know, let's just back it up and so that people have context on this. The fossil fuel companies have recognized that the world is decarbonizing. And so their growth and their survival is linked to new revenue streams, right? And what those revenue streams are is plastic. So plastic, you know, whether or not it's a bottle or yoga pants comes from fossil fuel. You know, it's fossil fuel derived. So there is a lot of pressure to continue production of plastic at the pace. And, and actually much higher than the pace. So like, these companies need to kind of make up for lost revenue as people switch to electric cars and, and, you know, devices become more efficient. These companies need new revenue streams and what that looks like is, is new plastic facilities. And so, the CPG industry, where that comes in. So the CPG industry, I think a lot of its growth has, has been Really based on the premise of this, cheap and seemingly disposable material. I mean, it's an incredible material. It's light. It's easy to transport. It's flexible. You can make it look, you know, a million different formats. And, you know, so it's an incredible material. The problem is it doesn't go away. So plastic breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces of microplastic. And those pieces are quite literally everywhere on the planet. You know, from the deepest parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, I mean microplastics are literally in air, water, soil, plants, human placentas, breast milk, like there isn't, you know, kind of a space on earth untouched by plastic. And if we allow these fossil fuel companies to keep on the trajectory that they'd like to be on, that's going to get exponentially worse. And, and I think for people who really, you know, are informed on this. It's already like horrible. So, you know, I don't want to be but we should be alarmist. Right. And so CPG companies are right in the middle of this same challenge of like their continued growth is based on this model of like, we're going to sell you. We're essentially what we're selling you is clean hair. And you've been conditioned that, no pun intended, you've been conditioned. To understand that every product that you bring into your house comes in a plastic bottle and you use it. And when you're done with it, you put it in your recycle bin and through some magical process, it will turn into another shampoo bottle. The reality is there's two myths there. One is that clean hair doesn't require plastic, right? Like it's, it's a concept, that is like a marketing concept. And I think that there's a lot of exciting innovation there. And that consumers are understanding that they signed up for clean hair. They didn't sign up for packaging. That last 500 years in a landfill, right? So, like, nobody asked for that, and so that's one challenge, I think, for the CPG companies is innovating out of that. And then the second one, oh, is this wish cycle? I mean, sure, you can put your, depending on where you live, you can put your cleaned out bottle in your recycle bin, and if it is, you know, type 5 plastic, maybe it will get recycled, it'll make it two more times into new bottles of some kind, and in a best case scenario, it will turn into a speed bump. But realistically, plastic, you know, most plastic doesn't get recycled, only 9 percent in the U. S., I think we're now down to 5%, and most of that is PET, which is like plastic water bottles. And even if plastic does get recycled, it can only be recycled one, you know, two or three times max because of the chemical composition of plastic. It starts to break down and become unusable. So there really is no end of life for plastic that's positive. And you know, which kind of drives me nuts, like all these brands that are like, buy yoga pants made of plastic bottles. And it's like, actually, that's worse because plastic bottles are the one thing getting recycled. And now you're putting them into yoga pants, which are going to shed microplastics every time you wash them, and then they're going to go to a land I mean, it's like, we're not chopping our way out of this problem, right? So, CPG companies are right in the middle of this. They use plastic to package everything. They've set goals, around recycled plastic that, are unrealistic. One, because they pretend that they can continue to use plastic, and that's fine, because they're going to use recycled plastic. And the second is that there isn't enough recycled plastic for these massive companies to meet their, recycled plastic goals. So like Coke, Pepsi, you know, you name your CPG company, all of them have goals around transitioning to recycled bottles. There literally is not enough recycled content for them to all meet those challenges. They've all set the same timeline. the recycling infrastructure that we have in this country and elsewhere does not support the volume that they need to transition their business. And you know, that's number one. And number two is, it's still a problem, like, recycled plastic is just one step away from all of the problems that, you know, virgin plastic had, it just has a better beginning of life. So, you know, I think plastic and CPGs is a really nasty problem that, you know, we're starting to acknowledge, like, we don't, you know, we don't want to use plastic, but in so many ways, it's just become so difficult to avoid. Like, even myself, I have little kids. I mean, I try my best, you know, but, like everyone else, like I really just, I like really strongly believe this cannot be a problem that you put onto consumers. This has to come from the brand level, these innovations. And I think the brands, larger brands, you know, have not been honest about acknowledging the scope of that problem. And that's honestly a big reason I went into consulting is I'm really tired of the sustainability 1.0, you know, kind of pretending to be 2.0. Like recycled plastic goals are not real sustainability goals. They're pretend goals that you say to your investors. You know, whatever. I mean, it's, it's just like not a real solution. Keith Anderson: I'm noticing in a lot of the reports that I read, the infrastructure, the lack of infrastructure is one of the big, explanations for why, I mean, almost none of these targets have been hit, on either the retailer or the brand side. And there seems Danielle Jezienicki: in the beginning of that. Yeah. Keith Anderson: to be a ton of, hope being directed at advanced or chemical recycling, which I'm guessing you have thoughts on? Danielle Jezienicki: Uh It's also not a solution. I mean, you know, I'm not an expert on it. I understand from what I do understand it is problematic and is being seen as a silver bullet solution that enables the continued use of plastic. I just don't think there is a solution that should allow us to keep using plastic the way we are, you know, chemical recycling included. It's an industry driven solution, put it that way. Keith Anderson: What do you think of bioplastics? Danielle Jezienicki: Same thing, they're really problematic from a recycling standpoint. They're better from the beginning of life because there's less fossil fuel, but they're more problematic for recycling and they don't biodegrade. I mean, this whole concept of biodegradability, for something to be composted or biodegraded, it needs certain conditions. Oxygen, water, air. And those don't exist in a landfill, so when you have bioplastics or pretend biodegradable solutions, only 2 percent of households in the U. S. have access to municipal composting, and I have it here in San Francisco, if you look out on trash night, not every house has their green bin out, so like, of that 2%, I would guess it's a lot lower than actually compost, so I think biodegradability is another one of these things where like, we're pretending we have a solution, it's not a solution because nothing is actually going to biodegrade in a landfill, and a lot of people I think are surprised by that. But there just is no solution that involves plastic and I know, I'm not saying we should never use plastic, but I think the role plastic needs to play is in durable, refillable, reusable goods. So, you know, higher quality plastics like HDPE, things like that, made recycled products, made in a format that is meant to be reused, right? And so you have to, recycling is part of it, but it's really more of like, you know, like, just thinking it from a modular perspective, like, how are we actually refilling, reusing products? Like, not in a recycling way, but just like changing the paradigm of like, sure, we can use plastic, but the point isn't to throw it away. Like, let's take advantage of its qualities. The fact that it never goes away, and it will stay in its format forever, like, let's take advantage of that. That makes a great refillable product, right? So, how do we create systems? Like, rather than banging our head against the wall with recycling, which we need to do, I'm not saying we don't, I just don't think we should be throwing all our energy around, like, let's make it recycled. Let's make it bioplastic. The problem is single use. Nothing single use. Single use aluminum is also problematic. Like, single use is the problem. And I think the CPG industry is a really, you know, it's a, it's a real reckoning, right? Because the CPG industry, like, wants you to buy things that are single use because you'll buy more of them. And that's really, like, the growth of the whole industry has kind of been built on that. So from a sustainability standpoint, I would say, like, we kind of need to flip that. And I think there's tremendous opportunity there. I don't think it's, it means everyone's going to shop at co ops. I think we need to just flip our thinking a little bit. And I would love to see retailers take, you know, a real stance there. Not like a, oh yeah, it's page 87 of our sustainability report stance. Keith Anderson: Well, to their credit, they're also running a two store pilot that'll be shut down after a few months. Danielle Jezienicki: Oh yeah. I've been in those. Yep. Exactly. It's really. Keith Anderson: I don't know. I, Danielle Jezienicki: That wasn't advertised in one location and, you know, again, page 86 of the sustainability report. Yeah. Keith Anderson: Other than Grove, or if Grove is the best inspiration free to talk about it, but are there case studies or examples that you view as really, Inspirational in terms of designing plastic out, rethinking about how to decouple the growth of the business with that form of doing bad. I mean, as you just said, something I've been sort of going category by category, thinking about the applications, you know, between expandable consumption categories versus, you know, lower frequency, less expandable. In expandable consumption categories, so much of the business model is about how do we create demand where there may not have been demand, and there are some categories where I see a viable, prosperous future where they're not only changing things like packaging, but they're fundamentally changing the nature of how people engage with that category and so I'm curious if there are examples, even at a category level, that you think are really good food for thought as people think about what Sustainability 2.0 might look like. Danielle Jezienicki: Yeah I think category by category is exactly right because there are nuances in each category that really matter and you have to meet consumers where they are. You really, I think if you try to push people too far, you kind of lose the masses and that's a problem. So I think Grove has a ton of great examples. So I think that's, in terms of like, you know, I'm trying to think, I mean, the thing, I mean, I think Grove is definitely a good step forward, right? You've got your refillable products, everything is generally in aluminium which is the most recyclable material in the most places in the US. So I think that's a good start. If you look across the platform of brands that Grove carries, there's a lot of like really cool innovations. I mean, I was a Grove customer long before I worked there and, I think it's like, I can't imagine for people who understand how to use Grove, I think it is like irreplaceable, you know, because like, I'll go on and find, like, I can get compostable diapers, but then, you know, I have the earth baby service here in San Francisco, which is now rediaper, but anyway, compostable diapers, which is, I'll make a plug, like the number one thing that parents can do to, you know, kind of minimize their impact is diapers, like another case. And also, Oh my gosh. Okay. Well, I get so overwhelmed because there's so much information when you start like looking around your house of things you want to share with people. But anyway, chemical safety really comes into this also. Like, if you start thinking about, you know, the health of your children, like you really don't want all these plastics in, you know, kind of sensitive parts of their body. So this is a really important topic for parents. I encourage you to look at EWG and, and some of the research on diapers. Okay. But Keith Anderson: What's EWG? Danielle Jezienicki: Oh, Environmental Working Group. Sorry. They do, I think, like the best research out there for consumer products to connect them to chemical safety, which is another kind of peripherally linked topic of plastics. It's like the chemicals you absorb by using Okay. So, you know, kind of thinking category by category. This is like such a hard question for me to answer because, I am so passionate, obviously, about sustainability in the home space. And so rather than trying to answer every category, what I will say is the advice I usually give people is you have to look at your own habits, right? And, and look at your recycle bin and try to understand like, where am I using plastic? Where am I using waste? And solve problems based on that. You know, and I think like when I, so when I think about like my use of growth, so many great products, right? Like refillable soaps and you know, concentrated cleaning products, like things you use every day. The Swedish disc cloth replaces like millions of paper towels. So you've got like kind of cleaning and home essentials. And I love what Grove is doing there. You know, and then when I think about other categories, for example, I think Nike does a cool job of reusing, you know, plastic into Flyknit, they, they come up a lot as like, just having innovated, I think, sustainability into the design process in a way that I think other brands haven't, you know, because I think a lot of brands. We'll design something and then at the end, like the last step, it's like, okay, well, how do we source organic cotton or how do we kind of check a box for sustainability? Whereas I think Nike has flipped that and really integrated sustainability into every step of design. And that's a really difficult thing to do. And I really applaud them for it. I don't think they get enough credit for the work that they do to design products with sustainability in mind, with recycled materials in mind. You know, and also, you know, I love kind of the social impact work and everything else they do. So credit is due to them there, you know, rather than, I think there's handfuls of kind of pockets of cool things happening in different areas, but in general, the thing that makes me the most excited are the areas that haven't set out to be sustainable businesses. So like the RealReal, the Poshmark, you know, of the world, those kinds of things where you have, I mean, I'm, I'm an addicted Poshmark user, I try to buy, I set a goal for myself to buy 85 percent or 75, upwards of 75 percent of what I buy needs to be pre existing. So whether it's like used or like just exists already, like it's not new. And so what, what makes me excited about consumer products is you have these marketplaces where people are so passionate about circular economy and reuse and resale, and they didn't come to it to be sustainable, right? Like. People at The RealReal are looking for a deal. They're like luxury fashion people looking for like a good deal. People on Poshmark are just like, you know, a lot of these, like I got one product, which was like, you know, thank you for supporting like my, you know, Christian home and da, da, da, da, da. It was like, this is not your traditional sustainability messaging, but I love that it brings together people from just totally different backgrounds who are, you know, maybe like a stay at home mom, like finding a business by selling stuff online. So what is most exciting to me are those innovations that haven't set out to kind of be a sustainability problem that haven't like set out to market themselves as sustainability. But like have done that. So like one kind of counter example, a company, you know, I think about a lot is Rothy's that uses plastic bottles and makes them into shoes. It's a good start. And I think the problem is that people then buy Rothy's and they're like, Oh yeah, I wear sustainable shoes. And it's like, okay, well you wash them in the washing machine. And so you shed microplastics. And then. They don't have, like, no one sends them back. So then you just put them in a landfill. So, like, these kind of halfway solutions, I think, are incremental steps towards where we need to be going. And I applaud brands that are doing that and at least using recycled materials to make new products. And I don't mean to talk badly about Rothy's. I think they're a great, they're, they're well along the way and well past where most companies are. But we're missing that critical part of, like, closing that loop. So, in a very long winded way, I'm saying I love the companies that have closed the loop without intending to. Like you know, the circular, you know, you know, then I think another challenge we come into is, with this topic of resale is that all, all brands are now have their resale platforms, right? And it's like buried on the website and there's 10 sad items on there. But you know, I think for the brands who are still in business to sell you stuff, as you said, like expandable consumption. I've not seen one brand take a meaningful stance on resale of like, we, like a revenue goal, basically like we want to see 10 percent of our revenue come from our resale business this year and 20 percent next year. And, you know, dah, dah, dah, dah, like all of these brands, all of these innovations are not meant to replace the traditional part of the business. And so I think that's really the problem, that we're facing right now is like, yeah, sure. There's cool things happening. They haven't replaced the business, like the practical business. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co. Stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=2864z358…
