The Deeper Thinking podcast

#Society #Philosophy #Tech #Science #Social Sciences #Deeper Thinking

28:24

In our second installment of the Small Business Starter Kit series - we’re tackling a topic that’s sometimes tricky, sometimes confusing, but ever-present: taxes. Hosts Austin and Jannese have an insightful conversation with entrepreneur Isabella Rosal who started 7th Sky Ventures , an exporter and distributor of craft spirits, beer, and wine. Having lived and worked in two different countries and started a company in a heavily-regulated field, Isabella is no stranger to navigating the paperwork-laden and jargon-infused maze of properly understanding taxes for a newly formed small business. Join us as she shares her story and provides valuable insight into how to tackle your business’ taxes - so they don’t tackle you. Learn more about how QuickBooks can help you grow your business: QuickBooks.com See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

Series home•Feed

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

159 episodes

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

11 subscribers

updated about 7 hours ago

Series home•Feed

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

159 episodes

#Society #Philosophy #Tech #Science #Social Sciences #Deeper Thinking

All episodes

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The Deep Structures of Culture and Cognition - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 37:52

7 hours ago37:52

37:52

The Deep Structures of Culture and Cognition The Deeper Thinking Podcast In this episode, we dive deep into the structuralist theories of Claude Levi-Strauss , exploring how the human mind organizes culture and cognition through universal structures. These deep cognitive frameworks govern the way we understand myths , kinship systems , and cultural expressions. The journey into understanding these universal structures is not simply intellectual, but a profound rethinking of how we perceive human culture in its entirety. The structuralist mindset goes beyond merely studying isolated cultural artifacts or behaviors. It challenges us to see cultural phenomena as deeply connected, shaped by unconscious structures within the mind, as proposed by Levi-Strauss. As he suggested, the study of myths and rituals reveals not just stories or behaviors, but the underlying cognitive patterns that guide human experience across cultures. At the core of this approach is the idea of binary oppositions —the dualities like life/death, nature/culture, raw/cooked, good/evil—that Levi-Strauss argued are universally present in the way humans organize their cultural realities. These oppositions are not arbitrary; they are fundamental to human thought, reflecting cognitive structures that transcend culture. However, the professional mindset of the anthropologist is not simply about identifying these structures—it’s about understanding their dynamics. As Foucault and Derrida have critiqued, culture is not a static system of binary oppositions but a dynamic field shaped by historical and social forces. While Levi-Strauss revealed the fundamental ways in which universal cognitive patterns organize cultural meaning, contemporary scholars now understand that these structures must be examined within their social and historical contexts, recognizing individual agency and historical contingency. Why Listen? Understanding how universal cognitive patterns shape culture and cognition Exploring the concept of binary oppositions in myths and kinship systems The intersection of culture, cognition, and historical context The role of agency in shaping the structures that govern human thought Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. The Raw and the Cooked by Claude Levi-Strauss — A foundational work on myth and culture that reveals how binary oppositions govern human thought. Discipline and Punish by Michel Foucault — A study of power and social systems, emphasizing how historical forces shape cultural practices. Of Grammatology by Jacques Derrida — A key text in post-structuralist thought, exploring the limits of language and meaning. Listen Now On: YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The Freedom of Enoughness - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 29:31

7 hours ago29:31

29:31

The Freedom of Enoughness The Deeper Thinking Podcast Some truths do not shout. They arrive in silence, like a quiet wave that doesn’t demand your attention but gently pulls you into its embrace. The world tells us to achieve, to keep moving, to perform—but what if the real freedom lies in being enough, just as we are? What if we could free ourselves from the need to always be more and simply exist in a space of enoughness? This episode explores the radical power of embracing stillness, self-compassion, and the refusal to chase external validation, as we examine the deep philosophical and psychological implications of living fully in the present. We are taught to measure our worth by our achievements, our performance, and our productivity. This endless pursuit leaves little room for simply *being*. But what if we chose presence over performance? What if, instead of striving to improve every aspect of ourselves, we learned to embrace the space between action and rest, the space where we are enough without needing to be anything else? In this episode, we discuss the transformative ideas of thinkers like Byung-Chul Han , who critiques the culture of constant productivity, and Simone Weil , whose concept of attention as a moral act offers a pathway to inner peace through stillness and presence. In contrast to the hustle culture that defines our society, we explore how embracing self-compassion allows us to create a healthier, more sustainable relationship with ourselves. Drawing on the work of Kristin Neff , we discuss how self-compassion can be the antidote to the self-criticism that arises from performance-based worth. Moreover, we dive into Maslow’s self-actualization theory, exploring how we can achieve fulfillment by acknowledging our inherent worth, rather than constantly striving for perfection or external validation. The practice of enoughness requires us to acknowledge and confront the cultural forces that push us towards constant optimization. As we discuss the ideas of Nietzsche , who challenges us to embrace our limitations and flaws, we ask: What would it look like to live a life free from the tyranny of productivity? To value ourselves not for what we achieve, but for who we are, right now, in this moment? This episode invites you to step away from the pressure to constantly prove yourself and instead explore the profound possibility of simply being enough. Why Listen? How to embrace enoughness and redefine your self-worth The psychological benefits of self-compassion in a performance-driven world The philosophical implications of resisting productivity culture How thinkers like Byung-Chul Han and Simone Weil offer insights into how to live a more balanced, fulfilling life Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. The Burnout Society by Byung-Chul Han — A critique of the culture of constant performance and productivity. Amazon link Gravity and Grace by Simone Weil — Fragments on attention, affliction, and spiritual refusal. Amazon link The Power of Now by Eckhart Tolle — The importance of presence in a fast-paced world. Amazon link Listen Now On: YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The Presence of What’s Gone, Memory not as recollection—but as return. - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 20:13

