最佳Baude播客 (2024)

1
Sebastien Jarrot, creating and curating his cycling life. 59:33

7d ago59:33

59:33

My guest today is Sebastien Jarrot On today's show, we talk about the C-word. Yes, folks the C-word - CYCLING. And a whole lot of other words that start with the letter C. Sebastien is a good friend and a good friend of the podcast. He's always been very supportive of this passion project. I've always wanted to have Sebastien on the show because I …

1
Separation-of-Powers Police 1:12:36

25d ago1:12:36

1:12:36

After a long hiatus, we're particularly unpredictable with an episode that isn't about the Supreme Court. We're joined by NYU law professor Daryl Levinson to talk about his exciting and important new book on constitutional theory, Law For Leviathan: Constitutional Law, International Law, and the State. Listen to learn why the Supreme Court's consti…

1
Lucy Bartholomew takes the Beyond the Mountains questionnaire 7:04

2M ago7:04

7:04

Lucy Bartholomew takes the questionnaire designed to reveal her true mountain character and reveal your beliefs and aspirations.由Ashley Pettit

1
Running happy in the mountains with Lucy Bartholomew 54:32

2M ago54:32

54:32

My guest today is Lucy Bartholomew. At the young age of only 28, it feels like Lucy is a veteran of Ultrarunning. She did her first 100km run with her dad's supervision at just 15 years old. Since then she has been a regular protagonist in the ultra-running scene. She is competing in the races all over the world. In 2023 she was 10th in the UTMB (U…

1
Not the Best Founder 1:16:51

2M ago1:16:51

1:16:51

We take a long last look at two more end-of-term cases, where the Court made news with what it did NOT decide: Moyle v. United States (the abortion/EMTALA case), and Moody v. Net Choice (state regulation of social media). But first, a bit of debate about some prominent figures in constitutional history.…

1
Hype Music 1:02:37

3M ago1:02:37

1:02:37

Unpredictably, our recent torrent of episodes continues. We take a deep dive into Moore v. United States, which addressed the scope of Congress's constitutional power to tax.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Reticulated Python 1:11:43

3M ago1:11:43

1:11:43

We continue our breakneck pace and dig into two substantive criminal law opinions: Fischer v. United States and Snyder v. United States.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Ultimatum Game 58:55

3M ago58:55

58:55

We're back just a few days after our last episode to dive in to Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, a 5-4 decision about the power of the bankruptcy system to release claims against third parties.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Libertarian Legal Morality Tales 1:12:16

3M ago1:12:16

1:12:16

As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.…

1
Evil Batman 1:25:12

3M ago1:25:12

1:25:12

After a vacation-related hiatus, we're back to discuss Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (overruling Chevron) and Corner Post v. Board of Governors (time limits for challenges to regulations). We try to figure out just how disruptive these decisions will be for the administrative state and somehow manage not to waste half the episode debating Su…

1
Back on the Island 1:15:04

4M ago1:15:04

1:15:04

Will makes Dan interrupt his vacation to talk about the case you've all been clamoring for: Trump v. United States.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Hope Springs Eternal 1:34:05

4M ago1:34:05

1:34:05

We break down SEC v. Jarkesy and City of Grants Pass v. Johnson.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Felony-Adjacent 1:08:23

4M ago1:08:23

1:08:23

We cut to the chase with extended discussions of two of last week's cases: United States v. Rahimi, which upheld a federal gun law against Second Amendment challenge and produced six concurring and dissenting opinions; and Erlinger v. United States, a case about the jury's role in sentencing that continues a line of cases starting 25 years ago in A…

1
Small Victories 1:28:17

4M ago1:28:17

1:28:17

After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in U…

1
Vexillology 1:37:55

5M ago1:37:55

1:37:55

Unpredictably, we take a new approach and record immediately after the Court drops new opinions. We dig into Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (voting rights) and NRA v. Vullo (free speech). Before that, we engage with listener feedback and talk about the latest developments in the endless Alito flag saga.…

