Artwork

内容由Matthew Lavy and Iain Munro提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Matthew Lavy and Iain Munro 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

Give me my Bitcoin back!

12:36
 
分享
 

Manage episode 274983079 series 2803112
内容由Matthew Lavy and Iain Munro提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Matthew Lavy and Iain Munro 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

This podcast explores the legal remedies that are available when Bitcoin are misappropriated, and some of the practical challenges of enforcement. For a more detailed analysis of the treatment of cryptoassets as property, see the Legal Statement on cryptoassets and smart contracts, November 2019, published by the LawTech Delivery Panel UK Jurisdiction Taskforce (downloadable here).

The legal basis for recovery of fraudulently misappropriated Bitcoin and factors that are engaged on an interim application are addressed in AA v Persons Unkown, Re Bitcoin [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm).

In relation to crypto-assets as property in other common law jurisdictions, see:

  • Ruscoe v Cryptopia Ltd (In Liquidation) [2020] NZHC 728 (New Zealand).
  • B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Lrd [2019] SGHC(I) 03 (Singapore).

For a detailed explanation as to the technical workings of Bitcoin, see Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, Nakomoto, 2008 (available here).

Note: in an earlier version of this podcast, the exchange was unable to transfer Alice's bitcoin back to her because it did not have access to the fraudster's private keys. In practice, however, the majority of mainstream exchanges do control account holders' private keys (allowing them to treat "deposited" bitcoin as fungible). Therefore we have altered the scenario to reflect the more common case (albeit at the expense of illustrating a conundrum we think rather interesting!).

  continue reading

14集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 274983079 series 2803112
内容由Matthew Lavy and Iain Munro提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Matthew Lavy and Iain Munro 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

This podcast explores the legal remedies that are available when Bitcoin are misappropriated, and some of the practical challenges of enforcement. For a more detailed analysis of the treatment of cryptoassets as property, see the Legal Statement on cryptoassets and smart contracts, November 2019, published by the LawTech Delivery Panel UK Jurisdiction Taskforce (downloadable here).

The legal basis for recovery of fraudulently misappropriated Bitcoin and factors that are engaged on an interim application are addressed in AA v Persons Unkown, Re Bitcoin [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm).

In relation to crypto-assets as property in other common law jurisdictions, see:

  • Ruscoe v Cryptopia Ltd (In Liquidation) [2020] NZHC 728 (New Zealand).
  • B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Lrd [2019] SGHC(I) 03 (Singapore).

For a detailed explanation as to the technical workings of Bitcoin, see Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, Nakomoto, 2008 (available here).

Note: in an earlier version of this podcast, the exchange was unable to transfer Alice's bitcoin back to her because it did not have access to the fraudster's private keys. In practice, however, the majority of mainstream exchanges do control account holders' private keys (allowing them to treat "deposited" bitcoin as fungible). Therefore we have altered the scenario to reflect the more common case (albeit at the expense of illustrating a conundrum we think rather interesting!).

  continue reading

14集单集

Alle afleveringen

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南