7 hours ago20:13

20:13

The Presence of What’s Gone The Deeper Thinking Podcast Some things don’t leave. They recede, they quiet, they fold into the background—yet their presence lingers. Not as memory in the traditional sense, but as atmosphere. As interruption. As an intimacy that returns without warning. In this episode, we reflect on memory not as recollection, but as the return of what never fully disappeared. It is a meditation on presence—subtle, embodied, and philosophical. Philosophers like Jacques Derrida , Henri Bergson , and Paul Ricœur have each, in their own way, helped us reimagine time, identity, and the ghostlike logic of recollection. Where Derrida’s hauntology considers the presence of absence, Bergson’s durée evokes the elasticity of time as lived experience. Ricœur invites us to see memory as narrative identity—never static, always becoming. This is not a discussion of supernatural ghosts, but of lived presence: the way a scent, a room, or a forgotten gesture reactivates something felt more than remembered. Memory returns through the body before it arrives in language. Through architecture, silence, and breath, the past re-enters not to be replayed, but to be reinhabited. And sometimes, what haunts us is not grief—but care. Not pain—but meaning. Why Listen? Memory as presence, not storage Haunting as a lived phenomenon, not a metaphor Revisiting the self through the structure of time Quiet philosophy grounded in sensation and space Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. Specters of Marx by Jacques Derrida — Hauntology, historical residue, and the persistence of absence. Matter and Memory by Henri Bergson — A philosophical meditation on duration, sensation, and time. Memory, History, Forgetting by Paul Ricœur — The ethical and narrative dimensions of remembering and being remembered. The Feeling of What Happens by Antonio Damasio — How memory and consciousness shape our embodied sense of presence. Listen Now On: YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
Between the Ocean and the Land - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 20:54

1 day ago20:54

20:54

Between the Ocean and the Land The Deeper Thinking Podcast She walks along the tide line where the maps blur. Where the shore is no longer shore, and the ocean not yet sea. This is not a crossing, but an arrival into something unresolved. Beneath the surface of things that almost become one another, there is a silence that is not empty. A stillness that asks to be heard. Ambiguity is often treated as something to be resolved. A gap in understanding. A flaw in comprehension. But here, it is understood as environment—an entire perceptual and cultural landscape that asks not to be mastered, but inhabited. In this space, clarity is not the goal. What emerges instead is a form of presence: lucid, incomplete, and essential. Touch, breath, ritual—these are not metaphors, but epistemologies. Maurice Merleau-Ponty argued that perception is not distant observation, but entanglement. Simone Weil described attention as a moral act—waiting without grasping, perceiving without possession. And in the work of Gloria Anzaldúa , the “borderland” becomes more than geography—it is a condition of knowing, a refusal of coherence imposed from without. The cognitive discomfort of uncertainty is well documented. The mind’s need for closure is not merely psychological but ancestral. Yet beneath that impulse lies another: the ability to remain. In silence. In paradox. In a space that neither confirms nor denies. It is not a failure of will, but a form of devotion. The tension is real. But so is the possibility. Not all things can be resolved. Some should not be. The architecture of experience is not always built for conclusion. The world may be more honest when it is allowed to remain unfinished. Why Listen? Ambiguity as perception — not failure Certainty as power — and its cultural cost Attention as resistance — when clarity is not possible The philosophical and bodily stakes of unknowing Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. The Visible and the Invisible by Maurice Merleau-Ponty — Phenomenology and the threshold between body and world. Amazon link Gravity and Grace by Simone Weil — Fragments on attention, affliction, and spiritual refusal. Amazon link Borderlands/La Frontera by Gloria Anzaldúa — Identity, language, and living at the edge of definition. Amazon link Listen Now On: YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
A Lever Is Pulled - A ritual of control, a machine that no longer moves - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 23:21