1
p(doom) 1:29:03

5M ago1:29:03

1:29:03

Continuing our pattern of staying a week behind the Court's latest output, we discuss last week's opinions: CFPB v. Community Financial Services Association (the Appropriations Clause), Harrow v. Department of Defense (jurisdiction and equitable tolling); and Smith v. Spizzirri (arbitration), while also covering the shadow docket order in a Louisia…

1
Svein Tuft takes the Beyond the Mountains Quiz 12:46

5M ago12:46

12:46

The questionnaire is designed to reveal your true mountain character - and reveal your beliefs and aspirations You only have 30 seconds to answer each question. Are you ready to play, are you ready to take the Beyond the Mountains questionnaire? Svein Tuft - let's go.由Ashley Pettit

1
Svein Tuft, the importance of following the call of the mountains. 1:19:01

5M ago1:19:01

1:19:01

My guest today is Svein Tuft. He is the character straight out of the Jack London book "The Call of the Wild" He was professional cyclings unconventional cyclist, but his unconventional approach is what made him so successful. He knew what worked for him, he knew how to extract the best of himself for his success and his team's success. He famously…

1
Poison Pill in Your Pocket 1:16:58

5M ago1:16:58

1:16:58

We follow up on feedback, puzzle over the Court's apparent continued lack of interest in Fourth Amendment cases, and then discuss two of the latest opinions—Culley v. Marshall (civil forfeiture) and Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy (copyright). And yes, we know Dan's audio sounds terrible due to a technical snafu, sorry!…

1
Radical Agreement 1:10:28

6M ago1:10:28

1:10:28

After taking some listener questions, we analyze the lengthy shadow docket opinions in Labrador v. Poe, dealing with universal relief, emergency applications, and more. We then tackle two recent merits opinions: Devillier v. Texas (takings) and Muldrow v. St. Louis (Title VII).由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Bootlegging-Adjacent 1:04:41

6M ago1:04:41

1:04:41

After discussing a few pending issues at the Court, we look back to analyze several decisions from last month-- FBI v. Fikre, a mootness case with national security implications, and the shadow docket dispute in one of many cases named United States v. Texas (the SB4 case)-- and then turn to last Friday's more recent decision in Sheetz v. County of…

1
If it's easy, it's not fun. Filming and storytelling with Aurelie Morrison-Gonin 1:13:50

7M ago1:13:50

1:13:50

My guest today is Aurelie Morrison-Gonin She is a multi-talented mountain sports storyteller. She is a producer, director, photographer, camerawoman, writer and editor. She has worked on the Freeride World Tour, the Summer and Winter Olympic games, and is an independent storyteller for many mountain brands, athletes and magazines. In a world of hig…

1
Dinkus 1:03:59

7M ago1:03:59

1:03:59

After grappling with listener feedback ranging from the acoustic to the typographical, we catch up on last month's decisions in Great Lakes v. Raiders Retreat Realty (admiralty) and McElrath v. Georgia (double jeopardy). We then turn to last week's decisions about public officials on social media, Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratliff v. Garnier, an…

1
Political Hacks Pretending to be Lawyers 59:19

8M ago59:19

59:19

We (of course) break down the Court's opinions in Trump v. Anderson, the Section Three case from Colorado. We also discuss the Court's cert. grant on Trump's immunity from criminal prosecution, and several other opinions on the orders list, dealing with rent control, magnet school admissions, and campus speech.…

1
How to photograph epic mountain landscapes with Michael Blann, professional photographer. 1:09:33

8M ago1:09:33

1:09:33

Ok, so this is the first episode of season 3. This is my first interview for 2024. This is also my first remote interview. My first guest for 2024 is Michael Blann a professional photographer based in London. He is also a keen cyclist and he believes in the power of Passion projects. We talk about all this, plus we talk about is love for taking pho…

1
Votin' for Lincoln 53:15

8M ago53:15

53:15

After quick review of an order about admissions at West Point and two new unanimous opinions, we spend almost all of the episode breaking down last week's oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson. What excuse will the Supreme Court use to keep Colorado from disqualifying Trump from the ballot?由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Into the Brick Wall 1:06:10

9M ago1:06:10

1:06:10

After catching up on a few odds and ends, we decide to give the people what they want and discuss Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment and whether the Supreme Court could possibly declare Donald Trump ineligible for the Presidency. You won't want to miss it.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Muppetproof 1:08:38

