Clinically Relevance - Looking At Recent Research (11) Precision Evidence podcast

Clinically Relevance - Looking at Recent Research (11)

3y ago 8:28

已归档的系列专辑 ("不活跃的收取点" status)

When? This feed was archived on July 02, 2022 00:05 (2y ago). Last successful fetch was on July 27, 2021 13:07 (2+ y ago)

Why? 不活跃的收取点 status. 我们的伺服器已尝试了一段时间，但仍然无法截取有效的播客收取点

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

内容由Kim Kristiansen and JG Staal提供。所有播客内容（包括剧集、图形和播客描述）均由 Kim Kristiansen and JG Staal 或其播客平台合作伙伴直接上传和提供。如果您认为有人在未经您许可的情况下使用您的受版权保护的作品，您可以按照此处概述的流程进行操作https://zh.player.fm/legal。

Clinical trials and research should always aim to provide information that is meaningful and relevant for patients.

However, researchers are rarely addressing that topic when presenting results from trials.
In this episode, we look at published papers from high-ranking journals to get a sense of the extent of that problem.
You may be surprised by our findings...

We want to make it mandatory to state the researchers' clinical relevance levels ahead of the trial, mentioning what they will consider clinically relevant when they pre-register their research on the clinicaltrials.gov website or similar websites. They then need to compare their findings in both the paper and abstract when publishing data from the study. #clinicalrelevance

LINKS:

Our specific page on our website about requesting clinical relevance statement and evaluation https://www.precision-evidence.com/p/clinical-relevance/

Overview of clinical trials registers like clinicaltrials.gov: https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/yhectrialsregisters/home/clinicaltrials

Precision Evidence episode 10: “How to Get to Clinically Relevant Research” https://www.precision-evidence.com/10

NOTES:

Statistical significance vs. clinical significance in clinical research
Clinical significance, clinical relevance, clinical meaningfulness, clinical evidence
Why researchers in the clinical field should always note ahead of starting a trial what they would consider clinically relevant and then refer back to that in the paper and abstract
Looking at 44 papers published in early 2021 in high ranking journals and analyzing the mentioning of clinical relevance
It is disappointing....
ALWAYS ASK FOR A CLINICAL RELEVANCE EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS - every time, all of us, whatever relation we have to produce, read and use information from clinical research
ASK FOR A CLINICAL RELEVANCE EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS - and let's make it just as normal as the p-value #doesitmatter

GET THE ABSTRACT SCREENING TOOL

It can be a challenge to screen papers for clinical relevance. As we go beyond the abstract in this podcast, we have created a screening tool to use when reading an abstract from a clinical research paper.

Using that tool enables you to quickly screen an abstract from a medical journal for clinical relevance selecting only those you want to read. At the same time, you will know why you skipped the rest. Get it at our website https://www.precision-evidence.com

Twitter @PrecisionEBM,

You can learn more at our website, where you can also leave us a voice message.

Website: www.precision-evidence.com

Get the Precision Evidence Newsletter https://bit.ly/3tLBx3Z

Hosts:

Dr. Kim Kristiansen, M.D: @KKristiansenMD

JG Staal: @HealthyEvidence

Music thanks to mixkit.co

13集单集