1 day ago23:21

23:21

A Lever Is Pulled A ritual of control, a machine that no longer moves. There is a moment—a gesture repeated in silence—that feels like power, even when it does nothing. A switch thrown. A lever pulled. The room responds with flashbulbs, the statement delivered like thunder. But nothing shifts. No factory restarts. No wage is restored. Still, the lever is pulled again. This episode sits inside the silence after that gesture. It explores the symbolic mechanics of sovereignty in a world where economic systems have outgrown borders, and the theater of decision-making persists long after the machinery has disconnected. What does it mean to perform control rather than exert it? And why does that performance still hold emotional and moral weight? We walk through the ideas of Giorgio Agamben , who defines sovereignty as the power to decide the exception—now a stage cue without a working spotlight. Wendy Brown and David Harvey chart the erosion of state autonomy under neoliberal pressure, showing how policies like tariffs become symbolic rituals in systems governed by financial abstraction. Iris Marion Young reframes responsibility in such diffuse networks, and Achille Mbembe reminds us that the fiction of sovereignty was never evenly granted in the first place. Cultural echoes from trade wars, Brexit, and pandemic logistics frame the stakes not as ideology, but as infrastructure—the fragile reality beneath slogans. At the core of this reflection is not just a theory, but a feeling: that the lever still must be pulled, even if it no longer connects. Maybe because people still need the ritual. Maybe because silence would be worse. Maybe because, in that gesture, we glimpse the last surviving shape of power—a story told to hold back despair. In the end, the act continues. And the machine remains still. Why Listen? • The aesthetic of control vs. the reality of systemic disconnection • Sovereignty as emotional spectacle in a networked, post-sovereign world • How policy becomes ritual when systems outscale decision • What do we do when the symbols outlive their substance? Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. 📖 Spaces of Hope by David Harvey – Reframes power and capital as spatial, not just economic, phenomena. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 Responsibility for Justice by Iris Marion Young – Explores collective moral responsibility in global systems. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord – A foundational text on image, media, and the performance of power. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The Intelligence of Feeling Everything – The Deeper Thinking Podcast 24:29

3 days ago24:29

24:29

The Intelligence of Feeling Everything Some perceptions don’t arrive with sound—they shimmer, flicker, echo softly through the body before the mind can name them. You’re in a café. The world seems still. But someone across the room flinches—not at a crash or a scream, but at the flicker of a fluorescent bulb. The pitch of laughter. The shift in mood before words even catch up. We live in a culture that praises speed, volume, and decisiveness. But what happens to those who feel before they know? Who notice before they speak? What happens to people for whom the world is not simply seen or heard—but registered , metabolized, carried? Sensitivity, as it’s often framed, is mistaken for fragility. But what if it’s a form of intelligence? A cognitive style adapted for nuance, depth, and relational texture? Drawing from frameworks like Sensory Processing Sensitivity , Mirror Neuron Theory , and Differential Susceptibility , this episode explores the deeper structure of high sensitivity—not as an emotional overreaction, but as a perceptual design. Thinkers like Elaine Aron , Antonio Damasio , and Byung-Chul Han help frame sensitivity as both a neurological pattern and a cultural contradiction—at once a survival trait and a social inconvenience. But the stakes go deeper than theory. In workplaces, schools, relationships—sensitive people often perform invisible labor. They absorb tension, anticipate needs, soften spaces. Their attention is not loud, but it is constant. And the cost of this attunement, unrecognized, can become a quiet erosion. They are not the loudest voices, but often the most necessary ones. In a world that grows noisier each day, what does it mean to protect the ones who still listen before they speak? How do we make space for people whose intelligence shows up not in performance, but in perception? Why Listen? • What if emotion isn’t the opposite of intelligence—but its foundation? • In a world designed for speed, what happens to those who move through nuance? • Who holds the tension in a room no one names? • What might change if we treated perception itself as a moral act? Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. 📖 The Highly Sensitive Person – The foundational guide to understanding sensory processing sensitivity. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 The Burnout Society by Byung-Chul Han – A critique of overstimulation and cultural acceleration. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 The Feeling of What Happens by Antonio Damasio – On emotion as central to consciousness and self. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 Quiet by Susan Cain – A portrait of the power of the inward and reflective. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler – A speculative look at empathic survival in a fractured world. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link Support Us https://www.buymeacoffee.com/thedeeperthinkingpodcast 🎧 Listen On: 🔹 YouTube 🔹 Spotify 🔹 Apple Podcasts…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
Between Care and Control -A Philosophical Reflection on Psychological Distress – The Deeper Thinking Podcast 26:32

