))
064 Why I Don't Program Odd Objects
Manage episode 419745444 series 3498945
内容由Paul Weber提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 Paul Weber 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。
Bottom line – SPECIFICITY
Less specificity than simple barbell training
When you have multiple training priorities (when you’re trying to improve in multiple disciplines simultaneously) then specificity becomes even more important.
For a CrossFitter, the training effort you can give to any one discipline is less than it would be if you were just a weightlifter, just a gymnast or just an endurance athlete.
When you have a scarcity of training effort, you need to be even more selective how you spend it.
You want that training effort to produce the highest possible performance improvement. That is usually the thing that is the most specific.
Preparedness
Preparedness needs to be brought up
e.g. bending with lumbar flexion
We have to consider preparedness for that position, knowing that loaded lumbar flexion is more risky than bending with a neutral or extended lumbar.
It’s not that you can’t do it or should never do it, you just have to build preparedness before you go take a maximal stone for a ride.
Compatibility
High axial loading and fatigue – means odd object strength training is incompatible with other high axial fatigue movements, like squat and deadlift, which are more specific to CrossFit.
If you challenge yourself in this style of training, it must displace some training effort that you would otherwise put to barbell squatting and deadlifting.
I would rather have my athletes doing the thing that is most specific. Especially if it’s high fatigue.
Summary
I prefer standard barbell strength training to odd object strength training.
Reason #1 Specificity
Reason #2 Preparedness – takes time to prepare for novel positions
Reason #3 Compatibility – high fatigue, axial loading, so displaces training effort you could be putting into the barbell
108集单集
分享