In this episode of the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast, host Keith Anderson delves into the world of supply chain adaptation in the face of climate change. Joining him is Berk Bahceci, Founder and CEO of Heraclea, a family-owned olive oil producer based in Turkey. Berk shares how his company has maintained supply chain stability and quality yield amidst industry challenges caused by climate-related impacts. They discuss the unique agricultural practices Heraclea employs and explore potential scalable solutions for the broader industry. If you've ever wondered about the relationship between climate change and the cost of olive oil or are interested in innovative supply chain strategies, this episode is a must-listen. Learn more about Berk and Heraclea: Heraclea’s Website Berk’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our plus and pro tier program at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Hey, everyone. We've got a great episode today, and candidly, it's a little different than what we've covered so far. I would say that most of what we've heard on the show to date has been about mitigating emissions. That is, things that we do to prevent or reduce emissions and today's episode, in many ways, is more about adaptation. The end of September, I listened in on the Goldman Sachs Global Sustainability Conference and one of the more interesting sessions to me was Kathleen McLaughlin, Walmart's Chief Sustainability Officer and EVP. Who made a comment about supply chain impacts of climate change that I want to quote from just to set us up for today's episode. And quoting, she said, a second impact that we experience is in supply chain in terms of surety of supply and shifts in yields and quality of commodities just based on, again, weather effects and so on. So those are some near and present things. And Kathleen and Walmart are not the first or only retailers to talk about challenges in the supply chain, transcending just the pandemic and some of those disruptions, but spilling over into what's happening as temperatures rise and more volatile weather impacts the supply chain. And if you're like me, maybe you're a fan of olive oil, and if you are, you've probably noticed some pretty steep inflation over the last year or two. And, candidly, I hadn't thought much about what was driving it until I met and spoke with today's guest, Berk Bahceci of Heraclea. Berk is the founder and CEO of Heraclea, which is a family owned olive oil producer based in Turkey and he and his company are taking a pretty interesting and different approach to agriculture that has helped them maintain surety of supply and quality of yield while the rest of the industry has faced just incredible challenges and really significant drops in supply, at the commodity level. And so, Berk will be the first to tell you that at the scale that he and his company are producing product, some of the approaches and practices that work for them may not work for the industry at large, but he does have some ideas that he thinks will scale. And, regardless, I certainly found it really fascinating to hear about. What led him to start the company and how he approached the decisions he's made about, how to grow and produce and package and, so many other decisions about the business. So, I'm sure you're going to enjoy hearing from Berk as I did, and let's introduce Berk Bahceci of Heraclea Food Company. Berk, welcome to the show. Berk Bahceci: Thank you very much for having me. Keith Anderson: Great to have you. Well, why don't we start with your story and the story of starting Heraclea. Berk Bahceci: I'll go back a little bit. I, I was born and raised in Turkey. I moved to the States 12 years ago for college first. And I always had the, intention of becoming, an attorney actually here in the States and I followed that route up to college. I went to law school. You know, took the bar exam, started working in DC, but at some point, and this is like actually my first year in the profession, I realized that it's not going to be, for me, the things that I'm looking for when I wake up and go to work are not, I couldn't find them in the work that I was doing. And I wanted to, you know, develop something, a business that really reflected, my own self. Maybe it was a search for identity. And then it was that around that time that I started reflecting on my life, and myself and, you know what is it that I can do here in the States that shows a part of me? So then we got to the olive oil. My family had always owned olive groves, not at the scale that we're currently at, but we did have some land. And I proposed the idea of turning our olive oil thing, family thing, into a for profit business. We started this in November of 2020. We started working on the idea. Keith Anderson: So three years ago? Berk Bahceci: Yeah. And then, but we did a lot of things in that three years. We, first we purchased, acquired more land to get it to a scale. We had like around 50 acres, and right now we have around 200 acres of olive groves in Turkey, Milas. And then we built, a processing facility from scratch. For storage of the olive oil, because it's the most important thing in olive oil production, I think, is the way you store your olive oil. It has to have no contact with oxygen. The temperature must always be maintained at a certain level. There has to be no humidity, you know, a lot of different things. And I, we thought like, if we don't control this part of the business, then, I don't think we can claim that we're producing and selling high quality olive oil. So we built that facility from ground up in six months. We got it, certified for food safety by international bodies. All of these things took a lot of time. And then we did the branding, of course, photo shootings, like sourcing of the bottles. We got that from Italy. We wanted it to be different, in the look. So we spend a lot of time forming the business. Those three years were spent, towards that and then we launched on March of this year, 2023. And it's been going great so far. Keith Anderson: Rocket ship ever since. So in a way you didn't choose olive oil, olive oil chose you. You know, part of the reason I thought it would be so interesting to meet and speak with you is you've already mentioned things like temperature and humidity. And I think we've all seen headlines about inflation in the olive oil category. What has your experience been about, the impacts of erratic weather and, and rising temperatures and how do you think about some of those factors as you're producing and building an olive oil business. Berk Bahceci: Of course. So like in, in olive cultivation, there are, there are two, a couple of ways to do this. One is the conventional way, which is, you plant, olive trees, in certain distances across a huge land and then, you, do irrigation, you use fertilizers, you use pesticides, whatever you can think of to maximize the yields. And that's how it's done in, I would say, most parts of the world because, you know, at the end of the day, olive oil is kind of like a commodity. People need it. You know, you have to, you have to be producing at a certain level to supply the world's demand. I get it. But I think, and the recent developments in the olive oil industry is showing this, that the current conventional standards of olive cultivation aren't actually working. And that is why we're seeing this drop happening. supply significantly being impacted. I mean, we're talking about, 80 percent reduction in, the world's biggest producers supply last year. Like, that's a huge number and it's not just about, oh, the weather got like hotter and now we're not able to produce. It's not just about that. It's about the way you treat the soil and the surrounding ecosystem for all the times up until that drop and that, decrease in supply started happening. So you have been using fertilizers, you have been using pesticides to kill the weeds, to beat the bees, bugs, and everything in the soil just for the sake of growing olives at like, you know, inflated amounts. And now the soil or the ecosystem is basically dead and, a slight, an increase in temperature or a reduction in like water is now causing this huge impact on olive oil. So, we're not doing the same thing. What we're doing is, we, we, our production has remained notably resilient, like, in the face of the severe drought conditions, that, that we're seeing, which I mentioned in Spain and Italy, and I think it's, the way that we've been communicating able to survive is a direct result of our, commitment to sustainable farming practices. Not everyone can do it. I mean, if you're working at a scale of thousands of acres, I'm not expecting you to do it, but we're able to do it. Our position enables us to do it. We've focused on, responsible management of our land, paying attention to soil productivity through natural methods. Like, instead of using artificial irrigation, we're doing rainwater harvesting. What is rainwater harvesting? We brought, like, a couple professors from a local university and we've identified the paths the water, follows when, you know, there's, significant rain. And at the end of those roads, we built, we dug, big holes so to say , And then we collected that water and used it, as needed instead of just digging a well deep down and exploiting the, well, beneath the surface water resources, which are already scarce, like we're, we, we've treated the environment nicely so that now it's not treating us as badly as it treats, other producers. I'll give another example. So in olive cultivation, there are certain elements called NPK, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. And there are fertilizers named NPK in different ratios that, you know, farmers use. We don't use any of them. Instead of, like, when we see a deficiency in the soil, we try to take, an alternative approach. What we did, for example, was to build, close to a hundred bird hives in our olive groves to attract birds. And we fed them and, in return, they're pooping on our land. And we found that this is maybe, a small contribution, but, small contributions like this, when they get together, totally they're impacting the MPK, nutrient levels of our soil, and we don't need to use fertilizers. So things like this, green manure for nitrogen fixing. If there's a nitrogen deficiency, we use green manure. We plant it, we mow it, and then, we fix that problem. That's how we treat the soil. That's how we treat the environment, the ecosystem, I say. And I really seek to protect it. And in return, I think it's treating us well too. But this is something specific to the way we position the company. If we were a producer that supplied like 20 percent of the world's olive oil, we wouldn't be able to do any of this. So I agree, I understand those who do it that way, but we do it this way. Keith Anderson: Well, you've mentioned the contrast in scale a few times. Is the ambition to grow the business to a larger scale? And how do you anticipate having to evolve some of these practices as you do get bigger? Berk Bahceci: It is, I mean, it is never our intention to supply 50 percent of the world's olive oil needs, like, that, we're not talking about a scale at that level, but I, envisage Heraclea to be, an accessible, household brand in the States, providing, traceable, number one, and, sustainably, produced, olive oil throughout the United States. And I think, we're able to do the things that we do this way. And scale our business by acquiring more lands and working with local farmers who also already own, those, huge acreage of lands and bring them up to our standards by being able to purchase their products from them at a premium so that they are incentivized to change the way they do business, the way they do farming and just, help us, grow our supply chain. So I don't think, we're, we're able to, we're, we're able to scale, our business the way we do it. Of course, we can't do it in the way to supply the world's need of olive oil, but, we can, have ourselves a target market and, expand this business by the ways that I mentioned, and still be profitable because like, if you go to a grocery store, you're going to find an olive oil for 16. 9 ounce selling for. 10 or like 12. We won't, we will never be able to do that, because, you know, our costs can afford it, but at the level that we're selling the price point that we're selling, we're able to, scale this business to supply, you know, needs of people in the States looking for a high quality, traceable and sustainable olive oil. Keith Anderson: Taking a bit of a step back. I, I knew there were supply issues over the last year or two. I didn't realize how profound they were. Was it really such an abrupt, precipitous drop from those leading producers? And well, I mean, you may not have the answer, but is that something that the industry anticipates is going to be, an ongoing supply issue? What's the, how are the big players responding to something like that? Berk Bahceci: So, this issue has been going on for two years. It's not new, first of all. Last year, this was also the case in Spain and Italy. And actually, in Spain, there are co ops that are, like, the biggest producers of olive oils. And, these co ops, because they're supplying, like, off the top of my head, I don't remember, but like, I am going to, I'm inclined to say like 40 percent of the world's olive oil needs, when they experience, a crisis like this in their supply chain, they look elsewhere. I mean, they have to still be able to produce that olive oil. When I say produce, I mean, bottle it and then ship it to whatever customers they have. So they go and look out to places like Turkey, Tunisia, Morocco, Greece, and they talk directly with producers in these countries to purchase their olive oil in bulk, ship it to Spain or wherever their, bottling facilities are, and then, produce their, continue producing their bottles. So, that's how they're, that's how they're, trying to, manage this issue with, to, to, with minimal damage to their business. But I think this, this is not a solution. The, the real solution is, actually in the way, we treat the, the soil, and it's been treated badly for generations now. So I think it's going to take time for it to heal. And we really, have to, not we, I mean, those people who are experiencing this really have to think about, the way they do all of cultivation and maybe change their farming practices. Perhaps this is going to be reflected in increasing olive oil prices. We will keep on seeing this because there's a, there's a mismatch right now between supply and demand. And I, I see all about pricing, prices keep increasing, this year, next year. And I think until this problem is, resolved. Keith Anderson: You've mentioned changing some of the agricultural practices. One concept that I see mentioned more and more frequently by a lot of the major global brands that rely on agriculture as regenerative agriculture. Is that something that you consider yourself to be doing? Berk Bahceci: Yeah, I mean, regenerative is a very popular name these days, especially in the United States. And yes, I mean, when I say, they have to change the way they do things, it doesn't necessarily have to be doing like regenerative agriculture only. I mean, it can be like over 50 percent of the carbon emissions associated with olive oil production from farm to mill until it reaches your table, comes from the use of fertilizers and pesticides. The problem here is, that the producers are doing. What is called super high density farming. Super high density farming is let's say if just making this number up, but like if 100 trees could go into an acre, 100 olive trees, what super