Artwork

内容由Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

Calculate Equipment Reliability

 
分享
 

Manage episode 450326665 series 2359263
内容由Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Calculate Equipment Reliability

Abstract

Chris and Fred discuss how we can go about calculating equipment reliability … when you only have a small amount of information. Help!

Key Points

Join Chris and Fred as they discuss how you can calculate equipment reliability when you have a little bit of information. This comes from a listener who asked us to calculate the reliability of their equipment that failed four times in one month (with 400 hours of operation). How do we find this system’s reliability?

Topics include:

  • So what is the number? If we assume a constant hazard rate (yuck) then we can use the exponential distribution to work out that the reliability at one month (400 hours) is 1.8 %.
  • Is this helpful? Our listener didn’t tell us why they wanted a reliability number … but 1.8 % is almost certainly useless in terms of making better decisions. Why? Well we don’t know if our equipment is wearing in or wearing out. We don’t know if we have 10 pieces of equipment working at the same time over this month, with only 4 of them failing. So what do we do?
  • What is the DECISION? This is a common question (refrain). What are you deciding to do with this number? We can’t think of a single decision that this 1.8 % estimate will help. Again, we don’t know if the equipment is wearing in or wearing out … which would affect our estimate. Knowing the precise times of failure would be really helpful as well. But is the decision more useful if it is based on availability? It sounds like the equipment is being repaired, so how long does it spend being repaired? What is the DECISION!
  • Don’t just stick with numbers … look for WHY? Are you doing root cause analysis (RCA)? If you can (for example) quickly identify that the four failures were caused by incorrect startup procedures, and a quick change to those procedures would make the problems go away … fix it! Stop doing statistics on numbers you can make go away.

Enjoy an episode of Speaking of Reliability. Where you can join friends as they discuss reliability topics. Join us as we discuss topics ranging from design for reliability techniques to field data analysis approaches.



Show Notes

The post SOR 1018 Calculate Equipment Reliability appeared first on Accendo Reliability.

  continue reading

677集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 450326665 series 2359263
内容由Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Calculate Equipment Reliability

Abstract

Chris and Fred discuss how we can go about calculating equipment reliability … when you only have a small amount of information. Help!

Key Points

Join Chris and Fred as they discuss how you can calculate equipment reliability when you have a little bit of information. This comes from a listener who asked us to calculate the reliability of their equipment that failed four times in one month (with 400 hours of operation). How do we find this system’s reliability?

Topics include:

  • So what is the number? If we assume a constant hazard rate (yuck) then we can use the exponential distribution to work out that the reliability at one month (400 hours) is 1.8 %.
  • Is this helpful? Our listener didn’t tell us why they wanted a reliability number … but 1.8 % is almost certainly useless in terms of making better decisions. Why? Well we don’t know if our equipment is wearing in or wearing out. We don’t know if we have 10 pieces of equipment working at the same time over this month, with only 4 of them failing. So what do we do?
  • What is the DECISION? This is a common question (refrain). What are you deciding to do with this number? We can’t think of a single decision that this 1.8 % estimate will help. Again, we don’t know if the equipment is wearing in or wearing out … which would affect our estimate. Knowing the precise times of failure would be really helpful as well. But is the decision more useful if it is based on availability? It sounds like the equipment is being repaired, so how long does it spend being repaired? What is the DECISION!
  • Don’t just stick with numbers … look for WHY? Are you doing root cause analysis (RCA)? If you can (for example) quickly identify that the four failures were caused by incorrect startup procedures, and a quick change to those procedures would make the problems go away … fix it! Stop doing statistics on numbers you can make go away.

Enjoy an episode of Speaking of Reliability. Where you can join friends as they discuss reliability topics. Join us as we discuss topics ranging from design for reliability techniques to field data analysis approaches.



Show Notes

The post SOR 1018 Calculate Equipment Reliability appeared first on Accendo Reliability.

  continue reading

677集单集

所有剧集

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南

边探索边听这个节目
播放