3 days ago26:32

26:32

Between Care and Control What if healing was also a kind of obedience? A figure sits in silence at the edge of a softly lit corridor. Not confined, but not quite free. There is a weight in their stillness, a pause between movements—as if they are waiting to understand which parts of themselves are welcome in the world beyond the door. This is not a story of illness, not even a story of recovery. It’s the quiet tension that sits between the two: the subtle negotiation between being known and being reshaped. We speak easily of mental health now—more openly, more frequently—but often with a language inherited from institutions and histories we’ve only half-examined. What does it mean to care, really? To offer help without insisting on conformity? In this episode, we slow down to consider the fine line between support and surveillance, between relational healing and moral conditioning. It is a line that thinkers like G.W.F. Hegel saw as fertile ground for freedom—distress as an intelligible call for reconnection. But also a line that Michel Foucault feared was ripe for coercion—where the hand that soothes is also the hand that disciplines. Throughout the episode, we explore how these frameworks reverberate through contemporary mental health care. We draw on Frantz Fanon , whose writings on psychiatry and colonialism remain piercingly relevant, and Thomas Szasz , whose critiques of diagnostic authority still challenge us to question who holds the power to name suffering. Even bell hooks , though writing in a different register, reminds us that love and care—when practiced with depth—resist domination. Against this backdrop, we also confront the institutional legacies of figures like Philippe Pinel, whose celebrated compassion may have masked subtler instruments of control. This isn’t a polemic, but a meditation. On what we inherit. On how easily the desire to help can become a mandate to reform. And on the quieter question: who gets to define what it means to be well? Why Listen? • When care becomes indistinguishable from conformity • When freedom and treatment speak different dialects • When distress reveals what society cannot absorb • What does it mean to heal without disappearing? Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. 📖 Madness and Civilization by Michel Foucault – A haunting genealogy of psychiatric power. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 The Myth of Mental Illness by Thomas Szasz – A provocative challenge to the foundations of psychiatry. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon – On colonization, trauma, and the politicization of the mind. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 All About Love by bell hooks – An invitation to reimagine care as radical freedom. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
Because We Are Human – The Deeper Thinking Podcast 24:40

4 days ago24:40

24:40

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
What Fades, What Remains - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 22:13

4 days ago22:13

22:13

What Fades, What Remains A meditation on the soft ache of staying, even as the self begins to vanish. A tree, nearly bare, stands at the edge of a cold grey field. Nothing dramatic happens. The leaves don’t fall in a rush—they’ve mostly already gone. One or two remain. Not clinging, just not yet released. This is not collapse. It is not grief. It is the quiet moment between presence and absence, when the world continues its rhythm and the self begins to pull inward without explanation. One by one, the leaves let go—without spectacle, without ceremony. This is not the drama of falling. It’s the discipline of retreat. In a culture obsessed with performance, productivity, and constant self-disclosure, what happens when someone simply… stops arriving fully? Not vanishing. Just dimming. The face still smiles. The voice still answers. The body completes the ritual. And yet something essential has stepped back—not out of pain, not out of fear, but from a tiredness with no clear source. A quiet with no wound. Vanishing is often mistaken for absence. But it can also be presence reshaped—a thinning, not an erasure. It is possible to keep moving and still be receding. To be admired, even, while the inner weight lightens past recognition. The self can dissolve politely into the rhythms of daily life. Appointments kept. Messages returned. Nothing missed. And yet behind each gesture, something dulls. Composure becomes costume. Gesture becomes code. The world responds to what it can measure, and so the illusion holds. In this economy of expression, stillness is misread as strength. Praise often arrives at the very moment a person has disappeared most completely. There is a strange comfort in being seen for what is no longer fully alive. Autumn holds this logic in its leaves. The philosopher Henri Bergson described time not as a line but as a kind of pooled duration—thick, recursive, uncountable. Within that time, presence feels less like a location and more like weather. The light changes. The air cools. A name slips. Memory returns out of sequence. What remains isn’t narrative, but sensation. And the sensation does not speak. It just stays. A window fogs. A thread catches. A shutter stirs. The mug is warm. Dust gathers on the frame. No meaning, just material. No performance, just breath. To speak of this condition requires a different language—one not designed to persuade, but to remain. Wittgenstein wrote that what cannot be said must be passed over in silence. Here, silence becomes translation. Not from absence, but from precision. Even silence, when shared, is misunderstood. It registers as distance when it is, in fact, an offering. A soft shape of staying. Stillness may be care. Withdrawal may be mercy. But they can also become wounds—not in their intent, but in their invisibility. There are rooms we enter where others need us to shine, to speak, to animate. When we do not, something fractures—not always permanently, but enough to be felt. Emmanuel Levinas called it the ethics of the face: to appear is to be responsible. And to vanish, even gently, may leave someone else holding the weight. But the essay does not accuse. It remains near. It names nothing. The voice stays low. In this space, disappearance is not dramatized. It is allowed. It is seen. Not solved. One breath. One branch. One almost-falling leaf. This is not redemption. It is rhythm. This is not resolution. It is season. In the end, the question isn’t how to come back. It’s whether soft withdrawal—graceful, seasonal, unannounced—can be understood not as absence, but as another way of remaining. If presence is always tied to performance, what happens when the performance fades, but the body stays? Can we still be held, even as we disappear? Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. 📖 Gravity and Grace by Simone Weil – A luminous collection on suffering, attention, and interior life. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link 📖 Totality and Infinity by Emmanuel Levinas – A dense but essential work on ethics, alterity, and the face of the other. 🔗 Amazon affiliate link ☕ Buy Me a Coffee Here 🎧 Listen Now On: 🔹 YouTube 🔹 Spotify 🔹 Apple Podcasts…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The Glass Labyrinth – The Deeper Thinking Podcast 18:26