high density farmers do is they they plant 800 trees in that one acre and it is too many olive trees for that piece of soil to handle And then, to make it work, they pump fertilizers, they use artificial irrigation, and then, because the trees are so close to each other, there are fruit flies, different kind of bugs, weeds, and to tackle that, then they use pesticides, you know what I'm saying? And then, this is a cycle that keeps on repeating, and with every piece of chemical you use, your contributing another damage to the soil. I'm saying, maybe olive oil shouldn't be produced at this level, at this amount. You know, it's, unfortunately, it's something that requires a lot of time, care, and if you use these things, fertilizers, pesticides, or other chemicals, you know, we see, you know, in the long run, yields decreasing, drops happening, and output significantly being impacted, why, and I'm saying why not, like, let's use less aggressive, methods in our agriculture. You know, let's not plant 800 trees in one acre. Let's plant like 300 trees and try to use less of these chemicals. And yes, the price will increase because supply will decrease, but maybe that that's the price that olive oil should be at for a sustainable production. And, I think, in time, I don't know how long this is going to take, but people will realize that. , The conventional methods have been working so far, but now with the drop and, impact on olive oil supply, we're seeing the mother nature is telling us you know, it's responding, it's saying, you know, like, I'm hurt and I don't want to, like, I can't continue doing this. And that's, that's like a very maybe romantic way of explaining this, but this is the truth. Like, the soil can't take it anymore. And this is not about like, olive cultivation only. This is something that we're seeing in other parts of, other areas of agriculture as well. But olive cultivation is kind of what I do, and I can speak for it. I, we're not observing any of the problems, that are being observed in other parts of the world in our own groves. I mean, the, ecosystem is lively, there are bugs, bees, beads, we're not cutting anything out, you know, it's, it's, it's working great so far for us. Keith Anderson: You mentioned some of these same issues are happening in other agricultural sectors. Where else do you see it being an issue? Berk Bahceci: I mean, like I said, I, I'm not an expert in those areas. I'm just seeing inflated prices across, different commodities. And I think this is due to a general trend in the methods that are being used are supposed to be decreasing prices, increasing yields. That's why they're doing all of this, but I'm seeing lower output, higher prices, and part of it is due to global inflation, of course, but I think, we as like stakeholders in agriculture should also be looking and reflecting back on the ways we do things and assess, our, performance and try to, you know criticize ourselves and find ways. Is there anything that we're doing wrong that's contributing to this? Not just it's inflation, prices are increasing. That's a very easy explanation. Okay. I think, you know, more in depth explanation will include, answers to the ways we do farming as well so. Keith Anderson: Yeah, again, part of the reason that I thought it would be so interesting to speak with somebody from the olive oil industry is I think one of the impacts that's a little under discussed is how some of these things are already impacting yields, quality. There was a with Walmart's global head of sustainability at a Goldman Sachs sustainability forum a few weeks ago, and she was pretty direct about mentioning that there are already issues with yield and surety of supply and I think it's pretty notable to have, among the world's largest retailers increasingly directly mentioning this isn't only something that we're trying to do, from a, it's the right thing, for from a mitigation point of view, it's increasingly becoming an issue of keeping the products that people want on the shelf and I, I see a couple of different philosophies about how to approach it. You know, one thing that I've seen, you mentioned nitrogen and some of the fertilizers, there are companies like. Kula Bio and Nitricity. Kula is close to us. They're based in Natick, Massachusetts. Nitricity is in the Bay Area in California. These are companies that are developing decarbonized or more sustainable nitrogen fertilizers, and I'm sure there are others. And I think on that end of the solution spectr the idea is basically we can continue producing in a essentially conventional way, just with a decarbonized substitute for how we were getting to the same outcome. And then you, you said something that I think is pretty interesting, but really potentially controversial, which is, and these are my words, not yours, but effectively the managed decline of the category, which I, I find interesting because, again, I'm starting to see certain retailers for different reasons, sometimes because they're having these ongoing supply chain issues, and sometimes because they're on a net zero path that they don't see a way to get to while continuing to sell the same volumes of certain types of products that they've historically sold, but how do you think about maybe not just for your own business, but for the industry? How do you think the industry is and how do you think they should be approaching the sort of scale side of reinventing itself, both to adapt to some of these supply issues and to lower the footprint? Berk Bahceci: First of all the concept of and this is not just about olive oil, but in general, for any business that is involved in production, the concept of doing your production and then if there are any carbon emissions, buying credits to offset and become a net zero is a concept that I'm very against, because I don't think the solution is you know, just offsetting your carbon emissions with credits elsewhere, the solution is, you know, really looking at your own production and mitigating and finding ways to make sure you are not emitting the carbons that you're already emitting. Well, in our case, that is not using fertilizers, not using pesticides. We just, completed the project of putting solar panels above, our, storage and bottling facility. So the AC that's working inside the bottle, bottling machine when it's turned on, or, you know, even like the electricity that we're using, everything is solar powered now. We haven't made any assessments of these because we're still in the stage of developing the brand, the company, and its, total, chain of, production. But once we finalize those things, we will do an assessment. And what, if there is, if there's a, if there's still a positive, carbon left, yes, I mean, we, we may buy credits, but like the, the real way that we're going to do is like, what else more can we do to make sure that this is not result producing, positive carbon emissions. So I think with the, olive cultivation and olive oil industry, I think, these, producers that are producing at scale, first of all, should look into the fertilizers and other chemicals that they use. The ones that the companies that you mentioned, I haven't heard many of them. Probably because we're mostly reliant on the companies that are available in the region where we produce. And, you know, we're not dealing with those companies too much because there's really no purchase, happening because we're not using any of this. But those that are doing this at like global scale, should, should really reconsider, the things they use, and the ways that they use it. But, and, if this is going to result in a lower output, so be it. And I don't think it will result in an output, like last year, the drought caused 80 percent decline in the supply, okay? I think, if producers switch to, more environmentally friendly alternatives and the chemicals that they use and change the ways, like instead of doing super high density farming, if they choose to do high density farming, like not 800 but like 500 trees, still not 100, like Keith Anderson: You're negotiating with yourself. It was 300 a few minutes ago. Berk Bahceci: Or like, I mean, as I'm saying, like try to find a balance that is still going to make this business be at a scale, but not at the scale that it's currently at, because the decline of 80% is going to be much less, in my opinion. If you switch to these health, more environmentally conscious alternatives, maybe it's gonna be 20%, 30% decline in your deal, but it's not gonna be all of a sudden one year 80% decline and the prices. I've tripled, like since 2020, I'm following olive oil prices every day. There's an international olive council that is, releasing daily, prices, from the major producing regions, high end in Spain is one of them. And if you, if you look at the graph since, 2020, all you're going to see is it's going up and it doesn't look like it's going to go down. So, I mean, we're at the same point. I mean, output is lower, prices are higher. What the things that you were doing was supposed to keep the output high, prices low, but obviously they're not working. I mean, they have been, have been working, but now we're seeing backlash from, from the earth. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=28xkyr3n…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

In this episode of the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast, host Keith Anderson sits down with David Bryngelsson, CEO and founder of CarbonCloud. With a background in climate science, David shares his journey from academia to founding CarbonCloud, a climate intelligence platform for the food industry. They delve into the challenges and opportunities of product-level climate footprinting and labeling, exploring why it's gaining traction and how it can drive sustainability in the food value chain. Tune in to discover how technology is revolutionizing climate transparency in the food sector and why it's becoming a crucial consideration for retailers and brands. Learn more about David: CarbonCloud’s Website David’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ 👈 If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Keith Anderson: Hello, this is the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson. Today's guest is David Bryngelsson, PhD. David is CEO and founder of CarbonCloud, a climate intelligence platform for the food industry. Essentially, they help anyone across the food value chain calculate and reduce the climate footprint of food products. Previously, David was a climate scientist. He spent eight years immersed in climate change mitigation. As a published researcher and lecturer at Chalmers University of Technology before he made a career pivot and started CarbonCloud. We cover a lot of ground in this conversation. It's a topic I've been following for, around a year and was really eager to learn more about. We talk about why product level climate footprinting and labeling has historically been so challenging and why new technology makes it a lot more achievable. We talk about why comparatively few retailers and brands calculate product level footprints and label their products with climate footprints today, but why that's likely to change in the years to come. And we unpack the business case and who typically has a seat at the table when retailers and brands are deciding and deploying, this type of technology. I really learned a ton, and I think you will too. So let's meet David Bryngelsson, CEO and founder of CarbonCloud. Hi, David. Thanks so much for joining me. Good to see you. David Bryngelsson: Good to see you. Thank you for having me. Keith Anderson: Well, I always love starting these discussions with a little bit of background on you and how you came to do what you're doing now. And, as I said to you a bit earlier, I find it super fascinating when somebody who comes from a, deeply technical or scientific background, sees opportunity to have an impact in industry. So maybe we could start there. Why don't you tell us a bit about, who you are and how you came to start CarbonCloud? David Bryngelsson: All right, let's do that. That goes actually a pretty long way back, but yeah, so now we are a source company. I've been running this for a bit over four years. And we're now going to a growth phase. And before that I was in academia for, roughly eight years doing climate change mitigation research. And that is maybe an unusual trajectory, but sort of how did this happen? So let's go back a little bit further. I decided when I was like 14 or something like that. So first half of the nineties that I wanted to dedicate my life to fighting climate change and doing it as effectively as possible. And then I thought about like, how do I make the best impact? And, As I was doing studies at university, I was doing physics and I was like thinking about what to do. There was some, a division there that was doing some teaching where they had some professors that were very influential, both in sort of public outreach and to prime ministers, you know, IPCC lead authors, stuff like that. And I thought, well, that, that is definitely a way of making an impact and some really cool people. So I joined that research division and I did research for a while before I realized that for most verticals, like energy, transport, the change was already happening, like the cutting edge research wasn't needed, but more like it was already in the commercialization phase. Whereas at the same time we had the food industry, which at the time was responsible for about a quarter of the problem and there was really nothing happening. So, I focused increasingly on that from a research point of view. And there also it became very clear to me that we know enough from the point of view of research to solve the problem and like from the, to get the measurement going and get the engineers working on finding the solutions. But the industry was entirely lacking. tools and methods for, for working with it, to be data driven and to, to act on the business opportunity that I saw was there. And the business opportunity being the food that, the world has decided to solve climate change. The policies are coming. We can be very certain that people will eat also in the future. We want food. And then if you're as a food producer, figure out a way to produce good food that people want without emissions, people will want to buy it. Basically, same thing as Tesla did for transport. And no one was doing that. And I was thinking why? Well, fundamentally, it had to do with a measurement problem. So if you're in a food producer, you normally don't know what their emissions are. So to be able to go after a business opportunity like that, you need to have a strategy for how to decarbonize your production and still deliver good products. But as the food system looks, which is a very large network of long supply chains where they don't know a lot about each other. No, no one really knew how to go about it or very few companies knew how to go about it. But I figured that I think I know how to solve that. So, I switched careers, left academia to fund this company to solve that problem, to develop a platform, a tool to enable, to put really, really good quality data in an understandable way, in the hands of the people who need the data to make this transition happen. And these people are then from everywhere in the supply chain, from the grocer or wholesaler, to the producer, to the ingredient supplier, to the farmer. And everyone will need to collaborate to collect data, to make innovations, to do changes in the production system to solve the problem. And, and that's what we are working hard on now. So I ended up as like the reason for me to becoming then the software founder and building this company is that I see this as a very, very good tool to build a scalable solution to make this impact, to sort of take the learnings and insights that I've gotten and refine it and really sort of put it in the hands of the people who need it. And also it's awesome fun. Keith Anderson: I'm sure it is. So just briefly from your academic background, you mentioned when you got into this area, food represented around a quarter of the problem. Can you just expand on that for folks that may not understand, why food is such a big source of emissions? David Bryngelsson: Yeah, sure. All right. So, looking at climate change in total, I mean, you have emissions from many different sources where fossil fuels have been and still is the major part of it. Where you burn fossil fuels, you can get emissions. And that is a part of the problem that needs solving. But it's really not the only part of the problem. You have other sectors as well, where food is a very large one, where, you have emissions from biological processes in soils, biological processes in livestock, in animals when they're eating, and then you also have energy used, in farming, you have energy in tractors, and then you have in sort of logistic systems and refinery processes. But for food, it's primarily the vast majority of the emissions happen at the agricultural stage. Where some of the processes on the agricultural states are very easy to understand, like deforestation. You cut down trees, trees are made out of