11M ago1:08:38

1:08:38

We discuss the passing of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, then turn to two interesting opinions on the shadow docket (in Griffin v. HM Florida and DuPont v. Abbott), and finally break down the Court's first merits opinion of the term in Acheson Hotels v. Laufer, at the intersection of standing and mootness. Will also expresses skepticism about Dan's l…

1
Made in the Wild. Fred Buttard high mountain guide. 1:12:18

11M ago1:12:18

1:12:18

My guest today is Fred Buttard. He is a high mountain guide, ski touring guide, gravel biking explorer, beer maker and full-time dad, who spends his time between the French Alps and the Scandinavian mountains of Sweden and Norway. Before this interview, I didn't really know Fred that well, I'd only seen him around the village, out skiing or at a lo…

1
Talking to the pioneer of steep skiing Anselme Baud. It's a no fall zone. 1:04:15

11M ago1:04:15

1:04:15

My guest today is Anselme Baud. He is one of the pioneers of steep skiing, Powder magazine named him as one of the 48 most influential skiers. He may be retired but he's still getting out into the mountains. Just after we recorded this interview he was heading off to Nepal and the Himalayas. His name is associated with many first ski descents in Ch…

1
Easy Win 1:12:41

11M ago1:12:41

1:12:41

We discuss the Court's new Code of Conduct, catch up on shadow docket happenings, and debate what historians can teach originalists. We then recap the argument United States v. Rahimi, (the Term's big Second Amendment case). Finally, we stay on brand by circling back to Pulsifer v. United States from the October sitting, where the Justices puzzled …

1
Good Dig 1:07:42

12M ago1:07:42

1:07:42

The October Term is now underway, and that means it's time for Season 4 of the show. We catch up on the inevitable shadow docket happenings before diving into a discussion of two cases that were argued earlier in the month. First, we dig into Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, and debate which jurisdictional ground the Court will rely on to get rid of …

1
Keeping people mobile so they can enjoy life in the mountains 58:11

1y ago58:11

58:11

My guest today is Kristy Shelley. She is a fellow Aussie and was a self-confessed ski bum in her youth, she chased the fresh pow across the northern and southern hemispheres as a ski instructor, before she finally decided to go to the Hollywood of big mountain sports - Chamonix. And like so many people before her, the allure and attraction of the C…

1
Screaming Clown 1:04:15

1y ago1:04:15

1:04:15

The Court hasn't done too much while the summer recess drags on, but we're back for what might be our last episode of Season 3 before Season 4 kicks off with the new Term. We manage to piece together an episode with some items from the mailbag, some SG gossip, and a few shadow docket happenings.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Lib Fanfiction 1:09:36

1y ago1:09:36

1:09:36

The Justices have beenoff on their European vacations for a couple of months but we're still cranking out episodes breaking down last Term. We start off by discussion Will and Michael Stokes Paulsen's SSRN-breaking article arguing that Donald Trump is ineligible for the presidency under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. We then break down a co…

1
Map Guy 1:10:14

1y ago1:10:14

1:10:14

We recap some shadow docket happenings and catch up on the latest SCOTUS ethics news before continuing our march through June opinions we missed. This time, we dive back into Indian law in Arizona v. Navajo Nation and try to make sense of private causes of action and the so-called Spending Clause in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County …

1
Triple Threat 1:05:33

1y ago1:05:33

1:05:33

What could be more unscheduled and unpredictable than our fourth episode in little more than a week? We briefly discuss the latest developments in the Mountain Valley Pipeline shadow docket dispute, and then revisit ethics controversies. Then, we continue marching through the June cases we missed. We talk about the First Amendment's "true threats" …

1
Dishonorable Tradition 1:14:27

1y ago1:14:27

1:14:27

We defy all predictions by releasing a third episode in a week. This time, we talk about the intersection of public accommodations law and the First Amendment in 303 Creative and the Confrontation Clause in Samia v. United States.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Peak SG 1:52:47