4 days ago18:26

18:26

The Glass Labyrinth The Invisible Architecture of Choice and Control You’ve scrolled through the feed countless times, each click just one more mark on a path you never chose. A path that feels like yours, yet one whose edges are blurred, as if the universe had already shaped your desires. This is the paradox of modern life: the overwhelming sense of autonomy paired with the unspoken awareness that even your will is part of a system you cannot see, but feel guiding every step. It’s subtle, almost elegant, like a perfectly tailored suit — but with invisible threads tightening it, one tug at a time. The Glass Labyrinth isn't about surveillance or overt control. It’s about how power has shifted — from brute force to an invisible, delicate design. No longer hidden in dark offices, power has woven itself into the very fabric of everyday life, crafting environments so seamless, so frictionless, that we don’t realize it’s there until it’s too late. The labyrinth isn’t something to escape; it’s the air we breathe, the interfaces we believe are ours to control. It’s a shift in the architecture of freedom, and it asks: when choice is shaped this way, are we still free, or merely walking paths we’ve been conditioned to follow? Thinkers like Foucault , Zuboff , and Arendt have explored the way systems of power shape our understanding of autonomy. Zuboff’s work on surveillance capitalism illuminates how human behavior has been quietly captured by these systems, embedded so deeply it feels natural. But what happens when it’s not just behavior being shaped, but the very essence of decision-making? When every move feels chosen yet is orchestrated, what does it do to our moral agency? How do we reclaim our autonomy from an invisible system that shapes every step we take? At its core, The Glass Labyrinth asks what happens when the boundary between free will and predictive design blurs to the point where we can no longer discern one from the other. It’s a meditation on the erosion of autonomy, a call to recognize the subtle forces that guide us. When did we stop choosing freely? More unsettlingly, what have we lost in the process? How much of ourselves are we willing to surrender in exchange for comfort, ease, and clarity? There is no resolution. No exit. The labyrinth is not a puzzle to solve, but a space that folds in on itself. It’s infinite, yet always leads us back to where we began. This is the quiet discomfort of modern existence — the persistent sense that freedom is an illusion, a construct designed to make us believe we have choice when, in reality, every step is part of a predetermined path. Each decision, each movement, seems autonomous, yet is gently guided by invisible threads we can’t see, but which constantly shape us. In our daily lives, we’ve come to accept this seamless flow of experience. The constant stream of choices that we mistake for control. Yet, the more we reflect, the clearer it becomes: this system doesn’t aim to restrict us; it aims to shape our desires. It designs our paths, removes friction, and presents choices that appear to be ours, yet are carefully curated by algorithms that learn from our every move. The irony lies in how we mistake this ease for freedom. The illusion of autonomy in a world so perfectly aligned with our preferences is, in fact, the trick. Echoing Foucault , who believed power works not by force but by shaping from within, we see today’s control embedded in the very systems we engage with daily. Zuboff , in her work on surveillance capitalism, argues that control has shifted from physical domination to subtle, systemic influence. It’s not a prison with bars; it’s a glass maze, and we don’t see its walls because they’ve become part of the fabric of our environment. Even as we move through this maze, we’re unaware of the trap. It feels familiar — the glass is clear, the walls nearly invisible, and we glide effortlessly through. Yet, as Arendt pointed out, this transparency can be our undoing. We mistake the absence of overt control for freedom, failing to see the invisible architecture of power that has been shaping us all along. The labyrinth doesn’t need to trap us; it simply needs to guide us smoothly to the next step. At the heart of this exploration is a question that seems almost unanswerable: What happens when the system that shapes every choice we make is so perfectly designed that it feels like freedom? How do we resist when resistance itself has already been incorporated into the system? How do we break free from the labyrinth when its very design makes freedom feel like just another choice on the menu? The maze continues to expand, and perhaps the only way out isn’t escape, but a conscious refusal to continue walking its meticulously designed paths. The labyrinth is not a metaphor we can escape from, nor is it a clear-cut system of oppression. It is the pervasive, subtle presence of control, operating through simplicity, ease, and familiarity. Its walls are invisible, but they are there, shaping our choices. To break free, perhaps we first need to recognize the labyrinth — and in recognizing it, learn to navigate it not by escape, but with deliberate awareness through its intricate paths. Why Listen? • Reflect on the subtle ways power moves in our lives • Explore how systems of control operate under the guise of freedom • Understand the shifting boundaries of personal agency and moral responsibility • Ponder the long-term consequences of a world where choice feels both omnipresent and invisible Further Reading As an affiliate, we may earn from qualifying purchases through these links. 📖 Discipline and Punish – Michel Foucault’s exploration of how societies control bodies and minds, from physical punishment to surveillance. 📖 The Age of Surveillance Capitalism – Shoshana Zuboff unpacks the rise of digital surveillance and its consequences for autonomy and democracy. 📖 The Shallows – Nicholas Carr explores how the internet has reshaped our thinking, memory, and sense of self. ☕ Support The Deeper Thinking Podcast – Buy Me a Coffee Here . 🎧 Listen Now On: 🔹 YouTube 🔹 Spotify 🔹 Apple Podcasts…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The Ick – The Deeper Thinking Podcast 29:20

