Artwork

内容由Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen, Bruce Nielson, and Peter Johansen提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen, Bruce Nielson, and Peter Johansen 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal
Player FM -播客应用
使用Player FM应用程序离线!

Episode 80: Knowledge vs. Simul-Knowledge

1:44:34
 
分享
 

Manage episode 404556453 series 2853322
内容由Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen, Bruce Nielson, and Peter Johansen提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen, Bruce Nielson, and Peter Johansen 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Bruce wraps up his epic 6 part series on knowledge and the 'two sources hypothesis' (i.e. Deutsch's theory that all 'knowledge' comes from only two sources: Biological evolution and human minds).

What happens if we take all the non-two sources examples of 'adapted information that cause itself to remain so' (e.g. the walking robot, the immune system, trade secrets, animal learning, animal memes, etc.) and give them their own theory distinct from the theory of 'knowledge'? Sort of like a theory of "a simulacrum of knowledge" (to uses Deutsch's own term) or "Simul-Knowledge" for short.

This turns out to be remarkably easy: you just take the constructor theory of knowledge without any implicit additional criteria. Doing this has immediate profound implications that impact how we see and understand Deutsch's theory of knowledge.

Like to a version of the drawing Bruce refers to throughout the episode.

--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/four-strands/support
  continue reading

96集单集

Artwork
icon分享
 
Manage episode 404556453 series 2853322
内容由Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen, Bruce Nielson, and Peter Johansen提供。所有播客内容(包括剧集、图形和播客描述)均由 Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen, Bruce Nielson, and Peter Johansen 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品,您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal

Bruce wraps up his epic 6 part series on knowledge and the 'two sources hypothesis' (i.e. Deutsch's theory that all 'knowledge' comes from only two sources: Biological evolution and human minds).

What happens if we take all the non-two sources examples of 'adapted information that cause itself to remain so' (e.g. the walking robot, the immune system, trade secrets, animal learning, animal memes, etc.) and give them their own theory distinct from the theory of 'knowledge'? Sort of like a theory of "a simulacrum of knowledge" (to uses Deutsch's own term) or "Simul-Knowledge" for short.

This turns out to be remarkably easy: you just take the constructor theory of knowledge without any implicit additional criteria. Doing this has immediate profound implications that impact how we see and understand Deutsch's theory of knowledge.

Like to a version of the drawing Bruce refers to throughout the episode.

--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/four-strands/support
  continue reading

96集单集

Alle afleveringen

×
 
Loading …

欢迎使用Player FM

Player FM正在网上搜索高质量的播客,以便您现在享受。它是最好的播客应用程序,适用于安卓、iPhone和网络。注册以跨设备同步订阅。

 

快速参考指南