carbohydrates. You burn them or they rot or whatever. The carbon in the trees ends up in the atmosphere. That is one large driver of emissions in agriculture, but then you have these nitrification processes in soil where bacteria, and stuff like have this, like, I don't know, biological processes where there are chemicals produced and you have nitrous oxide and methane and other very potent greenhouse gases getting emitted. And, yeah, globally, that is a big part of, big part of the problem. And also this goes back to when I talked about earlier about the measurement part of the food system, one that's tricky, like the, how to keep track of the emissions of food is much more difficult than other verticals. Because if you take a power plant to make electricity, you burn coal. or natural gas, you get electricity out, and you get emissions. And the amount of emission is always proportional to the amount of coal you burn. So you burn a pound of coal, you know how much carbon dioxide you'd get. Same if you drive a car and you burn a liter of petrol, or a gallon of petrol or whatever, you always know how much carbon dioxide you get. Whereas in food, you have the emissions happening somewhere else in the supply chain and also most of the emissions, as I mentioned, happen in the agricultural phase, so for most food producers and definitely for retailers, very far away and also very difficult to measure. So these microbiological processes are very, very tricky to measure because the flux, the amount of gas released from the field is low, but in aggregate, it's very large. Keith Anderson: Well, and, and you've sort of anticipated and started to answer one of my big questions, which is, there's been a ton of venture capital invested in, I think, industry agnostic, sort of broad based carbon accounting and management platforms. Why does the food industry require something tailor made? It sounds like part of the, the question is, or part of the challenge is the complexity of measuring it. Are there other drivers? David Bryngelsson: Yeah, yeah, I would say definitely are, and, and this goes back to which problem are you trying to solve? So if the problem you're trying to solve is figuring out roughly where are we at? So you have an operations, you want to figure out, so how much of the emissions come from our spend on food? How much come up on our spend on sort of housing properties, vehicles, whatever, the personnel then doing this industry agnostic where you have spend based data, rough estimate, it's, it's good enough. And, and for a lot of the reporting needs, it's, it's good enough, you're fine. But if you want to get to a solution of the problem, you go from, all right, so you figure out that, say you're a grocer, and you realize that 95 percent of our emissions come from the food that we sell. And then like, all right, so what are we going to do about it? When you get to that, what are we going to do about it? You need to dig into the detail, because the details matter. And then suddenly knowing that a dollar spent on food causes roughly this amount of emission is not enough and also knowing that if it's spent on meat it's roughly this. It's also not enough. You need to be able to differentiate between all your different options and this goes down to so as a grocer, if you're going to procure something to keep in, like, in your store, you need to know what's the difference between different suppliers and different options. Because if you were to say, stop selling meat, your business will probably not go very well. So you need to figure out, you need to maintain sort of selling what people want. And this goes back to the business opportunity. People still want food, they want good food, but they will increasingly be prepared to do something to get the missions done, maybe pay a little bit of premium or whatever. And then you need to identify where that is. And then you need to go down to the details. What's the difference in getting an orange from Mexico, Florida, or Brazil? What's the difference, right? First on roughly level, and then eventually get down to, so you're getting your oranges from Mexico, and then someone supplying those realize that you want to pay premium for lower emissions, then they need to figure out what's, what's the out of our thousand farmers, say, that we procure from, how do they fare? Which ones are better? Which ones are worse? And then eventually figuring out how can we get the poorly performing ones to perform better? And that is definitely in the detail on how the nitty gritty in agriculture happens. And so the solution needs to be able to capture the data for how the production systems look like in the detail, to be able to tell the story, to be able to track it, to be able to track it over time and differentiate, and then create the visibility of the better performance towards those who care. Because even say that you are in a country very far away where there is no climate policy whatsoever, but your market is the U. S. or the market, your market is Europe, where there is climate policy and there will be more policy coming, then if you can prove that your emissions are lower, you get access to that market and you get paid premium. So then it becomes relevant to perform. But then you need To be able to measure on a very large scale in a very consistent manner, all the different producers to be able to tell that story. And there it needs to be very specific. Keith Anderson: So I've got a good sense now for why food is so, different and, and more challenging than broad-based. You know, let's use averages to estimate based on spend. Let's unpack a little bit, what exactly is the data that you're able to provide, you know, at what level of granularity, where does it come from? And, and we can move from there, I think, too. So who's using it and how are they using it? David Bryngelsson: Back to the measurement problem, right? So we say, we have agreed, our governments have agreed that by mid century. We are going to get down to zero emissions. So, at least not every country, but in the U. S. and Europe and some other places, we've agreed to this. So this is 26 years back, away. Sorry. So in 26 years, we're going to get down to zero. And, the amount of data, like if you take a fairly complex product like, like this one, a soft drink here, with a lot of ingredients in it and, and each and every ingredient, like first, there's a lot of parameters to calculate the footprint. You need to know what the ingredients are, how much there are, where they're from, how it's produced, and so on and so forth. And then for each ingredient, there is a value chain with several steps. And there are many, so it branches out. So for a sort of complex product, there might be something like 10, 000 parameters to calculate the footprint. And there will eventually we will need to collect all that data and not the data we're talking about production data. So like yield levels, solid type levels or vehicle types, load factor types for transport, fuel types and so on. So a lot of different parameters need to be collected and then we need to make investments and innovations to sort of change how we operate to get the emissions down. So the totality of data that we'll need to track will be very similar to the amount of data we have in the financial accounting system. That's the scale of this measurement thing that we'll need to do and we'll need to build this up quickly. And compared to financial data, we've had something like 700 years to build that up. Right? Keith Anderson: We don't have that much time, do we? David Bryngelsson: We don't because we need to act on the data. So we need to build it up and we need to act on it to get it down in 26 years. That is tricky. Fortunately for us, now we have built a lot of very good software tools that enables us to scale things extremely rapidly. But also there needs to be a bit of a pragmatism because if you take a food brand like this one that I showed, Tenzing here, that, they realize this, they want to act as your business opportunity and profiling themselves as we are working on climate change. They need to be able to start making decisions and use this before every single producer in along the value chain, including every single farmer has collected all the thousands of watts of data, because that would take forever and there wouldn't be an incentive really for compliance for most of them. So, what we have done to solve this is that we have flipped the calculation process around by look, instead of collecting all the data and then making the calculation, we look for, we're basically built a framework. What are the equations that govern emissions in the food value system, in agriculture and everything after? And then look for, what do we know about it? What has someone measured and collected somewhere? And there's a lot. And then we built this benchmark data set for every single parameter. So if you know that like you get a tea from Kenya that goes into this one, we have a pretty good idea how tea is produced in Kenya and how it gets here and what types of vehicles and so on and so forth for the entirety. So we know that without knowing the specifics, we can actually tell a lot, which means that we can enable someone like that to, by only letting us know what goes into the product. More or less and where it's from tell with extremely high precision the performance of the product so that they can use that in their go to market and also in their future sort of thinking about how to develop the product. So long winded answer, but, but like you can start with very little data and through this pretty cool tech, we can enable you to say a lot. And then go from there, incentivize by sort of telling the supplier, hey, we're now quantifying our climate performance. We'd like buying from you. If you're going to go forward, we'd like you to collaborate. We've already calculated your product. Could you verify it? And they just have to answer some very, very easy to answer questions and they're on board. And then they get access to the market and so on. And eventually, they collect a lot of data. But by the time they do that, they will see the value in it, because it's to prove performance that someone else values financially. Keith Anderson: So there's sort of an assumption that over time, some of the sources and methods are going to evolve as more data is available and can be included in the model. But you're taking a really practical approach now, given the urgency to provide the best available data to make better decisions today. David Bryngelsson: Exactly. So, I'd say, like, where will, Yes, it's improving. We are, like, our goal is to say At any given state of information that you have about your production processes or your assortment of products you're selling or whatever, we'll be able to give you the best possible quality of climate performance data for that. And that is typically good enough for you to not draw the wrong conclusions and to know how to navigate. Keith Anderson: I know, I was digging into this general topic of, product level, climate footprinting and labeling. And, I didn't find a ton of examples of retailers that were doing it at scale. One of the interesting examples was Tesco, maybe 12 years ago had made an announcement that they were going to, label essentially the full range. And, as I think we all know from walking their aisles, they didn't get there and it was largely due to the complexity and, cost of calculating product level emissions at that point in time, and even today, you know, Walmart was recently at the Goldman Sachs Global Sustainability Conference, and given the size of their assortment, was wringing their hands a little bit about this product level measurement challenge. So, I'd love to hear how the technology is really being used. Practically changing what's possible, and maybe we can help people understand, you know, what that cycle of input and output looks like in terms of, here's how much effort goes into, providing your current assortment, and here's the kind of questions you have to answer, and here's how long it takes to get out what you need to make better choices. David Bryngelsson: Yeah. Yeah. So the Tesco example, I think is a good example of great ambition, but prematurely from a technology point of view attempt, right? So the years to be when you did product specific calculations, and for the most part, this is still how it's done. It's a very manual process where you have to redesign and figure out how to do it every time. And there is a lot of back to the data problem, right? So you want to calculate the product, you have access to some data about the product, but most of the data you don't. And then if you're going to do the calculation, say you know you're getting tea from Kenya or you're getting oranges from Mexico or something like that into your product, and then you need to think about, all right, so how are they transported? How do I calculate the transport? How do I, like a lot of different methodological things that need to be figured out. And then for all the stuff that you don't have data, where am I, where am I going to find that? Which makes it an excruciatingly sort of time consuming project to do for a product. And you can do like, and most of this has historically been done in Excel, basically, and it doesn't scale to, to the scale it needs to do, to do for a grocer or a retailer or whatever. And this is fundamentally one of the problems we have solved. So two of the problems we have solved. One is the automaticity of it. So that. Almost every step on this calculation is automatic and the data collection and the methodological choices have already been made. So there's nothing of that. So we can do, and we are doing, full assortment for grocers. Like we did recently now we're doing with, Miniago, which is one of the biggest wholesalers here in the Nordics, a part of the Cisco group, where we've done 23, 000 SKUs, I believe it is. That soon will be made available to the customers on the website for every single one. That's like where we can, by making this automatic, we can calculate this on a very large scale. And, we are about to do similar things for a lot of other large retailers, out there. And, and the second part, which is crucially important here, is the collaborative part of it. Where, as I mentioned, I think I mentioned the sort of network aspect of it. Like the problem is a network problem. You need to collaborate with your supplier to know anything about your product. You can't tell the footprint of you, your product without knowing something about your supplier and they normally need to know something about their suppliers. So we built the platform like that so that we can model all these different steps. And so that also we can get collaboration through the network. And that means that when we first, we pre calculate every product at the grocer or retailer wholesaler first. And then we can reach out to all the different suppliers and say, hey, so we did a life cycle assessment fundamentally of your product, the footprint calculation of your product. Can you go in and take ownership of that, please? Verify the assumptions and then they can open up the box and they can look at what did the platform assume regarding ingredient contents, where it was produced, how it was shipped around and so on and so forth. So there are a lot of different parameters, but they need to first answer some very basic ones on the product like the bill of material, what goes in for making this? Where is it produced? Where do I get this stuff from? And that increases the level of quality tremendously. Then there are a lot of nitty gritty details you can also dive into over time if you want, but normally the predictive model gets those very close to the reality. And, and this process makes it possible to do, like, even if you are a producer, like on a scale, if you have a thousand products in your portfolio, that's easily done quickly. So that you are then able to show whatever investments, whatever innovations, whatever good stuff you have been doing historically and are doing going forward becomes visible through your sales channel to your customer, which makes sort of one, the process is easy and quick and you can keep it up to date. And secondly, it's visible to those who care. And yeah, this 12 years ago because we, of course, building this rely on a lot of tech that has been developed since, but now it is. Keith Anderson: Yeah. And I keep coming back in this area to sort of two related, but distinct, rationales for doing it. You know, one is you're a retailer or a brand, I suppose, that's made a net zero commitment. Maybe you expanded from scopes one and two, and you're now doing scope three. And for all the reasons that you've articulated, that means you've got to understand all the inputs upstream. You know, I see some retailers beginning to do these product level footprinting exercises, really for a couple, reasons, some of which are customer facing, but some of which are simply, hey, we need to understand and, both at a granular level and even, a category or department level, where are our emissions, coming from so that we can start to, score suppliers in the products