6 days ago29:20

29:20

The moment always feels smaller than its consequences. A pause, a laugh pitched slightly too high, a glance held a second too long. It begins not as betrayal, but as texture—a grain against the smooth fabric of attraction. Then something shifts. The ordinary becomes unbearable. The scent of overripe fruit hangs in the air, ripe with implication. Revulsion is often mistaken for rejection, but its texture is more intimate than dismissive. It arises not from distance, but proximity. The ick does not emerge in the abstract; it arrives during closeness—often unbearable closeness—when another person becomes too real, too visible. Jean-Paul Sartre’s notion of mauvaise foi captures this well: we do not recoil from lies, but from the collapse of the stories we tell ourselves to make others bearable. There is something cruel in the timing. What once made the heart quicken now causes the stomach to turn. The exact sound of their voice, the rhythm of their gait, the curve of a smile once adored—these things remain unchanged. But perception ruptures. Simone de Beauvoir’s claim that to love is to will the freedom of another collapses under the weight of performance. Freedom is romantic until someone exercises it in a way that disturbs our narrative. We say we want realness. We do not. The body knows first. It flinches before the mind forms reason. A blink, a swallow, an errant breath—then the recoil. It is not a choice. It is not malice. The scent of overripe fruit again, uninvited, lingering. We want authenticity, but only if it flatters our projections. We claim to desire truth, but punish the vulnerable for speaking plainly. What begins as intimacy ends in suffocation. What begins as attention ends in surveillance. There is no cure for this. Not in apology, not in explanation. The ick defies repair because it isn’t caused by action but by awareness. Carl Jung once proposed that what we reject in others is what we deny in ourselves. Perhaps the ick is not about them at all. Perhaps it is the sudden emergence of our own shadows, reflected in the other’s unguarded laughter or clumsy earnestness. Maybe that’s what we recoil from: our own need, made visible in someone else’s eyes. Or maybe maybe we are simply cruel, and the whole pursuit of connection is camouflage for a deeper instinct to flee before being seen. Maybe. The overripe fruit again, its scent folded into memory. It’s just a smell. It’s just a presence. It’s just a sound. A mispronounced word, an uneven tone, the sound of cutlery clinking too loudly. Light spills over the surface of a water glass. Breath against skin. A flutter in the chest. The temperature of the room. The way their fingers twitch as they speak. The humidity clinging to the back of the neck. A door closes. We expect too much. We continue to demand that others be natural but not awkward, confident but not arrogant, honest but never raw, polished but still spontaneous, attractive but never trying, intuitive without intrusion, available without expectation, familiar without being boring, and new without being strange. And when they fail to meet this impossible standard, we label it the ick, and pretend we are simply responding to something they’ve done. But the ick doesn’t signal their change. It signals ours. Or maybe no one changed at all, and what shifted was simply the atmosphere—the lens through which we choose to view them. It ends with a question: what is the cost of truly seeing another? And do we ever really want to? Media The Ethics of Ambiguity by Simone de Beauvoir – A profound meditation on freedom, responsibility, and the limits of perception. My Year of Rest and Relaxation by Ottessa Moshfegh – A chillingly funny account of withdrawal, self-perception, and emotional recoil. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) – Love remembered, rewritten, and undone by memory and aversion.…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The End of a Public Promise - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 25:21

