Artwork

内容由J. Paul Neeley提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 J. Paul Neeley 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

Rebuilding Democracy (Pt. 2) - Disagreement and Civility

51:33
 
分享
 

Manage episode 278198615 series 2827257
内容由J. Paul Neeley提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 J. Paul Neeley 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

“Democracy runs on disagreement: it is by means of citizens hashing out their differences that democracy can achieve better political outcomes.”

In Part 2 of their podcast, Turi and Bob Talisse follow on from their discussion of Equal Citizenship (and why polarization strains that ideal), to discuss Disagreement and how we build democratic ‘Civility’ to make sure disagreement is working for, not against, democracy.


Disagreement is central to the democratic aspiration. Not only does it enshrine the right of individuals to participate in the democratic process, but it is epistemically useful - it helps us discover and articulate new ideas. But how can we argue properly when all our instincts push to defeat the other side rather than build with them?


Bob Talisse explains that we're programmed to argue (a good thing) but that we must remind ourselves to do so within the bounds of 'civility'. Not 'civility' in the 19th Century sense of the term, but rather 'Civic Friendship' - anchoring our argument in the idea that we're all building the same civic project together, that our disagreement is precisely what makes our collective experience so much better.


Listen in to understand:

  • Deep Disagreements: the kind of differences no reasoning or logic will ever succeed in bringing together
  • How (and why) we privilege winning arguments over learning from them.
  • Performance Debating: why we love to argue, and why we’re so bad at differentiating real debate with playing to the gallery.
  • Why politicians play to their bases rather than try to convince the other side.
  • How we've merged the notion of fact and opinion.
  • Civil Discourse: what it means and how we can work to build ‘Civic Friendships’.
  • And whether COVID-19 might just bring us back together as societies…

“The informational environment seems directed at dissolving the distinction between knowing what happened and having a judgment about what happened.”

More on this episode


Learn all about the Parlia Podcast here.


Meet Turi Munthe: https://www.parlia.com/u/Turi


Learn more about the Parlia project here: https://www.parlia.com/about


And visit us at: https://www.parlia.com



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

45集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 278198615 series 2827257
内容由J. Paul Neeley提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 J. Paul Neeley 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

“Democracy runs on disagreement: it is by means of citizens hashing out their differences that democracy can achieve better political outcomes.”

In Part 2 of their podcast, Turi and Bob Talisse follow on from their discussion of Equal Citizenship (and why polarization strains that ideal), to discuss Disagreement and how we build democratic ‘Civility’ to make sure disagreement is working for, not against, democracy.


Disagreement is central to the democratic aspiration. Not only does it enshrine the right of individuals to participate in the democratic process, but it is epistemically useful - it helps us discover and articulate new ideas. But how can we argue properly when all our instincts push to defeat the other side rather than build with them?


Bob Talisse explains that we're programmed to argue (a good thing) but that we must remind ourselves to do so within the bounds of 'civility'. Not 'civility' in the 19th Century sense of the term, but rather 'Civic Friendship' - anchoring our argument in the idea that we're all building the same civic project together, that our disagreement is precisely what makes our collective experience so much better.


Listen in to understand:

  • Deep Disagreements: the kind of differences no reasoning or logic will ever succeed in bringing together
  • How (and why) we privilege winning arguments over learning from them.
  • Performance Debating: why we love to argue, and why we’re so bad at differentiating real debate with playing to the gallery.
  • Why politicians play to their bases rather than try to convince the other side.
  • How we've merged the notion of fact and opinion.
  • Civil Discourse: what it means and how we can work to build ‘Civic Friendships’.
  • And whether COVID-19 might just bring us back together as societies…

“The informational environment seems directed at dissolving the distinction between knowing what happened and having a judgment about what happened.”

More on this episode


Learn all about the Parlia Podcast here.


Meet Turi Munthe: https://www.parlia.com/u/Turi


Learn more about the Parlia project here: https://www.parlia.com/about


And visit us at: https://www.parlia.com



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

45集单集

Alle Folgen

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南