they're offering us, through this lens when we're making buying decisions, full stop. Then I think to your point, there's the, and so that alone may be influential to you. Regulators, investors, there's all kinds of stakeholders independent of the shopper that might care that you're engaging your supplier base and trying to reduce scope through emissions. Then there's the, again, related, value of communicating to your shopper. How do you think about those, discreetly? Is, is one of those the clear winner in terms of where the demanded value is? David Bryngelsson: Who's the clear winner? I don't know, but I mean, these things are very much connected in a really interesting way. Like, the policy makers will not introduce policies, effective policies, if they think that the industry will be fiercely opposed to them. That is impossible, because that, that politician will, like, their career will end. So that doesn't work. But, and here, but here there's a nice cycle. I mean, eventually we can expect there to be policy, and the reason why I'm confident for that is that there is a business case to be made for the retailer, there's a business case to be made for the producer here. So there is, like, as long as the rules of the game are clear, there is like, you can play the game, you can win the games, you can earn more money, grow your business in an increasing policy environment. And the problem, fundamentally, it's solvable. And here, the communication to the end customer is important because there is already a customer demand for doing more. There is a large cohort of people out there who are willing to pay premium for better performance; you see that. Why are people buying organic? Because they want to do something. Why are people buying the products that are labeled, like the one I showed here? They have Tenzing, they put climate labels or carbon labels on the pack as a way of differentiating, showing we are doing something. And that works. Like, the retailers like it, we have several customer examples where they have gotten climate labels and thus gotten shelf space at retailers, helped them get enlisted, getting shelf space, which is great. Why? Because the retailers realize that we need to start doing something, like there is both the reporting requirements that are coming, where they need to report emissions, both scope 3, and the scope 3 is tricky for them. But then, even more importantly, like Back to then, again, the climate targets, so by 2050 we need to get to zero, which means that the retailers need to sell stuff without emissions, if they want to stay in business. And then they need to figure out how to solve that. And the retailers are interested because it's not really their problem to solve, because they don't have the emissions that will make the production, but they can incentivize efforts. So by saying, hey, if you're transparent, we will sort of give you something. We will highlight your product one way or another. And then there is a game that can start by, all right, yeah, sure. We're part of the transparency game. We show our emissions and we get the shelves space. When you're a competitor also, you need to get lower, but then very, very important, like lower. And then presumably you'll sort of gain the customer by, by being lower. But very importantly in that is. That climate performance is not everything, like taste is king, you never get around that. So if you have a product they haven't tried before, your emissions are lower than the competing one next to it, you get the shot. But if they don't like the product, they're not going to keep on buying it anyway, right? So, so that, that is, that needs to be in there, but you can also factor in the climate performance. and then once more and more food brands or producers start doing that, then of course from the policy point of view, it's quite safe for a politician to say, now transparency becomes mandatory, or else they see that they're competing on performance, they can implement whichever quantitative sort of policy you want, if you want it to be tax, a cap and trade system, a mission standards, whatever. I mean, there's a handful of different policies that work and as long then, if you are a producer, as long as you're better than the next guy, that policy will only make you get more revenue or profits. Keith Anderson: Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Keith Anderson: Thanks for listening. I'm Keith Anderson, the executive producer and host of Decarbonizing Commerce. Sonic Futures handles audio, music, and video production. If you enjoyed the show, we'd really appreciate it if you took a moment to subscribe and leave a review or share it with a colleague. For the full episode and more member exclusive insight and analysis, join the Decarbonizing Commerce community at Decarbonize.co. Thanks for listening and we'll see you on the next episode of Decarbonizing Commerce. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=r8krk32n…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

1 Decarbonizing with Data with Tanvi Patel, Sr. Data Analyst, Climate & Sustainability, SPINS. 45:23
In this episode Keith is joined by Tanvi Patel, Senior Data Analyst for Climate and Sustainability Data at SPINS. SPINS is a data technology company specializing in wellness, health, beauty, food, and beverage, at the heart of where innovation meets sustainability. In this episode, we delve into Tanvi's unique career journey, which beautifully intersects retail data, consumer packaged goods (CPG), and the pressing issue of climate change. We explore the remarkable framework developed by Tanvi and SPINS to enrich the SPINS product intelligence suite, unveiling the invaluable insights it offers to brands and retailers. Join us as we uncover the trends and transformative potential that lie at this powerful intersection. Learn more about Tanvi: SPINS Website Tanvi’s LinkedIn To listen to the full episode join our plus and pro tier program at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ Episode resources: Regenerative Organic Alliance The Non-GMO Project SPINS Product Intelligence Framework If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Keith Anderson: Hi, and welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and I'm really excited for today's guest, Tanvi Patel, who is Senior Data Analyst for Climate and Sustainability Data at SPINS, a data technology company helping brands and retailers in the wellness, health and beauty, food and beverage, and adjacent spaces. When I found Tanvi, I had to meet her because her career sits at the intersection of three topics that are near and dear to my heart and my career. Retail data, CPG, and now climate and we talk about the framework that she and SPINS are using to develop attributes and append them to the SPINS product intelligence suite, who's using that data and how they're using it, and some of the trends that she sees on the horizon. I really enjoyed meeting her and covering some of her work, and I think you will too. So here's Tanvi Patel. Tanvi, it's great to see you. Thanks so much for joining us for the show. Tanvi Patel: Thanks, Keith, thanks for having me. Keith Anderson: Well, I think to kick us off, it would be great to learn more about your career trajectory and trajectory and especially the work you're doing now with SPINS. Tanvi Patel: Yeah, absolutely. So to give you a quick background on myself. So I'm from Phoenix, Arizona. And I've always been interested in sustainability and the environmental space. I went to school at Arizona State University, which was really lucky. It's I believe it was one of the first undergraduate programs for sustainability in the country and it happened to be in my home state, so that was really cool. Love the program and I decided I wanted to add more of a business context to what I was learning, more generally in sustainability. So, decided to add a supply chain management degree as well. And just fell in love with sustainability. I did some consulting work in undergrad. I interned for a company working on, circular packaging and recycled packaging for them, as well as shaping their sustainability strategy. And then, after college, I went to work. At Gatorade, so working with PepsiCo at the Gatorade production facility, which was more of a supply chain role, but definitely incorporated elements of sustainability into that. So, I was measuring greenhouse gas emissions for them for EPA reporting. I did a water conservation project, and also worked on their Zero Waste to Landfill goals. From there I went to work at a company called Chicken of the Sea, it's a seafood company. I actually did supply planning for them, so kind of shifted back to more of the supply chain management side of things, but still always had that really strong interest in, in sustainability, and was able to work on packaging and initiatives wherever I could. I did some consulting in there as well for Beauty for All Industries, now called IPSY, doing some life cycle analysis stuff for them. And that is what brought me to my current role. So, I've been with SPINS now for six months. I'm the Senior Data Analyst in Climate and Sustainability for them and, I think it just perfectly combines everything I love about this industry. I'm able to work with product data, and consumer brands. And really empower brands in the sustainability space to grow sales if they're doing innovative things, but also to empower them to work on more sustainability initiatives, we know that consumers care more than ever about sustainability and that's proven not to just be a trend even through inflationary times and through COVID, it's something that people are really, putting their dollars behind, so, yeah, I'm excited for what I'm able to do in this role and excited to get into it with you. Keith Anderson: When I saw your background, your career sort of sits at the intersection of three topics that I have a deep interest in CPG, sustainability, and product data. So I thought, boy, I've got to meet Tanvi and learn more. For those that may not be familiar with SPINS, can you just describe a bit more about the company and unpack some of the data that you work with? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, definitely. So, SPINS is a, basically a retail data company, so we provide product data, for a huge number of products, about 3 million products, 3 million UPCs and counting, we're always adding to that, mostly in the health and wellness space, and I'll get into that a little bit later, so, basically anything you'd buy at the grocery store, mostly food and bev, but also health and beauty, vitamins, supplements, things like that. We are taking in all that information, all those data points, so we're looking at ingredient statements, nutrition fact panel, data, certifications, claims, even like the romance copy, so the little advertising language that's on package, plus things like pack type or container material. Basically aggregating all of that, and then overlaying our product intelligence on top of it. So, we have a very intelligent and educated team of product intelligence R& D people, that are subject matter experts in their area, from nutrition to areas like climate sustainability, which is what I do. So, not only are we looking at things like claims and certifications, we're able to develop really complex attribution around that. And I can also talk to you about how we get some of that data. So, we get data from a couple of different areas. Either directly through partnerships that we have with retailers. And a lot of our partnerships I'll also mention. So, we have tens of thousands of exclusive retailer partnerships. [Note: Tanvi later clarified that she misspoke here; SPINS has hundreds of retailer and brand clients.] Mostly with brands that are, in the health and wellness space. So natural channels, regional channels, really because these brands are usually innovative and smaller. And so we're trying to, catch them where in that startup phase, where our data will be the most useful to them. And so going back to where we get that data from, so we get it directly from retailers and brands. We also have a partnership with Circana, formerly IRI, where we get sales data and volume data from them. And then, we also recently acquired a company called Pinto. And Pinto is really cool. So what we're able to do with Pinto is take images, high quality images of the product and just pull all the data off of that product. So all the information and data I mentioned before, ingredients, labels, etc. We're able to do it automatically and at scale. And so, directly from product images, from retailers and brands, through our partnerships and then finally, we also have partnerships with certifying bodies, so certifiers like Regenerative Organic Alliance, Non-GMO Project, we partner directly with them and are able to get UPC lists directly from them. So another really key area of our framework that I'm pretty excited about is our circular packaging attributes. So circular packaging or sustainable packaging, basically packaging that's not, that's not designed to end up in a landfill. It's something that is very top of mind for consumers. I think the latest stat I read is that 55 percent of consumers are very, or extremely concerned with the environmental impact of packaging. So we know it's definitely something that they're looking for when they're searching for products and for sustainable products. And so within our framework, we also have a suite of circular packaging attributes. So that can be things like recycled packaging, packaging made from recycled materials or bio based materials, compostable, refillable, et cetera. So that is another aspect of sustainability that we're identifying as. Something that's important and something that we can track in our data as well. So we have a number of, attributes within that area. So consumers can, sorry, so brands can look at things like container type, container material. And, with our data automation process, we can evaluate if the main component of a packaging is recyclable or compostable or something like that. So they're able to track against their own packaging goals. Benchmarking, bidentifying opportunities, all of those things that you can do with the rest of our attributes. Keith Anderson: are you parsing some of those terms? And I'm no level of mine expert, but my growing sense is, like with organic before it and other claims, there's not exact standardization or consensus on what some of those terms mean. So, what kind of complexity does that create for you? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, that's a very good point. We are, so not only are we capturing what. It says on the package. We know that a lot of those claims can be false sometimes. Sometimes you see it says recyclable and it's not actually recyclable. In your municipality, or it requires you to take the package into a store drop off, or some sort of other recycling program, right? So there's a lot of confusing messages in the recycling space. Our approach has been to go with kind of the industry accepted standards set by the sustainable packaging coalition, for example. So. Within, like, our recycled packaging attribute, we actually have curbside recyclable and store drop off recyclable, as well as TerraCycle. TerraCycle is one of those, mail in programs that brands can sign up for, and those difficult to recycle types of packages can be mailed in. And so the way that I designed it was basically if. It is a plastic material and it's a rigid container that we know that can be recycled in over 60 percent of U. S. households. We'll say that it's curbside recyclable. If it's an LDPE bag, for example, like a bread bag or something like that, one of those flexible plastic materials, we know that that can be generally recycled when you take it into the store at one of those store drop offs. And so the data that we're collecting, um. It is in the process of being automated, but it's also being coded manually by actual people. So they're able to look at the product image and put in, what the container material is and the container type. So they can say, it's glass, it's a colored glass, or it is, it's a box or a bag or a rigid kind of container like that. So using all those data points. We can make a fairly accurate assumption, based on that of how to actually recycle it or if it's compostable. So with compostable, we're going with certifications instead of claims. So BPI, for example, is one of the certifications that's verified by a third party and is going to ensure that it actually is compostable and tested. Keith Anderson: Yeah, that's, that's super interesting. I, I've waded into, part of the reason that I started with refillable is it candidly seemed to be the most straightforward of all of the emerging, you know, alternatives to single use plastic, basically, you know, not a lot of debate or controversy over what refillable is, ton of debate and controversy over when it makes sense and what are the economics like and, but it, it's not sort of stuck in a discussion of who should be able to say package is refillable?. That said, it, it is pretty interesting to me that you've got more of a fact based approach to identifying packaging at that level. I'm not going to name names, but there's a large U. S. based mass retailer that has a packaging, and some other claim based, messaging that they're using both on their site and in some stores to help shoppers find, or in some cases to guide them to products that have many of those, packaging types that you just listed. And because we've been doing all this work on refill, I was looking for examples for the report that we're working on, and I go to the section of their site where they let you search your filter and we picked refillable and suffice it to say, it's not a particularly accurate set of results that you get. So the intent is there, but it's actually the second example of product level climate and sustainability related faceted search or other attribute or claim driven discoverability and findability that I've seen on e commerce sites for major retailers that is clearly, I would say, quarter baked, it's not even half baked. And, you know, I have to admire the intent, but I think it's going to take more data like this that is scalable and largely automated. I can totally appreciate the need for human review for near perfect accuracy. But I just think it's going to be really a key enabler to get that level of granular data at scale, because I think the retailers are showing signs. They want to help shoppers find products that meet these criteria, but having data that's up to date and accurate when the suppliers themselves may not yet be reporting it themselves, is challenging. And in particular with Pinto, are you going beyond what's observable on the physical package with the attribution that you're layering in? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, absolutely, so we are really trying to create multi layered and dimensional complex attributes. So, some examples of what this means. We have an attribute that is an ancient grains ingredient attribute. So, not only are we looking at the individual ingredients that make up ancient grains, amaranth, buckwheat, etc. We're able to say, okay, how do these ingredients appear on the label? Which ingredients actually qualify in the mind of the consumer, in the minds of brands as ancient grains and all the benefits that come with that? So we're layering on that, that product intelligence. We can even get more complex. So we have positioning attributes. For example, plant based positioning is a really popular one of ours. So with this attribute, right, the really just straight data approach would be, okay, look at the ingredients in this product. Does it have any animal derived ingredients? No, it's plant based. Obviously, that's going to pull in everything like water or popcorn. Things that just aren't really valuable as a data point. So our plant based positioning attribute is actually where we're taking a look at the product, but also the brand and the category that it's in and understanding beyond the package, looking at their website, looking at their marketing and really all the positioning information to see if it's a product that's positioning itself as a plant based alternative to a traditional meat based product, for example. So there is a lot of that complexity and dimensionality that we're adding on top of just the straight data. Keith Anderson: So the, the point of sale data that you get from cooperating retailers and the Circana partnership really is the starting point to give you a sense of the size of a given market and. Share and how quickly it's growing and, the, the attribute data really helps you understand that a fairly granular level, what's driving some of the demand in terms of product characteristics. Tanvi Patel: Definitely. Yep. And then. What you can do too with, like, the product data is compared against our other attributes. So demographics of the consumer, geographies, sales channels, things like that. Slice it and dice it in every, any way that you want to. Keith Anderson: Can you tell us more about who is using the data and how they're using it? Ideally on the retailer and the brand side, I think a lot of data. Like this is often sourced by a consumer and marketplace insights team or similar, so I'm sure they have a seat at the table, but commercially, who else finds this data interesting and what kind of decisions is it informing? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, absolutely. And I can speak a little more generally or kind of drill down to more of the sustainability and climate attributes, Keith Anderson: I I think both would be of interest. We can definitely start at a, at a broader level just to contextualize things and then definitely want to get into the climate and sustainability angle. Tanvi Patel: Cool. Yeah. Yeah. So. The majority of people using our data are people like category managers at retailers, brand managers, there's also, you know, space for marketing people, sustainability analysts, analysts, when we get more into the sustainability attribution, but there's a ton of, ton of use cases here, right? So things like competitive benchmarking, looking at your competitors in your product category. And looking at all that data for your competitors, looking at their sales volume, but also looking at things like what certifications are they using, what label claims, how are they positioning or marketing their products? To really identify what's driving sales and growth and how does your product or brand stack up? From a retailer perspective, looking at category management, identifying opportunities, identifying the white space. So, what are the certifications or different product data points that are up and coming and really driving consumer interest? It's also a way to inform brands and, different companies on how to innovate. So, what kind of new products can we bring to the market that consumers really care about? Proven by the data. Proven by what is driving sales. Keith Anderson: And do you have a sense of what cadence people are analyzing this data on, is this data that you look at monthly, quarterly, every day, depending on the use case? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, absolutely. Our data goes back for years. So, within, like, our dashboard, Satori is, Satori is the, the main software that the users will interact with the data with. And so, they can look at the previous day, the previous week, they can go back several years. It's really any timeline that they want to. Keith Anderson: And are they accessing it through a portal, or how, how is the data typically accessed and engaged with? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, so, I mentioned Satori, that's pretty much our main, software offering. In which, you can go in, you can look at your product data, you can add in all the attributes and just build, like, customized reports depending on what you want to look at. There's also more of a backend offering. So within our API, you can go in and just directly download whatever data you need, and you can get more access to more data points that way. Keith Anderson: Got it. You mentioned some of the certifications. Are there examples you can share about, effectiveness or how brands are using data like yours to prioritize among the many certifications they have available? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, absolutely. So, I kind of mentioned before an example of identifying the white space. Another problem that I see, or another question that I see a lot is brands aren't really aware of which certifications they should be pursuing. In sustainability, there's an overwhelming amount of messaging out there, claims, certifications, it's consuming, it's confusing for consumers, it can be very confusing for brands as well to understand what they should be prioritizing, and what certifications or what they should be investing in, to gain market share. And so an example of some cool statistics that we put together with our partnership. So, Regenerative Organic Alliance, is a certifying body that we partner with. They're doing really great work in setting really stringent criteria for regenerative agriculture. So, for those that don't know that, know what that means, basically, it goes beyond organic and actually aims to regenerate the soil, so adding nutrients back in, having less emissions. It's already organic, so no pesticides. It's a very holistic and sustainable method of agriculture. And so some statistics around that that we've put together for them are, over the past year, there's been an 821 percent growth in sales for products in the refrigerated yogurt section that have this certification versus ones that don't, right. So there's all these examples of how we can see, sales increasing over time. And you can also compare it to different categories. So, milk, for example, regenerative organic in the milk section drives or drove 114 percent growth in the last year. And so the answer to that question of what certification should I go after? What kind of claim should I go after? is very specific to your product or your product category, so the answer can get very nuanced, but using our data, it's very easy to see and customize that to exactly what you want to understand and what's relevant to your brand and your category. Keith Anderson: I can see how category level and, possibly even custom data ends up being pretty important. Are there syndicated views, that is sort of standard views across categories that you're producing or publishing for clients or the industry also? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, yeah, so, we definitely have a number of reports, a number of customized reports that we provide, at every level, so, you can go in and build your own reports, but we're also, releasing white papers, we're releasing, webinars around the state of plant based dairy, for example, or just these different areas of rising consumer trends, because we're in this data all the time and we're constantly understanding what the new trends are and what's relevant. We're really well positioned to kind of track these trends and see where the numbers are headed, where the growth is headed. Yeah, Keith Anderson: Yeah, I see just an immense volume of survey data, sort of self reported, here's what people say, they think, feel, and do, but in my experience, the behavioral data that you can get via point of sales in particular, because it's really post transaction Did you buy or didn't you buy? It's a pretty accurate reflection of what's really performing in the market. And so I think for that reason, it's really fascinating to me what kind of climate related attributes are starting to be appended to traditional point of sale data that every brand in retail works with. And I think it's also sort of entering a vacuum of data that is, performance based and helps the industry. Make sense of just what, what I think continues to be the Wild West in a sense of labels and certifications. And, I'm curious to get your perspective on, you know, in almost every topic I'm working on. I look at it through two lenses, primarily commercial and climate or sustainability. And so commercially. It's clear you've got a great lens into what's performing from a sales and market share and growth perspective. And it sounds like from a climate and sustainability perspective, through some of the underlying ingredient data, you're able to better understand the relationship between the claims or the certifications and what the product actually is. Are there other ways that you're working on or exploring layering in data that links, for example, life cycle analyses or other disclosures or reporting that a company, is obligated or encouraged by their retailers to provide? Tanvi Patel: Yeah, yeah. Great question. So I'll kind of start with talking more about our framework around sustainability and what really cool attributes we're developing right now. And to your earlier point, too, I think that's a, it's very true that consumers can say one thing, that they care about shopping one way. But how they actually behave when they're in the grocery store can be quite different. So, having this real data behind it to inform business decisions is, is really crucial. And so, talking about the different areas of sustainability and How it's just this very confusing kind of area since there's so many different areas and concepts rolled up into it. We're developing a framework to really kind of cut through that noise and cut through greenwashing, but also provide more of a standardized approach to segment out the different areas that consumers care about, and the different areas that brands are making sustainability happen in their products. And so we can attach this in the show notes, I believe so. Just a visual of what our framework looks like. We've segmented it into kind of three main pillars and I'll just walk you through what those look like. And keep in mind that this is both how we're organizing the different areas of sustainability, but each of these areas is also an advanced attribute as well. So, you can use it as a brand to understand more generally, do consumers care more about good for the animals, for example, sustainable animal welfare certifications, or do they care more about people centric sort of certifications? And so our three main pillars are animals, people, and planet. And then we have levels of granularity under that. And these are all driven by label claims and certifications. So, kind of understanding, you know, what I know, what my team knows about all these certifications, which ones actually hold a lot of weight when it comes to sustainability, which ones are more subject to greenwashing, for example. We're able to organize all of these into these areas. So, good for animals, we have areas of animal welfare and marine animal welfare, separating seafood versus land based animals. So, certifications that would live under that. would be things like Certified Humane or A Greener World, all those animal welfare certifications rolled up into one animal welfare attribute. And then things like, Fair Trade or B Corp that would live under the people attribute. So you can get as granular as you want. You can also look at these groupings because these are ways of thinking are different areas of sustainability that consumers care about. Some more examples under the planet bucket, we have, good for environmental. I guess we have good for production practices. So, like sustainability around production practices, things like zero waste or upcycled foods. We have reduced carbon footprint, so looking at certifications around climate neutrality, carbon zero, and all those different areas, like organic and how that relates to soil conservation or habitat biodiversity. So that's kind of our, an overview of our main framework and how we're approaching it. And then to your point about incorporating some of that deeper data beyond the pack, looking at life cycle analysis, for example, that's definitely in our roadmap. I think, as time continues on, I think emissions level data will start to surface more for consumers. And I'm excited to see that happen, at scale. But incorporating things like, what is the water use of this type of product or the carbon emissions of this type of product, understanding that, conventional dairy versus a plant based dairy, there's going to be an inherent sustainability differences there and how can we create attribution around that, is definitely something that's, that we're thinking about. Keith Anderson: And do you anticipate some of that more granular attribution is going to be used primarily behind the scenes by retailers or brands as they're making decisions about ingredients or formulation or assortment, or do you think it's going to eventually show up in shelf communication? You know, you mentioned consumer interest in labeling. One of the first reports that we worked on at Decarbonizing Commerce is on product level footprinting and carbon labeling and It's a pretty interesting subject to me simply because it is one of the most obvious ways some of this could show up and in, in a limited number of cases is showing up at the shelf to consumers. But again, it's, it's really the Wild West. There's different approaches. There's no standard. It's not clear if retailers or brands or regulators are going to play the driving role in pushing the industry towards a standard and widespread adoption. So I'm curious to get your view. Tanvi Patel: Yeah, absolutely. I think. To answer your question, all of that is a use case for these. I think on the brand and retailer side, as mentioned before, right, identifying opportunities, comparing. What are your competitors doing in this space? Also like internal performance analysis, so looking at, your different categories, looking at your products, and measuring it against internal sustainability benchmarks. Maybe you want all of your products in a specific meat category to meet the certification or have a certain level of sustainability work being put into it. So I think definitely all those use cases. But I'm also excited to see how this kind of manifests more, but I think there's a ton of potential on the consumer side as well. So, building things like a sustainability score into an e commerce platform. So, making