TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025]

Supreme Court of the United States

#Politics #News #Austin Songer #Government #Justice #Supreme Court #USA #United States #Docket

18:09

HR is no longer just about managing people—it’s about shaping the future of work. Jens Baier, BCG’s HR transformation expert, discusses how AI and shifting employee expectations are forcing companies to rethink talent strategies. From re-recruiting to upskilling employees, HR must adapt to a rapidly changing landscape. Learn More: Jens Baier: https://on.bcg.com/41ca7Gv BCG on People Strategy: https://on.bcg.com/3QtAjro Decoding Global Talent: https://on.bcg.com/4gUC4IT…

大约1年之前 2:28:50

MP3•单集首页

QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

341集单集

Supreme Court of the United States

TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025]

Supreme Court of the United States

32 subscribers

published 大约1年之前

MP3•单集首页

QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

341集单集

#Politics #News #Austin Songer #Government #Justice #Supreme Court #USA #United States #Docket

所有剧集

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:30:44

6 weeks之前1:30:44

1:30:44

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) , or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:15:57

6 weeks之前1:15:57

1:15:57

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:13:53

6 weeks之前1:13:53

1:13:53

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:12:12

6 weeks之前1:12:12

1:12:12

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025] 2:05:32

6 weeks之前2:05:32

2:05:32

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 23-971 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 49:01

7 weeks之前49:01

49:01

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 1:17:03

7 weeks之前1:17:03

1:17:03

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:18:04

8 weeks之前1:18:04

1:18:04

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act , a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed — loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:30:43

8 weeks之前1:30:43

1:30:43

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Step Act ’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the act’s enactment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025] 2:28:50

8 weeks之前2:28:50

2:28:50

QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act , as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024] 1:10:58

12 weeks之前1:10:58

1:10:58

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024] 1:50:37

12 weeks之前1:50:37

1:50:37

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:13:34

12 weeks之前1:13:34

1:13:34

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:26:52

12 weeks之前1:26:52

1:26:52

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; and whether all contract rights are “property.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024] 2:21:11

13 weeks之前2:21:11