Artwork

内容由newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

Episode 6 Democratic Theory and the British Columbia Citizens' Assembly with Mark Warren

21:02
 
分享
 

Manage episode 279440006 series 2816253
内容由newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Mark Warren is a political scientist based in North America whose original interest in democracy theory broadened to encompass deliberative democracy when he studied the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly in 2004.

Mark’s analysis of that case study and all that followed has been extremely influential in the field.

In this conversation, Mark wonders aloud about the resistance to using deliberative methods on the part of politicians even though bureaucrats are increasingly seeing their advantages, i.e. to help them do their job better.

He cautions deliberative designers to pay close attention to a clear remit and other design options and advises them against convening a mini-public if the design is flawed.

Mark is interested in the way that public deliberations can help to overcome the current ‘democratic malaise’. He believes that these methods can help citizens to own their democracy and enable them to work together constructively despite their differences.

newDemocracy Foundation R&D Note on Framing the Remit

Music acknowledgement.

  continue reading

47集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 279440006 series 2816253
内容由newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Mark Warren is a political scientist based in North America whose original interest in democracy theory broadened to encompass deliberative democracy when he studied the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly in 2004.

Mark’s analysis of that case study and all that followed has been extremely influential in the field.

In this conversation, Mark wonders aloud about the resistance to using deliberative methods on the part of politicians even though bureaucrats are increasingly seeing their advantages, i.e. to help them do their job better.

He cautions deliberative designers to pay close attention to a clear remit and other design options and advises them against convening a mini-public if the design is flawed.

Mark is interested in the way that public deliberations can help to overcome the current ‘democratic malaise’. He believes that these methods can help citizens to own their democracy and enable them to work together constructively despite their differences.

newDemocracy Foundation R&D Note on Framing the Remit

Music acknowledgement.

  continue reading

47集单集

所有剧集

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南

边探索边听这个节目
播放