it really easy for consumers to immediately see and compare the sustainability of different products, whether that is through a set of certifications, maybe it's the marine animal welfare attribute, a way for them to filter and quickly understand the different environmental impacts of different products. So yeah, I would love to see that on e commerce. I know that's starting to slowly roll out, as well as in shelf tags, so having things like the carbon emissions of a product to be listed. So I think there's a ton of potential there, on the consumer side as well. Keith Anderson: Yeah, it makes sense. Jumping back to some of the commercial use cases, what, one of the assumptions that I am really encountering across the industry, almost any time I mention that I'm working on sustainability related topics in CPG with, people that know me for traditional CPG and retail strategy. Sort of say, yeah, yeah. Sustainability. The question is sort of who's going to pay for it? You know, it's, it's a basically baked in assumption that the sustainable choice is inherently and almost always more expensive and therefore has to be sold at a price premium. So with some of the data you have, have you looked at, or have your teams looked at the relationship between these attributes and consumer prices and how that affects performance? Are there examples where, that assumption isn't true? It's just, I found examples in different categories, some of which I think Spence would cover, but it seems to be this conventional wisdom that I'm not convinced is to your earlier point about category specific detail. I'm not convinced it's as true universally as it seems to be believed to be. Tanvi Patel: Yeah, absolutely. I think we have a lot of data that supports this and kind of debunks that, where, you know, it was, first of all, the understanding that, or the thought that sustainability is a price premium. We're seeing like over time and at scale different products are price competitive and eventually will also be, can potentially be, even less expensive. So I think there's a couple of aspects and ways to think about this. I think as consumers start to demand it more and awareness starts to build, but also governmental regulation starts to roll through, things like the SEC requiring ESG reporting, all of that, as that increases, there'll be more of this awareness. And need for more of a true cost accounting when it comes to the price of things. And so looking at, well, so I guess I'll, I'll back up a bit. So with our data we have found and, I don't have specific numbers with me at the moment, but I kind of mentioned this earlier too. So through COVID, through inflation, people kind of thought that sustainability would take a dip along with all these other things. What we actually found is that people are willing to pay more still for sustainability and that held true through inflation and through COVID when people had less money to spend. So I think that's a super telling point, right? It's not really this trend that's going to go away. That people are, it's not like a passing fad that people are interested in. But it's something that people are understanding is very important and companies and brands are being required to treated as something is as important as well. So it's definitely something that will continue to grow and as that happens, prices will go down. An example, too, of something that I think is super interesting is this coming trend of, precision fermentation. So there's a couple of specifically dairy brands out there that are non animal dairy. So they're using cell cultured, microbes to basically create an identical product to dairy, so it's identical molecularly. It's still like tags as an allergen, as a milk allergen, but it can be made with no animals. And so that's a highly efficient form of creating the same quality product at the same taste. And all those properties, but, completely eliminating the need for animal agriculture, right? So these technologies, I mean, inherently it's so much more efficient. There's so much less cost of involved in the supply chain. And so when we start realizing the true costs of some of these things, that price will go down. Keith Anderson: It's such an interesting, the whole alternative protein space is really interesting. And I'm just learning a bit about, fermentation and it's emergent along, I think, with sort of cultivated animal proteins as, alternatives to the alternative of plant based and potential successors to some of the really high growth and then tapering growth options that we've seen in the market over the last, call it five years. So I think it's really interesting and important that you call that category out and it hadn't occurred to me before you mentioned it, but, I mean, I'm, I'm looking at some of those emerging approaches from a capital investment point of view. So, I mean, I've, I've bumped into companies like Tezza Foods and Nobell and others that I think fall into that fermented alternative protein space. But the only indicator I typically have at my fingertips is You know, how much capital have they raised? Secondly, sometimes what kind of retail traction are they getting in terms of distribution? But I think to get a complete picture, you do need the sell through data in addition to the sell in data. And so I would imagine the data you sit on is a great leading indicator of consumer adoption and acceptance of some of these emerging potentially disruptive, ingredients and materials that are really aimed at producing a comparable product, experience, you know, similar taste profile, texture, you name it, but with a very different, resource and environmental footprint. Tanvi Patel: The interesting challenge that I think brands in that space faces, just the education part. It's such an innovative space. It's such an innovative product of, it's dairy, but it's not from an animal, and it's vegan in some ways, but not technically, right, just that piece of educating consumers because, it is, there's so many benefits environmentally, but just trying to get people to understand that it's a clean product. It's highly sustainable and efficient. But yeah, it's different than anything else on the market today. So, bridging Keith Anderson: Have you, Tanvi Patel: gap will be key. Keith Anderson: have you tried them? Tanvi Patel: Oh, good question. I haven't tried them actually. There's a couple of brands that I've been meaning to. My sister is actually a vegan, and has been for a couple years, and I told her about, I think it was the, the no cow milk brand. And so she picked it up and tried it, and then she called me. She's like, I just realized I haven't had milk in years. Like, this is probably going to hurt my stomach because I'm not used to it. But yeah, she liked it. It was, it was crazy. She hasn't tasted milk that real in years. Keith Anderson: Well, I'm always interested to try any of these products, whether it's a food product or personal care, just because I continue to think so much of the competitive dynamic. While I totally acknowledge it's clear in the data, there is a strong interest in the, you know, better for the planet option, I think, in many cases, certainly not all, the effectiveness or experience isn't yet at parity with the conventional offering that it's intended to replace. And so I think that's why there's so much investment and so much innovation, which I'm having a great time looking for and studying, to try to raise the bar on what is that consumer experience? Is it as convenient to find and buy it as the way that I used to do it? Is it economically at parity and the answer in many cases today is not necessarily, but it is in more and more cases, and I'm always eager to hear about those breakthrough experiences where somebody says, hey, I switched from the old razor I was using to this double edged safety razor, and it's actually saving me money, and it's a better shave, and it's a better shave and what do you know? The waste and footprint are really favorable versus the way I was doing it before. So, fermented proteins are one of those that I'm really intrigued by. Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of Decarbonize.co, stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=vn50yxp8…
D
Decarbonizing Commerce

1 Category & Career Reinvention with Emily Fultz, VP Marketing and Sustainability, North America, the Humble Co. 30:49
Keith is joined by Emily Fultz, the Vice President of Marketing and Sustainability, North America for the Swedish company, the Humble Co. Emily has more than 25 years of experience in the U.S. consumer goods market, having worked at Starbucks, IRI (now Circana), Campbell Soup, Henkel, and most recently the Clorox Company. They discuss how Emily has transformed her roles with broad competence from working in both marketing (omni channel) and sales calling on grocery, drug and home hardware, but also overseeing sustainability in this innovative company. Learn more about Emily: The Humble Co.’s Website Emily’s Linkedin Emily’s Email To listen to the full episode, join our Plus or Pro memberships at decarbonize.co: https://decarbonize.co/member-benefits/ If you enjoyed this episode then please: Follow, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts Follow and rate on Spotify Learn more about Decarbonizing Commerce at decarbonize.co TRANSCRIPT BELOW: Keith Anderson: Welcome to Decarbonizing Commerce, where we explore what's new, interesting, and actionable at the intersection of climate innovation and commerce. I'm your host, Keith Anderson, and together we'll meet entrepreneurs and innovators reinventing retail, e commerce, and consumer products through the lenses of low carbon and commercial viability. Welcome to the Decarbonizing Commerce Podcast. I'm your host, Keith Anderson. And today's guest is Emily Fultz, Vice President, Marketing and Sustainability, North America for the Humble Company, an oral care brand that was the creator, one of the first, if not the first creator of bamboo toothbrushes, really trying to reinvent the oral care category in some interesting ways. And before Emily was at the Humble Company, she has a career in all kinds of functional roles. In areas like omni channel and category management and shopper marketing and brand management at some of the biggest names in the CPG industry, Henkel, Campbell's, and most recently at Clorox. So I thought it was really interesting that Emily has built a career and followed a trajectory from big CPGs to an emerging brand and has evolved her career from conventional commercial functional roles to a leadership role at Humble that includes some traditional functions, but is also overseeing sustainability and was really eager to meet her and learn more about how she made that jump in her career and how she's approaching her work at the Humble Company. So, let's meet Emily Fultz of the Humble Company. Emily, it's great to be with you. Thanks so much for joining the show. Emily Fultz: Thank you for including me, Keith. I've been looking forward to it. Keith Anderson: So have I, and you are Vice President Marketing and Sustainability at the Humble Company. Can you tell us more about what you do and how you came to do that at The Humble Company? Emily Fultz: Sure, sure. So I am the, really the leader of this function and it is a pretty small team in North America. We were founded in Sweden by a former dentist that saw the need for more environmental solutions to waste in oceans and a way that he could impact that was through the invention and launch of the bamboo toothbrush. And so I had spent about 13 years working for Clorox in different roles and functions. And I found that this would be a kind of a neat next step for me to take a function and expand it into sustainability for another organization. Keith Anderson: I think I, I mentioned this to you when we were first speaking, but as a former consultant, I can't resist four box frameworks. And when I, when I looked at your background, I sort of pictured, you know, on one axis, commercial experience leading up into sustainability and on the other axis, big CPG companies, you, you named Clorox, but you have experience at several other big CPG companies Emily Fultz: Yes. Keith Anderson: and then eventually joining an emerging brand. And so to me, it's really interesting and I hope we get a chance to go into a little detail on some of the comparisons and the contrast between working in purely commercial roles and then taking on work that involves sustainability and what's similar and different about working inside of a big incumbent CPG versus a newer emerging player. Emily Fultz: Yes, I think, it boils down to kind of where you start your career is often where you end up. I started out my career, coming out of undergraduate from Santa Clara University and I moved overseas and I worked as an English teacher in Italy. And I've just fell in love with Western Europe, and I knew I wanted to have an opportunity to work for a European company someday as well. So, I came back from that experience and I went back and I got my master's in business at Thunderbird, which is an international business school in Arizona and came out of that experience and coming out, you know, young with an MBA, very ambitious. I went for an Italian company that imported Italian foods into the U. S. marketplace, and I built that small brand. And what I realized in that experience was I had a lot of curiosity and love for marketing, but I didn't have a lot of the traditional training that I felt I needed to be a successor in my career with. So that's when I went to work for Starbucks Ice Cream, and that was based in Oakland, California, and it was in the Dreyer's headquarters. And I had the opportunity to build a brand from scratch. And I worked with some great marketers there where I did everything from package design to portfolio development, to copywriting, to national sampling. And I was making a lot of reporting really to our joint venture at the time, which was with Starbucks and Dreyers. And I realized that when I was doing this reporting, I really wanted to have more of an analytics understanding. So, I decided my next career step would go to work for IRI, and I worked for them, now Circana. But IRI at the time, and I was a vendor services manager at the Safeway headquarters, where I partnered with large CPG brands on their analytics and positioning for sale at Safeway. And from there, I had a great exposure to all different types of analytical suites. And category management, and then Campbell Soup tapped me on the shoulder, and they said we'd like to have you come work for us. And so Campbell Soup, I spent about five years there, and mainly in the category management function. I worked on the Prego business and then the Soup business. And then because of my brand background, they tapped me on the shoulder when it was time to start shopper marketing. They had not been in this function yet. And so I had the chance, along with three other people, to create that function at Campbell Soup. And I fell in love with it. I loved the opportunity to bring a brand to life with retailers. And to kind of put some of that creative focus at shelf and in store. So I worked for them for a long time. I loved it. And then my family and I, we moved to Charlotte, North Carolina, where I reside. And I decided that I really wanted to continue in shopper marketing. And so a couple, a little while after I moved to Charlotte, I went to work for Clorox and at Clorox, I was able to really get a touch on multiple channels of trade. I worked with home hardware. I worked with The Dollar Channel. I worked with Target. Really across all the brands at Clorox, and I had a chance to really work with teams of people. And so I really feel that this industry is this opportunity to partner across functions to really build a brand. And so I had a chance to do that with my peers and with those retailers. And one of my accounts, was Lowe's Home Hardware. And at the time, they were really getting into e commerce in a big way. And I had a chance to really push the organization and myself to learn in this burgeoning space. And so really learning about the digital shelf and new technologies and influencing the retailer to also evolve, you know, even further in this space. And so, with that, after really being, I think we had great success with that account. I was asked to join a part of the Clorox organization, which was the Omni Channel, category leadership program. And so I worked with an industry leader, Anne Zabowski. And our team was small, but, but mighty, and we were able to coach our existing retailer sales organization across the field on how to win with e commerce and Omni Channel. So that was a fantastic field. I absolutely loved it. The exposure, the learning and the application. And so it felt at that point. There was an opportunity for me to go and kind of bring those learnings and experiences and make it a little bit broader than one function. And so I've had that opportunity at the Humble Co. I lead both the marketing function as well as our, obviously, our sustainability area for North America. And I also guide our e commerce and insights. It's again, it's a lean team, so I couldn't do it alone. I