1y ago1:52:47

1:52:47

In the spirit of keeping things unpredictable, we're back with a new episode barely days after the last one. This time, we take a deep dive into two jurisdiction-y cases in the Divided Argument wheelhouse: Jones v. Hendrix and Moore v. Harper.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
My Despised World 1:55:29

1+ y ago1:55:29

1:55:29

After some inevitable self-flagellation for our lengthy hiatus, we catch up on some recent news and debate SCOTUS ethics. We then talk about implications of the Harvard/UNC affirmative action case, revisit Mallory v. Norfolk Southern, and break down the latest case captioned "United States v. Texas."…

1
The guardian of the glaciers and climate action. Dr Heidi Sevestre 1:19:23

1+ y ago1:19:23

1:19:23

My guest today is Dr Heidi Sevestre. She is just an awesome human, plus she is a glaciologist and is on the front line of climate change. So we had a lot to talk about during this episode BUT BEFORE I hit the intro music I want to say a few things. After I finished recording the interview with Heidi, we were just chatting as I was packing up my equ…

1
Climbing Everest changed my life. Lakpa Sherpa 1:14:24

1+ y ago1:14:24

1:14:24

My guest today is Lakpa Gel jen Sherpa. At the age of 25 with no training or experience, he reached the summit of Mt Everest the highest mountain in the world. He has reached the summit of Everest 7 times and climbed many other 8,000-meter summits in Nepal. With no education, no English or training but a strong belief in taking positive action and …

1
Demokratia 1:33:35

1+ y ago1:33:35

1:33:35

We record our first inter-continental episode, as Will reports in from a visit to Tel Aviv. We then dive in to two of this month's opinions: Haaland v. Brackeen, which rejects a series of challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act, and United States v. Hansen, which upholds a federal immigration law against a free speech overbreadth challenge.…

1
Justified True Belief 1:09:28

1+ y ago1:09:28

1:09:28

We discuss a recent effort to identify the least interesting SCOTUS case, and then discuss Tyler v. Hennepin County, United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc., and Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Pale Fire 1:11:07

1+ y ago1:11:07

1:11:07

We debate Justice Gorsuch's unusual "statement" in Arizona v. Mayorkas. Then, we don't let our complete lack of knowledge of intellectual property law stop us in trying to make sense of Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, the big copyright throw-down between Justices Sotomayor and Kagan.…

1
Break the Fourth Wall 59:55

1+ y ago59:55

59:55

After catching up on news and bemoaning some listener feedback, we look at some opinions that the Court dropped last week. We take a deep dive into National Pork Producers Council v. Ross and briefly discuss the two fraud cases, Percoco and Ciminelli.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

1
Provocative Subtitle 54:07

1+ y ago54:07

54:07

We talk (and argue) with special guest Steve Vladeck about his new book, The Shadow Docket, just published by Basic Books. Steve explains why it is important to educate the public about the Court's use of unsigned and sometimes unexplained orders, and how it is changing. Will and Dan press him on whether his criticisms go too far . . . or not far e…

1
Creator of the Stars of Night 1:12:25

1+ y ago1:12:25

1:12:25

We cover many developments -- Justice Alito's unusual interview in the Wall Street Journal, the release of Justice Stevens' papers, more news on Supreme Court ethics, as well as a new cert. grant on the Chevron doctrine, the mifepristone shadow-docket ruling, and still more jurisdictional news in Moore v. Harper. But first -- an anonymous caller dr…

1
Liv Sansoz, LIVing life to the fullest and protecting the mountains she loves. 1:35:29

1+ y ago1:35:29

1:35:29

My guest today is LIv Sansoz and she still has the hunger to compete and test herself with new challenges or as she says “she has a thirst for effort. Which is something I need to taste again. In her youth she was a climbing superstar, winning world championships, and world cups, and competing all over the world. Then through a climbing accident, s…

1
Best Suits 49:44

1+ y ago49:44

49:44

We revisit a story about Justice Scalia from last episode and then discuss recent allegations about Justice Thomas's financial disclosures, and Supreme Court ethics more broadly. We also briefly turn to two recent merits opinions -- Türkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States and Reed v. Goertz.由Will Baude & Dan Epps

值得一听的播客

Baude播客

值得一听的播客

快速参考指南