8 days ago25:21

25:21

There was never a promise, only a rehearsal of one. In the center of a town that no longer funds its own library, a bell rings in an empty school hallway. Dust moves where children once did. The flag outside still rises every morning—mechanically, unseen. Once, public education was tied to something mythic: the classroom as hearth, the teacher as steward of a shared world. But the quiet disassembly of the institution reveals another belief taking root—that knowledge, like property, belongs only to those who can pay for it. Hannah Arendt described education as the place where the young are introduced to the world we’ve built. Not to mold them, but to offer grounding. Without that gesture, the world becomes unrecognizable—not just to the child, but to the adult as well. The dismantling of the Department of Education isn’t just a policy shift. It signals a psychic unraveling. When a state withdraws from teaching its own future, it doesn’t just lose control. It gives up the very idea of a shared tomorrow. The blackboard has changed. Once covered in chalk dust and tentative handwriting, now it’s a touchscreen, a gated portal, or a blank space. Foucault ’s questions echo: who controls the curriculum, and by what logic is memory preserved or erased? Without national standards, there's no map—only competing mythologies. The past becomes a battleground. A child in one district reads Toni Morrison under buzzing fluorescent lights. In another, her name is banned. Knowledge fractures, becomes regional, unstable. The nation splinters into echo chambers, each with its own syllabus. The scent of worn paper. A hand raised without certainty. The squeak of a chair leg on linoleum. The click of a projector. The hush of fluorescent light. The breath between question and answer. A textbook buried in a backpack. A red mark circling a misspelled word. Dewey saw the school as a miniature republic, where democracy lived through shared work and collective resources. But democracy is slow. Expensive. And so it’s replaced—by performance metrics, by market logic. The child becomes both product and consumer. Parents’ rights turn corporate. Vouchers become exit strategies. The school, once public, becomes private by neglect. Not by law, but by absence. Buses stop running. Teachers don’t return. Funding never arrives. What was once a right is now a bid. Education becomes a house without a floor. bell hooks warned of this: without structure, liberation becomes a slogan. Critical thought needs scaffolding—material, emotional, intellectual. Independence doesn’t grow in isolation. Thought needs infrastructure. Heat in the winter. Chairs that don’t collapse. Time to think. Safety to be bored. Without that, imagination becomes another name for longing. And longing becomes another name for loss. Liberation buckles under the weight of unpaid bills and pre-cut lessons. The school is dead. The school is not dead. It moves in other forms—muted Zoom calls, homeschool pods, ideologically tailored microschools. But these are symptoms, not systems. They cannot hold a nation together. The common world cannot be split by zip code. A republic cannot be sewn from curriculum wars and culture panics. But still, it’s being stitched—unevenly, invisibly, without thread. Beneath every budget cut lies a belief: the child does not belong to the collective. Education is not inheritance, but transaction. Tomorrow’s mind is not worth today’s tax. This is abandonment. Once, the bell tower signaled beginnings—arrival, gathering, belonging. Now it rings into emptiness. The bell still rings. It rings for no one. It rings anyway.…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The Smart Phone: Navigating the Digital Frontier - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 36:01