have a fantastic team of people with small levels of experience, to my CEO, Rich Hewton, who has had a grand tenure, really, within consumer packaged goods that I learn from every day. Keith Anderson: It's so interesting to me, listening to some of the different functions and disciplines that you've worked within Emily Fultz: Mm hmm. Keith Anderson: and I recall in the early days of shopper marketing when it was, you know, the first moment of truth was introduced to the industry as a concept and many CPG brands got a much deeper appreciation for what it meant to influence and win at the physical shelf. Emily Fultz: hmm. Keith Anderson: I sort of watched and I guess our paths actually intersected during this next phase when digital and omni channel became such a big part of where growth in the industry was being sourced. Emily Fultz: Mm hmm. Keith Anderson: And to your point about cross functional, it changed. So much of the work that I think in many companies for many reasons is siloed, but it's, it's hard as time goes on to succeed at building a brand or winning at the digital shelf or any of these important disciplines if you're working in a vacu and, and I think it's So interesting and important to have people who have not only worked with the different teams, but, have worn those hats and can empathize and relate to what somebody who's working on packaging or working on what's our portfolio strategy for the next three years, any of those considerations, while they're also trying to keep up with whatever the fastest moving New trend is, and that sort of leads us to sustainability because candidly, I don't think it has quite hit the way that these other, disciplines did in, in their moments of peak interest, but I think the next three years are going to move very quickly and yeah. And so I, I think, you know, it's, it's going to be very useful in your work and to your company, I'm sure, to have been through similar. Transitions when a new discipline with new considerations about consumers and customers is suddenly changing the work in all these conventional areas. Emily Fultz: Yeah, and I think sustainability is one of these terms that is thrown out pretty loosely within organizations. And I feel like it's always, there's, you know, there's definitions of sustainability, and then there's ways to enact sustainable action within your organization. And so I think traditionally we have, you know, consumer packaged goods companies are Short term profit motive and sometimes that is not aligned with sustainability. And so creating a platform to get reaction from your organization in a meaningful way. I think that the B Cert, that is, you know, becoming more prevalent across a lot of the natural channel. In oral care, I see that, you know, several companies are now certified B corporations and so that is that's my goal, is that we are in that space over the next three to five years. Maybe sooner. But I do feel that that understanding of there's not just one way to be sustainable. It's our actions every day. It's how we treat our employees, how we pay our employees. It's also how we, address Our packaging and our product and how we get that from distribution all the way back to the manufacturing cycle. And so I think what we're going to see in the next 3 to 5 years is a hyper focus there. I think from everything we're hearing about the UN, right, like the UN climate meetings where Us and China were not invited to the table 'cause we haven't made enough action in that space. So I seek that. I see that as kind of a challenge for all of us in consumer packaged goods to have a seat at that table moving forward. I think that we have, a lot of passion in this space. And a lot of creativity. I think the United States, we are full of the most creative people on earth. So I feel like we have the talent and the capability to get there. You know, how can we, you know, put pressure on our own internal systems to shop, go local, right? Local is the best. So trying to keep product off the seas when we can. How can we use less virgin plastic in our products? I think PCR, Post Consumable Recycled Goods of plastic in goods is a step in the right direction, not always all the way to bright. I see a lot of opportunity in protein based packaging. That's going to come our way. And this is a All in the best interest of Mother Nature. So I think that the more we can evolve our companies and the people that work for them to be aware in this space is really important too. It can't just be one sustainable champion in your organization. It needs to be a part of your fabric. So one area that we've made action on as a company, really globally is I've just led with my, my partners at the Humble Co, a new, mission and core vision statement work that's really grounded in people and planet first, humbly, is where we're leaning towards. We haven't final, we haven't finalized the mission statement, but I think that as long as our core values are aligned to get there, it's taking steps in that direction. But it needs to be the fabric of the, I think the area of the organization that you work in. Keith Anderson: Well, you've touched on a couple of, I think, common challenges, one of which is the incentive models aren't always aligned between essentially a company's sort of core purpose, which is often to make a profit. Emily Fultz: Yes. Keith Anderson: And I think secondly the importance of linking some of the vision and the mission to everyday action and I know you're in the midst of this work. It's not, it's not done. It's probably never done, but can you tell us more about what is so appealing about the B Corp designation, what kind of commitments and changes you think that's going to bring to an organization like yours and how do you think as you refine and ratify this new vision and mission. How are you going to link that to some of these everyday decisions and functions across the company? Emily Fultz: Well, I think to motivate change, we do need to address, you know, sales and profit. And so I think one of the areas that I see evolving too is that, you know, Gen Z is coming right on the heels of really addressing a lot more of the wallet of the American shopper. And they are voting towards the environment. So I think, you know, as we think about short term versus long term viability for brands, I think it only makes sense to make steps in the right direction. I think, you know, B Corp is kind of the most broadly understood certification, globally. And so what I'm excited about, as I enter into this work with my team, is it's not just about knowing what your carbon footprint is. There's a lot more to it than that. So it's again, how we treat our employees, 360 reviews, making sure that there is not such a large wage disparity across an organization. So these are all elements of getting the certification. And again, I haven't initiated the work yet within, my Humble Co. yet. I'm still in the evaluation framework. So maybe next year when I come back and speak, Keith, I can talk a little bit more about our experience. Keith Anderson: Fair enough. , and, and I think it's important to emphasize, How holistic some of those considerations are and I think part of the reason it's appealing to so many companies is it does force you to think about the relationship between. These different elements of building a company and operating a company through these lenses of so many important factors about how are we going to operate fairly and equitably and, you know, play the long game. And I'm reminded again, as you mentioned, Gen Z. In the early days of the growth of e commerce and online grocery, it was a very similar conversation about millenials. Emily Fultz: Hmm. Keith Anderson: That is, you know, I helped produce analyses that when you charted the data would show, okay, here's the breakdown of income and consumption by cohort today. And here's the projection of when they're going to reach their peak consumption years, that is, they're going to get married, they're going to form households, they're going to buy pets, they're going to have kids, and those are among the bigger drivers of expanded consumption, and in those days, we were emphasizing that the way they were shopping and buying differently was mediated by technology. They, they were digitally native, they were buying through a screen, and the whole transformation discussion was about to your earlier point about thinking beyond the next quarter, how do we walk that tightrope between the way that we've always done things while acknowledging things are going to be different in 3, 5, 10 years? And it may seem slow for a long time, and then it's going to seem sudden as that rotation happens, and now I see the same sort of thing happening both with Gen Z, and others. I mean, not unlike what happened with digital as time went on. There certainly are the early adopters who care the most and change their behavior more dramatically and earlier, but over time you sort of see the flywheel effect of, well, as their desires are met with more selection and more choices in the marketplace, suddenly more people are exposed and start making similar choices. And before you know it, things look really different. you've worked for Some of the largest brands in the industry, you're working for, an emerging brand now. What are some of the really key distinctions, both in a general sense and then in a sustainability sense? Emily Fultz: Well, my ability to impact on a mega scale is diminished, so but I do feel that on a smaller scale to start building a brand really in the North America market is very rewarding. So I think, you know, beyond budget, differences. There is this opportunity to engage in a different way than I've ever experienced before. Again, Keith, you know, I came from very functional background, so category management, brand, omni channel, e commerce, and this role that I'm in now is really more broad scoped, where I have the chance to guide multiple functions at once. And so I think what I've realized through this experience is that it's really rewarding owning multiple functions and especially I think in sustainability to make sure that we're being true across the different elements of our business and talking more synchronously on our mission. So I think that's very rewarding. Also, I'm at a stage in my career where I have a lot of knowledge, a lot of experience. I don't say that to be. overly confident. I say that because I work with this team of young people that truly want to learn and they are asking for my information and working with it and I see their growth and there's a certain amount of reward in that. Just to see that evolve and see their skill sets grow. So I think that that's a real tangible. Also, you know, I've seen tremendous growth on our brand. So it's not just doing good work with good people and having fun. It's also I'm seeing the numbers. And so when I came in to the organization we didn't yet have a consumer data. And so I've done a small purchase, with spins, which is really focused on the natural channel. And the natural channel is where we've really focused in most of our retail brick and mortar focus, because that's where our shoppers are. They're the ones that are looking for a bamboo toothbrush or for, you know, a floss pick that is plant based. And so post consumer recycled product. So that's been a wonderfully rewarding thing to see and start to track our progress. And so, you know, we have also now kind of, now that we've have this solid foundation in the natural channel, we are starting to see a really great traction within the NPL, which is the natural products. Area of food as well as MULO, which means that those shoppers aren't just going to the natural food stores. They're also buying groceries and they're seeing our brand, and it resonates with them from a value based, place. And so that's been really fun is also. It's freeing in the way of, I think, traditional large CPG brands. They have a very defined brand communication platform, and where we have brand guidelines, we also have this ability to flex our creative and identify more with, you know, raw content with our, within our social media channels. And that's been super fun too, where we are able to lay out our annual plan and really focus in on, you know, key events that make sense for us. You know, we are a natural Swedish oral care company. And so we, you know, we can celebrate different holidays, that are meaningful for our shoppers. And we can participate in different ways. Keith Anderson: Are there any favorite holidays that we should all be celebrating? Emily Fultz: You should all be celebrating summer solstice, for sure. That is a super fun time of year, very festive and rewarding. And I also think there is this kind of clean, simplistic, Swedish vibe that our brand has that I think resonates with, you know, the whole kind of cleaning out your house, cleaning out your mind, being more mindful in your approach to life, which I'm really excited to play with more, you know, moving forward. Keith Anderson: I can tell you My neighborhood throws many block parties, but one of my favorites is the summer solstice Emily Fultz: Oh yeah? Keith Anderson: block party. So, I wasn't sure where you were going to take the, you know, different holiday celebrations, but I'm happy that that's one that I have been celebrating for the last few years. Emily Fultz: Good job. Keith Anderson: You mentioned your background comes from highly functional roles, and I think it's super interesting to hear you talk about now at this stage of your career in the company and the role that you're in with oversight of several different functions at once. One of which is sustainability. I think when I tell people what I'm doing and, you know, sustainability or climate comes up, the natural first thought is it's all about switching your sources of energy or changing how you heat and cool the production facilities. And truthfully, those are all immense parts of it and they're a big deal, but where I see so much potential and I think, you know, whether it's from regulations, as you mentioned, or, competition among the retailers and brands, I think there's going to be a lot of business model transformation, too. And so, in some of these areas that you are focused, you've mentioned packaging, where do you see synergy between marketing and omni channel or e commerce and sustainability? Are there other areas that, through your perspective as a functional expert you're already finding promising opportunities to change how you go to market, that also have benefits in other areas? Emily Fultz: Yeah, so I think that there's always different, challenges with different channels in which you sell your goods. So, you know, with Amazon we have, we found a lot of success and so we can pull some of that success in the way of keywords and product. And also how we package our goods so that we can help lessen our certain fees that are associated with doing business on Amazon, like our FBA fees, where we are able to really navigate what the weight and dimensions are of our items so that we can lower that cost, and then focus it really towards different ways to market our product from DSP, which we are, you know, recently engaging with, as well as, different programs. And so I think that we take a lot of learnings from there and we're able to apply it to our digital shelf and to our packaging. So I think it's this, it's a constant continuum really, of learnings that we're finding, that are working in one channel and applying it to another. So I would say that, as well as how to inspire some change. So, often retailers really respond, I think, to seeing what's working at other retailers and when they're leaning in to sustainability and how it's being proactive in growth. And so, again, I lean on the analytics side of the house where, comparing the natural products compared to the total collection of products that are being sold and to show that the natural products really are outperforming, outperforming by and large, both in MULO and in food to say, and to share with retailers that it's okay to kind of lean into some of these, nascent brands that are providing something different for their shoppers. So, but I also, you know, I think I've changed my shopping behavior as well, as I've been involved in this space. And so I think that we can all take little changes. So maybe when you're reaching for a plastic bottle of water, you kind of shift and, you know, grab something out of your faucet or, you know, when you're thinking about heating and cooling your home. Maybe you think about if you're going to stay in your home for more than 10 years to invest in some home solar. There's just little steps that we can take as humans that if enough of us take steps there, I think it's going to step us in the right direction. Hey folks, this is the part of the show where we say thank you and see you soon to the general audience, plus and higher tier members of decarbonize. co. Stay tuned for the rest of the episode. Have a question or feedback about Decarbonizing Commerce. Record an audio message https://s.castplus.fm/decarbonizing-commerce?episode=68rmq6rn…
欢迎使用Player FM
Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。