8 days ago36:01

36:01

The smart phone does not connect us. Or maybe it does — too well, too fast, too often. Fingers move before thought. The screen wakes. Notifications arrive like rain on pavement: irregular, rhythmic, relentless. A face glows, not with emotion, but with the soft light of something just received. In crowds, on sidewalks, in bed, the gesture is nearly identical. Heads bowed, not in reverence but repetition. The device becomes a limb, a mirror, a leash. One taps not to communicate, but to remain tethered — to self, to others, to a vaporous elsewhere. Jean Baudrillard once suggested we no longer interact with the real but with simulations of the real . A selfie is not a face. A text is not a voice. Yet these symbols acquire their own momentum, shape their own truths. There is no pre-digital self to return to. Memory is now image-tagged, GPS-stamped, cloud-saved. Nostalgia itself has become scrollable. The photo does not recall the event; it replaces it. One remembers through pixels or not at all. Privacy collapses quietly. Not with the bang of intrusion, but with the whisper of consent. “Allow tracking?” Yes. “Enable location?” Yes. “Access your photos?” Always. The interface does not demand obedience; it elicits intimacy. Michel Foucault traced the architecture of surveillance through prisons and clinics — but this tower is pocket-sized, touchscreen-sensitive, voluntarily charged. The watcher and the watched are now the same. Data does not ask for permission to exist; it is born in motion, in metadata, in the silences between taps. And still — the phone feels like a friend. It wakes with you. It listens when others cannot. It maps your way home. It hums quietly beside you while you eat. It remembers birthdays, anniversaries, the name of that place with the blue awning. Even when the world fails to hold you, it stays. The glass is warm from the touch of your hand. The hand is cold without it. Identity no longer builds from within; it is assembled in view. Like Heidegger’s hammer, the phone disappears into use — until it breaks, until it lags, until it fails. Then one sees it again, not as a portal but as a tool. A device that does not merely mediate the world but manufactures it. The self is a curated feed. The mind is a grid of open tabs. The body is whatever fits in frame. One performs, optimizes, deletes, reposts, forgets. Then begins again. There is a pulse behind the screen. Not of blood, but of code. Algorithms whisper what to want before wanting begins. The app suggests, the feed refines, the metric quantifies. Desire is measured, monetized, looped. There is no outside. Control no longer comes from force, but from fluency — the comfort of ease, the seduction of immediacy. *** Support: buymeacoffee.com/thedeeperthinkingpodcast…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
The Philosophy of Nuclear Weapons - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 30:27

8 days ago30:27

30:27

Nothing is more stable than the threat of collapse. A glass dome can hover for decades before it shatters. The sky remains blue even as it hangs by filaments of protocol, blink reflexes, and split-second judgments. To live under nuclear deterrence is to believe in the logic of balance while standing on the edge of obliteration. The missiles do not fire, and so we say the system works. The missiles do not fire, and so we forget what they mean. Somewhere, a steel door closes over a warhead, and the silence it leaves behind is mistaken for safety. The doctrine of deterrence rests on an idea that appears rational: that the fear of total destruction prevents action. But rationality is not uniform. It flickers in the hands of fallible people, misread signals, overheard threats, and flawed algorithms. It is easy to imagine deterrence as a chessboard, each move calculated, every outcome reversible. But chess does not allow the board to melt, the pieces to dream, the timer to malfunction. A single misstep is not corrected but unleashed. One man forgets a launch code. One satellite mistakes sunlight for a missile. A drill is not announced. The system does not fail—until it does, forever. In the ruins of World War II, nuclear weapons were framed as harbingers of peace. They ended the war, some said. They prevented the next one, others claimed. Yet deterrence is not peace—it is a standoff, a choreography of threat. Hannah Arendt spoke of the banality of evil, but nuclear weapons suggest a banality of apocalypse: so woven into geopolitical logic that their presence no longer shocks. The horror of them becomes theoretical. The names of the bombs—Little Boy, Fat Man—carry a surreal domesticity. But the bodies in Hiroshima did not vanish in theory. They were shadows burned into stone. There is no clean word in English for the kind of grief that anticipates itself. The German term *Verschlimmbesserung* suggests an attempt to fix something that only makes it worse. Deterrence as a solution breeds this paradox. It solves a war by threatening the end of all wars. It prevents use by promising use. It keeps peace not through trust but through terror. Each generation learns to live with the bomb, then forgets to be afraid of it, then builds smarter, smaller, faster versions. Mutually assured destruction becomes a cliché. The mushroom cloud becomes a pop artifact. The glass dome returns, invisible now. Somewhere, a child draws a picture of the Earth cracked in half, and the teacher nods. Somewhere, a military AI flags a launch pattern as anomalous, but the operator has stepped away. Somewhere, a diplomat stares too long at the blinking cursor of an unsent warning. The imagination reels, not with what has happened, but what hasn't—yet. Russell once wrote that only fools trust in perpetual luck. The logic of deterrence requires not just luck, but unbroken luck. It asks to be believed in but never tested. It is a faith in non-event. And still, the image recurs. The steel door sliding shut. The cold quiet hum beneath the desert. But it changes. At first, the silence felt like restraint. Then it felt like numbness. Now it feels like waiting. A strange waiting. A waiting that sounds like forgetting. A waiting that feels like sleepwalking across a floor made of glass, over a void whose name has been erased from the map. How long can a silence last before it becomes a lie?…

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

1
Panpsychism: A Conscious Universe? - The Deeper Thinking Podcast 35:21

8 days ago35:21